seamless gifs

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (902 of them)

View Previous Page...

damn it i see the seam now.

― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Monday, 25 April 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/ReadinginthePark.gif

― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

yeah loving those NYC ones

― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

Even the Daily Mail likes those...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1380795/Have-seen-photo-Artists-develop-amazing-cinemagraphs-stills-level.html

― not_goodwin, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

Love the taxi one.

― not_goodwin, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

I kinda want to know who "invented" these - the person behind iwdrm.tumblr or this pair. I want to credit iwdrm cos i haven't seen him/her throwing around wanky terms like cinemagraph.

― Number None, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

they're two different techniques - cinemagraphs are animating one part of a still photograph where iwdrm captures those loopable moments from films. both are grebt, this thread is the best, and that spinning arm mandala up there O_O

― herbal bert (herb albert), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, the iwdrm gifs often have one tiny part of the frame moving with everything else being static in a way it wouldn't have appeared in the film.

― Number None, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i dont think there's anything different from what iwdrm and these other people are doing besides one is using dvds of feature movies and the other is going out in the world with their dslr

also how do you "animate one part of a still photograph" and have it come out like this?

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljmk0oCdjM1qeyuguo1_500.gif

― gr8080, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

there's no way that this guy used "clever photoshop techniques" to "animate a still photograph" of this:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/ReadinginthePark.gif

― gr8080, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

Been out for years - they are called GIF's

- Steve, Nottingham UK, 26/4/2011 22:04

lol

― Some other race (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

They're really simple, I think. They're really just two layers. The background layer is a looped bit of film. The foreground is a still from the same angle, with a hole cut out over the part of the image that moves.

― secretariat on demand (Z S), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 23:57 (fifteen years ago)

^bingo

― gr8080, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

scruffy.gif = classic

― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:43 (fifteen years ago)

the iwdrm ones are often mindblowing because i can't tell how they're working - when they have multiple rhythms going on (e.g. the latest full metal jacket one), which don't really appear to be syncing up with each other, what's going on? i assume i'm just not polyrhyhthmically aware enough to figure out where they meet (if it's something besides that i'd be very interested to hear it), but that he's somehow caught that he can extract that seamless loop from multiple things going on at once is amazing to me.

― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:57 (fifteen years ago)

If there are multiple pieces looping, that just means that there are multiples "holes" in the foreground cover layer I mentioned a few posts ago.

― secretariat on demand (Z S), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:02 (fifteen years ago)

The cinemagraphs work by using GIFs, a type of picture format similar to a JPEG

― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:03 (fifteen years ago)

When I get back from Denver I'm going to make one of multiple me's walking around my living room. Or maybe cats.

― secretariat on demand (Z S), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

iwdrm and 'cinemagraphs' are really corny, sorry http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9627011/userArmsCrossed.gif

― br8080 (dayo), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

ugh, he made one of project runway gretchen. :(

― reggaeton for the painfully alone (polyphonic), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lk65utXb4P1qglg3no1_500.gif

― nate woolls, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 08:21 (fifteen years ago)

^ real talk

― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 09:22 (fifteen years ago)

Not impressed at all totally pointless.
- Dave Pittam, Droitwich worcs, 27/4/2011 10:13

For once the comments section of the DM reads less intelligent that the article itself

― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:35 (fifteen years ago)

well, maybe not for once

― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:36 (fifteen years ago)

wow last gif is dope cause the blue matches the color of ilx's text

― gr8080, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:19 (fifteen years ago)

ilx text fly @ u face

― br8080 (dayo), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:29 (fifteen years ago)

iwdrm and 'cinemagraphs' are really corny, sorry

I don't mind iwdrm but yea those cinemagraphs are horrid faux-tasteful gee-whiz bullshit

― don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

yes

― caek, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 13:30 (fifteen years ago)

haha in that DM article,

In most cases she shoots the photos and Mr Burg adds on motion-graphics over several hours of painstaking editing.
The more complex ones take an entire day to pull together.

and then...

...you get to experience what a video has to offer without the time commitment a video requires.’

― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 14:16 (fifteen years ago)

anyway, more seamless gifs please

― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkbf0838EV1qgbqmio1_400.gif

― nate woolls, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.fullhalloween.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/joker_applauds.gif

― willem, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.hazenworld.com/smokingmonkey.gif

― willem, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

illblu.gif up there, nate

― nultybutnice (whatever), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

http://i54.tinypic.com/29gkal5.gif

― StanM, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://i51.tinypic.com/2s0xwz4.gif

― StanM, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://i55.tinypic.com/116j4oi.gif

― StanM, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

sexy radial engine

http://i53.tinypic.com/2ahe0ww.gif

― StanM, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

illblu.gif up there, nate

I don't know what this means.

― nate woolls, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, was a reference to gr8080 mentioning the blue, and i thought it was a good gif, and so there's the ill blu thread Eww: It's the Ill Blu Hype Thread

― nultybutnice (whatever), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

Many of these seamless gifs aren't seamless.
Joker one for starters.

― not_goodwin, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/mbrWO.gif

― StanM, Thursday, 28 April 2011 13:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/Tesseract.gif

― StanM, Thursday, 28 April 2011 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgh2776y6W1qasaqoo1_500.gif

Shake it, Thom.

― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 28 April 2011 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkglxfySmI1qg39ewo1_500.gif

― nate woolls, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 08:56 (fifteen years ago)