no! we must come up with unlikely alternate explanations for every joke and ruin them ALL with interminable arguments.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 03:39 (fifteen years ago)
*kills self*
― Citizen SNPs (Trayce), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 03:40 (fifteen years ago)
a. but not interesting enough to argue about...I think I thought about this on my own before while watching the episode, which was recently cause I'm powering through the first 10 seasons. homer's response isn't the joke and was prob an afterthought for the writer. classic episode...top 5 for me.
― iatee, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 03:43 (fifteen years ago)
The show's writers did not worry too much about perfecting Scorpio's lines because they knew Brooks would rewrite or ad lib new ones.[4] Entire parts of Scorpio's dialogue, such as his hammock speech, are Brooks's lines and not the writers'. Dan Castellaneta described how, after he prepared something for Homer to say in response to Brooks's new Scorpio lines, Brooks would deliver totally different lines in the next take.[7] Josh Weinstein said Homer's reactions are exactly like someone talking to Albert Brooks.[4]
― iatee, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 03:46 (fifteen years ago)
Hah. Yes I could totally see "you ever see a guy say goodbye to a shoe?" being an adlib, as well as castellanatas response!
On the DVD of season um... 1 or 2, the one where Marge falls for Jaques the bowling instructor, there is a whole outtake section where Brooks and Julie Kaver are doing what sounds very much like an extended adlib of the seduction scene where she's fainted. There is someone giggling in the background and everything. Brooks is a hoot.
― Citizen SNPs (Trayce), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 03:50 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1355405/Daniel-Agger-shows-tattoos.html
― the ineluctable bigness of john mensah (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 February 2011 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
amazing post i stumbled across on a TV Without Pity forum:
Practically everyone on the Simpsons has a catch phrase, which was highlighted at the end of one episode where all of the characters appeared and said their's. Then, everyone looks at Lisa, who hasn't said anything, she frowns then mutters, "if anyone needs me, I'll be in my room." Here's the debate I had with someone else once: Is that her catch phrase, or is the point that she doesn't have one? I thought it was the latter, my debatee thought it was the former. Opinions?
like, this person makes the people on the wrong side of the viking debate seem like rocket scientists.
― some dude, Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:05 (fifteen years ago)
the wrong side of the viking debate
Which is the wrong side again?
― death, taxes and (onimo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 09:08 (fifteen years ago)
but, they're right?
― and the hint of parp (ledge), Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
oh i misread the last part, i guess by "this person" i mean the one being described, not the one who wrote the post.
― some dude, Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
imo it is both
― the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
Procrastination, that's where Darragh's a salmon.
― death, taxes and (onimo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
no, you've got that completely wrong
― the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
It simply means that you were really good at procrastinating, not that you are literally a salmon when you do so.
― death, taxes and (onimo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
were = are
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SsEJYY3HW8E/TARBbMUEmDI/AAAAAAAACMY/XwgbS8Ppwv8/s1600/Salmond460x276.jpg
― kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
Pointless nationalist grandstanding, that's where he's a Salmond.
― death, taxes and (onimo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
no no no
The procrastination is mere happenstance, and i am literally a salmon
― the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
it is literally an actual metaphor
― the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
― some dude, Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:43 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
well the writer has completely missed the point too--it's not that lisa doesn't have a catchphrase, it's that she thinks everyone else is a moron!
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 31 March 2011 13:16 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e2weCZFqWQ
― mick signals, Friday, 1 April 2011 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
heroin, that's where I'm a viking!
― symsymsym, Saturday, 2 April 2011 01:14 (fifteen years ago)
yeah cad that's true too, i mean the person writing was clearly kinda dumm even if they weren't on the really wrong side of the debate
― kl0pson (some dude), Saturday, 2 April 2011 01:19 (fifteen years ago)
i love how mad the wrong interpretation of this joke makes aero
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 21:21 (thirteen years ago)
classic
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 21:21 (thirteen years ago)
ha guess we were both reviving this at the same time
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 21:22 (thirteen years ago)
my favorite aero thread, next to poop shelf
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 21:35 (thirteen years ago)
Second, there was controversy over the existence and meaning of Bentley's alleged instruction to Craig, "let him have it, Chris". Craig and Bentley denied that Bentley had said the words while the police officers testified that he had said them. Further, Bentley's counsel argued that even if he had said the words, it could not be proven that Bentley had intended the words to mean the informal meaning of "shoot him, Chris" instead of the literal meaning of "give him the gun, Chris".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Bentley_case#Attempted_burglary_and_the_murder_of_PC_Sidney_Miles
the only time a linguistic debate got more heated
― *buffs lens* (schlump), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 21:53 (thirteen years ago)
Huh. I missed this internet war. The dream interpretation's never occurred to me. I guess it's plausible, though this metafilter post makes a good argument for "area in which he excels":
http://www.metafilter.com/61946/Sleep-is-where-Ralph-is-a-Viking#1723914
― jim, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 22:14 (thirteen years ago)
this seriously happens in a bugs bunny cartoon
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 22:21 (thirteen years ago)
The dream interpretation's never occurred to me. I guess it's plausible
Lighting a candle and saying a prayer thanking the gods that Aerosmith is currently on tour.
― Tom Hardy & the Batbreakers (Phil D.), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 22:30 (thirteen years ago)
"Oh boy, sleep! That's where I'm a pred ship!"
― Tom Hardy & the Batbreakers (Phil D.), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 22:31 (thirteen years ago)
epic thread
did horseshoe and n/a revive at the same time by total coincidence!? or was it brought up on some other thread or something
― some dude, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 22:49 (thirteen years ago)
in dreams that's where I begin responsibilities
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 23:05 (thirteen years ago)
btw I never read this thread so I kind of started now (didn't finish obvi) but I have to say that deejs entrance into it is on some classic wwf new villain out of nowhere shit
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 9 October 2012 23:22 (thirteen years ago)
haha wow this thread. just read the whole thing but I never heard of this "debate".
I wonder if there's some fundamental difference in how the A & B people experience dreams. It seems like a few of the A people have a problem conceiving of sleep as a place, which might be why they were stretching for some alternate interpretation.
― wk, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 05:37 (thirteen years ago)
Would never in one million years have conceived of the non-dream option, what is even happening to America
― www.toilet-guru.com (silby), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 05:50 (thirteen years ago)
It's actually exactly the sort of thing I'd think of first and then go "duh" when I realized the sensible interpretation.
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 05:56 (thirteen years ago)
my gf was asking me what ilx was like tonight and i described this thread to her. i think she got the point.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 06:45 (thirteen years ago)
can she explain the point to the 35%
― Randy Carol (darraghmac), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 08:43 (thirteen years ago)
I'm coming around to the dream option, but I don't see why the non-dream option strikes people as so unnatural. It's natural to hear "that's where I'm an X" and assume that the gesture towards a location is just metaphorical for a context in which the speaker is an X. We use this sort of spatial metaphor all of the time.
What I'm guessing blocks this reading for people is that "viking" is never used as a metaphor for "champ"... my assumption was that Ralph was inventing an idiom, and part of the humour (maybe unintended) is that he's coining a phrase to express how dumb he is.
Anyway, I'm reluctantly evolving towards the other reading. But the metafilter post that I linked makes a good point, that 5 or 6 foreign language translations confirm the non-dream option, and none unambiguously confirm the dream option. This is the closest thing to a paraphrase we can get.
― jim, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:39 (thirteen years ago)
STOP IT JUST STOP IT
― kinder, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:41 (thirteen years ago)
Viking of Dreams II: The Next Generation
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:45 (thirteen years ago)
It's natural to hear "that's where I'm an X" and assume that the gesture towards a location is just metaphorical for a context in which the speaker is an X.
This is a little unclear. I meant,
It's natural to hear "that's where I'm an X" and assume that the gesture towards a location is just metaphorical for "When it comes to that, I'm an X."
― jim, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:46 (thirteen years ago)
No really, STOP THIS MADNESS.
― emil.y, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:51 (thirteen years ago)
to sleep, perchance to dream
― barthes simpson, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:52 (thirteen years ago)
fuck I ate ALL the popcorn during the last round of this
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:52 (thirteen years ago)
OK, I'm done. ;) *lets sleeping dogs lie*
― jim, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:56 (thirteen years ago)
sleeping dog vikings
― barthes simpson, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:57 (thirteen years ago)
this is seriously one of the best threads ever
― Technology of the Big Muff (DJP), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 13:59 (thirteen years ago)