http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/269208/prison-math-and-war-drugs-veronique-de-rugy
... wait where does the stupid part come in
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Sunday, 19 June 2011 17:36 (twelve years ago) link
daniel foster on the pulitzer prize winner who "came out" as an undocumented immigrant:
Liberals are coming out of the woodwork to call Vargas’ confession — meant to spur that “national conversation” about immigration that is perpetually just around the corner — courageous and pioneering. It is certainly the former, and may turn out to be the latter. But in their rush to praise Vargas — who is thoroughly culturally American and has “contributed” to American society with his journalism — they conveniently leave out that at the beginning of his story is not one but a series of crimes. Vargas entered the country illegally after his grandfather paid a coyote $4,500 to smuggle him in. The grandfather then obtained a fake passport and green card for Vargas, which they used to acquire a valid Social Security card. But that card, which subjected Vargas’ right to work to the approval of the then-INS, was illegally doctored, allowing Vargas to secure job after job for more than a decade by showing nothing more than a photocopy of a fake document.
heh, i dont think anyone is "leaving that out"? i think thats uhhhhh kind of the point.
― ☂ (max), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:22 (twelve years ago) link
which liberals have "come out" of "the woodwork"? First I heard of this story was when I read it in NRO World this morning.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:24 (twelve years ago) link
well its a big cover page story in the nyt magazine!
― ☂ (max), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:25 (twelve years ago) link
what does "coyote" mean in immigration slang
― frogbracist (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:31 (twelve years ago) link
its the guy who smuggles people over the border
― ☂ (max), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:31 (twelve years ago) link
What it says -- somebody paid a hungry coyote to smuggle the immigrant across the border in its mouth.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:32 (twelve years ago) link
xp yeah i figured, wasn't sure if a "coyote" had any special designations beyond that
― frogbracist (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:34 (twelve years ago) link
No regrets coyote -- it was just another false alarm.
http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumblarge_488/1269115212H50AT5.jpg
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:38 (twelve years ago) link
that really gives arizona's hockey team -- the phoenix coyotes -- a whole new context
― frogbracist (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:42 (twelve years ago) link
and has “contributed” to American society with his journalism
shitty journalist calls out high-achieving journalist on account of worthlessness of journalism.
― devoted to boats (schlump), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:43 (twelve years ago) link
x-post No cognizance at all that the "crimes" committed are the equivalent or less than a rich dude writing off a golf trip as a business expense on his taxes.
― President Keyes, Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:44 (twelve years ago) link
liberals may THINK they're proud of vargas for being an illegal immigrant, but what they DON'T REALIZE is that his immigration to this country was ILLEGAL!
― my Sonicare toothbrush (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:46 (twelve years ago) link
"coyote" clearly refers to hank quinlan.
― my Sonicare toothbrush (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 23 June 2011 01:47 (twelve years ago) link
― my Sonicare toothbrush (difficult listening hour), Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:46 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
<3
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 23 June 2011 03:45 (twelve years ago) link
just... magisterial:
[Approved commenter] WJ Alden
06/23/11 00:03
Link
Report Abuse
I'm not sure why it's considered inhumane to make Vargas return to his country of legal residence, unless you're a racist and assume that it's an unbearable tragedy to have to live surrounded by Filipinos.
The Left certainly does not believe that one is entitled to a community that is culturally and ethnically static. Certainly they don't feel that *Americans* are entitled to it, given their overwhelmingly support for the dramatic changes which have occurred under the immigration policies of the last four decades. So Vargas's social milieu will change from SWPL Americans to Filipinos. Who cares?
As for the significant alteration in Vargas's quality of life, it will be little different than that experienced by millions of deadbeat homeowners forced from their overpriced McMansions and into rundown apartment complexes during the past 3 years.
Life happens. He'll adapt, and he'll get by, as will every other illegal deported for taking something that is not theirs.
― goole, Thursday, 23 June 2011 04:22 (twelve years ago) link
omg
― horseshoe, Thursday, 23 June 2011 04:23 (twelve years ago) link
unless you're a racist and assume that it's an unbearable tragedy to have to live surrounded by Filipinos.
feel like somebody's projecting
wau, every sentence of that is a tiny little masterpiece
― ☂ (max), Thursday, 23 June 2011 04:49 (twelve years ago) link
esp: "Who cares?"
hmm. i feel like i can think of at least 1 person who cares!
"Life happens."
post next time one of them gets pissed abt something
except abortion, i guess, ho ho
― arachno-misogynist (D-40), Thursday, 23 June 2011 04:50 (twelve years ago) link
holy
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:47 (twelve years ago) link
haha zing
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270515/re-stonewall-friday-night-jason-lee-steorts
― caek, Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:07 (twelve years ago) link
I'm baffled by that one! As a few of the commenters have said, these guys don't often disagree this personally in public.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:23 (twelve years ago) link
never actually heard of that guy. last posted on the corner nearly a year ago.
― caek, Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:33 (twelve years ago) link
I'd like to add that the very tyranny she alludes to, is being enforced, now, here, by you Jason Lee Steorts. She has the right to disagree with gay marriage on whatever grounds she pleases, or none at all. If only one view is 'right' or can be tolerated, and the other must be shunned or belittled, is that not a form of soft tyranny?
― ☂ (max), Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:42 (twelve years ago) link
I'm really excited about reading KJL's response on Monday.
― Mordy, Monday, 27 June 2011 01:14 (twelve years ago) link
[Approved commenter] flenser
06/26/11 20:13
Four updates! This is starting to look like a Glenn Greenwald post.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 June 2011 01:18 (twelve years ago) link
Love how those tyrannical regimes (say, N.Korea) continually are bestowing new rights on their people.
― President Keyes, Monday, 27 June 2011 01:24 (twelve years ago) link
Mr. Steorts:Thank you for the excellent example of the tolerance we traditionalists will be graciously afforded under Gay Rule. I don't know what we could possibly be afraid of!
Thank you for the excellent example of the tolerance we traditionalists will be graciously afforded under Gay Rule. I don't know what we could possibly be afraid of!
― Mordy, Monday, 27 June 2011 01:25 (twelve years ago) link
Gay Rule sounds kinda great!
― Clay, Monday, 27 June 2011 01:45 (twelve years ago) link
Gay Rules:
If the straights were at the point, we forced them left and doubled them. If they were on the left wing, we went immediately to a double team from the top. If they were on the right wing, we went to a slow double team. And if they were on the box, we doubled with a big guy.
― my Sonicare toothbrush (difficult listening hour), Monday, 27 June 2011 01:57 (twelve years ago) link
you forgot the fouling
― mookieproof, Monday, 27 June 2011 02:58 (twelve years ago) link
the corner self-immolation later today? stay tuned
― viktor daevid handjob (m coleman), Monday, 27 June 2011 11:14 (twelve years ago) link
judging from the comments you'd think the NYS govt not only legalized "SSM" but also ordered every catholic to have anal sex before next sunday
― viktor daevid handjob (m coleman), Monday, 27 June 2011 11:17 (twelve years ago) link
What the hell is this dude even doing there?! http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270517/nro-readers-are-best-michael-potemra
I’m even thankful, to some extent, to those who wrote in disagreement, most of whom avoided cheap vilification. Many gave me food for thought, and some, I admit, for tongue-in-cheek mockery. One of my favorites deplored gay marriage as sending us down the road to “the full ‘gay’ morally relativistic agenda” which will result, if we permit it, in “materialism at high-tide.” Now, this is an objection I take very seriously indeed, because I think materialism is a great danger to the soul, especially in a wealthy country such as ours. So I hope we never reach those vilest depths of moral decay, the ones my reader is so worried about; and never become a country so overtaken by materialist excess that a respected conservative presidential candidate will have a million-dollar account at Tiffany’s to buy gifts for his wife. The gays will sure have a lot to answer for, if that ever happens . . . . . . I am generally a fan of Archbishop Dolan — I have written about my appreciation for him here — but I thought his North Korea comparison was unfortunate. I know that he was trying to make a very specific point, about the relation between government power and the use of language; but I also know that if some liberal ever compared America to North Korea, even in the most “nuanced” possible way, conservatives would be jumping up and down accusing him of “anti-Americanism.”
. . . I am generally a fan of Archbishop Dolan — I have written about my appreciation for him here — but I thought his North Korea comparison was unfortunate. I know that he was trying to make a very specific point, about the relation between government power and the use of language; but I also know that if some liberal ever compared America to North Korea, even in the most “nuanced” possible way, conservatives would be jumping up and down accusing him of “anti-Americanism.”
― Whitey G. Bulgergarten (Phil D.), Monday, 27 June 2011 12:36 (twelve years ago) link
To be honest, one of the reasons why I vote against gay marriage is because I know it annoys people like this. Chalk it up to spite.
― President Keyes, Monday, 27 June 2011 13:13 (twelve years ago) link
^^^ 2011 GOP motto
― Whitey G. Bulgergarten (Phil D.), Monday, 27 June 2011 13:15 (twelve years ago) link
When the Athenians voted to execute Socrates, was he or was he not the victim of tyranny? Can tyranny take any form other than dictatorship? Are the fears of our founding fathers mere fantasy, or is care for legal protection against the tyranny of the majority an actual real-world concern? Is the vote of a democratically elected body necessarily not tyranny? To dismiss the N. Korea analogy as beyond the pale is to deny the rational of the founding fathers, to deny any appeals to right and wrong that extend beyond positive law. Tyranny is capricious law, based upon the will of one, few, or many in a way that gravely contradicts the common good and the traditional laws for securing that good. Too much Team America and not enough Aristotle in these dismissals of the N. Korea analogy.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 June 2011 13:45 (twelve years ago) link
tsk, the tyranny of democracy
― frogbs went a-courtin' (WmC), Monday, 27 June 2011 13:46 (twelve years ago) link
where is the originally N. Korea comparison? Following all their link circle jerks leads me nowhere.
― President Keyes, Monday, 27 June 2011 13:55 (twelve years ago) link
wasn't Socrates a boy bugger?
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 June 2011 13:56 (twelve years ago) link
tying themselves in knots trying to explain how the votes of elected politicians equal dictatorial mandates, but that's how you have to roll sometimes
― President Keyes, Monday, 27 June 2011 13:59 (twelve years ago) link
everyone loves the majority opinion when they are in agreement with it
― chupacabra - a delicious burrito (DJP), Monday, 27 June 2011 14:00 (twelve years ago) link
here ya go, Ed: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270491/new-york-s-age-anarchy-hour-zero-michael-potemra
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 June 2011 14:01 (twelve years ago) link
the tyranny of democracy - from the same folks who brought you "liberal fascism"
― viktor daevid handjob (m coleman), Monday, 27 June 2011 14:04 (twelve years ago) link
Dear fuckfaces,
Below is the entirety of the long-dead Founding Fathers' thoughts on gay marriage:
Thank you,The Management
― Whitey G. Bulgergarten (Phil D.), Monday, 27 June 2011 14:11 (twelve years ago) link
oh man:
She Went by ‘Daddy’June 27, 2011 11:53 A.M.By Glenn T. Stanton
My daughter and I were in Manhattan over this weekend so I could do some research at the Met. Waves of people were coming into the city for Sunday’s big gay-pride march, where they could celebrate the Empire State’s new same-sex-marriage law. We sat behind some of them on the train, three young women with a precious, excited toddler girl in tow. The very evident leader of the clan was the patriarch. Adorned as if she might be an actor portraying a hip-hop teen from Cleveland, she had her meticulous corn-rows tucked under a backwards navy-blue flat-billed ballcap, a matching wife beater revealing a mural of tats on her arms, shoulders, and back. Baggy jeans rode low, leading to her construction boots with untied laces dangling free.
She was the only one of the adult threesome that interacted with the child, mindlessly uttering reassuring words like “Daddy will be right back” or “Sit over here by Daddy.”
You see, this is one of the things that most concerns me about the legal institutionalization of genderless marriage and parenting. We are told that nothing will really change with such laws; people who really love each other will just be able to enter really meaningful, legally protected relationships.
But, to use the language of our women’s-studies scholars, such a turn “does violence” to our concept of sex difference. They would have us believe that their way of looking at the world transcends the “narrow” confines of socially constructed gender difference, but these very folks end up playing to those very confines, usually in comically stereotypical ways. Think drag queen in her everyday clothes, like our Urban Outfitters dad on the train.
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 June 2011 15:54 (twelve years ago) link
If that's all they got, they don't got a lot.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 June 2011 16:09 (twelve years ago) link
She went by Daddy!
― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 June 2011 16:11 (twelve years ago) link