Shall we anticpate the AMC series "Breaking Bad"? I think I may.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5619 of them)

the only thing I found "outlandish" about the whole underground lair, and really the whole arrangement with (and value of) Heisenberg, was the idea that they were the first/only crew to pull something like that off. Am I supposed to believe that all meth in this country comes from junkies in RVs?

xxps

rockapads, Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

The only reason the coincidence seemed like a Rube Goldberg machine is because we knew the guy who was the main catalyst. That is how things happen in real life; we just can't see it that way we don't have the god's eye view of the narrative. Was the crank head finally getting fed up and dropping the ATM machine dropped on dude's head any less of a coincidence?

rockapads, Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

x-post to some dude

it's not very rube goldbergian at all! walt's inaction allows jane to die, which affects her dad, then plane goes crashy. not that crazy. dramatic maybe, but THAT'S BECAUSE IT's FUCKING DRAMA.

everything walter does has consequences, which seems to me to be the point.

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

that was just a thing that happened, there was no actual or even perceived coincidence to the ATM thing (xpost)

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

ultimately i get that there IS some degree of logic or at least thematic coherence to this stuff, i'm just saying the overall effect strikes me as dumm and faux 'deep'

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

we don't usually have the god's eye view in this show so when something like that happens it can yank you out of it; it did me. usually the big strength of the show for me is seeing the characters working through the consequences of fucked up shit and it usually feels natural, even inevitable. the final ep of S2 you could see the writers pulling it all together which is funny when it happens on seinfeld but not so much here. that said this is one of the very best shows ever made for television so... i'll allow it

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

ultimately i get that there IS some degree of logic or at least thematic coherence to this stuff, i'm just saying the overall effect strikes me as dumm and faux 'deep'

there are parts of s2 that i dislike, or find heavy-handed, & the plane crash as visual metaphor is probably too much but i think thematically its really good & interesting & works to push the audiences awareness beyond just sorta ~whats going on~ & really helps throw into relief how selfish & self-deluded walt's thinking is in a p powerful way...

idk i think the show gets morally interesting in late s2 & i like that its trying to make the point abt the sheer magnitude of 'unintended consequences'. also i think the moment where walt kills jane is probably one of the most emotional & potent moments of the show so far imo. it was cathartic to have that dramatized into this big 'the sky is falling' thing in the story itself

dearth of the hipster (Lamp), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

plane crash is worth it for Walt's speech at the school gym in s3

Simon H. Shit (Simon H.), Thursday, 28 April 2011 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

^^ so true, I recant my criticism.

Clay, Thursday, 28 April 2011 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

w/r/t suspension of disbelief, the only thing on the show that I struggled with is the idea that Gus is so completely reliant on Walt that he has to go to these lengths to keep the lab running. Is his overhead so high that he can't go a month without supply?

Also they need to explain why Saul made such a radical decision to put his life on the line for Walt and Jesse.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 28 April 2011 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

gus is using his lab to cut mexico out of the picture, if he can't keep a steady supply going to the streets mexican dealers might muscle their way back in, think they spent quite a bit of time establishing this

businesses often have to overextend themselves in order to get to the next level so I don't think it's sloppy plotting, actually pretty realistic

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Friday, 29 April 2011 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

plane crash is worth it for Walt's speech at the school gym in s3

so awful and then also so great.

phantoms from a world gone by speak again the immortal tale: (Jenny), Friday, 29 April 2011 00:13 (fifteen years ago)

Also they need to explain why Saul made such a radical decision to put his life on the line for Walt and Jesse.

think Saul sees Walt's business as being much more lucrative for him than his usual parade of penny-ante losers, as long as it can be reliable. so he does everything he can to keep it reliable.

also he just kinda likes Walt.

my one-man band is Cut Creator AKA PhiΙ Pat (sic), Friday, 29 April 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

I thought the Gus plot was entirely plausible -- it's the cartoonish Mexican brothers that I have a problem with. I guess I shouldn't expect so much from, I dunno, satellite characters, but Jane's a satellite plot-moving character, and she was given more depth than the brothers.

Basically, without revealing much, I can say that it seems like the Mexican-Americans (including Jesse's friends, male and female) are given a lot more chance to be real humans, multifaceted people, whereas the Mexicans (including madman Tuco and the mute bell dinging uncle) are pretty one-note/monochromatic. I think that's kinda lame.

deez m'uts (La Lechera), Friday, 29 April 2011 02:42 (fifteen years ago)

I also want to stand up for old Hank, who I think is the most interesting character on the show.

deez m'uts (La Lechera), Friday, 29 April 2011 02:44 (fifteen years ago)

I thought the Mexican bros could have worked just fine if they weren't virtually identical twins who did everything methodically in ridiculous Terminator mode.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 29 April 2011 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

Including raiding the clothesline of sn innocent family.

deez m'uts (La Lechera), Friday, 29 April 2011 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

I also want to stand up for old Hank, who I think is the most interesting character on the show.

― deez m'uts (La Lechera), Friday, 29 April 2011 02:44 (2 hours ago)

He's the true protagonist of season 3, for me.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 29 April 2011 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

this is all nitpicking btw, this is maybe the best TV drama ever.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 29 April 2011 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

(nitpicking on my part)

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 29 April 2011 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

i like it 90% of the time, less so when there are "clever" conceits like the stupid fly episode
i never liked it when the wire would try to be clever either
i think i basically hate when things are too clever. just let the story be without injecting cleverness into it all the damn time.

the fly episode is not very well loved but I dug it... I did know going in that it was a budget-driven eps so maybe I was more forgiving, but the ending really stuck with me. when walt is staring at the blinking light in his bedroom ceiling you can read the scene a couple of ways - he's either realizing fly = bug = gus is bugging the lab OR fly as symbol of death and that's what's keeping him up at night, driving him nuts and making him break bad. I like the way various possible interpretations were communicated in a subtle way by a simple scene, it raised the profile of the whole episode and made me think again damn this is good stuff.

but maybe that's what you mean by too clever clever and in that case forget I said anything

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Friday, 29 April 2011 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

I also want to stand up for old Hank, who I think is the most interesting character on the show.

― deez m'uts (La Lechera), Friday, 29 April 2011 02:44 (2 hours ago)

He's the true protagonist of season 3, for me.

― Matt Armstrong, Friday, April 29, 2011 1:33 AM (9 hours ago)

i'm glad to hear he gets more interesting in s3 because at this point i feel like the guy is so close to being a Mad TV character (the horrible 'cop talk' sketches on the s2 dvd may have heavily influenced this observation, admittedly).

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Friday, 29 April 2011 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

yes, that is what i mean by clever

and Hank totally gets more interesting -- his relationships with his job/coworkers, Marie, Walter, and with himself are really complex.

deez m'uts (La Lechera), Friday, 29 April 2011 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

hank & his partner is a great relaish

johnny crunch, Friday, 29 April 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

I loved The Fly. It struck such a great balance between funny and ominous. I appreciated them turning a budget episode like that into such a pivotal one. I read the fly itself as kind of a metaphor for Walt's conscience, aka everything preventing him from enjoying any of the fruits of his labor. When he goes on the rant about where it all went wrong was the key for me.

rockapads, Friday, 29 April 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

Hank is amazing in S3, I mean he's always great and gets better and better and more sympathetic ALL the time, but I knid of needed to get a blanket to chew on out of worry for him in every second scene he appeared in by early S3

wicked Nome King, brah (sic), Friday, 29 April 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

something to be said for the shift between sympathetic and unsympathetic characters from S1 -> S3

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Friday, 29 April 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

but I knid of needed to get a blanket

vermicious

wicked Nome King, brah (sic), Friday, 29 April 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

I could never figure out how Walt's new baby added anything to the show that wasn't there already. They already had issues before the baby - financial, emotional, professional. In fact, you barely see the baby for the vast majority of the show. It seems to live exclusively in its car seat carrier when it's not simply MIA.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 29 April 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

They used it for the parallel to Jane telling Jesse to sleep on his side. Earlier in the episode they mention the same thing about the baby.

Jeff, Friday, 29 April 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

so I guess we can agree it's not bringing a whole lot to the show

can't even remember its name and/or sex tbh

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Friday, 29 April 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

Holly

phantoms from a world gone by speak again the immortal tale: (Jenny), Friday, 29 April 2011 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

The baby was also necessary for the cracking scene where Walt has to miss her birth in order to go make his deal with Gus

Number None, Friday, 29 April 2011 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

the baby has been key to what has driven Walt throughout the whole show. I'm grateful that she hasn't played much of a role outside of being the equivalent of the suitcase in Pulp Fiction.

rockapads, Friday, 29 April 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

"also he just kinda likes Walt."

You think? I am only at ep six or something, but i don't get that feeling. he's just a way of doing better business.

fucking love this show btw

Nathalie (stevienixed), Friday, 29 April 2011 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

re: Saul, sure Walt is a big client for him, but Gus is a client (or employer) too. Taking Walt's side vs. Gus was a really ballsy move that I don't understand from someone as self-centered as Saul.

But we got that scene in the Lazertag arcade out of it, so whatever.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 29 April 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

Without Bryan Cranston this show is nada mucho.

calstars, Saturday, 30 April 2011 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

* would be

calstars, Saturday, 30 April 2011 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

the biggest shock the show could deliver at this point is if he dropped dead halfway through a season and they did a bunch of episodes w/o him just to test that theory, though

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Saturday, 30 April 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

I assume at some point either him or Jesse will die. Or both of them. Or a member of his family.

Jeff, Saturday, 30 April 2011 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

maybe. i feel like since Walt's imminent death is a given they're not gonna kill off any of the other next 2 or 3 biggest characters, though, i don't know if even this show is bleak enough to leave no major character around to even mourn another.

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Saturday, 30 April 2011 00:43 (fifteen years ago)

My guess would be that skyler is going to die before walt/Jesse. Then they'll deal with walt trying to justify that.

Jeff, Saturday, 30 April 2011 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

Gus is only a removed and occasional referrer of business to Saul, right? If he is Walt's sole representation, then that is regular and lucrative business.

...as long as he can convince Walt to do business sensibly and not destroy everything he touches. Which, oops.

wicked Nome King, brah (sic), Saturday, 30 April 2011 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

yank walt and i likely don't give a shit about the show, it's tru

And thusly create the illusion of babby (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 30 April 2011 04:19 (fifteen years ago)

Saul and Pinkman become flatmates in a half-hour sitcom

wicked Nome King, brah (sic), Saturday, 30 April 2011 04:26 (fifteen years ago)

Would you have watched The Sopranos without Tony? Kind of an odd argument.

Number None, Saturday, 30 April 2011 11:01 (fifteen years ago)

I was just trying to underscore how great Cranston is. Vulnerable yet strong and willful.

I think Jeff is right about Skyler - maybe that's what we'll see at the end of this season.

calstars, Saturday, 30 April 2011 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

not destroy everything he touches.

I don't think that is in fact true. When Jesse said that then I thought: "is that some fucked up way to shove the blame of your gf's od on someone else?" Of course if it wasn't for him, he wouldn't have started deeling hard drugs and not have met that girl. I do like how the show really underlines that cause and effect thing.

Of course he ain't gonna die (from cancer). Not soon anyway.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Saturday, 30 April 2011 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

Of course Cranston is great but so are Aaron Paul, Bod Odenkirk, Giancarlo Esposito and the dude who plays Mike, Jonathan Banks.

Number None, Saturday, 30 April 2011 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

not really feeling Aaron Paul, a lot of his dialogue readings feel really stilted to me, like he has to think really hard to remember to add "yo" at the end of every sentence

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Saturday, 30 April 2011 14:46 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.