seems pretty grody to me, for no real benefit.
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
"At the United Nations, questions arose about the killing. The organization’s senior human rights official, Navi Pillay, called for more details. While noting that Bin Laden was a dangerous man, she said any operation against him should have been done legally".
The unsolvable dilemma of laws of war and international justice, in a nutshell.
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
Westphalia, so much to answer for
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)
I appreciate the cautious definition of Bin Laden as a "dangerous man".
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
i think panetta said the photos will come out eventually, which seems right, whether or not the white house officially releases them. this is one of those things i think--how can something that so many people know exists, and is wanted to be seen by so many people, stay hidden?
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
max there are a lot of famous vaginas out there too
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
or you think he’s wearing a suicide vest
It just occurred to me that, were I bin Laden, I would have booby-trapped the house.
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
The Day the Clown Cried
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
ha I was about to say "you make it sound like Kim Kardashian's sex tape"
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
ok lol
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, we've had camera phones for the better part of a decade, something will leak.
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
how can something that so many people know exists, and is wanted to be seen by so many people, stay hidden?
it has a mansion built with 7-foot privacy walls and burns all its trash
― TheDunkster (absolutely clean glasses), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
vaginas want to be free
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
brb, registering vaginaleaks.com
oh wait, no
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
Wikiginas? CuntiLeaks? SnatchSnaps?
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
This thread is usddenly making me the mental equivalent of wall-eyed to vision.
"...Kim Kardashian's sex tape."
"...something will leak."
Wha?
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:20 PM (6 minutes ago)
well there's not really a 'dilemma' afaik wrt killing someone who's unarmed and surrendering, or someone who's been captured - it's illegal. the explanation most people are giving is that it was in the 'heat of the moment' or something, which to me seems plausible and since we're never going to actually know for sure what went down, i'm fine with that, whatever
― estkella (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
i want to know more about this woman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audrey_Tomason
the "director for counterterrorism" eh? and she couldnt even get a seat at the table???
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
i had never heard of her before either.
not a real helpful wiki there
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ photo
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
like not only is the wiki empty, the sole photo is one we have all already seen
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
im saying
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
where are the conspiracy heads now
WAS THIS THE WOMAN WHO MADE THE SECRET DEAL WITH PAKISTAN
the explanation most people are giving is that it was in the 'heat of the moment'
now i'm imagining bin laden singing "i never meant to be so bad to you"
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
white house should just be hardass. press conference should have been: "he's dead. we killed him. grab some donuts on the way out. later, dudes."
that's what john wayne would have done.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailybeast/20110503/ts_dailybeast/13869_audreytomasonwhoisthemysterywomaninthesituationroomwithobama
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
― buzza, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:35 PM (36 seconds ago)
i'd probably cap him in this case too tbh
― estkella (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
i'm guessing osama's been removed from the "living person" wiki category...... or has he???
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
"yes, about osama being unarmed..."
"look, we killed him in cold blood and if there were any way to bring him back to life we would have done so and then killed him again and then brought him back to life again and then killed him again and we would have kept doing that for, like, a year. any more questions?"
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22audrey+tomason%22+site:whitehouse.gov&hl=en&prmd=ivnso&filter=0
haha, uh...
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
i mean "legalities"? pish posh. bit late for legal behaviour over there.
it's unethical to raise the dead solely for the purpose of ending their lives once again
― Mordy, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
"well there's not really a 'dilemma' afaik wrt killing someone who's unarmed and surrendering, or someone who's been captured - it's illegal".
The dilemma is between what is prescribed by the law and, for lack of a better expression, political and historical reality (or perceived necessities). It is obvious that the American one was a de facto assassination squad, but at the same time it is difficult to imagine Obama's administration acting differently.
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
i don't actually spell behavior like that. don't know what i was thinking.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
truth outs, scott's a britisher
― don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_v63oTveUEGI/SQhVLu6HJAI/AAAAAAAAHGQ/uWaZs_jz2-0/s400/lotionfun.JPG
― Captain Hyrax (Phil D.), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
― goole, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:39 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
RIGHT!?
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
an official said she worked with the National Security Council, a White House agency closely involved with the intelligence that led to bin Laden. The official intimated that the White House generally doesn't discuss personnel at any of the government's covert or intelligence agencies. Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the NSC, confirmed she worked with the agency. When asked why she had never been identified or mentioned before, Vietor responded "Well, we've never killed bin Laden before."
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
can't we all just get along and kill bin laden?
― socks & pwns may break my bwns (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
"Is that a story [the White House] wants to put out there in public? The fact that we can see her face could potentially jeopardize her career."
This strikes me as unlikely--they took the time to obscure a classified picture obliquely visible on the desk of the conference room, somebody wouldn't say "Oh, we should probably 'shop Audrey out of this"?
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
Audrey Tomason worked as Americorps*VISTA and Associate at ACCION International after Tufts. She is attending the Kennedy School's master's in public policy program and is scheduled to graduate in 2003.
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
SHE IS FROM THE FUTURE
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
skills: throwing knives, seduction, electronic entry, slavic languages
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
audrey tuomason
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
"how do you get on google?"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
I knew there were Masons in Bam's WH.
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
somebody wouldn't say "Oh, we should probably 'shop Audrey out of this"?
if her name is even audrey
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
oh shi
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
here is a clip of her introducing Noam Chomsky (!) as an undergrad at Tufts in 1997 (if its the same person), starts around 2:30 into it
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/ACrit&showFullAbstract=1
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)