DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived Cleggeron era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7011 of them)

http://www.atoshealthcarejobs.com/

We aim to give people autonomy and dignity - and improve their quality of life.

Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

DG, that is apalling. Best of luck to your mum with the tribunal.

How is it that we are an allegedly progressive democracy and yet this country is so disgusting? Time to set fire to something.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

this scares the hell out of me for my mum, good luck dg.

Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

thank you but yes, these people are sinister fuckers

Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

People need to look up the US company Unum Provident, banned from several states and now sniffing around markets where class action suits aren't as easy to launch against their shit, like here. They are the generators of welfare-to-work bullshit and are involved with Atos.

anna sui generis (suzy), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

they look like a barrel of laughs

Romford Spring (DG), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

Amazing, considering there's a McDonald's right there that always has its litter blowing about:

Daniel Astaire, cabinet member for society, families and adult services, said: "It is wrong and undignified that people are being fed on the streets.

"Efforts by local organisations responding to the needs of the most vulnerable within their own community are to be applauded.

"However, soup runs on the streets in Westminster actually encourage people to sleep rough in central London, with all the dangers that entails."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12594397

James Mitchell, Monday, 28 February 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

Such cocks. You'd expect the cathedral to appeal against this but maybe not.

Matt DC, Monday, 28 February 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

NIMBigSocietY.

on... imo (onimo), Monday, 28 February 2011 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

think i'm gonna go homeless for free soup

Romford Spring (DG), Monday, 28 February 2011 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

wow, they do soup runs on the street in Westminster? I'm gonna go and sleep rough there tonight, should be lulz

Nulty By Nature (Noodle Vague), Monday, 28 February 2011 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

"However, soup runs on the streets in Westminster actually encourage people to sleep rough in central London, with all the dangers that entails."

Upsetting tourists et al being the biggest danger I assume?

Tom D (Tom D.), Monday, 28 February 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

@dpastaire - just sayin'

James Mitchell, Monday, 28 February 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

how easy is it for homeless ppl to get places in hostels etc?

don't understand these ppl whose first thought when confronted with ppl sleeping on the streets of a wealthy city is 'omg how unsightly! will nobody think of the tourists'

they will have been disappointed not to have been (nakhchivan), Monday, 28 February 2011 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

These ppl = small businessmen/ shopkeepers i.e. the very beating heart and raging soul of this once great nation, sir

Tom D (Tom D.), Monday, 28 February 2011 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

It does just strike me as such a weird thing to do when your entire schtick is about charity taking over the role of the state - are you not just going against the whole meaning of your own Big Society here?

emil.y, Monday, 28 February 2011 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

These ppl = small businessmen/ shopkeepers i.e. the very beating heart and raging soul of this once great nation, sir

Kind of unfair projection I reckon.

Matt DC, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

However, soup runs on the streets in Westminster actually encourage people to sleep rough in central London

wut

lex pretend, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

srsly liz jones had a better understanding of homelessness than this

lex pretend, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

till you've tried their soup you haven't lived (rough)

ledge, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

However, soup runs on the streets in Westminster actually encourage people to sleep rough in central London

Translation = "they're going to sleep rough anyway, we just don't want them doing it anywhere near us".

Matt DC, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

"It is wrong and undignified that people are being fed on the streets.

At least let them starve with dignity!

Matt DC, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

About 150 people sleep rough in Westminster on any given night and 98% of those people "have no connection to the borough", the council said.

this wd be hilarious if not so repugnant -- homeless people by definition have no connection to any particular place

they will have been disappointed not to have been (nakhchivan), Monday, 28 February 2011 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

Be interested to know what the two homeless charities' stance on this is - presumably they feel there should be more shelters etc?

Matt DC, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

nother story linked from that one about homeless (sixth form?) students

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-12342627

one was sleeping on the streets

shit is totally fucked imo, how difficult would it be to provide overspill hostels etc

they will have been disappointed not to have been (nakhchivan), Monday, 28 February 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

homeless people by definition have no connection to any particular place

Not so, really - this is more of a throwback to old-school parish laws which would bounce tramps/travellers back to their 'home' parish straight away in order not to have to expend resources on them.

emil.y, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

ya well obv everyone has relation to a particular place, but it's kinda arbitrary where homeless ppl go to......various reasons why they congregate in city centres i guess

they will have been disappointed not to have been (nakhchivan), Monday, 28 February 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

looking forward to london tory councils trying to outdo each other in the destruction of civil infrastructure stakes in the 2k10s

they will have been disappointed not to have been (nakhchivan), Monday, 28 February 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Oh yeah, don't think I'm defending the cocking Tories and their cleansing strategies or anything! They're obv despicable, just trying to position the argument historically, you know. I mean, those parish laws were terrible - a lot of people just moving to try to find work got 'bounced' out of town, never mind people who were actually much more vulnerable.

xpost

emil.y, Monday, 28 February 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

The Hare Krishnas also give out free food all over Westminster - can we send a big fat jingling bunch of them to surround Dolphin Square or something? Or they can offer to feed the unpaid interns working in Portcullis House.

anna sui generis (suzy), Monday, 28 February 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

Amazing performance by @dpastaire on London Tonight, tonight: http://www.itv.com/london/soup-runs-to-be-banned77332/

James Mitchell, Monday, 28 February 2011 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

- gadaffi is in venezuela
- we're going to do a no-fly zone (using... um...)

fucking dynamite work lads

this odyssey that refuses to quit calling itself (history mayne), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 10:19 (fifteen years ago)

He's in Venezuela? Sterling work there Ken.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 10:25 (fifteen years ago)

Reporters should start asking William Hague where various heads of state are, on a regular basis.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 11:12 (fifteen years ago)

This is fucking hilarious in an "inevitable spiral of doom" way:

NHS reform could see GP surgeries on stock market

IHP is in talks with three GP consortiums to set up a company that would turn underspends in their annual budget – in effect, savings on patient spending – into profits. This company, which aims to list on the stock market in three to five years, would treat patients at 95% of the cost of the NHS. This putative saving, amounting to £40 per patient, would be booked as "profit".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/mar/02/nhs-reform-surgeries-stock-market

Obviously it hasn't happened yet but I'm sure it sounds like a great idea to my local MP Mr Lansley.

oigwheoiqng4g (seandalai), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 11:17 (fifteen years ago)

What a wonderful set of incentives there.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 11:28 (fifteen years ago)

I would buy shares in them and then get really really sick.

ka£ka (NickB), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 11:32 (fifteen years ago)

Think we missed this yesterday:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/mar/01/mervyn-king-blames-banks-cuts?CMP=twt_gu

When revolutionary socialists like Mervyn King agree the deficit is the banks' fault, I'm surprised that the opposition aren't going in harder.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 11:35 (fifteen years ago)

Barnsley Central by-election results:
Dan Jarvis (Lab) 14724 60.8%
Jane Collins (UKIP) 2953 12.2%
James Hockney (Con) 1999 8.3%
Enis Dalton (BNP) 1463 6.0%
Tony Devoy (Ind) 1266 5.2%
Dominic Carman (LD) 1012 4.2%
Kevin Riddiough (Eng Dem) 544 2.2%
Howling Laud Hope (Loony) 198 0.8%
Michael Val Davies (Ind) 60 0.2%

WAYNE ROONEY ELBOW STORM (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 4 March 2011 08:21 (fifteen years ago)

Lib Dems doing well to hold off the English Democrats to grab that all important sixth place, but sadly would have needed a coalition with the Loony party to save their deposit.

WAYNE ROONEY ELBOW STORM (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 4 March 2011 08:22 (fifteen years ago)

Result doesn't mean a huge amount for anyone other than the LibDems, as its about as safe a Labour seat as exists. But wow @ LibDem slump. Short-sighted idiots.

Be very interested to see a southern marginal seat come up for by-election sometime soon - my guess would be increased Tory majority at the LibDems' expense but you never know.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 March 2011 09:39 (fifteen years ago)

you never, tru.

Mark G, Friday, 4 March 2011 09:42 (fifteen years ago)

Should we have a new thread? I think the Cleggeron era is pretty much over. May Day getting abolished, minimum wage under attack, councils privatising "everything".

(also 4.7k messages seems quite a lot)

Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Friday, 4 March 2011 11:53 (fifteen years ago)

Naah, they'll be right back together again before you know it.

Mark G, Friday, 4 March 2011 11:55 (fifteen years ago)

need a good title first

someone_who_cares_about_hipsters (history mayne), Friday, 4 March 2011 11:56 (fifteen years ago)

Way I'm feeling to-day it would just be a load of swear words with the words Cameron, Gove and Osbourne inserted at random points.

Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Friday, 4 March 2011 11:59 (fifteen years ago)

Result doesn't mean a huge amount for anyone other than the LibDems, as its about as safe a Labour seat as exists.

Maybe, but the Tory vote collapsed, tho not as spectacularly as the LOLDems (and seems to have gone to UKIP, so obv. it's going to go back come a general election). Also, it might be a safe Labour but they did pretty well considering the last MP ended up in prison!

Tom D (Tom D.), Friday, 4 March 2011 11:59 (fifteen years ago)

Abolishing the May Day bank holiday is some dumb shit. You don't fuck with England's bank holidys. Any money says they row back from that one.

Matt DC, Friday, 4 March 2011 12:09 (fifteen years ago)

Nooh, they were grousing about it being "Labour Day" and preferring "glorious Saint George or Battle of Trafalgar Day plz" ever since it was 'granted'....

Mark G, Friday, 4 March 2011 12:11 (fifteen years ago)

... I wondered about that but surely the LibDems can tell them all about Mayday, they all hang about folk clubs and drink real ale, don't they?

Tom D (Tom D.), Friday, 4 March 2011 12:13 (fifteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.