Rolling US Economy Into The Shitbin Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10701 of them)

Thank you New York state for doing what the feds have clearly declined to do, and it's about fucking time some one did it.

Aimless, Thursday, 19 May 2011 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

the new spitzer

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 19 May 2011 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

"The government already has reached the limit of its borrowing authority, $14.3 trillion, and the Treasury is using a series of extraordinary maneuvers to meet financial obligations."

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/01/us_congress_debt_limit

but we can't raise taxes

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 1 June 2011 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

we're not gonna budge here

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201106010013

maybe a stretch, but her dress is awesome

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 1 June 2011 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

crooked timber:

Eric Cantor:

“Everything is on the table,” he said. “As Republicans, we’re not going to go for tax increases. I think the administration gets that. But we’ve also put everything on the table as far as cuts.”

Imagine what the response would be if this were flipped around. Imagine a Democrat emitting the following, as a bold deficit reduction plan: “Everything is on the table … we’re not going to go for spending cuts. I think the Republicans get that. But we’ve also put everything on the table as far as tax hikes.” No one would say such a Bizarro Norquist thing, of course, because no one on the Democratic side is as bizarre as Norquist. But if someone did, it would be perfectly obvious the person saying this thing wasn’t concerned with deficit reduction. The idea that someone unwilling to contemplate spending cuts – anywhere – was a deficit hawk would not pass the laugh test. As Cantor’s statement does not.

disagree with the awful strategy proposed in the rest of the post, but that's pretty otm. saying "everything is on the table" while absolutely refusing to consider tax hikes is absurd, especially given that over the past century, the standard response to recessions has been tax hikes.

Z S, Thursday, 2 June 2011 01:50 (fifteen years ago)

biggest Dow dip since last summer yesterday. Looks like I picked the right season to reduce my 401k contrib (so I can afford my upcoming rent hike and vacation)

the gay bloggers are onto the faggot tweets (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 June 2011 11:17 (fifteen years ago)

and vast wealth was destroyedcreated by elaborate financial deceptions

Kerm, Thursday, 2 June 2011 11:23 (fifteen years ago)

rick ungar otm

http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/06/01/how-our-largest-corporations-made-170-billion-during-great-recession-and-paid-no-taxes/

twelve of the nations largest Fortune 500 companies, while making $170 billion in profits during the period of The Great Recession, paid an effective tax rate of negative 1.5%

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 2 June 2011 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

goldman subpoenaed

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-02/goldman-said-to-get-subpoena-from-manhattan-prosecutor-over-senate-report.html

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 2 June 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

that took fucking long enough

nuclear power, jet propulsion, radar, laser beams, cordless phone (abanana), Thursday, 2 June 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

the last decade in terms of real wages was actually worse than the Great Depression

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/06/03/235709/depression-wages/

The increase in total private-sector wages, adjusted for inflation, from the start of 2001 has fallen far short of any 10-year period since World War II, according to Commerce Department data. In fact, if the data are to be believed, economy wide wage gains have even lagged those in the decade of the Great Depression (adjusted for deflation). Over the past decade, real private-sector wage growth has scraped bottom at 4%, just below the 5% increase from 1929 to 1939, government data show.

i think we should cut taxes and deregulate stuff

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 June 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

so frustrating

curmudgeon, Friday, 3 June 2011 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

If we all just sit and wish hard enough, maybe the rich will start letting us have a bit more of the profits of our labors.

Aimless, Friday, 3 June 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

but nobody in america wants to redistribute $$$$$$, except for like half of americans

Americans break into two roughly evenly matched camps on the question of whether the government should enact heavy taxes on the rich to redistribute wealth in the U.S. Forty-seven percent believe the government should redistribute wealth in this way, while 49% disagree, similar to views Gallup found four years ago.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/147881/Americans-Divided-Taxing-Rich-Redistribute-Wealth.aspx

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 June 2011 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

florida couple forecloses on bank of america

http://www.news-press.com/article/20110603/BUSINESS/110603016/Bank-America-pays-debt-instead-losing-furniture

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 5 June 2011 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

That story made me happy, until I thought about all the shit that couple had to put up with and how little the bank really compensated them for it.

Aimless, Sunday, 5 June 2011 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2000558/Record-61-6TRILLION-financial-promises-paid-US-borrow-125bn-month.html

We knew the U.S. economy's financial health and future was looking bad - but amazing figures show how rapidly it deteriorated even further last year.
The federal government has a record $61.6trillion of financial promises not paid for after $5.3trillion of new financial obligations were added in 2010.

This gap between spending commitments and revenue in the year gone by equals more than one-third of the nation's output, reported USA Today.

Medicare added $1.8trillion in new liabilities and Social Security took on $1.4trillion in obligations, which is partly down to longer life expectancies.

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 00:33 (fifteen years ago)

really could do without the daily mail on this thread

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 01:02 (fifteen years ago)

Of course, but it was a toss up between that and USA Today.

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 01:32 (fifteen years ago)

how about the boise register? chinidaho ho!

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/12/31/1472023/chinese-company-eyes-boise.html

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

FYI, approximately half of the jobs created in May came from McDonalds

Up to 30,000 of the 54,000 jobs created in May were the result of a hiring spree by the hamburger chain, analysts at Morgan Stanley told Market Watch on Friday.

Z S, Thursday, 9 June 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

Richard Fisher, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, dropped by our offices this week and relayed a remarkable fact: Some 37% of all net new American jobs since the recovery began were created in Texas.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304259304576375480710070472.html

since this is the wsj, curious how many of those new lone star positions are mcjobs (not that there's anything wrong with those). i'd want to see info on average wages and benefits before i take them seriously

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 12 June 2011 12:50 (fifteen years ago)

nobody in america wants to redistribute $$$$$$, except for like half of americans

We've BEEN redistributing it... upward!

already president FYI (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 June 2011 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

it's called "rightfully earned" Morbs

Gukbe, Sunday, 12 June 2011 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

um...

symbol of the paramount chaos (Drugs A. Money), Sunday, 12 June 2011 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

Multi-billion-dollar government subsidies to, for example, oil companies are "rightfully earned"?

Aimless, Sunday, 12 June 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

but they create jobs so we should be grateful for them and give them whatever they need out to give us jobs because they create them for us and we're goddamn lucky for the privilege

Gukbe, Sunday, 12 June 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

certainly the Bush-Obama Tax Cuts have rewarded the right class.

already president FYI (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 June 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

they work hard, despite their comfortable upbringings. the rest of us should be grateful for their job-producing ingenuity, and go to church

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 12 June 2011 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

When self-parody surpasses all attempts at satire it becomes impossible to know what ground is left beneath our feet.

Aimless, Sunday, 12 June 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

All that is solid melts into pixels.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 12 June 2011 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

the rest of us should be grateful for their job-producing ingenuity, and go to church the mall

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 13 June 2011 04:26 (fifteen years ago)

"Why are workers taking home such a reduced share of the pie?"

i blame the unions and jimmy carter. and welfare

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

Communists

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

a rising tide will lift all boats

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

i blame obamacare

Z S, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

i blame everyone except for the workers who are taking a enlarged share of the pie

Z S, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

yes. they are engorged upon ill-gotten pie, extorted from the ultra-productive upper management class.

Aimless, Thursday, 16 June 2011 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

you know things have gotten weird when "Frum Forum" commenters are more reasonable than anybody at Talking Points Memo

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 June 2011 09:38 (fifteen years ago)

this was interesting imo http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n10/donald-mackenzie/how-to-make-money-in-microseconds

caek, Thursday, 16 June 2011 11:38 (fifteen years ago)

I should have started a bank back when the getting was good.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 June 2011 12:32 (fifteen years ago)

professor, what's another name for pirate's treasure?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTzMqm2TwgE

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 17 June 2011 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

this is a pretty amazing article about how goldman lost 98% of a $1.5 billion sovereign wealth fund practically overnight. oh yeah, and which country's sovereign wealth fund was it? step forward, libya.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/goldman-tries-fails-to-sell-soul-with-libya-deal-20110602

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 18 June 2011 12:38 (fifteen years ago)

Having managed to get their bankers out of Libya with their heads still attached to their shoulders, Goldman decided to make up for losing $1.5 billion of Qaddafi’s money by offering the international pariah a $3.7 billion equity stake that would have made him one of the largest single owners of the bank.

In con-man parlance, this is called the reload. You beat someone in a Ponzi scheme for his life’s savings, and when he shows up at your door with an axe, you get him to mortgage his house to buy a stake in the Brooklyn Bridge. After blowing $1.5 billion of Libya’s money almost instantaneously, Goldman’s solution to the problem was to immediately get Qaddafi reaching back into his pocket for a cash sum over twice the size of the original losses. It’s really hard not to admire the sheer balls of the whole deal.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 18 June 2011 12:39 (fifteen years ago)

I've talked to a lot of people who got on the wrong end of a bad Goldman deal, and I never heard any hint of Goldman coming back with flowers and chocolates after the date rape. What makes the Libyans deserve such special attention? One wonders if you get better service from an American investment bank if the threat of beheading is behind your business deals.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 18 June 2011 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

krugman and wells on jeff madrick's new book, age of greed

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jul/14/busts-keep-getting-bigger-why/?pagination=false

The great financial crisis of 2008–2009, whose consequences still blight our economy, is sometimes portrayed as a “black swan” or a “100-year flood”—that is, as an extraordinary event that nobody could have predicted. But it was, in fact, just the most recent installment in a recurrent pattern of financial overreach, taxpayer bailout, and subsequent Wall Street ingratitude. And all indications are that the pattern is set to continue.

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 26 June 2011 14:30 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, they're gonna kill us all with more floods if we let them. And we will, til we have fascism.

joyless shithead (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 26 June 2011 14:33 (fourteen years ago)

new bay bridge pre-fabbed at bargain rates.

Pan Zhongwang, a 55-year-old steel polisher, is a typical Zhenhua worker. He arrives at 7 a.m. and leaves at 11 p.m., often working seven days a week. He lives in a company dorm and earns about $12 a day.

“It used to be $9 a day, now it’s $12,” he said Wednesday morning, while polishing one of the decks for the new Bay Bridge. “Everything is getting more expensive. They should raise our pay.”

what does anything meme? basically (Hunt3r), Sunday, 26 June 2011 14:44 (fourteen years ago)

welcome to america

yeah pretty much fascism is the only way to explain shit like this

"It has now become orthodoxy on the right—despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary—that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, not Angelo Mozilo and Countrywide Credit, are to blame for the subprime mess."

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 26 June 2011 14:47 (fourteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.