Wow, did not realize:
Have you ever used a Libyan domain name? If you've linked to anything on Twitter, you probably have. The .ly suffix, beloved of those who want to shorten their links (usually to bit.ly), belongs to Libya, and according to "policy wonk" Jerry Brito writing in Time's Techland section, it faces an uncertain future.
― Ban Hammerskjold (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
ha yes there was a big collective freak out when a couple months ago kadafifi was all you know i can do w/whatever i want w/these .ly domains right
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
iirc he handed a foreign owned .ly domain over to libyan cause they asked or it
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
mitt romney stopped using mitt.ly a few months ago
and some "sex positive erotica blogger" or some such had her url shortner suspended
lol
the internet
― max, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
lol mitt.ly
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
yeah all that real.ly made me laugh i gotta say
― goole, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
i had not realized until a news story last night that Q is really close with berlusconi? npr described some scene where silvio paid a room full of models $100 a head to sit for a lecture from mr. libya about the virtues of islamic civilization. i don't live under either man but that kinda makes me think "worth it".
― goole, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
And I'm not sure what's wrong with being "somewhat sympathetic to" Mao tbqh
lol saw this quoted after the skip
cannot wait to see who posted it!
― for all the fucked-up children of this world we give you 1p3 (history mayne), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:33 (fifteen years ago)
seems like the The_Wests credibility re: democracy/values "promotion" was erased long before the iraq war― max, Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:11 PM (6 hours ago) Bookmark
― max, Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:11 PM (6 hours ago) Bookmark
not rly dealing in absolutes here. look at the competition. by the highest standard the_west has always been a criminal enterprise whose power rests on a laughable simulacrum of consent. but it isn't universally seen that way in europe, eastern europe, etc. they probably take a different view in south america, south east asia, the middle east...
― for all the fucked-up children of this world we give you 1p3 (history mayne), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:43 (fifteen years ago)
by the highest standard the_west has always been a criminal enterprise whose power rests on a laughable simulacrum of consent
oh, so there IS one thing we might possibly agree on
― sleeve, Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)
the_west doesn't have a freehold on democracy, obvi; by the same token, it pretty fuckin obviously doesn't have a freehold on 'criminality'. i'll go out on a limb, though, and say maybe the egyptian protestors are looking to have a country more like france than saudi arabia/china though. something a bit rich about pampered westerners saying, effectively, the thing the revolutionaries want, some degree of representative government, is overrated.
― for all the fucked-up children of this world we give you 1p3 (history mayne), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:19 (fifteen years ago)
real talk
― banjee trillness (The Reverend), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:58 (fifteen years ago)
any USers see frontline last night? interesting shit. have to say i'm a little skeeved out by how involved and how crucial the (young end) of the muslim brotherhood was to the whole thing.
― goole, Thursday, 24 February 2011 02:09 (fifteen years ago)
I don;t watch cable news all that often but wy the fuck is MSNC's Morning Joe playing Gimmie Shelter under Pay Buchannan ranting about the possibility of Gaddafi taking hostages in Libya?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 24 February 2011 11:21 (fifteen years ago)
"wy the fuck is MSNC's Morning Joe doing [x]" is one of those questions i've learned not to ask
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 February 2011 11:38 (fifteen years ago)
coz it sounds mean
― Elegant Bitch (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 24 February 2011 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
Reading Pilger makes me sad. First commenter OTM.
http://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/2011/02/pilger-fascism-bahrain-egypt
― DL, Thursday, 24 February 2011 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
Clearly it is a 'thing' because they had some U2 bollocks playing under Hillary Clinton. I'll never stray from Radio4 again.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 24 February 2011 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
never understood how anyone can take pilger seriously
― lex pretend, Thursday, 24 February 2011 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
Was fairly easy to do so in the '70s but now, not so much.
― anna sui generis (suzy), Thursday, 24 February 2011 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
Way back he used to be a great investigative reporter and campaigner. Now he's just embarrassing. I thought his The War You Don't See doc got a remarkably easy ride from critics.
― DL, Thursday, 24 February 2011 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/02/ambassadors-caught-on-tape-china-edition/71637/
this might be a big deal? some small "jasmine" style protests got off the ground in china, US ambassador was there, just chillin. the video is hilarious
― goole, Thursday, 24 February 2011 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
Very curious how the just-announced $35 billion buy-off from King Abdullah goes over in Saudi Arabia. As they pointed out on NPR, granted full scholarships to all students studying abroad means very little when there's a close to 50% unemployment rate among Saudi college graduates. Likewise, addressing the housing crisis is mostly symbolic, when this pay-out will only reduce the wait for a mortgage from 17 years to 16 years (real numbers!). Just as a show of force pisses off the populace, I wonder whether waving all that money around will sate the people or just remind them how little they have. Especially with King Abdullah having spent most of the past few pivotal weeks out of the picture/country getting serious medical treatment. What smells more, blood or money?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 February 2011 14:42 (fifteen years ago)
lol hes wearing a leather jacket w/american flag shoulder patch as if to say 'i am the ambassador' xp
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 February 2011 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
good on him for heading out to just check the vibe - i dig the style
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 24 February 2011 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
the top gun look is tight
― goole, Thursday, 24 February 2011 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
haha huntsman is such a goof, you guys know hes a HUGE dream theater fan right
― max, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:24 (fifteen years ago)
Huntsman is also a self-proclaimed fan of the progressive rock genre and on July 30, 2007, attended a concert by progressive metal band Dream Theater. Later that day, Huntsman signed a proclamation creating "Dream Theater Day" on that date for the state of Utah. According to Dream Theater's website, Huntsman is a keyboard player. Huntsman also joined REO Speedwagon on the piano for two songs during their concert at the Utah State Fair on September 16, 2005.
god eff this nonsense about bp employees stuck at tripoli airport. who gives a shit?
― caek, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
I sort of care that our government is too incompetent to run a rescue operation from a war zone actually.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus H and up until now I didn't mind the guy.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
i think the problems are due to single flight cancellation due to mechanical problems at gatwick
also imo a very well insured and resourced oil company operating in a country like libya, in which the airport is still open and safe, and which has a contractual obligation to its employees to get them out, should take care of its own business.
― caek, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
Everybody else's government seems able (and willing) to do it
― Tom D (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:33 (fifteen years ago)
Some of them, unlike us, weren't even buddies of Gadaffi
― Tom D (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
xpost It's not like BP are paying all their UK taxes. I know, let's persecute some single mothers instead!
― anna sui generis (suzy), Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
BBC comments thread on this subject predictably blaming the nanny state for the fact that people expect the British taxpayer to pay for them to be airlifted out of a country where people are being shot on the street. "LOL they chose to sell out and work in a country run by a dictator" isn't really a very constructive line of argument either.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
Radio 4's World at One was pretty harrowing today. Interviews with a Tripoli resident who started crying halfway through and an expat describing the hideous scenes at Tripoli airport, especially for Tunisian, Egyptians, and Palestinian workers. People sleeping outside in the rain, the international departures area transformed into a giant open toilet, etc.
Matt OTM. No excuse for lack of compassion here.
― DL, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
i think most non-libyans are getting out with the help of their employer, or taking the flights to malta that are still leaving regularly.
i guess my main point is i don't really think this should be the top story at the moment.
― caek, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
also seems relevant that the foreign office chartered plane that was supposed to pick them up got stuck at gatwick
― caek, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
Kind of assuming that not every British national in Libya is a BP employee but wau they are dicks if they're not doing anything about it.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
true. my friend's husband got out via malta overnight. he has libyan parents.
― caek, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:44 (fifteen years ago)
Think I prefer "hey British readership will your relatives be able to get out of Libya?" to "what do Libyan protestors think about The_West?" as a story anyway.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
Now Gadaffi is trying to say the whole thing is Bin Laden's idea.
Like any man-in-bubble situation, we see that mental illness eventually results if your every whim is satisfied by minions and Ukranian nurses.
― anna sui generis (suzy), Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:54 (fifteen years ago)
stole the joke from someone else but blaming Europe, drugs and Bin Laden sounds like Q hired a Tea Party PR guy
― Ludo, Thursday, 24 February 2011 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently pre-chaos, the only way to get out of Libya at all was to get two separate permits, in Tripoli, one from the military and one from the government, beholden no doubt to any number of hoops, bribes, exemptions and catches. I can only imagine the average Libyan with any inkling of an inclination is jumping at the opportunity to finally get off this sinking ship.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 February 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
Washington Post says Obama has been too passsive re Libya (but they don't say what he should do):
Dana Millbank:The passivity wasn't the fault of the new spokesman. He merely had the uncomfortable task of articulating a coherent policy in the absence of one. The problem was most glaring on the Libyan uprising, which the president has handled with the detachment of a powerless observer.
Finally, after days without speaking publicly about Libya, Obama addressed the cameras Wednesday evening.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/23/AR2011022304672.html
Washington Post official editorial(likely written by neo-con Ed. Page editor Fred Hyatt) :Administration officials explained this weak stance by saying they were worried about U.S. citizens, hundreds of whom were being extracted by ferry Wednesday afternoon. There were fears that the desperate Mr. Gaddafi might attack the Americans or seek to take them hostage. But the presence of thousands of European citizens in Libya did not prevent their government's leaders from forcefully speaking out and agreeing on sanctions.
Shouldn't the president of the United States be first to oppose the depravities of a tyrant such as Mr. Gaddafi? Apparently this one doesn't think so.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/23/AR2011022305993.html?nav=hcmoduletmv
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 February 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
i kind of have no opinion on how obama is "handling" this; if anything i believe his stance of not really handling publicly it is the right one.
but fuck if isn't clear that his domestic critics just have to come up with something negative to say since they don't have anything else to go on. iran, not enough, egypt, too much, libya, do something, blah blah fucking blah
― goole, Thursday, 24 February 2011 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
have any bushies claimed that the iraq war started all this yet (the wave of democracy spreading through the middle east)?
― a nan, a bal, an anal ― (abanana), Thursday, 24 February 2011 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
many
― Mordy, Thursday, 24 February 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
Today, in a surprise move. President Obama entered the White House press room to deliver this short statement, "Speaking as the President of these United States, I oppose each and every depravity of the tyrant Gaddafi."
When reached afterward for comment, Fred Hyatt said, "That was weak. I know for a fact Obama was not the first to oppose those depravities. Countless others have been there ahead of him. He's lagging behind the curve on this crisis in every conceivable way."
― Aimless, Thursday, 24 February 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)