Audrey Hepburn or Katherine Hepburn?

Speaking of wrong, phuck AMC for putting commercial breaks into their movies thus spoiling my enjoyment of Sabrina. I used to wuv AMC, but now they are bar-stards.

weird question i know but i'm just curious for some reason.

xpost

Maybe. A really sexy 12-year-old boy, though.

"don't say anything, hilary. just... go."

my grandfather gave me a bio of her to read - kate remembered. i started but then got sidetracked, but even the first few pages were more entertaining than most audrey hepburn movies.

http://delirium.lejournal.free.fr/Katharine_Hepburn1.jpg

I do prefer Audrey but her character in breakfast at tiffany’s did my head in, no guy would put up with that.

Katherine wins... just

You mean dud or Dutch? ;-) I do know that she could speak Dutch quite well. I think her granny made sure she continued using the language so she didn't forget it. I think she's so lovely. Very ethereal. Like a fragile porcelain angel. But not really sexy. If I remember correctly she said she was so skinny because of the war: the atrocities made her feel guilty of eating (or something along those lines). :-(

it's very telling that so many people prefer audrey.

Very ethereal. Like a fragile porcelain angel

if i wanted one of those, i'd buy it off the home shopping network.

Katherine - knockout ihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:KH_40s-10.jpg and better actress. Admired for her confidence
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/36/Katharinehepburn1.jpg
..which got annoying with old age.

Still, Kate.

Audrey wears me down if I see too much of her. Although I like her more in the abstract.

College-Aged Female Finds Unlikely Kindred Spirit In Audrey Hepburn

Catching up, catching up.

I've been listening to the Julie Ruin's Run Fast in the car for a couple of days. My favourite song is "Lookout"--found this video. Could do without the oversized lyrics blocking out all the images.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4id-3mw2hsI

The new doc is not good.

in fact, it is absolutely terrible

I liked it a lot.

Pretty sure I just watched my first-ever Audrey this week (The Children's Hour). Probably not the best intro to her allure but she was quite good in it.

re Audrey - Sabrina, Funny Face, Green Mansions, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, The Children’s Hour, Charade - she was great in all of them

Roman Holiday, My Fair Lady, and Wait Until Dark are my favorite performances of hers

19 years later, still so embarrassed that i got kate’s name wrong in the thread title

Katharine has the more impressive career by far.

Nothing in common, these two.

I know it's fish in a barrel to talk about gender relations in a lot of these old movies but Astaire in "Funny Face" singing that song that's like "girl you look grotesque but I'd still hit it" to Audrey Hepburn really is insane.

Recommend Paris When It Sizzles, a metacomedy featuring Hepburn and William Holden, the latter being a frustrated writer working on a terrible caper film called The Girl Who Stole The Eiffel Tower. They have Sinatra come in just to sing the theme tune (the girl who stole the Eiffel tower/she also stole my heart).

without signing off on any content as such, if you cant watch a 1937 or whatever movie for what it is then i think we might consider whether the warning sticker should be placed on the viewer instead of the dvd case

What was happening in the 60s to explain all these gorblimey cockney knees ups in musicals: My Fair Lady, Mary Poppins, Half a Sixpence, Oliver? There's probably others too.

Britain hugely in fashion but the audience for this type of thing too square for British Invasion or movies with Michael Caine having sex so this was the triangulation?

darra I can do that and also still laugh at that moment, actually

i didnt doubt it!

What was happening in the 60s to explain all these gorblimey cockney knees ups in musicals: My Fair Lady, Mary Poppins, Half a Sixpence, Oliver?

Big long post follows (apologies as only faintly relevant to Audrey).

Ans = I think three things colliding: two directly related (kitchen sink meets a boom-time for musicals), one less (the beatles: i’ll explain in a moment)

Kitchen Sink was a movement centred on “authentic" downbeat urban topics expressed in “authentic" non-posh accents, which was on the move from the page and the stage to the UK screen, and from the north of England to London. Its politics was an uneasy — generally fairly gloomy — exploration of the nature and limits of class-bound cultural aspiration; its central energy was a generation of actors and writers very committed to using and depicting their own experience. For years before the 50s it that seemed like John Laurie was seemingly the only person in British film encouraged to “be himself” on celluloid, and every screen cockney was a posh kid badly faking it. Now you could make your birth identity a selling point for employment (poor old Robert Lindsay, born and raised in Derbyshire, has made woebegone complaint about not getting the memo… ): anyway London has a rich theatrical tradition among all classes, and the new settlement of course included 1 x fvckton of london-born actors and artistes, hungry to experiment with possibility, obvious or otherwise

The boomtime for musicals, in Broadway and Hollywood as well as the West End, meant that the industry was just wildly trawling through all past endeavour, looking for quirky IPs to grab up and revive: hence My Fair Lady (1956, from Shaw’s 1913 Pygmalion), Mary Poppins (1964, from a sequence of children’s books about this character, striating in 1934), Half a Sixpence (1963, from H.G.Wells’s first and autobiographical 1905 novel Kipps), Oliver! (1968, from 1838’s Oliver Twist) and more. All of the originals are also studies in cross-class encounter, though taken from across a full century, the myths and possibilities of this are very differently grasped and deployed, especially when jammed into the respective US and UK class-and-culture battles of the 1950s and 60s. My Fair Lady is I think the primary generator — it was a huge hit on stage and screen, and survived the controversial casting of Audrey H (as a well known face) in place of Julie Andrews (established the role , beloved, able to sing; got Poppins instead so didn’t miss out). Poppins is very much cockneyed up, probably as a consequence of MFL’s success: the Dick Van Dyke role is a composite of more than one character in the books, and even so the role is expanded. Half a Sixpence was written for Tommy Steele as he transitioned from top pop skiffler to the old-school vaudeville mainstream. Oliver! was the brainchild of Stepney-born Lionel Bart, whose parents were Jewish refugees from Galicia and who had also crossed paths with Steele.

There’s a solid crosspoint for these two streams, semi-forgotten now but important at the time: a 1960 production called Fings Ain’t What they Used T’Be, worked up by (of course) Joan Littlewood at the Stratford East Theatre Royal, semi-earnestly about cockney gangs and prostitutes and corrupt policemen, a huge hit that transferred to the actual-real west end and also a best-selling OST LP. Music by Lionel Bart: Max Bygraves (for it is he) put a (censured) version of the title hit into the charts, but the combined casts are just a who’s-who host of soon-to-be-beloved figures on-stage and vinyl, among them Barbara Windsor, Yootha Joyce, George Sewell, Alfie Bass, Adam Faith, Sid James, Alfred Marks, and even (lord luvaduck) Sean Connery…

As for the third, well, the Beatles are (a) why Kitchen Sink when it landed in London bedded in so weird, I suspect, because their very unexpected global success threw out all the rules abt what worked in the industry and what was wanted (bcz no one in charge the fvck knew anything anymore), and also the rules about the cultural aspirations of those with non-posh backgrounds: the authenticity of the working-class voice became a kind of substrate surrealism swimming in and out of the theatrical and musical past. And (b) as Daniel says, they made “English accents” a hip and sexy idea in the industry at large, and of course in America especially, cockney was just so much handily available scouse…

censored not censured

also 1956 is the date of my fair lady on stage: the film is 1964

GBS, HG Wells and Dickens were certainly interesting choices for musicals!

i raise you chitty chitty bang bang, dr dolittle and the von trapps

The available clips of Audrey H singing Eliza suggest that she'd have been fine, but this was still very much not how it worked in Hollywood musicals

i found this quote (via quora) from http://www.julieandrewsonline.com/news/1960_news/maccalls_1966.html:

Did you do any special studying before you tackled Eliza?

JA: I ran the original movie with Wendy Hiller* over and over again and bawled every time. I studied cockney with an American professor of phonetics – here I was English, learning cockney from an American! – but I'm not very good at accents. Most of the work, I frankly confess, happened during performances – I didn't know what I was doing until about three months after we opened. Even with all of Moss Hart's help, I had to learn onstage, so to speak, and it's the best way to learn – if you can get away with it!

*(viz PYGMALION, 1938, in which hiller, born cheshire, was apparently first person to say "bloody" in a british film: "not bloody likely!")

mr doolittle in that version is an absolute marvel, disgusting

The available clips of Audrey H singing Eliza suggest that she'd have been fine, but this was still very much not how it worked in Hollywood musicals

― emishi sun hack (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 2 January 2024 12:58 (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

It's worth pointing out too that Jeremy Brett was apparently rather a good singer but they decided not to use his voice and so ruined the best song in the film by shooting him wandering around in the middle distance so you couldn't see his lips move.

Audrey is at her best and worst in Charade, on Amazon now and one of my comfort movies.

Oof -- scanning the thread spoiled it a bit to find out they were actually related, but only distantly. I rather liked the possibility they were identical twins but were in a real life Parent Trap situation.

Anyways, Kate Mulgrew (and Dana Carvey) are always shoe-ins for a Kathere-inactor but who could credibly be Audrey?

Because it's not Jennifer Love Hewitt!
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/021143_1601fe32acb64d36834548c7b7a89077.jpg/v1/crop/x_295,y_217,w_1719,h_2322/fill/w_388,h_688,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/heplovex.jpg

Tavi Gevinson?

Ariana Grande imo

chan marshall could have summoned the vibe at one time

they tried with Audrey Tatou but it never really took

It's curious how Audrey Hepburn suggests a shorter actress when she actually stood 5'7". Ariana Grande is 5'1" and Tavi Gevinson 5 feet even.

Yes I noticed she was pretty tall in My Fair Lady.

tavi gevinson is a horrible actress, based on the one half season of revived gossip girl I attempted to watch. that disqualifies her completely

but _does it_?

yes

deems was having a chuckle.

the fans of a big movie star have such a powerful attachment to their idol that it requires exceptional acting ability to convincingly impersonate them. it doesn't matter how much or little acting ability the movie star may have had.