Aren't they the fell beasts?
― felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)
actually, all the oversized beasties--the spider, the olyphants (wicked), the things the ogres were riding on, these were all incredible
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― rgeary (rgeary), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― rgeary (rgeary), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)
I loved the huge sweeping shots of the beacons being lit on the snowy mountaintops. The spider was fascinating, how she was so neat and quick about wrapping the body up and it made a cool, weird dry sound.
I didn't love the cursed ghost mountain people. I don't know what the alternative is, but all ghosts in movies look the same.
Sam and Faromir are my favorites. I hope Faromir marries Eowyn and they have like 10,000 babies. But I hope they live in Minas Tirith or wherever, not Rohan. I find Rohan drab and depressing.
― felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)
and yeah, the ghosts weren't that impressive but I really liked the long shots of them making there way up minas tirith
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
Where did those eagles come from again? They felt so deus ex machina-ish
Awesome movie though. Minas Tirith = !!!!! And teh funny worked way better than in part 2 (the dwarf's comment on Legolas' AT-AT action was perfectly timed)
― Wintermuté (Wintermute), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)
Ha! My friend Misty thought the same thing (and approved). Pretty spectacular.
Very important question: is Ghan-Buri-Ghan in it?
No. Maybe extended DVD will have it, who knows.
I have no idea about those eagles though.
It's in the original text, blame Tolkien if you must. (The moth reappearing was a movie invention and I *KNEW* it would show up again -- loved it).
Beacons -- pretty damned awesome. They're in the book but the version here was the way to go.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)
The one moment I looked at completely askance -- the exact death of Denethor. He does indeed immolate himself and all but in the book he simply lays down on the pyre -- the movie variation was just a little too much.
The reworking of Sam/Frodo/Gollum in the Minas Morgul/Shelob's Lair sequence was intriguing but I'll have to wait until I see it again tonight to judge better. The telescoping of the Cirith Ungol to Mount Doom sequences was abrupt but understandable. The expanded role of the Dead rooled and the actual breaking into Minas Tirith nicely ratcheted up the tension.
Anyway, back to work.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)
thanks for those with the spoiler warnings... perhaps a mod can add a spoiler title to the message title?
:*(
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)
And for my money, "The Man Who Killed Don Quixote" would likely have beenas brilliant as the rest of them, had it lived.I mentioned Gilliam because his fantasies (_Baron VonMucnchausen_, _The Fisher King_) have been stellar, and Scorsese because _Gangs Of New York_ had a dreamlike,mythical visuals that would have suited Middle Earth quitenicely.
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)
Er, I fear we have nothing further to talk about here if this is the example given. (The argument that one can take Tolkien's example in order to myth-create in different styles and approaches, however, is perfectly fine in and of itself, though the sense that a later/different approach will automatically be superior as a result seems forced.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)
Sometimes I think the only reason Tolkien is considered the bestis that he's usually the first (or only) fantasy author thatpeople read. Of course, there's nothing wrong with holding thisopinion (Tolkien's the best) but I strongly disagree.
I only mentioned _SOS_ because it was the first book to come outof Tolkien's tradition, not because I consider it the best. Still, it was addictive and hard to put down, qualities that areof utmost importance in fiction. In contrast, I found Tolkien's books to be long, long slogs indeed.
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)
If you're talking about Williams's fantasy trilogy, I found that to be astoundingly dull, much more so than Tolkien has ever been to me -- it was overarching but overstuffed, a couple of great characters aside. Kay in contrast I'm deeply fond of but the Fionavar books were a formal exercise in comparison to the alternate histories since, all of which have shown a much greater sense of range. Kay's ability to foreground moral ambivalence is indeed wonderful but I think this obscures Tolkien's own abilities in this field, something which I'm sensing you are dismissing all too readily.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)
(xpost Ned, Robin Hobb is really, really great and George Martin is even better. You should give them both a look.)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I actually have the Martin series building up 'on hold' for a read when it's done. Hobb I've not heard of, though, thanks!
Wot Dan said about Brooks, many times over.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 18 December 2003 05:31 (twenty-two years ago)
SPOILER sPoIlEr!!
My favorite part was by far the bit where Denethor was eating, having Pippen sing to him, while the gondor soldiers rode back out. It was kind of heavy heanded, but he syned the sounds & visuals so well that it came out very nicely.
But what was up with the dragging on of the endings? I know it's all in the book, but it felt like it was really dragging along. Although it was neat to the ring that Gandalf had on his hand as they left on the boat. It was kind of cool that they included that, even without calling it out by saying anything about it.
― lyra (lyra), Thursday, 18 December 2003 05:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Thursday, 18 December 2003 06:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Lyra very much OTM with the Denethor/Pippin sequence juxtaposed with Faramir's charge. And I was thinking of Gandalf's ring tonight, noticed it too!
Just got back from my second showing. Shelob's second attack really is fucking unsettling.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 December 2003 07:39 (twenty-two years ago)
the slate review correctly identifies the beacon sequence as the moment where the film really takes off.
i thought legolas' little escapade was an explicit star wars reference!
― rgeary (rgeary), Thursday, 18 December 2003 07:47 (twenty-two years ago)
In the extended Two Towers it is talked about a bit more -- Saruman identifies it as the Ring of Barahir, indicating his descent from Isildur. That is indeed part of the backstory in Tolkien's work -- to try and keep it quick (ha) Barahir was a Man in the First Age who assisted the Elves in their struggle against Morgoth; the ring was given to him by an Elf lord who he had specifically rescued in battle. Through Barahir's son Beren and then through the line of kings and lords of Numenor the ring became a symbol of descent and kingship.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 December 2003 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― rgeary (rgeary), Thursday, 18 December 2003 07:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 December 2003 07:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― rgeary (rgeary), Thursday, 18 December 2003 07:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Simon Daly, Thursday, 18 December 2003 09:44 (twenty-two years ago)
There were pacing issues and the lengthy endings (whilst cock on for the book) dragged a touch. Also odd that Arwen didn't want to see her Dad off on the boat. There also seemed something a bit off with Gollum at the end, I always remember him being a bit satisfied with his own death / destruction of the ring which did not quite come across (the perilous escape from the cracks seems a little bit overblown too).
All in all though thoroughly satisfying.
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 18 December 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I remember this being such a powerful moment in the book. I haven't seen the clip yet and was hoping this was going to be included in the final film. Yes, NOW I really want to watch it!!!
― Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 18 December 2003 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Can't wait to see it.
― Madchen (Madchen), Thursday, 18 December 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)
Lego-lass on the oilyfunt was the best
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
the Theodyn/Gandalf "what does your heart tell you?" line was the BAD Star Wars ref
has no-one mentioned how fucking great the 360 degress pans were?
fear not Madchen, the Shelob bits are absolutely stunning
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 18 December 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
the ghosts reminded me a lot of POTC more than anything else - i thought they were fine
biggest irk = no Saruman
when Aragorn and everyone kneel down before the hobbits for a split second i 'wished' it would cut to the fanfare end theme and the 'Directed by George Lucas' caption on starfield, haha
also very annoyed that we got trailers for the new Farrelly Brothers film (OH DEAR GOD IT LOOKS SO FUCKING TERRIBLE I WANT TO PUNCH THOSE STUPID PEOPLE) and the new Mask film (it's a baby.....a BABY.....) but not Spiderman 2 or that one with JUde Law and Nicole Kidman which might be good
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 18 December 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 18 December 2003 11:59 (twenty-two years ago)
Damn straight. Aimed for the epic and nailed it.
More coherent thoughts later tonight, though I'll probably chime in more throughout the day.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)