you're on fire! took me ages of pondering to get that...
― Neil S, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
once you twigged the anagram it wasn't too bad. the hardest clues are the ones where you can't work out yr line of attack i think
― bell hops (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
Good use of cricketing terminology!
That's where the c comes from?! I've been learning via puzzles in The Nation, and Frank Lewis being American I haven't run into cricket abbrevs.
― Hardcore Bangage (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
c = caught, that is.
Yeah, "c" for caught is an abbreviation used on cricket scoreboards, so it's widely used and accepted in UK crosswords
― bell hops (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
further sources of confusion: Bowled = b; run out = ro; stumped = st
― Neil S, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
not out = no
don't think you'd have much use for lbw
― bell hops (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
Joint, English, strangely out leg before wicket? (5)
― Neil S, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
lol ok
― bell hops (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
Guarantee Jimmy will take a meditative chant (7)
― ledge, Friday, 6 May 2011 10:47 (fifteen years ago)
promise
― abbottabadass (onimo), Friday, 6 May 2011 11:18 (fifteen years ago)
aye
― ledge, Friday, 6 May 2011 12:25 (fifteen years ago)
was racking my brains as to why Jimmy = prise, then it struck me...
― Neil S, Friday, 6 May 2011 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
Eccentric Scotsman puts his finished documents here, by the sound of it (5)
― ledge, Monday, 9 May 2011 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
Seriously annoyed with this clue from Paul in the guardian prize btw:
Into smacking, if I then propose shaking, the results should confirm it (3,5,2,2,3,7)
ans: The proof is in the pudding.
THE PROOF IS NOT IN THE FUCKING PUDDING
― ledge, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 09:33 (fifteen years ago)
lol outré.
― portrait of velleity (woof), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 09:41 (fifteen years ago)
lol
― ledge, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 09:47 (fifteen years ago)
That is nice. I usually am terrified of clues with scots things in them ('Hamish's cradle', 'Classy In Inverness' etc etc). There's one most weeks in Azed & it just means a bloody war of attrition and then dictionary mining to find a dialect word or strange spelling I'll immediately forget.
― portrait of velleity (woof), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 09:55 (fifteen years ago)
just had a look at that prize & god paul can be irritating.
In North America, island, island, island, island capital (7)
Fun, but next to no surface sense.
― portrait of velleity (woof), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 10:41 (fifteen years ago)
can't see the problem with that pudding clue. or the answer.
(it's the kind of clue i get by the word sizes rather than the anagram though)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
there's no such phrase as "the proof is in the pudding".
"the proof of the pudding is in the eating" wouldn't fit across a standard sized crossword i guess.
― objectionable petty a-hole (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
have you tried googling recently?
was always 'proof is in the pudding' at ours - the ingredients are all well and good but the proof is in the finished result.
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
1st google result
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/proof-of-the-pudding.html
"That longer version makes sense at least, whereas the shortened version really doesn't mean anything"
― ledge, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:15 (fifteen years ago)
only seems to work with a truncated phrase but...
http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/chart?content=proof%20is%20in%20the%20pudding%2Cpudding%20is%20in%20the%20eating&corpus=0&smoothing=1&year_start=1800&year_end=2008
― ledge, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:20 (fifteen years ago)
i look at that graph and i see a massive decline for the one, the other going from strength to strength. it's just a matter of time... 8)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
"proof" doesn't mean "evidence" in this sense either, but "test", i.e. "the test of whether the pudding is any good is in its taste and not other considerations"
― objectionable petty a-hole (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
would be ok with this if Paul had set a themed enraging/divisive-phrases crossword - 'proof is in the pudding', 'another think coming', 'literally a viking' etc etc
― portrait of velleity (woof), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
we should do one.
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
*cough* "another think coming" is uncontroversial and correct
― objectionable petty a-hole (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
You know where to take it.
― portrait of velleity (woof), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:42 (fifteen years ago)
what a fantastic thread.
i am sleep-deprived and can't do any of today's guardian, sigh.
― thomp, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
proof is in the another vikink coming
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
i'm doing better than usual at today's guardian
Blend or brew or fictional small family member? (8)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
Borrower :)
― objectionable petty a-hole (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
v good
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
(wasn't mine. is Brummie from today's guardian)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
need 2 from today's guardian:
12A Powdered bottom (6) _ R _ U _ _
3D One unknown to get into firm danger (6) _ A _ A _ _
(the last letters are the same, the rest are unches)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
ground
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)
hazard?
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:10 (fifteen years ago)
ah, with a-z to do with unknown somehow?
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
that's what I was thinking. it's how I get most clues tbh, vague hand-waving.
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
yes and yes, thanks (and so obvious when you know)
i suck at dual definition clues.
z often used in algebra to denote an unknown variable. (or x or y)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
on a very bad day i resort to vague handwriting, just so onlookers think i've solved it
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
One = A (ie singular)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
x would have been the obvious algebra substitution but ok
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
you're so one-dimensional 8)
― koogs, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
a little flourish before and after I find helps with that.
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
mr beanism
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)
Puzzle by Pasquale/Quixote/Don Manley in the New York Times this weekend.
― stars on 45 my destination (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 14 May 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
Just did it. It was enjoyable, pretty easy.
Finally did puzzle that won The Nation contest. Very nice. Those guys edited a book of insanely hard variety cryptics, National Puzzler's League Cryptic Crosswords, which is now out of print, but can be found on the web for free.
― stars on 45 my destination (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 14 May 2011 22:49 (fifteen years ago)