You get the 'spiritual' thing in fashion quite a bit - and it annoys me when I know damned well the person is basically agnostic and does a bit of yoga.
― that's when i reach for my ︻╦╤─* (suzy), Thursday, 12 May 2011 20:42 (thirteen years ago) link
lol but I feel like that would describe more people who would use this term.
Good thread. I like the Puffins.
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:17 (thirteen years ago) link
Ever asked someone who says this what they mean by "spiritual?" The response is usually:
"I just believe there's something else, something we can't see."
Ok.
― thirdalternative, Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:28 (thirteen years ago) link
it's called gravity
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:30 (thirteen years ago) link
"there's something else, something we can't see" was basically your definition of god on that other thread Shakey, wasn't it?
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:34 (thirteen years ago) link
no. you guys really need to brush up on your reading comprehension.
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:44 (thirteen years ago) link
Ever asked someone who says this what they mean by "spiritual?" The response is usually:"I just believe there's something else, something we can't see."Ok.
That bothers me far less than the people who believe in something that's equally kooky and poorly though out, but very specific. The wishy-washy-ness masks an uncertainty which could lead to further doubt.
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:46 (thirteen years ago) link
still trying to figure out how gravity is something we can't see
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:47 (thirteen years ago) link
fwiw, I did not offer a personal definition, I pointed out several different ways that the concept of God has been elucidated in various theological traditions.
xp
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:47 (thirteen years ago) link
lol. you see the EFFECTS of gravity. you don't SEE gravity itself. gravity does not reflect light.
science brigade really bringing it today... *sigh*
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:48 (thirteen years ago) link
gravity is a force, it doesn't have mass, etc.
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:49 (thirteen years ago) link
keep fightin off them hordes, shakes
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:50 (thirteen years ago) link
why do I bother
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:51 (thirteen years ago) link
lol "science brigade." You know, being an atheist doesn't necessarily mean you know shit about science.
but you have a very narrow definition of "see"
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:54 (thirteen years ago) link
you mean... the definition used by science?
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:57 (thirteen years ago) link
you see the EFFECTS of gravity. you don't SEE gravity itself. gravity does not reflect light.
so gravity = god and the effects = the prophet?
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:58 (thirteen years ago) link
I mean come the fuck on here. this is physics 101. What you can see is the spectrum of light reflected off material objects. Gravity is not a material object.
I wasn't even trying to make an analogy here, I was just making a loljoke about "unseen" things at work in the universe
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:59 (thirteen years ago) link
being an atheist doesn't necessarily mean you know shit about science.
also lol @ atheists believing in things they don't understand. sounds familiar.
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link
I know, but I was just fucking with you because you were loling at something that to me sounded identical to what you were claiming was the common monotheistic concept of god yesterday. And it also struck me as being pretty funny since gravity is something that we can in fact observe and measure while god is not.
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link
((i was making the point that the successfully trolling 'science brigade' you're so valiantly defending us against, but you know, have fun))
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link
and wtf does "believing in things" have to do with anything?
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:02 (thirteen years ago) link
"I'm not really scientific but I am an atheist."
― Abbbottt, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:06 (thirteen years ago) link
"probably believes in orgone"
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:08 (thirteen years ago) link
I'm not a bigot, I hate god and science equally.
― No pop, no style -- all simply (Viceroy), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:13 (thirteen years ago) link
What about Dorkus Maximus: the God of Science?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:19 (thirteen years ago) link
And it also struck me as being pretty funny since gravity is something that we can in fact observe and measure while god is not.
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:01 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark
really? we can measure gravity but not god? fire up the presses!
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:25 (thirteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3eTsNEgmL8
God is 3'!
― Abbbottt, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:28 (thirteen years ago) link
^^^divine revelation
― american thinker (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:28 (thirteen years ago) link
"I'm physical but I'm not a physicist"
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:31 (thirteen years ago) link
mormons know whats up
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:32 (thirteen years ago) link
u r either pure raw dog materialist or "spiritual" no middle ground & i think most ppl are a bit uncomfortable abt accepting that kind of determinism, or things like "love is purely material phenomenon" and i dont blame it is sort of weird
― flopson, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:33 (thirteen years ago) link
ime "I am spiritual"="I like sunsets and have a dreamcatcher in my car"
― Captain Hyrax (Phil D.), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:45 (thirteen years ago) link
some awesome spacemen 3 style wallpaper in that kids in the hall clip!
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:47 (thirteen years ago) link
Everything abt that Kids clip is awesome! Esp. Mark sticking out his smug lil tongue.
― Abbbottt, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:48 (thirteen years ago) link
i'm not racist but...
― omar little, Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:50 (thirteen years ago) link
Somebody gave me a dreamcatcher a couple of years ago. We're not friends any more.
― that's when i reach for my ︻╦╤─* (suzy), Thursday, 12 May 2011 22:57 (thirteen years ago) link
tbph, i get a little bummed by the knee-jerk sneering at this kind of straw-man spirituality. it's so easy, like lolling at dave matthews fans in their tevas and shit. i mean, the english language isn't really all that well-equipped to express these sorts of thoughts, hence dumb oppositions like "spiritual vs. religious."
how are we supposed to talk about our sense of things that seem to exist outside the material world?
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:12 (thirteen years ago) link
― flopson, Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:33 PM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark
disagree. i can't speak for most people, but i'm a "pure raw dog materialist," comfortable with the deterministic implications. i'm also open to and interested in what you might call "other things." there's no conflict there, imo.
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:15 (thirteen years ago) link
not sure ugi
― flopson, Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:28 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah, no. Not to me.
― The man who mistook his life for a FAP (Trayce), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:31 (thirteen years ago) link
Also, what contenderizer said.
I agree with you, although I don't think spiritual vs. religious is a dumb opposition. I think it's dumb that people try to ignore that difference and file all spiritual thought under the heading of religion. For example I don't think it makes much sense to think of Shinto as a religion in the western sense. And I understand the "lol dreamcatchers" impulse but it also seems not that far removed from the desire to make everything conform to a western conception of religion. How do you differentiate between "lol, stupid shit is stupid" or "lol, metaphysical shit is stupid" or "lol, you're going to hell because you haven't accepted Jesus Christ as your lord and savior"?
― geir was right (wk), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:36 (thirteen years ago) link
sense of thigns that seem to exist outside the physical world
u definitely r not a member of raw dog pure materialist club sorry
― flopson, Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:39 (thirteen years ago) link
I get where yr coming from flopson, like, even "love" is just chemicals in the brain, all that kind of thing.
Fucking depressing if u ask me.
― The man who mistook his life for a FAP (Trayce), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:55 (thirteen years ago) link
― flopson, Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:28 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark
no, dude, i get it. i just enjoy the dissonance.
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:55 (thirteen years ago) link
i'm experiencing some dissonance right now. Didn't we just do this thread?
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:57 (thirteen years ago) link
yes! it is still giving!
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Thursday, 12 May 2011 23:58 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.gilroydispatch.com/content/img/f274209/the-giving-tree.jpg
― Mordy, Friday, 13 May 2011 00:06 (thirteen years ago) link
kid 1, tree 0
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Friday, 13 May 2011 00:08 (thirteen years ago) link
i always thought that to be charitable to these people, you would just recognize that they probably think something like, 'i have religious feelings that are not just nothing, but every recognized religious institution / practice / doctrine i have encountered is disappointing or repellent or useless to me'.
― j., Friday, 13 May 2011 00:09 (thirteen years ago) link