Mission: Impossible

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (889 of them)
i really liked mi2 the first time i saw it and then i revisited it and wondered what the hell i was thinking the first time

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:21 (twenty years ago)

You stopped loving doves filmed in slow motion.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:22 (twenty years ago)

"'real' actors playing supervillains doesn't usually pan out,"

too true - cf. Malkovich, Dennis Hopper, tons of others.

(exception = Pacino in Dick Tracy!)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:24 (twenty years ago)

what about HANS GRUBER

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:24 (twenty years ago)

or even HANS GRUBER'S BROTHER

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:26 (twenty years ago)

gene hackman as Luthor?

Terence Stamp?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:27 (twenty years ago)

yaeh, real actors play FUNNY supervillains more successfully... no one shivered at Big Boy Caprice did they? Hackman as Luthor, David Warner in Time Bandits, etc.

I liked Malkovich in that Eastwood pic.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:28 (twenty years ago)

Hackman bugs me, in general.

Kneel Before Zod = teh classic, of course.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)

i'd say real actors as villains works out as much as it doesn't work out

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)

hackman was a BRILLIANT luthor.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)

But i will agree that "realistic"-type acting does not tend to go all that well in the exaggerated world of Bond/superheroes, etc.

for example, (ignoring the plot) Timothy Dalton & Robert Davi in License to Kill.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)

Warner's hilarious in Time Bandits. not bad in Tron either. (not sure what qualifies him as a "real" actor - did he do Hamlet or something?)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:30 (twenty years ago)

oh waitamin, what about Batman Begins & Xmen(1/2)?

xpost Warner is classically trained, right? Also did outstanding voicework in Baldur's Gate 2 as the villain.

also, Peter Cushing in SW

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:31 (twenty years ago)

remembered another pointless mid-90s villain turn - Irons in Die Hard 3.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:31 (twenty years ago)

okay I'm comin around to s1ocki's POV

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:32 (twenty years ago)

yes, Warner played Hamlet with the RSC. I saw him do Undershaft in Major Barbara on Broadway, two days after 9/11.

(OK, how about solid actors who get to use more than 5% of their chops playing big baddies? I think Brandauer and Malkovich qualify here.)

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:37 (twenty years ago)

warner in time after time

RJG (RJG), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:39 (twenty years ago)

in fact, I enjoyed the first two X-flicks b/c they had such strong actors in the 3 leads(2 were shakespearean britishes and one did show tunes)

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:46 (twenty years ago)

What actress could pull off a bond/supervillian?

we can pretty much rule out sharon stone.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:47 (twenty years ago)

gloria stuart?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:48 (twenty years ago)

what's her face from that movie where she was naked a bunch. The Last Seduction. I had big crush on her, but she was pretty evil in that movie.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)

Sigourney could do it (I'm surprised she hasn't already)

X-Men movies are great, kingfish otm for why too. (next one's gonna BLOOOOOOWWWWWW)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:54 (twenty years ago)

Why didn't Dr. Evil kill off the very concept of the post-1967 supervillain?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Alice Krige?

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:01 (twenty years ago)

Angelica Huston

remy (x Jeremy), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:02 (twenty years ago)

were there really that many supervillains pre-1967?

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:03 (twenty years ago)

uhh hitler?!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:04 (twenty years ago)

were there really that many supervillains pre-1967?

Ming the Merciless
all the bond books were written in the 50s, etc

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:15 (twenty years ago)

Timothy Dalton & Robert Davi in License to Kill

??? That's the best Bond movie by fucking miles. The "realistic"-not-really acting served the "realistic"-not-really plot perfectly. Wayne Newton as televangelist providing cover for Davi drug op? GREAT.

adam (adam), Friday, 5 May 2006 17:22 (twenty years ago)

I was using the last non-anachronistic Bond movie (ie You Only Live Twice) for my supervillain cutoff date (plus Donald Pleasence was the best Blofeld).

A character basically hissing "I'm evil" can usu be taken about as seriously as that Colbert critic announcing "I'm a funny guy..."

Next MI: Cruise vs Montalban as Khan. "You will be ber-ried a-li-ive..."

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2006 18:33 (twenty years ago)

Khan of course being the greatest ST villain(even better than Q, who quickly shed that identity).

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 5 May 2006 18:36 (twenty years ago)

Is ST Q related to JB Q? PRED SHIPS FOR EVERYONE!

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 5 May 2006 18:39 (twenty years ago)

saw this today at a matinee.

some good, some bad, some retarded plot twists, and some simon pegg(who's good in his two scenes as fumbly britishes computer guy)

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 7 May 2006 02:23 (twenty years ago)

i liked this one better than the other two movies, but of coursethat's not saying much. the vatican city part is really emtertaining, though.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 7 May 2006 02:51 (twenty years ago)

eNtertaining, even.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 7 May 2006 02:51 (twenty years ago)

what really bugs me is that these movies are pretty much ethan hunt 007 movies... mission impossible is supposed to be about a cool TEAM!!

otm! the only scene in this movie that actually felt like "mission impossible" was the aforementioned vatican city sequence, which happened to be the most entertaining part of the movie.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 7 May 2006 02:55 (twenty years ago)

m:i 2 sucked so much ass.

the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Sunday, 7 May 2006 18:02 (twenty years ago)

As bad as MI2 might have been, it was still loads better than every Bond movie post-Goldeneye.

many xposts - Irons is great in Die Hard With A Vengeance!

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 7 May 2006 18:11 (twenty years ago)

Someone really needs to make a real Mission: Impossible movie, with a non-descript team of agents doing ruthless shit under the radar, etc.

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 7 May 2006 23:50 (twenty years ago)

MI2 made me think everyone had false faces

Onimo (GerryNemo), Sunday, 7 May 2006 23:56 (twenty years ago)

a non-descript team of agents doing ruthless shit under the radar, etc.

well, the thing is, i don't think you need them to be all that non-descript e.g. Ving Rhames is great in his role, which is admittedly just being a Ving Rhames-type incarnated as an operative. There's plenty of value in a well-contructed team of folks doing something; like a semi-crazy helicopter pilot, a tough mechanic/driver/demolitions expert, a smooth-talkin' chameleon/covert ops type, and a cigar-chomping leader who loves it when a plan comes together.

For instance.

kingfish doesn't live here anymore (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 8 May 2006 00:03 (twenty years ago)

Crazeh suckuh, talks to plants!

Joe (Joe), Monday, 8 May 2006 01:56 (twenty years ago)

i liked this film a lot

gear (gear), Monday, 8 May 2006 02:01 (twenty years ago)

As did I. Well maybe not a lot. But some. Ving Rhames rulez. The wife pissed me off.

uptoeleven (uptoeleven), Monday, 8 May 2006 04:17 (twenty years ago)

this was a lot more entertaining than i expected. philip seymore hoffman was scary! and they gave ving rhames actual dialogue! that really bugged me about the first two movies, why even get the dude if he's just gonna stand around in shades the whole time. tom cruise was minimally annoying too. laurence fishburn was dope~!~~~

INSANE CLOWN FOSSE (Adrian Langston), Monday, 8 May 2006 07:09 (twenty years ago)

coolness, i'm sold.

the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Monday, 8 May 2006 07:25 (twenty years ago)

I never knew this til recently but apparently Robert Towne was the screenwriter for the first one...which explains why the dialogue is actually pretty slick. Not that MI was Chinatown obv but I think its a pretty great movie on the whole.

Actually looking at IMDB now it appears he was involved in all three. Still the second one was pretty awful.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 8 May 2006 07:52 (twenty years ago)

This page is the top Google result for "a wee bit of tit".

Alba (Alba), Monday, 8 May 2006 08:54 (twenty years ago)

kudos to rjg.

the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Monday, 8 May 2006 08:57 (twenty years ago)

haha

RJG (RJG), Monday, 8 May 2006 09:06 (twenty years ago)

i think having sat through part 1 with ever increasing disbelief that _this is the plot_ i could only really ever see myself sitting down to watch part 2 in a atwell_pants fan supercut tbh

tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 August 2025 07:20 (ten months ago)

theres a lot of talk about what next presuming cruise cant do forever and what is needed imo is a ten part series about sean harris breaking out and starting his next criminal superclub from scratch

the best part of this universe, and no more close ups of the MI crew trying to act, in particular pegg who is better than good in his lane but utterly wet and wretched when called upon to be emotionalbenji.gif

tuah dé danann (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 August 2025 07:24 (ten months ago)

I haven’t watched this yet but I remember thinking how terrible and tedious part 1 was…

AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 21 August 2025 10:34 (ten months ago)

i really loved part one, especially on revisit. still, haven’t heard anything about final reckoning that’s made me rush to see it. someday

ivy., Thursday, 21 August 2025 12:16 (ten months ago)

Sic and VG OTM

I could not in good conscience advise anyone to this see this movie without a bullet list of considerations

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 21 August 2025 12:54 (ten months ago)

Like, there is 60-75 minutes of cool shit in there! But then there’s the wasteland of the rest

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 21 August 2025 12:56 (ten months ago)

If Final Reckoning accomplishes anything, it makes Dead Reckoning seem a little better by comparison

Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 21 August 2025 13:00 (ten months ago)

huh i thought final reckoning rocked. submarine behring strait and prop plane chase were two of the best set pieces of the series. rolf saxon and his wife were great

i also found the suggestion that after the film ends ethan is going to fuse his brain with the entity and become an omnipotent benevolent god that rules the world to be a hilariously pure expression of cruise’s megalomania

flopson, Thursday, 21 August 2025 14:28 (ten months ago)

making half the movie a congratulatory victory lap celebrating and revisiting selected events from the entire series was a bit much

we have a series that does that with regularity: Fast & Furious

slowly imploding (mh), Thursday, 21 August 2025 14:51 (ten months ago)

xp it's also a fine endpoint of the Ethan Hunt character trajectory of: good spy in a bit over his head -> world's best spy -> superhero -> literal messiah who literally comes back from the dead.

lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:13 (ten months ago)

i enjoyed the flashbacks as mcquarrie’s totalitarian desire to rationalize the films before he took over and bring them under his control. but i can’t forgive him for explaining the (hilariously never explained) rabbit’s foot macguffin from iii and shoehorning it into the entity

(feels weird to use spoiler hiders in these movies where the plot is so stupid)

flopson, Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:15 (ten months ago)

set pieces worked great for me but connective tissue was way below standard for the series.

ryan, Thursday, 21 August 2025 16:10 (ten months ago)

Also someone please cast Hayley Atwell in more stuff my god

ryan, Thursday, 21 August 2025 16:11 (ten months ago)

sic otm

this was like the zombified corpses of like, three half-movies stitched together and animated with lightning jolts or whatever
but hey look at our shiny SET PIECES you guys (just dont look at literally anything else like plot, story, dialog (definitely noy dialog) or character)

literally held together w narration (! SO MUCH NARRATION)
flashbacks (at least 50% flashbacks)
and at some points dialogue is even adr’d over actors standing in shadow (esai morales for example) because they clearly didnt have a working script and were just whatevering their way through this massive budget movie wasting a thousand people’s time & good effort because those people thought they were making a movie and not “finding” the story while they were shooting/editing etc

this franchise has always been dumb fun but never so clearly, actually cravenly shitty (imo)

like just scooping out this cobbled together expensive garbage and throwing it on our plates because we the stupid sheeple will pay to see it based on good will that was genuinley earned and now completely wasted

to pull these run and gun b-movie dodges when they have all the fucking money in the world is kind if shameful to me?

cheap movies do these things because they cant AFFORD to do more

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 August 2025 18:18 (ten months ago)

I didn't like the last one, and literally couldn't muster the energy to see this one. Like, I want to say three times I was prepared to see it but at the last minute just kind of noped out. And it's not even that long! Just seemed ... exhausting. Even the trailer made me tired.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 August 2025 18:35 (ten months ago)

Did they ever figure out who had the key?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 August 2025 22:59 (ten months ago)

i hate that key

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:42 (ten months ago)

but hey look at our shiny SET PIECES you guys (just dont look at literally anything else like plot, story, dialog (definitely noy dialog) or character)

i didn’t find it exceptionally bad itr relative to the other recent movies in the series tbh

some parts of the plot/story that were enjoyable:

- set up to the behring strait sequence had some good iterations of the classic MI scene where ethan explains his plan to an incredulous audience. “so how are they supposed to know which random 4 square foot circle of ice to cut and collect your near-death hypothermic body from, out of the entire sea?” “by making an educated guess”
- ethan’s in the decompression chamber responding in the most asexual way possible to hayley atwell’s embraces
- showing up at rolf saxon’s house but the russians beat them to it was tense and suspenseful
- the subplot with angela basset and nick offerman actually successfully threw me on some red herrings (i thought offerman was compromised) and succeeded in having some decent jarring plot twists. i love basset so much in this role

flopson, Friday, 22 August 2025 13:29 (ten months ago)

one thing i could see being annoying about final reckoning is it relies extremely strongly on the assumption that the audience an emotional connection to the series and characters. but i do (lol) so a lot of that worked

flopson, Friday, 22 August 2025 13:35 (ten months ago)

Just struck me how funny it would have been if Tom Cruise's character had died heroically in each installment, but then showed up again in the next with no explanation.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 22 August 2025 13:54 (ten months ago)

It IS Paramount, go full Kenny-in-South-Park.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 22 August 2025 14:10 (ten months ago)

Mission Impossibly Long and Poor.

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Friday, 22 August 2025 19:07 (ten months ago)

Shea Wigham lookin' like a velociraptor.

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Friday, 22 August 2025 19:09 (ten months ago)

This shit is stupid. They are all sitting around talking bout The Thing and what is going to Happen with The Thing and what they will do or need to do because what if AI but oh no. And the first half an hour was basically a Clip Show!

How did they get so many good actors to sign up for this shit. Travis Trammell, Nick Offerman, Mark Gatiss, Hannah Waddingham, I am disappoint. Stop associating with this scientologist POS.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 23 August 2025 02:37 (ten months ago)

(I am not actively watching it. My bf has a terrible habit of finding THE WORST movies and watching them on weekends, like sub-5 star shit).

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 23 August 2025 02:38 (ten months ago)

I still love 4-6 but I really don't think I'm gonna watch this one.

Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Saturday, 23 August 2025 03:05 (ten months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.