2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

loool over/under, nader gets 1%?

m bison, Sunday, 24 February 2008 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

Nader is perfectly positioned to pick up...Ron Paul supporters.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

Tim Russert looks like he want to insert a potted fern into Nader's ear.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

gad, Russert is a douche.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

that doesn't sound like a douchey thing to want to do

akm, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

anyway, as disappointing as it is to see clinton go super negative like this, it does give me hope that if she does win the nomination, she will be relentless on mccain's ass; so much for that much-heralded "friendship" we'd heard about

akm, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

No, but Russert's investment in the efficacy of our political parties is douchey; he's genuinely appalled that someone would not accept party politics.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

word up homos: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/24/nader.politics/index.html

burt_stanton, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

yah russert is the biggest sycophant in the whole fucking world

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

Damn, someone already posted that Nader's running. Well, he's getting mine and my 5 semi-legal non-paid house maintenance interns to vote NADER 08.

burt_stanton, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

loool over/under, nader gets 1%?

i got a hundo on the under

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:06 (eighteen years ago)

over/under, nader gets 0.1%?

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:26 (eighteen years ago)

I was thinking about Clinton's new "Obama = Bush" argument and I've concluded that it's a really gracious strategy for her endgame, actually. The reason is that it doesn't tarnish Obama in a way that will have repercussions should he be the candidate in the general election. I doubt the GOP will pull out the "Obama = Bush" argument. But if she went with the "Obama isn't qualified to be the commander-in-chief" argument, it could legitimize a damaging attack in the general election. I suspect this attack (which doesn't seem very convincing to me, anyway) was motivated by these considerations.

Euler, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:16 (eighteen years ago)

i suspect it was motivated more by abject, panicked desperation

and what, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

i was talkin to someone last night who said he thought obama was the new tony blair

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:34 (eighteen years ago)

weak

Nicole, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

that's kind of mindboggling.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

just saw the fey/hillary clip... does it look odd to anyone else? she looks really uncomfortable going through it. maybe she knows her audience is probably anti-hillary, i dunno.

gff, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:46 (eighteen years ago)

I was thinking about Clinton's new "Obama = Bush" argument and I've concluded that it's a really gracious strategy for her endgame, actually.

I was thinking about Clinton's new "aggressive" arguments and I've concluded that, if things aren't going well for her in the Ohio debate, she will reach across the desk and try to strangle Obama to death.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

i was talkin to someone last night who said he thought obama was the new tony blair

Well he is running a lot of the Blair playbook

Ed, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

political systems are so different there's not much point in making the connect other than, if you don't like obama, you can say "he's the new tony blair".

people in 1996 were (iirc) saying that blair was the new clinton -- and what with blair's xeroxing clinton's triangulation steez, they had a point.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:25 (eighteen years ago)

The big question on Obama isn't whether he will govern as a centrist. He will. That's how the office works. The real question is whether he can, through the power of his position and the so-called bully pulpit, move the center leftward. I think he has a better chance of doing this than Hillary Clinton.

As for his running the Tony Blair playbook, that would come down to what substantive policies he lays out in his first six months, not how he chooses to fish for votes.

Aimless, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:28 (eighteen years ago)

just to bite, a little, blair became party leader, ie "presidential candidate" (but not), almost years before the next election, in 1994. he rapidly made symbolic gestures toward not being the loony left labour party of the 1980s, though nostalgists tend to forget how little chance of a revival there was for the labour left under any leader. (being specific, he ended labour's commitment to nationalization -- this was never going to come back on the table... until last week, in fact!)

but at that point 'old labour' had no rival to blair. his rival was also his ally, gordon brown. the party establishment was fucked by then, and his guy peter mandelson had assiduously put him and brown in good positions since the late 1980s.

i don't see strong obama parallels there.

on the other hand blair did usher in a new era of post-racial politics, his public-school-and-oxford education a radical break with british politics past, so yeah i concede that one.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

http://images.teamsugar.com/files/users/1/13839/15_2007/rok_119_05.jpg

NADERRRRRRRR!

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

Nadir.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 19:11 (eighteen years ago)

Poll has Obama in front in both Ohio and Texas:

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/decision-analyst-obama-texas-ohio-mccain-022308005.html

StanM, Sunday, 24 February 2008 19:14 (eighteen years ago)

jimmy the mod otm

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 19:26 (eighteen years ago)

oh man, this is not good:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/24/hillary-clinton-mocks-bar_n_88194.html

plus she's wearing that awful yellow blazer again.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:38 (eighteen years ago)

thaaaat video holy shit ^^^^^

uh yah hillary we have your voting record to prove that people dont always do the right thing

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:42 (eighteen years ago)

i am shocked and appalled that this photo isnt up on drudge yet - u slippin matt

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12717/thumbs/r-CLINTON-MOCKS-OBAMA-large.jpg

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:44 (eighteen years ago)

pathetic.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

whoa girl u mad!! i dunno what else she could do at this point other than get really negative, i guess we'll see how that goes. if your opponent has a lock on hope and sunshine i guess that's all you have left? still, it should be yet another lesson: you have to have managerial competence and a willingness to fight as part of your candidacy's values. but that's a baseline, innit -- running on those things as the central plank of your appeal is just not enough for people.

this thread, and my life-world at the moment, is Baraquiste central, so my sense of how turns like the yellow-blazer speech above will play out there in the world are a bit skewed. i can't see it doing her any good at this point.

gff, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

this thread, and my life-world at the moment, is Baraquiste central

what the hell does this mean?

and what, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

Loyal Barack Obama supporters not liking Clinton attacks on Barack Obama shocker

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, Hil has seemed irritatingly fake to me since the "i ain't noways tired" speech a year ago at Selma, which was like listening to my aunt diane doing a chapelle skit or something... but apparently people liked it! it is a mystery.

xp it means all my political chat these days, online, friends, family, is with ppl strongly pro-Obama. i don't have any contact with people for whom hillary's style is resonating, so maybe i just don't get it.

gff, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

Loyal Barack Obama supporters not liking lolling at Clinton attacks on Barack Obama shocker

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

if your opponent has a lock on hope and sunshine i guess that's all you have left?

yeah and the "watch out for false hope" message has really resonated so far

dmr, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:07 (eighteen years ago)

If your opponent has a lock on hope and sunshine i guess that's all you have left?

It's beginning to seem like Hillary & McCain are a divorced couple trying to warn their daughter away from dating some handsome poor loft artist type.

mulla atari, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

whoa @ snl clips ... weird

deej, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:20 (eighteen years ago)

Even though I support Obama I think Hillary & her style are just fine. She reminds me a bit of my mom's family. Her amping up the negative is really awful though.

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:25 (eighteen years ago)

yeah and the "watch out for false hope" message has really resonated so far

-- dmr, Sunday, February 24, 2008 5:07 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Wait til the general election.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

i don't have any contact with people for whom hillary's style is resonating, so maybe i just don't get it.

-- gff, Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:59 PM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

People who like Hillary might be basing their choice on something other than campaign style. It's a possibility you might consider.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:35 (eighteen years ago)

her hair?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:36 (eighteen years ago)

i don't get the 'she reminds me' thing - she reminds me of, um, everyone i know? her chief problem may be that she adopts different styles willy-nilly. maybe a good executive should be able to do that, but she does it with little finesse, and anyway people expect politicians, who now live in public more than ever before, to present a consistent image/message - in 2008 you can no longer target different groups in different ways, and she's still trying to get away with it.

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:36 (eighteen years ago)

2008 is gonna be the first presidential election of the youtube era

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:38 (eighteen years ago)

God, Rodham is like Mary Tyler Moore in Ordinary People with this shrill "SHAME ON U, OBAMA -- BUSH BROUGHT CHANGE TOO!" hysteria.

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

lol good comparison

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

what is obama like

deej, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

Franchot Tone.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:55 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.