The Coen Brothers' Burn After Reading

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (323 of them)

But unfortunately, it was made by a bigger douchebag.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 15 September 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Most enthused smart-critic reaction:

Ooh, it's mean, ooh, it's misanthropic, oh dear, the characters are cartoonish, my my, but there's next to nothing at stake in this empty little contraption. WHO. CARES. This film is endlessly, uproariously funny, and never stops generating new dimensions of witty stupidity... So what if it has no "heart"? It never struck me as being actively mean, in the way that Todd Solondz or Neil LaBute movies or certain Alexander Payne movies are.... Aside from the endless FUCK. FUCK. FUCK.s, this is how they used to do screwball. I say this as someone who honestly never thought I would ever like another Coen Brothers film again, much less love one. I'm just flabbergasted. All hail the new Lebowski.

http://academichack.net/reviewsSeptember2008.htm#Burn

I also read Pitt's Chad as gay, ja?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 26 September 2008 19:36 (fifteen years ago) link

I enjoyed this. Especially in retrospect, having sat through Eagle Eye last night.

Simon H., Friday, 26 September 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

i figured that was for certain.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 26 September 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

one of the reviews i read described pitt as "presexual" or something equivalent

metametadata (n/a), Friday, 26 September 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

I enjoyed this, but compatriots fooled by the slapstick trailer were a little surprised by the Fargo vibe. It was good. Not great.

12HOOS2012 (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 26 September 2008 21:12 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah pitt was kinda asexual as a sort of delayed-adolescent narcissist, i enjoyed his dumb face in this movie -- nice to see him when he's not doing his sexy face / cool face / serious face

playing the abortion card (elmo argonaut), Friday, 26 September 2008 21:17 (fifteen years ago) link

i liked it a lot! i don't think it's cruel, but in the early scenes all i really got from it was a huge dose of pointlessness and depression.

JK Simmons, tho, that motherfucker is funny

goole, Friday, 26 September 2008 21:21 (fifteen years ago) link

"dribble?"

playing the abortion card (elmo argonaut), Friday, 26 September 2008 21:23 (fifteen years ago) link

"we don't have extradition to venezuela"
"oh. oh yes, right, sir."
"so... what are we gonna do?"
"sir?"
"put him on a fucking plane to venezuela."
"oh yes, quite right, yes."

he's extra super funny to me atm cos i'm watching Oz, ha

goole, Friday, 26 September 2008 21:26 (fifteen years ago) link

"god no. burn the body"

12HOOS2012 (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 26 September 2008 21:29 (fifteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

I saw this tonight, enjoyed it, plenty of laughs, but I'm not sure if the combination of the caperish and the super-dark worked for me. More capers made the darkness much more OMG WTF incongruous than in Fargo, say. Kinda seemed like two different films smashed together with no care for reconciling the two parts, but I don't know if that's necessarily a bad thing.

Gotta wonder what kind of audience I was part of that saved their biggest laughs for *SPOILER*the gruesome axe-murder scene.*SPOILER*

I did like Brad Pitt, which is pretty rare.

Merdeyeux, Monday, 20 October 2008 01:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I want an excuse to go to the movies. Is this not it?

the pinefox, Monday, 20 October 2008 08:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Xp

lol everyone gasped at that bit when I watched it.

wilter, Monday, 20 October 2008 08:52 (fifteen years ago) link

also yeah Brad Pitt's 'ha he thinks it's a schwinn' was major lollz

wilter, Monday, 20 October 2008 08:53 (fifteen years ago) link

i would say its worth a watch, pinefox

SPOLIER SPOLIER SPOILER

if the movies about greedy and venal people getting their comeuppance, how come the only decent charachter (the ex priestnow gym manager) gets a hammer to the skull?

Michael B, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:05 (fifteen years ago) link

that's not what it's about.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:07 (fifteen years ago) link

it's not really about anything.

s1ocki, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't know what to make of it. I was expecting more slapstick comedy based on the trailer. I nearly walked out about a third of the way through. JK Simmons was the saving grace for me. I guess I "sorta" liked parts of it but am still baffled by the weird shifts in tone.

craven, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 00:30 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm ~tempted~ to think it's a small gesture toward a political point. in a lot of ways this is lebowski redux: self-obsessed creeps involved in an increasingly nasty caper, none of them seemingly able or in the least bit interested in figuring out what it is they're caught up in, only getting their hands on some illusory prize. as usual for the coens, not one character shows any ability to listen to or understand any other living thing, or have any self-awareness really.

only this time, the people involved have some responsibility over the rest of us. it's set in washington for a reason, i think.

goole, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 00:41 (fifteen years ago) link

The picture is quite slight, not very serious, but I think more enjoyable, and thus better, than reviews I've seen have said. The script is sometimes funny enough to be good, or vice versa. The final scene with the CIA officials wrapping things up absolutely trumps the rest of the picture, except for the earlier scene with the same officials - 'let me know when ... when ... well, let me know when it makes sense' - which was also good. That final scene was quite superb.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 12:53 (fifteen years ago) link

The final scene with the CIA officials wrapping things up absolutely trumps the rest of the picture

I don't agree. It's funny in and of itself, but it sits uneasily with the extreme darkness of what precedes it.

Freedom, Saturday, 25 October 2008 15:12 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm ~tempted~ to think it's a small gesture toward a political point.

yeah pretty much. me and my wife joked after we saw it that it was about the cia's intelligence failures in the aftermath of 9/11. but she was half serious.

dmr, Saturday, 25 October 2008 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost: I think that uneasiness is pretty intentional!

The droid army of the legacy press (bernard snowy), Sunday, 26 October 2008 01:27 (fifteen years ago) link

lebowski redux: self-obsessed creeps involved in an increasingly nasty caper, none of them seemingly able or in the least bit interested in figuring out what it is they're caught up in, only getting their hands on some illusory prize. as usual for the coens, not one character shows any ability to listen to or understand any other living thing, or have any self-awareness really.

This sums up Burn After Reading pretty well, but I strongly disagree that it sums up Lebowski (like, at all).

Jouster, Sunday, 26 October 2008 19:26 (fifteen years ago) link

hated the fucking music in this

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Sunday, 9 November 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

ha i was gonna say that doesnt sound like lebowski whatsoever

should i bother seeing this in theaters

Because it's a snow machine (deej), Sunday, 9 November 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

more like bored after watching, i would say.

Lingbert, Sunday, 9 November 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

bored while watching too

Lingbert, Sunday, 9 November 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

I finally saw this a few nights ago, and yeah, the music didn't do much for me either. I get that it was going for the late 1990s Harrison Ford action film feel, but I didn't understand why.

z "R" s (Z S), Sunday, 9 November 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

how is the CIA wrapping shit up not dark?

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 9 November 2008 20:23 (fifteen years ago) link

lebowski barton finkredux: self-obsessed creeps involved in an increasingly nasty caper, none of them seemingly able or in the least bit interested in figuring out what it is they're caught up in, only getting their hands on some illusory prize. as usual for the coens, not one character shows any ability to listen to or understand any other living thing, or have any self-awareness really.

fixed (?)

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 9 November 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

really, that could apply to any coen bros movie. any one.

s1ocki, Sunday, 9 November 2008 20:55 (fifteen years ago) link

That final scene was quite superb.

I agree completely. I loved that. Loved the whole film, in fact. Mind, I think The Man Who Wasn't There is their magnum opus, so I'm aware I'm a little out of step with Coen-brother-related thinking.

NOW WITH ADDED CAPS (grimly fiendish), Sunday, 9 November 2008 21:34 (fifteen years ago) link

I enjoyed this as a no thrills fargoesque romp, i never really had great hopes after hating HATING "No Country'".

High point was McDormand's laugh

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Thursday, 13 November 2008 14:51 (fifteen years ago) link

hated hated hated the final scene, and brad pitts death

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Thursday, 13 November 2008 14:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought Brad Pitt's death was a supremely effective shock to the system. Malkovich whacking your man just wasn't believable tho - too much in the direction of farce, even by the standards of the rest of the film.

Freedom, Friday, 14 November 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

this was a really empty movie

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 14 November 2008 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link

barton fink ruled tho

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 14 November 2008 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link

I need to get the DVD and watch this about four more times I think

TOMBOT, Friday, 14 November 2008 00:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I kind of loved it. I just really loved watching this bizarre version of a spy movie where every character is completely self involved and totally incompetent...it just sent that story into places I had NEVER imagined. ie the George Clooney chair. O_o

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 14 November 2008 06:21 (fifteen years ago) link

this was a really empty movie

that's what I thought. It's amazing how underwhelmed you can be by a film which is still full of roffles. Like George Clooney's chair.

Are you meant to assume that he got Frances McDornand to sit in the chair?

The Real Dirty Vicar, Friday, 14 November 2008 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link

N Cage & Holly Hunter were not self-obsessed creeps, s1ocki

Dr Morbius, Friday, 14 November 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link

they stole babies because they thought they wanted some!!!

the dick man from the hilarious 'Tom Of Finland' comics (sic), Friday, 14 November 2008 22:25 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

hated the fucking music in this

― Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Sunday, November 9, 2008 11:00 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i liked the percussion pieces that sort of parodied the dramatic percussion music that shows up in thrillers (but still sounded pretty cool on their own).

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Friday, 2 January 2009 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link

(btw i liked this movie a lot, but my expectations were low and i had already read that it's slight, empty, misanthropic, etc.)

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Friday, 2 January 2009 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

apart from schilinger-from-oz this was a piece of shit.

Jordan Sarging (Brohan Hari), Friday, 2 January 2009 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

this was way more Barton Fink than Fargo in tone, but more Fargo in it's semi-realism, which is where i think a lot of people are getting tripped up on figuring out how to approach it.

Liked it, didn't love it. on some level it is just an examination of a whole bunch of flawed and inept people failing to accomplish anything, which i guess is where the "empty" thing comes from, but it worked ok for me.

VISION QUEST TO KNOCK YOU UP (John Justen), Friday, 2 January 2009 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

this is the only Coen Corporation film of recent years I've enjoyed.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 2 January 2009 18:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I liked it. Best sequences were definitely the ones with Sledge Hammer and Vern Schillinger trying to figure out what the hell was going on.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 19:05 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.