Steven Spielberg - classic or dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1430 of them)
funny i was thinking about just this lying in bed this morning. I recon War of the worlds was great. I found it really frightening at times, I wouldnt bother with it on DVD but in the cinema it was genuinly gripping.
He has always been flagged as an auteur the creator of modern blockbusters etc etc, i think the truth is that he is a director for hire, who makes a few personal projects, and a lot of projects personal.
Amoung my faves are empire of the sun, Jaws, 1941, gremlins 2 and it has to be said, catch me if you can.
so classic, though minority report and ai both sucked ass, as does close encounters, so much build up for so little pay off.

lukey (Lukey G), Thursday, 28 July 2005 09:31 (twenty years ago)

it's not just about that (although, you know, it's nice to have more than the two-shot, the close-up, the master -- nice also to have expressive editing JUST OCNE IN A WHILE). i don't care if he's "great art" (blah jargon) or not; it's just he isn't all that interesting. there are more interesting directors. like spielberg!!! they both have a somewhat limited and audience-minded view of 'human nature', praps.

xp

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 09:33 (twenty years ago)

I'm with NRQ here.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 28 July 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)

i'm gonna have to restrain myself from writing an entire essay here, but suffice to say i think hawks is one of the five greatest directors ever and i can't even begin to say why his best films transcend "expressive editing" and all that film school bullshit. this is verging on "the ramones aren't as interesting as frank zappa" territory. and i hope no one thinks i'm being a boring old film rockist because hawks is like the most ENTERTAINING great director who ever lived. and i don't think your last sentence shows much (or any) understanding of his attitude toward his audience.

i actually LIKE spielberg and feel he gets a bad rap from "entertainment is not art" types, but howard hawks is a greater director than spielberg for the same reason charles schulz is a greater artist than dave sim.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:15 (twenty years ago)

haha when ppl ask me tomorrow why i look so sleepy i'll have to say "cos i was up at 4 a.m. being the film geek version of that guy who throws a fit because you think picard is better than kirk."

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:16 (twenty years ago)

and i hope no one thinks i'm being a boring old film rockist because hawks is like the most ENTERTAINING great director who ever lived.

i. dis. agree. there, that wasn't so hard. in this context, i don't care about great directors. i care about entertaining films. hawks' films are *quite* entertaining. but they don't stand out particularly from hollywood films of the 'classic' (c. 1930 - c. 1960) period.

he has a slightly nasty, right-libertarian view of society based on the rugged-individualist/masculinist ideal (women have to be men). it's this glib view of 'how to deal' that i mean by 'audience-minded'. he's all about winners.

expressive editing (blah phrase, but whatevs) is not film school bullshit. following the aesthetic choices of 1950s cahiers du cinema is film school bullshit!!

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:25 (twenty years ago)

when did great exciting crowd-pleasing moviemaking become "film school bullshit"?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

if indy running from the rock is now considered some abstract academic film-school braininess then i don't even know what we're talking about anymore

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

i think jd thought that what i meant [that was fun] by expressive editing and non-shot-reverse-shot moviemaking was, i dunno, something hyper-intellectual -- resnais, or whatever. i love resnais, but i *also* meant modern movies LIKE 'SAVING PRIVATE RYAN'. i have my qualms but as movie art there's a shitload more to chew on in 'SPR' than there is in anything by hawks.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

i'm gonna refuse to take sides on this one

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)

would the oft-overlooked michael curtiz be a better predecessor comparison?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:34 (twenty years ago)

no-one has seen all of curtiz's movies. he made 100s. there's no pressing reason to separate his stuff from hawks' or from thatera of hollywood in general: more unites 'to have and have not' and 'casablanca' than, oh i dunno, two curtiz films i've forgotten the names of. it doesn't belittle classic genre films to say that the differences between them are not particularly big -- in the context of the history of film as a whole.

point is the kind of stuff spielberg does, like the beach scene, was beyond the dreams of any classic hollywood director. they'd have fucking killed to have done it. maybe sam fuller with spielberg's crew would be the best thing.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)

Hitchcock was also "middlebrow" (which seems to be the label for a great image-maker who also entertains a mass audience). Not that Spielberg has ever achieved the consistency of Hitch from 1954-64, but his films (esp post-Jurassic) generally show more complexity and disturbingly adult themes than directors who are taken more seriously (cf Spike Lee, Soderbergh, Coens).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:46 (twenty years ago)

Here are some movies I have not seen and don't have any real intention of seeing.

# Indiana Jones 4 (2006) (announced)
# Untitled Steven Spielberg/Abraham Lincoln Project (2007) (pre-production)
# Untitled 1972 Munich Olympics Project (2005) (filming)
# War of the Worlds (2005)
# The Terminal (2004)
# Catch Me If You Can (2002)
# Minority Report (2002)
# Artificial Intelligence: AI (2001)

This list, of films I have seen, arranged more or less in descending order of quality (last = best) is the reason why I'm not interested in any of the films above:

# Saving Private Ryan (1998)
# The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
# Schindler's List (1993)
# Jurassic Park (1993)
# Hook (1991)
# Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989)
# Empire of the Sun (1987)
# The Color Purple (1985)
# Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)
# E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
# Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
# Jaws (1975)
# Duel (1971)

In conclusion, Thank You Mr. Spielberg for bringing some really fantastic adventures to the big screen, and showing us some highly exciting moments, No Thank You Mr. Spielberg for saddling nearly all of them with increasingly awful casting as time marches on and for trying to choke us to death with your faith in the human spirit or whatever you want to call that unbelievably smug annoying self-congratulatory horseshit.


xpost,
more complexity and disturbingly adult themes
So do the fucking Matrix movies. OMG HE DIES TO SAVE EVERYBODY

TOMBOT, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

Such soul-crushing cynicism deserves, oh, Michael Bay.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

"unbelievably smug annoying self-congratulatory horseshit"

this is kinda otm -- it's there in the movies -- but the horseshit bits are outnumbered by the highly exciting moments. or, they're *both* there. same way fall-flat bits of unfunniness and misanthropy coexist with real chills in hitchcock.

otoh, is 'saving private ryan' really that smug? it has those terrible bookends, and the matt damon bits are really annoying, but i've seen far less convinving movies about war.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

Spielberg has always been very good at provoking a visceral reaction using whatever crap he has available. He knows how to make ostensibly exciting movies. Unfortunately, since you know that all of his ostensibly exciting movies will be ending in some fashion that makes you feel like a baby chickadee just regurgitated golden liquid cuddles of redemption directly into your stomach, the thrill isn't there, because you're just waiting for the hammer to fall and get the brainwashing over with.

The first time I saw Duel I knew it was supposed to be "atypical" Spielberg but I still spent probably half the movie waiting for some insipid deus ex machina to rob me of all my actual emotions and replace them with spoonfed lotus blooms. This is what he's done to his legacy.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

into the west was awesome - rachel leigh cook!!

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

i helped my friend videotape an audition for into the west! he didn't get the part though :(

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

I am the only person in the world who thinks Jaws is a shitty, shitty movie. I don't entirely blame Spielberg because the book it's based on is even worse than the film, so in that respect, he did well.

Looking at that list above I realize I've disliked a LOT of his movies, without even really realizing they were Spielberg flix. I mean the only movies that I like in that list are Raiders, Last Crusade, Duel, Catch Me If You Can (and that's not even an active like because I forgot I saw it until recently) and...uh...well, I don't actually like Jurassic Park at ALL but Jeff Goldblum dresses fantastically in it so I'll give it a little bit of a pass (THAT FINAL SHOT OF THE T-REX AND THE RAPTORS IS THE ABSOLUTE WORST SHOT IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF CINEMATOGRAPHY AND DIRECTION AND THAT IS A STONE COLD FACT PEOPLE). I'd like Saving Private Ryan better if the bookends were deleted and it was about a half hour shorter.

Dr. Morbius, how about you discuss the "disturbing adult themes" in, say, Catch Me If You Can?

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

He's okay. I thought Minority Report was pretty decent, up until the ending, anyway.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

anyway, i gotta agree with everyone praising band of brothers on this thread, i really liked it so much more than i expected (and overall a lot more than saving private ryan).

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

Dud. Fuck him. I am Filmist.

Anti-Pope Consortium (noodle vague), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

Ok the more I'm thinking about that final shot of the T-Rex and the Raptors in the lobby with the fucking banner floating in front of them in Jurassic Park the more angry I'm getting. Goddamn hack.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

minority report had a pretty good first third/half, i guess, but boy does it ever go to shit. and it's about as dark and adult as an episode of young indiana jones

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

catch me if you can woulda been alot more disturbing/adult/fun if it'd kept true to frank abagnale's motivation in the book (pussy).

jaws fucking rules ally. jpark3's pretty great, the best of the bunch no doubt. poltergeist was pretty great. band of brothers was incredible. into the west was rousing fun.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

catch me would've been better if it had been about 30 mins shorter

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

WAIT WAIT I ALSO LIKE EMPIRE OF THE SUN.

Jaws does NOT fucking rule!

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

i think jpark3 is rett bratner or someone...

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

it's jumanji guy... joe johnston

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

nrq makes a really good point: that maybe spielberg is - deliberately? that wd be so cool - sacrificing good UNIFIED WORKS for the opportunity to make astonishing scenes or moments

UNIFIED WORKS suck anyway

ie his refusal to end his recent movies unyuckily is the price he is prepared to pay for the chance to shoot [x] idea

i don't buy this really, but i wd admire SS lots if i discovered this is where he's secretly at

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

war of the worlds woulda been alot better if richard dreyfuss had come out of the ship at the end.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

or if it had turned out it was the nazis!

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

allyzay i have seen lisztomania and yr hyperbole impresses me none

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

jaws rules

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:49 (twenty years ago)

http://www.thegreenhead.com/cat-gallery/3/cat_g3_10.jpg
from up-coming director's cut

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:51 (twenty years ago)

free frisky

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

i don't buy this really, but i wd admire SS lots if i discovered this is where he's secretly at

oh, begone intentionality! i think most movies are compendia of bits with lots of redundancies put in to keep front office happy. it's always been like that(?). spielberg is a total enigma as a man -- i have read a biography of him and know NOTHING about him.

but cutting through or ignoring the 'greatest generation' blah i've been impressed by the action scenes in the saving private ryan/band of brothers projects.

as with albums, ignore the rubbish bits.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:53 (twenty years ago)

bbbbbbbut what if Richard Dreyfuss was the Nazis?????!

My hyperbole is totally correct, watch JP again and wait for it...that final shot of the freaking T-Rex. Claymation dinosaur, why you ruin shot all the time? I would've liked Jurassic Park better if there was no dinosaurs, but instead Richard Dreyfuss and Roy Scheider.

Anyway I am still interested in finding out how Spielberg classics like Catch Me If You Can or The Terminal or The Lost World explore more disturbing, dark, and adult themes than Bamboozled and are more complex than The Big Lebowski! I'll give Morbius Soderberg.

XPOST ARGH STOP IT WITH THOSE MORPHED ANIMALS

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:53 (twenty years ago)

Film school types have a different measuring stick than an ordinary film viewer like me. Speilberg is probably the quinessential film school success story, the Lord of the Film School Graduates, the wet dream of budding director-wannabes. He's filthy rich, can command any script he pleases, casts A-list actors at will, and has all Hollywood groveling before him. He's a One Phone Call kind of guy.

Does this make him classic, or just Darryl Zanuck reborn?

I stick with my B+ assessement. He has good chops, and a consistent record. I like him OK, but nothing he makes excites me much.

Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

'lost world' is about the amoral exploitation of scientific research for profit -- it's an adult theme. treatment another matter.

aimless -- steve is hurt, but he will try to improve his record for next semester.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)

i don't give a penny fig for intentionality nrq, it is a phantom of goofy wackness, i wd still admire SS if this is where he was at!! it wd just be kinda cool given everything, if he too thought john williams wz an gharstly hack but WHAT THE HELL, at least with him on board i get to do x y and z

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)

well the treatment and exploration of these adult themes would seem to be the key here.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:58 (twenty years ago)

jpark1 wasn't all that but people were just so damn happy to finally get to see a real live dinosaur.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

wow you musta sawn i difft version to me blount

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Film school types have a different measuring stick than an ordinary film viewer like me. Speilberg is probably the quinessential film school success story, the Lord of the Film School Graduates, the wet dream of budding director-wannabes. He's filthy rich, can command any script he pleases, casts A-list actors at will, and has all Hollywood groveling before him. He's a One Phone Call kind of guy.

what's your point here exactly? that people in film school like him because he's successful? wtf does that have to do with anything

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

claymation dinosaurs

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

when i finally saw jurassic park 2 i was amazed at how bad and UN-masterful it was actually

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

(hmmm i am leavin the surface of planet english i think --- brisk walk off to robster's bday for me)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

give him our best mark

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

"Always"? "Tintin"? There are a few films more or less written out of his canon. "Always," "Tintin," "1941," "Sugarland Express," "BFG," maybe even "War Horse," possibly "The Post" ...

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 19 April 2026 16:20 (one month ago)

I saw AI in a theater in San Jose on July 4th. I was living in Texas at the time and my girlfriend and I were scouting out where I was going to move for grad school. My first time really leaving home and going far away from my friends and family and my mother who I was very close to.

The trip went well until immediately after the movie. It pushed the right combination of buttons in my brain at the right time and I broke down crying. I made it to the parking lot weeping and then into the car with my head on my girlfriend’s lap, sobbing.

I have no idea if the movie was good or not. I remember what the family house looked like, some sort of a sexy circus, and a far in the future ending with aliens.

Cow_Art, Sunday, 19 April 2026 17:08 (one month ago)

xpost
I think you can add The Terminal, Bridge of Spies, and Ready Player One to that list.

For such a big deal movie at the time, The Color Purple doesn't seem to get namechecked much now

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 19 April 2026 17:09 (one month ago)

Utterly repulsive and the only Spielberg movie I can think of that looks shitty.

The London-set scenes are rather lovely; won't defend the movie's look much beyond that, but what I wouldn't give for Spielberg to go back to working with someone like Dean Cundey.

cryptosicko, Sunday, 19 April 2026 17:12 (one month ago)

A.I. is a fantastic movie, one of his best IMHO, but it didn't properly take with me when I saw it at 17. Revisited in the theater at 42 and loved it.

Mighty Morphin Is The Subject of My Sentence (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 19 April 2026 19:20 (one month ago)

I've seen it quite a few times, most recently several months ago, and it has never lost its luster for me.

Galactic Poetaster (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 19 April 2026 20:13 (one month ago)

Time to repost this: https://www.ianwatson.info/plumbing-stanley-kubrick/

Galactic Poetaster (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 19 April 2026 20:14 (one month ago)

one month passes...

Last night I rewatched AI for the first time since it was released. It’s pretty sloppy and feels like different ideas/tones are bolted together in a way that’s clumsy and off-putting. The first quarter is really good. When the sick son returns home it gets a little wobbly and once the fake moon rises it totally goes off the rails. Some of the robot designs are awesome but the staging and camera work, it sinks almost to Hook lows.

It gets better after that but never fully recovers and the “happy” ending feels bogus. It would have been better if it ended with David praying to the Blue Fairy. The animated Blue Fairy was wack. The score was overbearing. It was a mess with some really good bits.

Cow_Art, Saturday, 23 May 2026 14:16 (two weeks ago)

I've made my peace with the ending. More and more I embrace messy films by good directors b/c it's fun to think about the mess.

The happy ending Kubrick's idea, I only learned a few years ago.

boners for bombs (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 23 May 2026 14:18 (two weeks ago)

I don't think of the ending as happy at all. I think it is utterly tragic and heartbreaking. I have no problem with it.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 23 May 2026 15:50 (two weeks ago)

yeah I've come to see the ending (and the whole movie) as an indictment of we humans. Dr. Hobby builds a doll to perfectly perform the unconditional love we crave, and then as the final demonstration of our vanity, programs it to desire a similarly hollow performance as its only motivation. when all else is gone, this pathetic neediness is what remains to tell our successors, to paraphrase Gigolo Joe, that "we were."

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 23 May 2026 16:01 (two weeks ago)

Yeah. And at the end of human civilization, David is closest the nu robots (who have outlasted their creators) can come to the real thing, and they are studying him, this last vestige/vessel of humanity whose goodness is 100% artificial, by design.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 23 May 2026 16:33 (two weeks ago)

I wish this looked good (I am not a Spielberg hater), but... it doesn't. The scenes with the little girl and the deer in particular look like something from a particularly uncanny valley-ish Robert Zemeckis Christmas movie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFz8czbdPdU

wipes chooser (unperson), Thursday, 28 May 2026 21:05 (one week ago)

Joke's on you, the deer is real, the people are all fake.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 28 May 2026 22:56 (one week ago)

https://www.nbcstore.com/products/disclosure-day-stag-popcorn-bucket

StanM, Sunday, 31 May 2026 11:25 (one week ago)

with popcorn in it: https://www.instagram.com/p/DY4nf82Eep7

StanM, Sunday, 31 May 2026 11:26 (one week ago)

The trailer for The New One looked okay. My boy Josh O'Connor looked hot as fuck.

boners for bombs (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 31 May 2026 11:48 (one week ago)

Wow, 2.5 hours of Spielberg talking about 2001 as a guest on the new Rewatchables episode.

Strait of Merzbow (Eazy), Monday, 1 June 2026 03:36 (one week ago)

Yes! looking forward to listening!

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 June 2026 03:51 (one week ago)

just watched and he’s a real joy of a guest.

sknybrg, Monday, 1 June 2026 04:14 (one week ago)

Yeah this was an absolute delight for me as a fan of him and of Kubrick, so fun. (And I laughed at Bill trying to explain that stupid apex mountain category to Spielberg)

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 June 2026 19:26 (one week ago)

Finally watched Ready Player One on a long flight. Woof. From my secondhand understanding of the source material, there's no question it turned out better in Spielberg's hands than it would with Generic 2010s Tentpole CGI Flick Director. But there's not much to recommend it. The real issues are at the screenplay level - story's a buffet of questy nothinges, screenplay's REALLY flat, themes are muddy, and the pop-culture quotational junkfest just sits there on the screen, neither hateable nor interrogated to the point of becoming interesting. Mendelsohn does his villain thing well enough but nobody else makes an impression. The Shining thing was lame but not even memorably terrible.

I was hoping to find some unexpected spark along the way, like "aha, THIS is what drew him into this..." but of everything I've seen by him, it felt the most faceless and voiceless.

I am excited for Disclosure Day though!

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2026 04:58 (one week ago)

This podcast is often lol fun. Very cool.

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Wednesday, 3 June 2026 21:45 (one week ago)

"Cruise or Hanks" hahaaa

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Wednesday, 3 June 2026 21:47 (one week ago)

I hope he does come back for a Jaws episode, my head would fully explode <3

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 3 June 2026 22:25 (one week ago)

I think it’s hilarious that he insists on always saying the full name of the film, “2001 A Space Odyssey”

sctttnnnt (pgwp), Thursday, 4 June 2026 02:27 (six days ago)

that was great, would hang with those three all day

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 5 June 2026 19:14 (five days ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.