who could the 35 have been...
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
it's occurring to me you could probably mint up a bunch of LORD'S RESISTANCE ARMY bumper stickers and do brisk business at the next CPAC
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
that would be some p lolzy trolling
― cop a cute abdomen (gbx), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:48 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.theresolve.org/lra-disarmament-and-northern-uganda-recovery-act-of-2009
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
btw goole that is fucking brilliant
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
haha. LORD'S RESISTANCE ARMY - FOR OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURE, maybe.
― joe, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
^^It would work, totally.
― a modest broposal (suzy), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
THINK OF THE CHILDREN would be more ambiguous IMO
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
So Dan, would your proposal ideally resemble UNIT, GI Joe, or the guys from "Predator"?
I'm think I'm down with this, only if Bill Duke gets to call the shots this time.
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
(my rationale being that it is much easier to read "FOR OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURE" as something LRA is unambiguously in favor of, whereas you can more easily go either way with "THINK OF THE CHILDREN")
xp: not gonna lie, I was imagining GI Joe
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
i watched Salt last night and they should get her to take all these guys out. she can jump really far.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha OTM
GI Joe never killed anybody! Guys from Predator were a rescue team, not assassins!
― Kerm, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
well, UNIT never killed anyone either, but that was because everything they tried to shoot was immune to bullets
except the Silurians; I guess they killed them
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
Bill Magill should be in on one of these teams, he wants to pull the trigger on somebody.
― the wages of sin is about tree fiddy (WmC), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
...anyway
re: killing unarmed bin laden
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/world/asia/04raid.html
Several experts on the rules of engagement in combat said that in a raid on a target as dangerous as Bin Laden, the Navy Seals team would be justified to open fire at the slightest commotion when they burst into a room. “If he were surrendering, or knocked out and unconscious on the ground, that would raise serious questions," said John B. Bellinger III, legal counsel at the National Security Council and State Department in the Bush administration. “But this is a guy who’s extremely dangerous,” he said. “If he’s nodding at someone in the hall, or rushing to the bookcase or you think he’s wearing a suicide vest, you’re on solid ground to kill him.” At the United Nations, questions arose about the killing. The organization’s senior human rights official, Navi Pillay, called for more details. While noting that Bin Laden was a dangerous man, she said any operation against him should have been done legally.
“If he were surrendering, or knocked out and unconscious on the ground, that would raise serious questions," said John B. Bellinger III, legal counsel at the National Security Council and State Department in the Bush administration.
“But this is a guy who’s extremely dangerous,” he said. “If he’s nodding at someone in the hall, or rushing to the bookcase or you think he’s wearing a suicide vest, you’re on solid ground to kill him.”
At the United Nations, questions arose about the killing. The organization’s senior human rights official, Navi Pillay, called for more details.
While noting that Bin Laden was a dangerous man, she said any operation against him should have been done legally.
― estkella (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
I like you max, you make me feel young again, with your fervor the newly radicalized so fresh and intact.
And I'm dead on about hipster girls, you know it. They cop so much style from lesbians, kind of like Madonna and the gays.
― thirdalternative, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
So much for the Bond villain ending. When finally faced with Cobra Commander, these guys went in itchy.
Not to necessarily make light of the situ, but pop cultural refs are the main way I process things. I'm not proud of one of my first thoughts upon hearing of the datagrab was that, "oh yeah, so these guys actually _DO_ go in looking for the briefcase aside from the bad guy. It's not just a video game thing."
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
Also, Bill Duke needs to be in more things.
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
so, next controversy: release the photos, or not? leon panetta has said they will (i think)
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
seems pretty grody to me, for no real benefit.
"At the United Nations, questions arose about the killing. The organization’s senior human rights official, Navi Pillay, called for more details. While noting that Bin Laden was a dangerous man, she said any operation against him should have been done legally".
The unsolvable dilemma of laws of war and international justice, in a nutshell.
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
Westphalia, so much to answer for
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)
I appreciate the cautious definition of Bin Laden as a "dangerous man".
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
i think panetta said the photos will come out eventually, which seems right, whether or not the white house officially releases them. this is one of those things i think--how can something that so many people know exists, and is wanted to be seen by so many people, stay hidden?
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
max there are a lot of famous vaginas out there too
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
or you think he’s wearing a suicide vest
It just occurred to me that, were I bin Laden, I would have booby-trapped the house.
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
The Day the Clown Cried
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
ha I was about to say "you make it sound like Kim Kardashian's sex tape"
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
ok lol
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, we've had camera phones for the better part of a decade, something will leak.
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
how can something that so many people know exists, and is wanted to be seen by so many people, stay hidden?
it has a mansion built with 7-foot privacy walls and burns all its trash
― TheDunkster (absolutely clean glasses), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
vaginas want to be free
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
brb, registering vaginaleaks.com
oh wait, no
― Dreaded Burrito Gang (DJP), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
Wikiginas? CuntiLeaks? SnatchSnaps?
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
This thread is usddenly making me the mental equivalent of wall-eyed to vision.
"...Kim Kardashian's sex tape."
"...something will leak."
Wha?
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
― Marco Damiani, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:20 PM (6 minutes ago)
well there's not really a 'dilemma' afaik wrt killing someone who's unarmed and surrendering, or someone who's been captured - it's illegal. the explanation most people are giving is that it was in the 'heat of the moment' or something, which to me seems plausible and since we're never going to actually know for sure what went down, i'm fine with that, whatever
― estkella (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
i want to know more about this woman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audrey_Tomason
the "director for counterterrorism" eh? and she couldnt even get a seat at the table???
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
i had never heard of her before either.
not a real helpful wiki there
― goole, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ photo
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
like not only is the wiki empty, the sole photo is one we have all already seen
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
im saying
― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
where are the conspiracy heads now
WAS THIS THE WOMAN WHO MADE THE SECRET DEAL WITH PAKISTAN
the explanation most people are giving is that it was in the 'heat of the moment'
now i'm imagining bin laden singing "i never meant to be so bad to you"
― buzza, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
white house should just be hardass. press conference should have been: "he's dead. we killed him. grab some donuts on the way out. later, dudes."
that's what john wayne would have done.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailybeast/20110503/ts_dailybeast/13869_audreytomasonwhoisthemysterywomaninthesituationroomwithobama
― Concatenated without abruption (Michael White), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
― buzza, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:35 PM (36 seconds ago)
i'd probably cap him in this case too tbh
― estkella (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
i'm guessing osama's been removed from the "living person" wiki category...... or has he???
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
"yes, about osama being unarmed..."
"look, we killed him in cold blood and if there were any way to bring him back to life we would have done so and then killed him again and then brought him back to life again and then killed him again and we would have kept doing that for, like, a year. any more questions?"
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 May 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)