Yes. I wish the White House would have pushed for a compromise date--halfway between now and September,say. We'll see how this all plays out.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 7 February 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
It sounds like the White House is going to be fine with a slow shift to an interim government. It may take until September which of course is what Mubarak wants but not the protestors (Mubarak and his supporters say that he constitutionally can't leave until then!).
― curmudgeon, Monday, February 7, 2011 10:42 AM (5 hours ago)
if the "president" resigns, the speaker of the parliament acts as the caretaker president until new elections take place, within a timeframe not to exceed 60 days, i think. elbaradei and other protest leaders have suggested suspending the constitution (which they consider pretty much invalid anyway) for up to a year while parties are allowed to form, etc, since 60 days is a pretty short amount of time given the circumstances.* as far as i can tell, none of the american leaders have given this much acknowledgement
*god if only our election seasons could last "only" 60 days over here
― kl0p's son (k3vin k.), Monday, 7 February 2011 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
Huge crowds today.
― banjee trillness (The Reverend), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 13:06 (fifteen years ago)
AJE is reporting that 20 Egyptian lawyers have filed a petition with the Prosecutor General against Mubarak for stealing public funds. I can't find any article about this yet.
― banjee trillness (The Reverend), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
As the authorities and protesters struggle to grasp the see-sawing initiative in Egypt’s 15-day-old revolt, the government of President Hosni Mubarak unveiled a new package of pledges on Tuesday, saying there would be no retribution for young people embroiled in the uprising and insisting that a process of reform was “on the right path.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/world/middleeast/09egypt.html?hp
Delay, delay, delay with tacit US support
Vice President Omar Suleiman of Egypt says he does not think it is time to lift the 30-year-old emergency law that has been used to suppress and imprison opposition leaders. He does not think President Hosni Mubarak needs to resign before his term ends in September. And he does not think his country is yet ready for democracy.
There are risks in the administration’s go-slower approach on Egypt.But, considering it lacks better options, the United States has strongly backed him to play the pivotal role in a still uncertain transition process in Egypt. In doing so, it is relying on the existing government to make changes that it has steadfastly resisted for years, and even now does not seem impatient to carry out. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/world/middleeast/08diplomacy.html?hp
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 14:33 (fifteen years ago)
this TV interview with Wael is kind of bonkers
― bien-pensant vibe (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
the US public is broadly behind the protestors
http://www.gallup.com/poll/File/145991/Egypt_New_Poll_Feb_07_2011.pdf
24. Overall, are you sympathetic or unsympathetic to the protestors in Egypt who have called for a change in the government?Are you very [sympathetic/unsympathetic] or only somewhat [sympathetic/unsympathetic]?
Very sympathetic 42Somewhat sympathetic 40Somewhat unsympathetic 6Very unsympathetic 5No opinion 6
― goole, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
however, i guess the muslim-scary stuff is working on the quarter of population in the bubble:
25. From what you have heard or know about the situation in Egypt, all in all, do you think the political changes that are occurring will be mostly good or mostly bad for – [A-B READ IN ORDER]?2011 Feb 2-5A. The country of EgyptMostly good 66Mostly bad 19No opinion 14
B. The United StatesMostly good 60Mostly bad 26No opinion 13
― goole, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
some different interpretations of events here...
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/02/08/suleiman/index.html
"Given the long-obvious fact that the Obama administration has been working to install Suleiman as interim leader as a (dubious) means of placating citizen anger..."
http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/02/08/obama_ajusts_on_egyptian_change
"Despite the rapid consensus that Suleiman has been designated as America's man in this process, any acceptance of his role is likely by default rather than design. The administration clearly does not want to allow Suleiman and Mubarak to revert to the status quo ante, or to consolidate a new nakedly military regime."
― goole, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)
the long-obvious fact
lol @ calling a week "long obvious"
― bien-pensant vibe (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
I'm interested in the ~6% of respondents who think that the changes are good for Egypt but bad for the US -- who are they? Neocons? Realists?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.salon.com/ent/comics/this_modern_world/2011/02/08/this_modern_world/story.jpg
― Pirates of the Caribbean V: Letters of Marque & Reprisal (Phil D.), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:00 (fifteen years ago)
I'm interested in the ~6% of respondents who think that the changes are good for Egypt but bad for the US -- who are they? Neocons? Realists?― Mordy, Tuesday, February 8, 2011 6:47 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Mordy, Tuesday, February 8, 2011 6:47 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark
no-one has a clue what the effect will be for the US. was 'negligible' a possible answer?
― the most revered deity in the universe (history mayne), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
come now, you know this whole thing's about the US
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:11 (fifteen years ago)
tbh, knowing the USA that 6% are probably respondents who forgot what they were being asked about halfway through the interview
― Mordy, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
Speaking of it being all about the US, I see in a Washington Post editorial that a Egypt working group made up of moderate Dems and neo-con Republicans like E. Abrams who profess to want democracy around the world, are complaining that Obama's State Department is not encouraging Mubarak to move faster on leaving and instituting reforms.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/08/AR2011020805786.html?sub=AR
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
No surprise that the media is also reporting that Israel, Jordan and Saudia Arabia are all pressuring the US to move slow with its political efforts in Egypt.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
welp
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67351/joshua-stacher/egypts-democratic-mirage
Despite the tenacity, optimism, and blood of the protesters massed in Tahrir Square, Egypt's democratic window has probably already closed.
Contrary to the dominant media narrative, over the last ten days the Egyptian state has not experienced a regime breakdown. The protests have certainly rocked the system and have put Mubarak on his heels, but at no time has the uprising seriously threatened Egypt's regime. Although many of the protesters, foreign governments, and analysts have concentrated on the personality of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, those surrounding the embattled president, who make up the wider Egyptian regime, have made sure the state's viability was never in question. This is because the country's central institution, the military, which historically has influenced policy and commands near-monopolistic economic interests, has never balked.
― goole, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
and with Israel, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, et al urging "restraint," it ain't bloody likely.
― Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
http://grab.by/8RvP
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
think they would rather have bread than freedom tbh
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 18:07 (fifteen years ago)
Btw, that guy's in Yemen, not Egypt.
― Le mépris vient de la tête, la haine vient du cœur (Michael White), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
Recent Krugman column connected the steep rise in food prices, especially wheat (think: bread), with the widespread unrest in the middle east. He then connected the steep rise in food prices to crop failures and reduced yields caused by extreme weather events. He then connected these weather events with global climate change.
Thank you, Paul Krugman. Someone needs to be saying these things out loud in the media. He's the only one I can think of, offhand.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 18:45 (fifteen years ago)
given the level of unrest/strikes/riots still going on in Egypt dunno if stacher is really right there
― lmao reminisces about his days in southern china (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
Wael Ghonim: This is no longer the time to negotiate, unfortunately. We went on the street on the 25th, and we wanted to negotiate, we wanted to talk to our government. We were, you know knocking the door. They decided to negotiate with us at night, with rubber bullets, with police sticks, with water hoses, with teargas, tanks and with arresting about 500 people.... Thanks, you know, we got the message.
lol
― lmao reminisces about his days in southern china (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
Xpost, krugman's drawing from Joe Romm (Climate Progress), who has been repeatedly drawing attention to the issue in recent weeks, who in turn has been pointing to Lester Brown (earth policy institute, food/climate expert), but yeah, ad usual no one is willing to make the connection.
I think people are hesitant to do it because look what happened to Krugman: the Atlantic immediately ran the headline "Paul Krugman blames global warming for middle east uprisings"
In fact, Krugman presented a nuanced argument, that climate change was likely a contributing factor, and unfortunately a factor that will be impacting food production more and more as time passes since, you know, we're not doing anything about it.
― this is the internet! gifs are the final word! (Z S), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i read that article and liked it but sort of half-prepared myself for exactly what you say the Atlantic did
― kl0p's son (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
light is shed on the protest organizers http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/10/world/middleeast/10youth.html
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 06:07 (fifteen years ago)
King warned Obama Saudi could fund Egypt
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 10 February 2011 11:22 (fifteen years ago)
that headline is
strange
― HOOS the master?? STEEN NUFF (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 10 February 2011 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
There was a ":paper" at the end which made it even worse. It refers to today's time front page story but that is behind a paywall.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 10 February 2011 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
US internet memes go global
http://chzmemebase.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/memes-y-u-no-mubarak.jpg
― Pirates of the Caribbean V: Letters of Marque & Reprisal (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 February 2011 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
BREAKING NEWS10:32 AM ET Egyptian Army Officers Are Meeting to Discuss Taking Over Government, State TV Reports
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
Murbarak quits tonight
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576136101983949120.html
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 10 February 2011 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
question i guess is to what extent the military are willing to yield to reform and how the protestors react
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
AP: military commander for Cairo area, told 1000s of protesters in Tahrir Square: "All your demands will be met today"
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:05 (fifteen years ago)
lmao via @hoosteen
AriFleischer Ari Fleischer If I were an Egyptian protester, I'd be careful of saying "Mission Accomplished" too soon...26 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
i guess Mubarak isn't a big Foreign Policy reader
― Mordy, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
amazing. so awesome.
― lmao reminisces about his days in southern china (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
it is!
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)
Except, like always, it's just the miltary making sure that their poltical liability goes away. What are the chances Egypt will really get a truly democratic regime where the Emergency Law is gone and the Mukhabarat are disbanded or at least disempowered and restrained?
― Le mépris vient de la tête, la haine vient du cœur (Michael White), Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
i think theyll get something, as far as ~truly democratic~ not likely, tho who knows theres an opening which is more than before
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
http://i1.nyt.com/images/2011/02/11/world/11egypt3/11egypt3-hpLarge.jpg
whats up w/grabbing this guys head
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
itll be interesting to see across the middle east the effect of egypt/tunisia acting as a proof of concept - will these governments be able to put the genie back in the bottle
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
What are the chances Egypt will really get a truly democratic regime
Probably about the chance any of us will anywhere -- not terribly likely. But any kind of representation is better than no kind of representation.
― Mordy, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
What are the chances Egypt ends up like Turkey used to be, "democratic" with a military that acted with impunity
― just woke up (lukas), Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
itd be a big improvement
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
If there is a tacit understanding, as there was under the Ataturk regime, that 'this is the system you get, guaranteed by the Army, and here's how representative it will be' and they stick to those rules, it will at least assure the ppl that the regime is sticking to its rules.
The same problem besets Iran; they fake elections, eschew any kind of accountability for their excesses, blame 'foreign spies', etc...
― Le mépris vient de la tête, la haine vient du cœur (Michael White), Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)
"truly democratic"
― am0n, Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)
I can't think of a single country that is "truly democratic" lol
I am cheering improvement here, not the attainment of perfection
― lmao reminisces about his days in southern china (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)