Rolling UK Economy Into The Shitbin Thread

Timing nothing. We bought when we got fed up with paying crappy landlords tons of cash for shitty housing. We had no idea what would happen and cared even less. The worse that could have happened is that we went back to renting.

Timing everything, even if you weren't aware of it! The worse that could have happened is that you ended up in horror negative equity or had yr home reposessed and the end of yr credit rating forever.

Ahh, you guys worry too much. Plenty of people (no, scratch that, just about everybody I know who bought around that time) went into negative equity. They didn't die, or get their houses repossessed or have their credit rating nuked. They sat tight and now are sitting on houses worth, as laxalt implied, about 15/20 times what they earn. With tiny mortgages. They did better than we did in the long run.

They sat tight and now are sitting on houses worth, as laxalt implied, about 15/20 times what they earn

Think about the implications of this sentence

Don't patronise me.

Again.

No,actually, you can. I sound like an asshole. Forgive me, I'm having a bad day for completely unrelated reasons! And I always end up taking it out on laxalt!

http://realonomics.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/chill-pill.jpg

Thanks, I need 2.

a £200m fund to buy unsold new homes and rent them to social tenants
So if you can't sell your overpriced house, don't worry -- the government will buy it! This is a good idea how?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7399340.stm

Don't think they are going to buy *your* house, its new houses only to keep builders and developers afloat and to continue building all the new houses that will also be unsold

Shared Ownership is an incredible ripoff, the govt really shouldn't be pushing this kind of thing...especially now

Shared ownership is a way of forcing people to long term save. So that this equity can be released back to pay for care once decrepit. Bricks and mortar are magic like that.

Shared equity means the buyer gets 50% the profit. In a rising market this means other houses are actually getting further away from them

Shared equity means the buyer gets 100% the losses. In a falling market the buyers equity is wiped out before the govt lose their share

oh and guess who is responsible for 100% the maintenance?

oops ive just noticed the actual figure here

a £200m fund to buy unsold new homes

how many houses do they think this will actually buy?

more tomorrow than today

Are they finally beginning to admit to it now? Did Healey or even Philip Snowdon actually say anything like that? (Esp when you consider the last 60 years included rationing of food!)

Motive: Is it

a) Breaking ranks
b) Preparing us for a series of 'rescue packages' of some kind

LOL HBOS

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/fds/hi/business/market_data/chart?style=bbc-big_thick-line&ins=1.E:HBOS&from=2008-09-12%2015:27:00&to=2008-09-15%2015:30:00&timeoffset=0&filter=weekend&filter=markettime(07:00,15:30)&src=intraday&plot=value&fixedxaxis=on

Uh, please don't LOL at my bank. Am I fuX0red?

I've never known trade as bad as this. It's worse than the '80's up here.

you are fine as long as you don't have more that £35,000 in savings and even then the government ended up guaranteeing all deposits when Northern Rock went titsup.

Oh, that's share price, not the bank actually falling apart or anything. I hope? What happens to your savings (ha ha, they just gave me an overdraft... oh wait, my paycheck just went in.) in the UK if your bank fails? There isn't an FDIC or whatever over here, is there?

x-post OK, phew.

Best comment I've heard so far, 'I'm keeping my money in my mattress, at least I know it'll be there in the spring'.

RBOS owns my US bank... let me know when I should be worried.

Strange. It's like I've posted here before.

Never mind, it was just a passing sensation.

Best comment I've heard so far, 'I'm keeping my money in my mattress, at least I know it'll be there in the spring'.

― Billy Dods, Tuesday, September 16, 2008 7:00 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

not where i live.

you used to be able to kick a ball in the street.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7620483.stm

RBOS != HBOS.

Royal (have Scotland actually had royalty since the Glorious Revolution?) vs. Halifax/Bank of Scotland.

(I have never understood why there were two. I can only assume it's some devious Sassenach plot.)

yes, they are different in that HBOS is on the maelstrom's cusp while RBOS is only heading in its general direction

FSA have apparently banned short trading on shares in banks and insurers. Classic shutting stable door after horse has bolted scenario.

As I said on the other thread: "Wouldn't a ban on short selling allow an overvalued stock to remain so for longer? So once investors decide to bail there's pretty much the same effect, especially in a climate of complete panic."

It just removes some liquidity from the market, which might restrict some of the herd instinct. However if people want to go short there wil still be ways for people to do it and that sentiment will feed back into the market.

Also it was hilarious to watch the mid-market Tory tabloids going "YES! ABOUT TIME TOO!" Lol Tory supporters not understanding modern Conservatism at all.

i think they all have been to some extent (read recently that Derbyshire Building Society have a high % of non-prime, and they're a mutual, with supposedly some sense!)

― laxalt, Monday, 18 February 2008 10:38 (7 months ago) Permalink

wonder whatever happened to them!

lol bradford and bingley

Is that all the demutualizeds gone now? Not a single one left?

Any of the mutuals vulnerable? I think Britannia and then Scarboro

So then, how does it feel to be a share holder ina bunch of clapped out banks?

Great, can I sell my shares immediately?

When the tories get back in they will be able to pull the scam of selling us things we already own again. Tell Sid he can fuck off.

^ and then using the proceeds to cut tax rates for the rich

Tories remarkably silent this week.

I think Cameron is hoping for doing an atlee from behind brown's churchill, except that atlee had ministries and plans.

Tories remarkably silent this week.

Biding their time until PMQs this afternoon.

Nah, it was all softball

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2008/oct/08/pmqs.gordonbrown

You know how Gordon Brown totally disappeared during the build-up to the Iraq war, and tacitly signalled his support, stumped up the money, but otherwise kept totally out of the headlines? That's exactly what Cameron's doing now.

except he has to stand up every week and raise the issues of the day, so it doesn't work so well.

Nah, it was all softball

Ha! I didn't realise the time - I've been on a mercy dash to Watford Gap and have lost the morning.

And now we wait.