semi surreal casual racism - dud, or dud and it does yer fukcing head in a bit as well?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (159 of them)
I watched the fabulous "Stone Tape" the other day (a ghost story by the guy that wrote Quatermass etc). It's about a bunch of electronics boffins trying to steal a march on "the japs" and at one point there is a buttock-clenchingly awful "impression" when a guy puts some white paper in his upper lip to look like giant white upper-teeth and guffs out a stream of engrish-type hilarity.

It was originally broadcast in 72 and is thankfully over very quickly, but it does annoy, when it's totally incidental to the story which is otherwise masterfully told and had me quite goosebumpy at the start of the final sequence.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 17 October 2003 10:48 (twenty years ago) link

err Microdisney's first LP was called "Everyone Is Fantastic" and I don't think we were supposed to take that title uncritically either.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 17 October 2003 10:48 (twenty years ago) link

"Everybody Is Fantastic", pedantry fans.

Also when WHYSAB was reissued on Creation, it was called "Love Your Enemies", similarly irony-riddled.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 17 October 2003 10:50 (twenty years ago) link

I have a problem with this at work, the problem being when people say stupid racist shit I can't really do anything about it because it's a small office and I have to work with these people every day, and most of them have been here longer than me. We were talking about Mexican restaurants last week, and this girl (who is about my age, she's 26) said, "I just can't go in those places anymore, because of the dirty Mexicans." She's constantly talking about the "dirty Mexicans" in her apartment complex too. She says it in front of the boss and everyone else in the company. And she's part Latino too, which makes it weirder to me, though I guess a lot of Latin Americans and South Americans look down on Mexicans.

NA (Nick A.), Friday, 17 October 2003 10:50 (twenty years ago) link

The first example I remember of the shockingness of CT racism (obviously this is filtered through a child's reccollections) was that our boy scout troup (which my mum ran) had two black children in it, even though they lived way across town. Why couldn't they just join a scout troup closer to home? Apparently, none of the other mothers would *have* black kids in their scout troups.

OK, this individual example is not "worse than South Africa" on a scale of racism, but it was just such shocking to see racism applied on a social and economic scale the same as if it were institutionalised. Having racism out in the open makes it much easier to fight or combat. Having covert and hypocritical racism seems just so much more insidious.

kate (kate), Friday, 17 October 2003 10:53 (twenty years ago) link

Microdisney, yes! I actually typed out the correct title, but added the "white", b/c i thought i must be remembering it wrong. My memory says microdisney were pretty good, though it's been a long time since I heard them. The record title seemed dumb at the time, though perhaps there was irony there that sails/sailed right over my head.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:01 (twenty years ago) link

white prole scum

mmmm, this kind of middle-class elitism is barely better than racism or misogyny. i am the aforementioned "prole scum" and am pretty offended by this - anyhow, i´m on a deadline so am not going to get too deep into this.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:07 (twenty years ago) link

meaning to say not all "proles" = "scum"
some of us are pretty clever, reasonable people...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:08 (twenty years ago) link

Roger - what the fuck are you on? 'Ruining this country'. This kind of language has peculiar resonances.

I know that at nearly 40 I should be able to tune stupidity like this out

Absolutely not - the sooner everyone calls racists what they are the better.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:13 (twenty years ago) link

I'm pretty happy to classify my mum and sis as white prole scum if they are being racist, which they have been on many occasions.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:14 (twenty years ago) link

obviously racism should be called out every time it´s heard (imho, preferably accompanied by a swift kick to the knackers or poke on the nose) and roger has clearly gone strak raving mental, but i do get a bit ticked off that it´s considered totally acceptable to voice one´s class prejudices, particularly in the context of a thread about how repellent other forms of bigotry are.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:18 (twenty years ago) link

Stelfox- I agree.

I don't understand the association you're making between class and racism. Some 'proles' -- and I've heard that used with such hate that it can never for me be 'descriptive -- are racist; but so are many of the middle class, even if they don't use racist language.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:20 (twenty years ago) link

Suzy - but why PROLE scum? Why bring the class thing into it at all?

Does 'prole' ever get used except as a derogatory term for working-class people?

(xpost with Enrique)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:22 (twenty years ago) link

Are said persons scum because they are proles, or scum because they are racist? Or is the assumption (bad assumption!) that proles are necessarily racists?

Argh.

It is Friday afternoon, I still have a residual hangover, and we're talking about racism, classism and sexism. TOO HEAVY!!! TOO HEAVY!!!

I'm off to go hang out on the crush threads or something. Nigel, save me.

kate (kate), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:25 (twenty years ago) link

The 'prole scum' is typical of suzy, unfortunately. I don't know why she does it. I guess in her mind you're only a prole if you act in scummy ways, but I don't really think you can drop the class-based meaning of the word just like that.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:25 (twenty years ago) link

In the same way there's some good ol' black boys who aint niggers.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:26 (twenty years ago) link

exactly: the words "white" and "scum" aint at issue here as both are correct. however, using "prole" as a perjorative is pretty problematic. then again, working in the media in london, it´s easy to forget that working-class people exist, have a voice or are capable of the slightest modicum of intelligence (unless that´s your background).

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:27 (twenty years ago) link

< / stelfox´s class war >

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

"Prole" is the opposite of "elitist"? ;)

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:29 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, the only time we see Proles round Bloomsbury/Clerkenwell area is when we're hunting them! With foxes!

kate (kate), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:31 (twenty years ago) link

(I shd say that as a northern prole myself {though i prefer peasant} i don't have a problem w/suzy's use of the term. I know what she's on about) apropos of nothing, except perhaps as a datum or something.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:32 (twenty years ago) link

(+++ sorry for k-heaviness k8! all i did was report on s.th that annoyed me this a m and how it made me feel, and look what happened!!)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:34 (twenty years ago) link

N - funny, i was going to mention Chris Rock's skit about 'you got the black people...then you got the niggers'

stevem (blueski), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:34 (twenty years ago) link

(Soz, is OK, Pash, it's not so much this thread that got my goat as the "equal pay" thread and the whole "oh, it's OK to have pay disparities between the genders because women don't work as hard or as long as men, what with them all running off and having babies, I mean, lifestyle choices" argument, but maybe I'm being oversensitive cause, like, it might be My Time Of The Month or maybe my biological clock is ticking or summit...)

kate (kate), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:37 (twenty years ago) link

We were talking about Mexican restaurants last week, and this girl (who is about my age, she's 26) said, "I just can't go in those places anymore, because of the dirty Mexicans." She's constantly talking about the "dirty Mexicans" in her apartment complex too. She says it in front of the boss and everyone else in the company. And she's part Latino too, which makes it weirder to me, though I guess a lot of Latin Americans and South Americans look down on Mexicans.

The nerve of the person! "Dirty Mexicans" my ass. You're more likely to run into a snobbish and loud Mexican who cannot stand one speck of dirt on their perfectly coiffured hair than a "dirty Mexican". Geez Louise, if you're going to stereotype, at least use an updated stereotype! ;)

No really, though, what this person said is deeply offensive, especially to people such as myself, but I'm not really going to waste my time or energy being angry at her. She's just highly ignorant, and the rest of Latin America isn't exactly better than Mexico anyway, which is at least a "second world" country that is, like India and Malaysia, in the midst of their own Industrial Revolution. "Dirty Mexican" -- hah. "Macho, Posturing Mexican" would be more accurate. *laughs*

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:40 (twenty years ago) link

This kind of ties in with a thread over on ILM that turned (via Carmody) into a joust about the 'new establishment' and its lack of racism (ie Ms Dynamite being loved by the Telegraph, etc). Despite this kind of progress (tentative anyway) there seems more than ever to be open season on the white poor.
For some reason the new establishment media is actually much more socially homogenous (ie liberal white South Eastern) than it was 50 years ago (in the age of big local papers whose leading lights would work their way into Fleet Street - though obv. back then they were mostly male and all white), and words like 'prole' creep in.

Say what you like about Julie Burchill, at least she's called people on this.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:49 (twenty years ago) link

oh, and i´d better point out that the shoulder chip is never just this season´s for us "proles": comments like suzy´s make sure they stay in style.
one pretty important point to add is that, sadly, it´s human nature for the disenfranchised/disenchanted to want to find someone to look down on, too (refernce my comments on threads abt dancehall and homophobia) and as long as class prejudice is considered acceptable, racism and misogyny will thrive among blue-collar white people.
you don´t exactly have to be noam chomsky to work out that loaded words like "prole" carry a very special set of negative associations, but the knock-on effect of such attitudes is easy to underestimate.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 11:51 (twenty years ago) link

Prole = C2DE. That's a big chunk of my background. All racists are scum, Norman's racists were white and were proles. No more, no less - and I'm disappointed in N. for having the audacity to guess at what is in my mind and SHARE with the group.

Dave's point about people who feel disenfranchised picking on the even less privileged is spot on, but I don't have respect for people who perpetuate a cycle of bullying whatever their parents did or where they come from. It makes me more, not less, likely to label a bully-in-turn stupid, scummy or both. It obscures the more pernicious racist elements in the governing/corporate classes who like it that brown people are even cheaper to run than paranoid working white folks who can't follow puppet strings to their logical end.

I think it's relevant to point out that racism is actioned differently by different social classes in most cases. The rich/influential racist makes policy and economic choices which benefit whites (see: slavery, sweatshops, Colonialism, 'let's call 'em asylum seekers' etc.); the middle classes are the ones in management roles who can't quite see why they have to change the syllabus (or be changed by the syllabus) or give the job to someone better qualified than their white golf buddy eg. institutionalised racism; the working/prole/tabloid classes throw the words around and the blows, too, and are made stupid and paranoid by the better educated and better paid, who become the people electing BNP councillors. They are utter TOOLS in every sense of the word. Obviously there are some examples of crossover behaviour but largely I believe this structuring to be correct.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:01 (twenty years ago) link

I still don't see why it was relevant to stick prole next to scummy in this case, suzy. Was it because pashmina was talking about a shopkeeper (who he said actually co-owns the shop so won't be 'C2DE' anyway)? I don't see how the rest of your post has anything with class - I'm sure you wouldn't let a middle class racist get away with saying things like that either.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:12 (twenty years ago) link

Suzy It does work, but it changes in emphasis. In your thing the racism in the top tiers is 'at a distance'; the working class racism not. The point is that 'the middle class' != 'the managerial class' - there's the mass of people, or a vast bulk, between these poles, and their racism is what I think the first post here was on about - I dunno 'lower middle class' or something. Your structure leaves out the people between tabloid readers and golf players - ie the Daily Mail readers (and actually Guardian readers). They won't vote BNP, but they aren't comfortable in odern Britain.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:13 (twenty years ago) link

i can't work out quite how suzy decided that the couple pashmina encountered *were* "C2DE" based on the information he imparted (small shop selling what?): that assumption seems to me the dangerpoint in her argt, which leads to the reading that she's using "prole" purely negatively (which i take it - since it applies to herself and her own background, minnesota white working class - she in fact isn't) (that said, it's not a usage i like, not least bcz it's one of abt ten million words in brit english which is used to obfuscate class, cultural and economic, rather than clarify) (i don't like ABCDE either)

x-post w. n

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:13 (twenty years ago) link

haha also i don't like "middleclass", which i think is the least illuminating word of ALL!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:14 (twenty years ago) link

*starts impenetrable argt abt how the ambiguity of the term 'petit bourgeouis' in classical marxism is necessary, as the crux point of hegelian motion*

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:16 (twenty years ago) link

suzy, i´m not having a dig at you per se, but you do say this sort of thing quite a bit. looking down on people from a slighty higher social vantage point is a dangerous thing to do. my family (not my old man or my mum, i hasten to add) regularly come out with all manner or shite like norman´s describing, but it´s not because they´re "proles". it´s because they´ve not had the same opportunities to open their eyes as me. they´re in that position where people like richard littlejohn actually MAKE SENSE and reactionary, racist opinions breed fastest. Using words like "prole" in this context (pushing working-class people further into the dirt) make wankers like him (with all his points about "bleeding heart liberals" and "the metropolitan elite") appear all the more valid and pertinent and the kind of attitudes toward the mass of the british population displayed by the liberal media actively help these ideologies to grow.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:18 (twenty years ago) link

"The English have, in addition to their bourgeoisie, a bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois working class" — Confused of Manchester

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:23 (twenty years ago) link

"bourgeois working class"

i guess that´s what i am!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:24 (twenty years ago) link

Mark: Nail: Head

Class:Cultural:Economic

Bourgeois != 'Middle Class'

But - hey, perhaps things have changed a leetle since 1844?

Friedrich E (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:25 (twenty years ago) link

I am lumpen prole aristocracy! Woo!

kate (kate), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

i used to think i knew what "middle-class" meant. then i moved to London!!

Norman's post is a great one. it reminds me VERY much of elevator convos among almost universally "older" men about wanting to bend the secretary over the back of a chair, etc and feeling expected to grin and join in. ladies you would not BELIEVE what guys will say to each other about you. but if you ever actually get down with one of them and their mate's like "so how was it??" you'd be amazed at how quickly they change the subject!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

God, bourgeoise working class! Unvarnished truth stares you in the face sometimes! I am going to refer to myself thusly in future. if the cap fits blah blah blah.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

anyway i´m going to have to catch my bus now to go sightseeing - was just killing time. am going to write article on iceland called "day in the life of a geyser"!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

Declasse = k-classic

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:30 (twenty years ago) link

I'm still trying to figure out in what way this conversation was surreal because this is what I assume 75% of conversations amongst "homogenous" groups of people about people outside of their group to be like. ("Homogenous" is not restricted to race, of course; I have recently been examining things that I regularly say about people whom I have decided are "not smart" to associates whom I consider "smart" and have ended up horrifying myself.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:38 (twenty years ago) link

(IOW human being denigrating the "other" to the "similar" SHOCKAH)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:39 (twenty years ago) link

one thing that's changed since 1844 (in the UK) = mass literacy

(he said, casually chucking the elephant in the room into the stagnant pol-economy millpond)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:40 (twenty years ago) link

Also to suzy's post that touched off the class debate, growing up I noticed a very strong tendency amongst upper-Midwest "alternakid" culture to be very nice and accepting of someone until that person commits some cardinal sin, at which point EVERY ASPECT of that person's life is open for ridicule and denigration with extreme prejudice with the implicit undertanding that the ire is individualized to the recipient, not generalized.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:43 (twenty years ago) link

what seemed "surreal" to me wasn't the iow human being denigrating the "other" thing, it was the fact that somebody beeping their car horn b/c they wanted another driver to move out of the way was taken as some kind of obvious racial quirk!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link

Mark - For serious. Not doubting ya. And democracy. And organized labour. The car. The telephone. The bicycle even. Pop music. World war. Chilled beer. Association football. The interweb. The Pill. Great days!

Dan - It's the language, but also the assumption a) about race and b) that other whites will appreciate a). It's surreal because it's relatively unusual behaviour (among ILX0rs) and because, I dunno, it seems so... odd. An odd thing to say, since as a racial assumption it's a bit receherche. It's not one I've heard.

Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:45 (twenty years ago) link

Haha note to London ILXors: If you don't want to hear all sorts of illogical, nonsensical behaviors attributed to ethnic groups seemingly at random, DO NOT MOVE TO BOSTON.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:47 (twenty years ago) link

(Um where I said "London" plz substitute "UK" thx)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 17 October 2003 12:47 (twenty years ago) link

Face it, the one's that got shipped over from Africa weren't the Albert Einsteins. Look at the gene pool in this country. They were living in the jungle with stone tools. The smart ones caught the slow ones and sent them over. They were selected for hard work. There are some smart "black" people, sure. But not the rule. More cross breeding will help.

and what, Friday, 11 July 2008 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link

John Wiley Price says dumb things a lot, but I still kind of like him. The worst part of his occasional misplaced outrage is the inevitable response from white talk radio hosts and columnists.

milo z, Friday, 11 July 2008 20:59 (fifteen years ago) link

when barack obomba is president
this stuff will seem mild
get ready for war, white folks
the 3rd world is upon you

and what, Friday, 11 July 2008 20:59 (fifteen years ago) link

its really bizarre that two black guys in dallas would be so responsive to the possibility of racism in casual speech

max, Friday, 11 July 2008 21:00 (fifteen years ago) link

After reading those comments I kind of can't wait for the inevitable white race riot.

HI DERE, Friday, 11 July 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Can someone remind me what Roger's real name was? I have this fear that I might one day wind up writing/talking about his music without remembering which one is him.

-- nabisco, Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:36 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark Link

http://www.media.wmg-is.com/media/portal/media/cms/images/200807/waiting-in-vain--cover-art-large_1214935958225.jpg

jaymc, Friday, 11 July 2008 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link

lol ezra pound

Just got offed, Friday, 11 July 2008 21:06 (fifteen years ago) link

that's got to be one of the stupidest stories I've ever heard. If the idiot commissioner and the judge don't know that that term has absolutely no racial ramifications, then they're fucking idiots.

-- Bill Magill, Friday, July 11, 2008 3:40 PM (31 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

good time to take a self-righteous stand!

deej, Friday, 11 July 2008 21:12 (fifteen years ago) link

"self righteous" -great call

Bill Magill, Sunday, 13 July 2008 15:34 (fifteen years ago) link

god if this keeps up ilx is going to turn into a whore

max, Sunday, 13 July 2008 15:54 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean hole, a black hole

max, Sunday, 13 July 2008 15:54 (fifteen years ago) link

ILX has turned into a singularity whence even light may not escape.

libcrypt, Sunday, 13 July 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

woops yeah i just meant regular-righteous
good catch!

deej, Sunday, 13 July 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Casual Anti-Semitism: Was eating at a local Indian spot recently and got to chatting with the owner (it was a slow afternoon for them). A really nice, funny guy. Talk of the upcoming US Elections. He: "Obama won't win. You know why? Because the Jews won't let him win." I didn't know what to say. It spilled out of his mouth as simply as if he had said, " You know why I own a restaurant? Because I like to serve food." Needless to say, I've found it impossible to go back.

-- Capitaine Jay Vee, Friday, 11 July 2008 20:57 (2 days ago) Link

After some of the tactics the Clinton campaign tried in the primary, this is not an unreasonable point, but should be qualified as "Israel lobby". Of course, that's probably not precisely what he meant.

Most frustrating thing about the "black hole" video clip is that the anchors were too cowed to inject an explicit opinion or to state the objective fact that there is no nor has there ever been a racial connotation to that term.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 13 July 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Sport/Pix/pictures/2008/08/15/460Spain_gesture.jpg

you'd think they might've heard of this thing called 'the internet'

DG, Saturday, 16 August 2008 13:03 (fifteen years ago) link

andre agassi?

darraghmac, Saturday, 16 August 2008 15:23 (fifteen years ago) link

no - chinese people, i think?

Frogman Henry, Saturday, 16 August 2008 15:27 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/aug/15/olympics2008.olympicstennis

DG, Saturday, 16 August 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Racism in spain

deej, Saturday, 16 August 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

So the racism in Spain falls mainly on the plain?

-- jaymc (jaymc), Monday, February 27, 2006 12:41 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Link

deej, Saturday, 16 August 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

It's seriously weird, the Spanish thing. A few weeks ago I was DJing at our night and I went to the bathroom, which is unisex, where there's a bathroom attendant guy, Simon, who is black. A Spanish guy and his girlfriend were ahead of me in the queue and as if out of boredom they started kind of taunting him and riling him and going "Africa, Africa......" etc.

Was just the most bizarre and fucking nasty racism from people who looked like students, I felt so angry I ended up telling the bouncer, who kicked them out.

-- Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, February 28, 2006 5:14 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Link

proto HOOS

deej, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:05 (fifteen years ago) link

jk but seriously what the fuck is up with Spain

deej, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

twelve years pass...

not a joke. i took that screenshot. you can try it yourself.

Li'l Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 September 2020 15:01 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.