Walter Bishop definitely the best character on this show. LET'S MAKE SOME LSD! I love that he's basically playing the same deranged old dude he did in Lord of the Rings, only a FRINGE SCIENTIST instead of a STALWART STEWARD OF GONDOR.
― BODY PROP (nickalicious), Saturday, 13 September 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
I really didn't like the pilot when I saw it last week, but weirdly it's grown on me over the week. I'm actually sorta looking forward to it tonight. Is this usual with Abrams' stuff? It sucks during the watching, but you recollect it fondly later?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 08:25 (seventeen years ago)
is joshua jackson playing george clooney or what
― gr8080 (max), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 01:13 (seventeen years ago)
Damn, how the hell did they get away with that gory shit, the surgeries, the eyeball (UGH), on public TV? I was seriously turned off by it. The rest of the episode was okay, I guess.
― Nhex, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 02:12 (seventeen years ago)
Didn't seem any more graphic than any given House episode.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 02:23 (seventeen years ago)
the eyeball was totally loltastic
― lol (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 02:58 (seventeen years ago)
This was awful. First episode wasn't great or anything, but it wasn't this bad. I don't even mind the clunky-as-fuck exposition of the first 5 minutes. The dream-sequence pregnancy thing? Yeah, I saw Aliens. The last image from the eye? I saw Wild Wild West too.
Felt like they were already out of ideas.
― Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 03:01 (seventeen years ago)
That played-out jaded horseshit stance where folks show off that they've watched movies and TV shows and read books and remember things from them and act like hot shit when they find these things in other movies / shows / books? Yeah, I liked it better when they didn't share.
― David R., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 03:34 (seventeen years ago)
Expected Chris Carter, got Joss Whedon.
― Kerm, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 03:56 (seventeen years ago)
Clearly, I really will watch Lance Riddick in anything.
― rogermexico., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 04:31 (seventeen years ago)
Lance is class.
xxpost
I'm not one for "I've seen this done elsewhere", nor do I think calling back upon Wild Wild West is anyway anyone can consider themselves hot shit. The point is really that a writer (or writers) should do well enough for someone not to notice. The eye thing has been done many, many times before, and it is usually a pretty cheap trick when someone's written themselves into a hole/can't be bothered to come up with something better. And the Aliens gag was weak.
I think I just find the world they've set up to be jarring and inconsistent. I don't mind being derivative, certainly not of genre tropes in a genre show, but they've got to help the viewers a bit. If you want to make a campy sci-fi/horror show, then do it. If you want a scary, serious thriller, then do that. There is no sense of humour in this show as far as I can tell, unless the cow thing was meant to be funny.
Kerm OTM, but at least Whedon seemed to have a sense of humour. He would willingly acknowledge from the get-go that the Hellmouth and Willow's hacking abilities was just an easy out for the writers, who were more interested in character anyway. I was hoping for a quality X-files deal, and I'll take a campy paranoid fantasy in its stead, but I can't be bothered with some inconsistent series aiming for somewhere in the middle, especially when it's as dull as this one.
I think I'm just disappointed, really. Hopefully it will get better, but I'm worried that it feels like they ran out of ideas in the second episode. Sorry if I offended you David R.
― Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 06:47 (seventeen years ago)
for the record, other than the seatwarmer gag I'm really really failing to see the whedon in this.
― rogermexico., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 07:09 (seventeen years ago)
Still dig Blair Brown, Lance Reddick and John Noble, but the other actors still have a ways to go. The pilot already lowered my expectations about the monster-of-the-week plots, I agree with the mediocrity as Gukbe describes.
― Nhex, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 07:42 (seventeen years ago)
Definitely neither Chris Carter nor Joss Whedon. The former had really sharp character work every episode and the latter had a sense of humor. I think what really disappoints me the most is the female protagonist. I can't even remember her name she's so unmemorable. I don't know if she's just getting awful writing from the writers, or she's just a poor actress.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 07:55 (seventeen years ago)
they really fucked themselves by starting this show off admitting there's a "pattern" to all of these things. oh, and the old guy just happened to work on anything involved in the pattern. magic computer can tell you EXACTLY where magic photo from dead girl's eye was taken. there weren't enough machinas in this episode for deuseses to be ex-ing from.
― REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:26 (seventeen years ago)
HOWEVER, i am still giving it a shot. but along with house tonight, this was kinda like fox's "ugh, come on, no way" tuesday.
― REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:27 (seventeen years ago)
I actually liked House tonight. But I don't think I've ever seen a House ep that I didn't enjoy.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:34 (seventeen years ago)
The point is really that a writer (or writers) should do well enough for someone not to notice. The eye thing has been done many, many times before, and it is usually a pretty cheap trick when someone's written themselves into a hole/can't be bothered to come up with something better. And the Aliens gag was weak.
As you might've gathered, it didn't really chafe me quite as much, tho I can't recall the eye thing being done before, and you can't really do a pregnancy "gag" without inadvertently referencing "Aliens". But to each their own -- I've got plenty of reservations about this thing (including my fear that it's going to resort to having a WACKY SCIENCE GIMMICK for every episode) (oooh do cold fusion next!), but I'm not not enjoying it. One request, tho (since the show makers are of course reading this): more Kirk Acevedo.
BTW, Gubke, sorry for getting pissy w/ my earlier comment. (I blame the internet.)
― David R., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:19 (seventeen years ago)
They Macgyver defibrillator bit was just ridiculous.
― I'm right right and you're wrong left (Susan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:22 (seventeen years ago)
the pregnant thing made me think of cronenberg's "shivers," but that's because "shivers" was on flix the day before yesterday.
― REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
more Kirk Acevedo
And maybe a Dean Winters cameo amirite?
― rogermexico., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
This show would be better if it had Cate Blanchett in it instead of her doppleganger.
― lol (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
that's the name i was lookig for last night!
― carne asada, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)
The only character in this show that is remotely endearing, entertaining or empathy inducing is Walter Bishop. This show sucks because all of the characters suck.
― Carl Magnusssen (petey_carnum), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah...I liked last night's episode way better than the pilot, but mainly just because they really didn't have enough story to fill out 90 minutes and it works much better as an hour. Walter Bishop is definitely the best part of the cast but he's treading a fine line of occasional, somewhat unexpected wackiness right now and that character could get tiresome or cheesy very quickly if they don't handle it right. Shows like this with a 'strong female lead' that don't bother casting a good actress or writing much of a personality for the character are so depressing.
― some dude, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:48 (seventeen years ago)
So what is the playing god part, is the kid a clone of Walter or just otherwise genetically messed with?
― mh, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
The only character in this show that is remotely endearing, entertaining or empathy inducing is Walter Bishop
Statement fails to account for RIDDICK FACTOR
― rogermexico., Thursday, 18 September 2008 00:55 (seventeen years ago)
I'm annoyed by the LOST music being recycled.
Also, yes, Joshua Jackson is just a bizarre form of Pacey - does he have any way of delivering his lines beyond bored/upset/ironic?"Yah dad, we sorta figured that out. OK? You can't retrieve images from eyeballs."
The show is pretty goofy - the previews made me yell "Don't steal from heroes!", and then my BF and I had a conversation about episodic series and, I dunno, chapter series.. I don;t know what the definitions are between the two. Episodic, to me, would imply episodes. But that's not the case?
― aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 01:22 (seventeen years ago)
Episodic means self-contained, largely, as opposed to serialized what's-its.
I'd even take the original Poor Man's Cate Blanchett, Sarah Wynter, over whoever plays Olivia.
lol @ Walter having the Doctor's hand-in-a-jar.
― Leee, Thursday, 18 September 2008 01:34 (seventeen years ago)
Was X-Files episodic or serialized or both? This is a serious question.
― aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:01 (seventeen years ago)
Both
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:03 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not all that familiar with much of Joss Whedon's work... He's just my go-to whipping boy whenever plot devices, government conspiracies, and powerful underworlds are too flippant to take half seriously. That may be just as much an Abrams trademark, but I don't watch his shows either.
Joshua Jackson hasn't been half as interesting as the description of him in his "file" in the first episode.
― Kerm, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:07 (seventeen years ago)
^^ wow do you not get Joss Whedon.
― rogermexico., Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:17 (seventeen years ago)
This show sucks because all of the characters suck.
― Leee, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:26 (seventeen years ago)
Abrams is more the plot device/conspiracy guy and Whedon is more the touchy-feely clever homey dialogue dude, I thought
― mh, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:27 (seventeen years ago)
Also: along with Aaron Sorkin, Whedon pretty much pioneered the serious treatment of season-as-arc in network drama.
― rogermexico., Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:34 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, Kerm, I think you might be confusing Whedon with someone else.
― Mordy, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:36 (seventeen years ago)
I mean the guy with the show about the high school cheerleader that fights demons.
― Kerm, Thursday, 18 September 2008 03:43 (seventeen years ago)
The West Wing?
― David R., Thursday, 18 September 2008 03:44 (seventeen years ago)
I kind of enjoyed this ep - goofy is the right word for it. This show has way more of an Alias vibe than Buffy/X-Files/Lost, right down to the bad sci-fi - never mind eyeball-imaging/accelerated growth, but also the gimmicky, guess-what-awesome-gadget-we're-using-this-week. Said gadget will probably never be used again, even when they inevitably start recycling plotlines.
Olivia looks more like Poppy Montgomery (another generic-TV aussie blonde) from Without A Trace than Cate Blanchett. She's still pretty bland but i think she might grow on me (whereas Pacey/dad are more likely to get tiresome fast) - in the same way i thought Jennifer Garner on Alias was pretty boring before that show's wtf-ness completely sucked me in.
― casino royale with cheese (Roz), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:35 (seventeen years ago)
I would give this show kudos if I got any hint from the writing that it is intentionally goofy, and that the writers are aware; but I get none of that
still, it is utterly goofy and not unenjoyable; I wouldn't buy the DVDs or nuthin but I wouldn't step out if it were on
― cozen (cozwn), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)
also: it is the x-files
― cozen (cozwn), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)
I know ppl have said it above but it bears restating and restating: this show is the x-files
It is the x-files in content but not in form.
― casino royale with cheese (Roz), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)
The X-Files was good.
― I'm right right and you're wrong left (Susan), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
good job outing the browncoats, Kerm
― some dude, Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
i saw the second episode of this. it's not the worst thing i've ever seen but i was happy to not get hooked on it at all (who has time to watch tv etc.).
― Jordan, Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)
The X-Files didn't assume that putting something in the script made it believable.
― Kerm, Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
c'mon, dudes, first couple of x-files episodes aren't what the show is famous for...
― REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
these guys could pull it out! i mean, they blew everything in their pilot but maybe...
― REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
anyway we finished the seriesFringe aka Dads: A Love Story is a very good series & 100% holds up the worst part of the whole series was Peter turning himself into an Observer but even that wasn’t terrible bc the rest of the story was good. oh and Joshua Jackson’s cry-acting is a bit too much, still bringing the old Dawson’s heat lol Give John Noble all his flowers, what a blessing he is to the series. Denethor The GOAT.
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 31 August 2023 05:39 (two years ago)
https://media.tenor.com/UtjjTDOuP1YAAAAC/dawson%27s-creek-basketball.gif
― hardcore technician gimmicks are also another popular choice f (President Keyes), Thursday, 31 August 2023 13:55 (two years ago)
ahaha stone cold classic RIGHT IN THE FACE
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 31 August 2023 14:51 (two years ago)
The entire series is on sale in the Apple TV store for $30. Heck of a deal if you don't mind all-digital
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 3 February 2024 07:26 (two years ago)
Just started back in with this on Max, having stopped midway through season 2. The season 2 episode with Peter Weller as a time traveler, "White Tulip," is fucking incredible. Noble and Weller have a scene together that might be the best thing I've seen, TV or movie, all year.
― Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Monday, 26 February 2024 04:27 (two years ago)
i love that episode so much, still hits as beautifully as it did the first time
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 26 February 2024 04:41 (two years ago)
watched a couple of these on pluto and . . . could do with fewer close-ups of walter's face. intrigued enough that i might start from the beginning though. the torv is grebt
― mookieproof, Monday, 27 April 2026 02:23 (one month ago)
it's worth a watch-through imo
― Serfin' USA (sleeve), Monday, 27 April 2026 04:12 (one month ago)
otm highly recommend!
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 27 April 2026 04:19 (one month ago)
IIRC some of the effects shots in the first season are properly disgusting - I remember being impressed with that even if the show doesn't quite know what it is yet. Second and third seasons are really, really good - I seem to remember it shoots itself in the foot a bit trying to work out a new status quo when Pacey disappears (did he have a movie to do?) and never really recovers, while never falling off to the extent that Battlestar Galactica did.
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 27 April 2026 11:03 (one month ago)
My family keeps pushing me to watch the newsreader show that Torv's in, anyone seen it?
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 27 April 2026 11:05 (one month ago)
Yes! I thought it was really good but i have only seen the first season
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 27 April 2026 14:53 (one month ago)
lol one of the first episodes i saw on pluto was when torv was . . . supposed to be possessed by leonard nimoy’s character? and played it like all vocal fry all the time? none of which i realized and thought was simply awful
― mookieproof, Thursday, 30 April 2026 07:44 (one month ago)
The first episode I saw of this show was the second one in season four back when it just came out. I enjoyed it enough to go back and watch the whole thing. It made things slightly confusing until I caught up
― treefell, Thursday, 30 April 2026 08:41 (one month ago)
ok i've watched the first maybe eight episodes
a) so much body horror! eyes bleeding, organs boiling, heads bursting, pregnancy explosions, crab-like heart parasite, etc. it's a lot
b) i don't require scientific verity in my sci-fi shows but this shit is ludicrous. already they have *twice* had our protagonists read the thoughts of comatose or literally dead subjects bc electricity (yet for some reason only the hot chick had to get naked and submerged in water to do it hmm)
c) also supposedly a dude subjected himself to the crab-like heart parasite and almost died JUST IN CASE our hero went to germany, sweet-talked a terrorist and relied on dead-brain reading to learn a two-word catchphrase
d) acting is v. good, although peter has had to sell some shitty dialogue. john noble is grebt, but a little walter weirdness goes a long way, and i don't really need so many closeups of his face
e) i'm okay with the endless closeups of everyone else's face (although i do wonder what peter's grooming regime is to keep that precise pseudo-beard going eternally)
f) idk anything about tv production, but this seems expensive? lotta external shots, people running through cars, swat teams attacking buildings based on any of our protagonists' random whims
g) love how, based on a literal psycho's demand, they'll send critically injured patients or corpses to walter's lab with no supervision
h) lance reddick had hella presence
i) tbh i probably wouldn't be continuing with it if olivia/anna torv weren't so riveting (yes she's lovely, but honestly mostly acting-wise)
― mookieproof, Thursday, 7 May 2026 03:41 (one month ago)
I think the Anna Torv casting is actually really crucial because she just grounds the show so well, and provides a good balance with whatever wonderful eccentricity Walter’s doing, or whatever emo-yearning Peter’s doing. I love Joshua Jackson but it’s very “The WB channel” school of acting. Torv is the secret third thing. she can think in closeup and be believable, or bring needed silence. She’s a wonderful actor.
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 7 May 2026 03:57 (one month ago)
otm
― mookieproof, Thursday, 7 May 2026 04:24 (one month ago)
her smiles can mean almost anything!
― mookieproof, Thursday, 7 May 2026 05:29 (one month ago)
Fringe is also a show that gets better in Seasons 2 and 3, when they figure out what the show is about.
― The Quaker Gurvitz Army (President Keyes), Thursday, 7 May 2026 13:37 (one month ago)