yeah that character is a problem. feel like s1ocki pointed that out at some point, maybe in this thread?
― horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw theres some real glass houses stuff to the psychoanalysis of wire fans, as if fans of a show abt hypermasculine mafia archetypes wouldnt have its own problematic fandom
but i guess the wire has the added OOOH RACE thing to throw in there so theres that
― deej, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
i do enjoy watching tv shows with more than one nonwhite character in them, full disclosure
― horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:11 (fifteen years ago)
"(one of the weirder exceptions here btw would be what's-his-name the criminal lawyer, who is an EVIL JEW WHO ONLY CARES ABOUT MONEY)"
I love that EVIL JEW.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:11 (fifteen years ago)
oh, yeah, that's why "exclusive" is there. almost everyone in the wire, even someone like landsman who at first is set up as evil, cares about other people and about society and stuff. it's just that they are also looking out for themselves, and the combined weight of that is what's so hard to tug against.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:05 (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
this is really banal shit tho, 'ppl who aren't entirely bad do bad things'
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
well it wasn't his whole point, he was just explaining why you didn't really catch him in a contradiction
― horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
they aren't strict contradictions but the subtraction leaves only that rather meagre notion
it's basically true to simon's worldview tho
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
the point isn't that people do bad things, or that people sometimes don't care about other people, it's that the cumulative not-caring-about-other-people of a whole bunch of people over time creates systems and situations that are really difficult to turn around. like the wire is constantly making the "this person is acting as is basically required of him for the preservation of his job, and look how destructive it is, but look how difficult it would be for him to act differently" point about all kinds of different people with all kinds of different jobs, and the GIANT DICKENS/ZOLA SCOPE that can sometimes make the show seem shallow or didactic or less deep than the presumably-more-shakespearean sopranos is necessary to get the perspective the show needs to figure out how these people's jobs got this way.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)
(even though there is plenty of shakespearean stuff in the wire, like all that stringer/avon stuff above.)
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
i love tv that is about people on their jobs. i guess the sopranos is about that, too.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
i love the part where he comes down to the police station to do something EVIL, i forget what, and says to landsman or someone "YOU KNOW YOU DRAGGED ME OUT OF SEDER"
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:24 (fifteen years ago)
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:20 (5 minutes ago)
this all true but it's p fucking limited stuff, there's a reason kids read dickens and nobody outside of france/college reads zola
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
if i could just establish that all wire detractors have no use for dickens maybe i could relax and stop reading this thread
― horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
also, you're p fucking limited stuff
― horseshoe, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
haha that's p good for the relentlessly secondrate horseshoe xox
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
this thread is either the best or worst such opposition on ilx cuz most ppl like both shows, i liked the wire a lot
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
both shows take place in the mad men universe, god willing.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
a show abt hypermasculine mafia archetypes wouldnt have its own problematic fandom
this is wrong. Sopranos is as much about the women as it is the men. which you cannot say about the Wire, which is even MORE invested in hypermasculine archetypes than the Sopranos is.
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
im not 'wrong' shakey, its obv commendable / important that sopranos is about women (& fyi wire totally has female characters playing important significant roles too?) but that doesnt mean its not also about male mafia archetypes! i mean we're already talking abt ridic strawpeople who apparently only like the wire bcuz they get off on xyz so why isnt it conceivable that, if i accept those strawppl exist, they might also exist for sopranos?
youre blinded by partisanship here
― deej, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)
which is even MORE invested in hypermasculine archetypes than the Sopranos is.
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:53 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark
like how are u even measuring this
― deej, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
by the yardstick that all the major characters in the Wire are male and all the female characters are, for the most part, terribly written and one-dimensional
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
i dont understand how that is a measurement of 'hypermasculine archetypes' -- isnt that a measurement of 'multi dimensional female characters'? but w/e, im arguing with shakey mo, time for a break
― deej, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
the men: hard-drinkin, hard-livin detectives, young black thugs, old hardassed corrupt politicians/administrators, blue collar Joe Luncpails etc
the women: lesbians (only one of which really has a good arc/fully fleshed out character), that terrible bird lady politician, the pixie-ish redhead lawyer with a heart of gold
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)
and then there's Namond's mom, who is just a monster, but hardly on the multi-dimensional level of Livia
saying your idea of "oh noes our american cities" being what resonates, actually probably will not resonate nearly as immediately and universally as "having a family is complicated"
― gawka flocka flamewar (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:01 PM (1 hour ago)
and there are tons of good tv shows and movies about complicated families ... and far fewer that engage the details of industrial decline/drug problems etc. in American cities.
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
and there are tons of good tv shows and movies about complicated families
well now that two and a half men is off the air...
― swag the dog (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
if I want to watch a tv show about complicated families, I'd rather watch 6 Feet Under or Roseanne, than the Sopranos
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
Kima, Beadie, Rhonda, Donette and Brianna were all worthwhile and not too one-dimensional female characters. was the cast pretty male-dominated? sure. is that a really valuable stick to beat the show with? ehh.
― some dude, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
swag the dog (The Reverend), Wednesday, 6 January 2010 13:54 (1 year ago)
― gawka flocka flamewar (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
Namond's mom was hilarious.
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno - maybe I've just seen too many Coppola movies to find the concept of the Sopranos appealing.
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
was the cast pretty male-dominated? sure. is that a really valuable stick to beat the show with? ehh.
fair enough. but it does make it ridiculous ground from which to cast aspersions on the Sopranos as male-dominated/oriented, which is just innacurate.
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
there really aren't a whole lot of decent female characters in the wire, it's true; but yeah like deej says, if we're gonna bring up the one white guy i know who was super super super into repeating dave chappelle and samuel l jackson catch phrases in high school and is now indeed super into the wire, and who i'm sure is representative of a bunch of others like him, presumably we can bring up everyone who's ever thought mafiosos were AWESOME AND BADASS. or not because it's a dumb way to talk about shows.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
i liked nick sobotka's girlfriend but maybe that's just because she was ADORABLE.
I prefer not to speculate on audience strawmen, it's just pointless. it's kidna deej's MO tho
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
― gawka flocka flamewar (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:15 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark
word -- i even searched 4 this
― swag the dog (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
that was Whiney building the strawman, wasn't it?
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
a lot of people (not only in this thread) build that strawman and between that one and the LOL YOU LIKE SEASON 2 I WONDER WHY one they've kinda got you coming and going
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:27 (fifteen years ago)
tbh I've just been ignoring any posts that have to do with speculating as to who likes what for what hypothetical reasons
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:31 (fifteen years ago)
Pretty sure I'm one of the 30: Maybe I said this elsewhere, but The Sopranos' great subject was the subconscious, and this hit me personally harder than even the greatest stretches of The Wire. But that's really saying something.
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
defensive crackers itt ought to be mindful that this thread only went down that storied route after hm and myself cast aspersions on retard king k3vvy k's bad faith racial politicking
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
i guess most of u just like the wire cuz it's a great show!
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
shakey my only point was that its ridic to build wire strawmen bcuz you could do the same thing w/ a show about mafia dons. i wasnt building strawmen, just pointing out that doing so in defense of one of hollywood's timeless archetypes of violent baddassness is kind of a glass houses / throwing stones situation
― deej, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:36 (fifteen years ago)
wiremen, surely.
― I just want to give a shout-out to Buzzy Beetles (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure k3vin was making a joke about the margin of the wire's win + number of black people in each show + absurd post-obama tea party convictions re: the balance of power in america; but i am not him so i guess i cannot confirm that he does not think that white people are always getting the short end of the stick
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:41 (fifteen years ago)
oh never mind i see what is going on, oh well
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:42 (fifteen years ago)
deej - don't worry - you were otm
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
fair enough deej, no worries
xp
― You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:41 (3 minutes ago)
nah he really is that stupid, but he'll appresh the alibi i'm sure
― maxwell's silva hamartia (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
― sarahel, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:43 (2 minutes ago) Permalink
this goes w/out saying -- that post was abt tamtam butthurting me while i was banned
― deej, Thursday, 10 March 2011 22:49 (fifteen years ago)