Ken vs. Boris: It's So On

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1874 of them)

Yeah, I know it's silly but the fact is that the bastard uses this buffoon bollocks to hide the fact that he's an old school arrogant tory twat who pretty much thinks he can do what he likes and people will love him. And they do.

Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 3 April 2008 13:51 (eighteen years ago)

I've saw him lots of times. On his bike. Jogging. Wandering about aimlessly.

Tom D., Thursday, 3 April 2008 13:52 (eighteen years ago)

This blog probably best sums up my problems with Johnson, although admittedly I do wish for a more appealing vote than Ken, but what are you gonna do?

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 3 April 2008 13:55 (eighteen years ago)

He's one of the few Tories with actual face/name recognition power in the general public, so on that count, his schtick has clearly worked.

I'm actually kind of glad, in a weird way, that he did run for Mayor because, well - I used to think "oh, he's not really a proper Tory, ha ha, he's so cute and loveable and rides a bike and all!" but the moment he started actually opening his mouth and publicising his views, well, there they were. Cured me of that idea post haste.

Still fancy him, though.

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:03 (eighteen years ago)

Well THAT certainly got my office's attention. s-post

A friend and I heckled Boris from the public gallery of the commons once. We were there on an economics trip and chose to call "Booooooooooooris. Booooooooooris." at him. Not imaginiative but did get his attention. And us thrown out.

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:05 (eighteen years ago)

i'm going to become really fat in 4 years' time and run for mayor and win.

ken c, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:06 (eighteen years ago)

red ken vs fat ken

ken c, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:06 (eighteen years ago)

Fat Ken gets my vote!

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:08 (eighteen years ago)

If you maintain your message board presence would that make you the Fat Ken Troller?

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://davehill.typepad.com/london3ms/

dave hill keeping a very good mayor blog here.

Pete W, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:17 (eighteen years ago)

http://torytroll.blogspot.com/2008/04/bnp-say-back-boris.html

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:19 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.stopboris.org/

Pete W, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:21 (eighteen years ago)

i might use LOLRUS festival as a launchpad for mayor 2012 campaign

ken c, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/lolrus-prezidenshul-candida.jpg

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:25 (eighteen years ago)

omg roflsburg

ken c, Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

lolololol boris did coke! ken has five kids!

ken's quote is choice:

"I don't think anybody in this city is shocked about what consenting adults do. As long as you don't involve children, animals or vegetables they leave people to get on and live their own life in their own way."

i'm sure he's a great father to all three sets of kids and everything, but this is typical ken arrogance -- kind of saying f u and yr bourgeois morality to potential voter. of course, ken often sucks up to people who care *very much* what consenting adults do but hey-ho.

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

Not siding with Ken, but f bourgeois morality tho.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

i'm kind of indifferent on that score. if everyone's happy, kudos. im just saying, as a populist politician, it's kind of a dick move.

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah it is but one of the many things I don't dig about politicians is sucking on the cock of popular morality.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

I think that's a pretty good way of killing the issue there and then - BoJo has been a bit of a shagger in his time as well and is unlikely to attack on those lines, while it goes "haha you and your ridiculous overmoralising" to the media.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

the media is only part of the "ridiculous overmoralising". people wouldn't buy rothermere titles if they didn't go in for it themselves. because he looks like an idiot and because no kids were involved, BJ's serial shagging is probably less of a liability. large swathes of london are made up of not so liberal types -- not that ken doesn't go in for ridiculous overmoralising or a certain form when it suits him.

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

There's always the Darius Guppy stuff

That mong guy that's shit, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

The only reason there were no kids involved in Boris's shagging is because he paid for an abortion. They're both potential liabilities on this score, which is why they've agreed not to attack along these lines.

Pete W, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

I like Ken's statement and can't see why you have a problem with it

I hate BJ, like KL, so perhaps that explains my attitude

the pinefox, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

actually, KL's siring all these kids makes me like him all the more, given the woes and worries catalogued on 'Do You Want To Have Kids?' thread -- on a issue said by all to be scary, he has been courageous ... 5 times

the pinefox, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:37 (eighteen years ago)

Think of his poor womb.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:39 (eighteen years ago)

i need to do some serial shagging before i stand for mayor in 2012

probably should do that before i become very fat too

ken c, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

johnson isn't so fat these days, and livingston never has been as far as i know

they can have as many rugrats as they like provided they all have to carry oyster cards if they wanna ride the bus for free

blueski, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:43 (eighteen years ago)

large swathes of london are made up of not so liberal types

How many of these people are likely to be voting for Ken? I mean, it's a pretty calculated comment masquerading as an off-the-cuff joke, Ken knows that *his* support is unlikely to be eroded that much.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

has it been revealed yet as to which way do BJ/KL wipe?

ken c, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

pinefox, i guess it's because "As long as you don't involve children, animals or vegetables they leave people to get on and live their own life in their own way" the use of vegetables seems to make mock of the notion that we should try to not to "involve" children.

we don't know what they're "involved" in in his case so maybe he was editorializing too far anyway.

and for someone who regards driving a big car as immoral, it's a bit rich.

How many of these people are likely to be voting for Ken? I mean, it's a pretty calculated comment masquerading as an off-the-cuff joke, Ken knows that *his* support is unlikely to be eroded that much.

-- Matt DC, Friday, April 4, 2008 4:46 PM (49 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

yeah i see that, but to win elections you need to reach outside your base? i don't know -- if i were a politician i probably wouldn't go out of my way to pointlessly alienate potential voters but he seems to do alright.

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

and for someone who regards driving a big car as immoral, it's a bit rich.

he has 5 kids with different mums so that he wouldn't have to drive them to school all in the same car innit.

ken c, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

everyone seems to be glossing over the possibility of these children being ken/newt hybrids

DG, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.best-horror-movies.com/images/Aliens-newt.jpg

That's some sick shit dude.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

so you think his statement suggests paedophilia is OK, and that's why you don't like it?

I don't think that's what he was trying to say.

'immoral' is a strong word, but KL is correct to think that some vehicles are more needlessly polluting than others, and has been bold in trying to do something very practical about this problem. I'm glad about this and I think it is another reason to vote for him. (exact results, nuances and implications of congestion charge no doubt = a complex topic in itself)

the pinefox, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's maybe more immoral to do unnecessarily terrible things to the natural environment than to have consenting relationships with other people, which change and end, and are, I would generally think, private

the pinefox, Friday, 4 April 2008 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

so you think his statement suggests paedophilia is OK, and that's why you don't like it?

no.

i don't know what he means by 'involve' tbh, hence my scare-quotes.

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

pinefox are you trying to say that you're going to be voting based on the candidates' abilities to apply practical and effective strategies to improve the living standards of london, as opposed to who has fewer illegitimate children?

ken c, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

I think banry thinks fathering kids "involves" them, and he has a point. But yeah, kudos to Ken for introducing a tax that disproportiantely affects poor people.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's maybe more immoral to do unnecessarily terrible things to the natural environment than to have consenting relationships with other people, which change and end, and are, I would generally think, private

-- the pinefox, Friday, April 4, 2008 4:58 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

ech, either it's private or it isn't pinefox! i'm, as i said, indifferent; so i'm not going to moralize about it either way. the car thing is purely about revenue and of not much significance to the fate of the environment. calling it "unnecessarily terrible" is hyperbolic -- the difference between big and small cars doesn't justify it. i don't and can't drive so i'm ok saying this, i think.

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

but i thought "small cars" are getting a reduction in the fees.

ken c, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

£2 reduction in fees compared to likely average income of big car/small car owners = lulz, insult, injury

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

So BJ took coke as a teenager. Rich bastard.

Pete W, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

exactly

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:10 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's time someone posted that picture of teenage toff Boris at Oxford!

Masonic Boom, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:10 (eighteen years ago)

wonder when cameron will have to take this particular plunge

banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:10 (eighteen years ago)

What a haircut?

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

There seem to be nuff fuckwits in this country who like the firm smack of patrician authority for the poshness not to be an ish.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/02_1/CameronEton_600x539.jpg

Oh god, yes.

Masonic Boom, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

No 7 is the best, he's some kind of uber-toff.

chap, Friday, 4 April 2008 16:15 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.