Shall we anticpate the AMC series "Breaking Bad"? I think I may.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5619 of them)

sometimes you dont want a criminal attorney - you want a criminal, attorney

ice cr?m, Friday, 28 January 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

RUN

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 28 January 2011 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_3u-G03Ri0

beer, beer, beer (Pillbox), Friday, 28 January 2011 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

breaking bad actors in other things #1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBFvxqEtgiM

a nan, a bal, an anal ― (abanana), Friday, 28 January 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/run_dmc.gif

it made me wish batman had written an article on mfas (Edward III), Thursday, 10 February 2011 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

<3

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 10 February 2011 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

hawwwwww

gallagher 3 (latebloomer), Thursday, 10 February 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

two months pass...

ok, finally dragged my heels through the end of season 2 -- fuck this show imo. hate when a DENSE LATTICEWORK OF COINCIDENCES AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS takes the place of plot.

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

guess you hate life, sorry bro

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

lol u mad doggie

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

maybe you should go watch some 2 1/2 men

iatee, Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

maybe you'd like to have a real conversation about this without any ad hominem attacks?

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

how is that an ad hominem attack, I was just suggesting you watch a show you enjoy, 2 1/2 men instead of a show you don't like, breaking bad

iatee, Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

maybe some dude is charlie sheen

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

the climax in the last episode was too "authorial" and wacky for me but it doesn't erase everything else in S2, which was awesome until that moment

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

RUN

And thusly create the illusion of babby (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

imo the s2 finale was very much of a piece with the wacky authorial nature of what came before

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

I felt sort of the same way about the end of season two, it was too much of a punctuation mark, too much of a SEE??

Season 3 on the other hand is so wow, so much of a jump. Trudge on, some dude, trudge on.

Clay, Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

I liked season 2 but yeah, season three was whole new heights. Definitely not a series of coincidences but a series of events that the characters set in motion themselves through their own good and horrible choices. What is also fun for me was to get a look at the fucked up motivations behind those choices.

phantoms from a world gone by speak again the immortal tale: (Jenny), Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

when does the new season start? ever?

deez m'uts (La Lechera), Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

July 17th!

Clay, Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah when S3 comes out on DVD shortly before S4 starts i will probably try to rent it and catch up -- it's an aight show and has its merits, i'm just kind of frustrated at the moment at seeing all the ways it gets close to being a show i could love and then keeps daring me to hate it.

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

oh good, thanks!
i like it 90% of the time, less so when there are "clever" conceits like the stupid fly episode
i never liked it when the wire would try to be clever either
i think i basically hate when things are too clever. just let the story be without injecting cleverness into it all the damn time.

deez m'uts (La Lechera), Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

I loved that whole framing device for Season 2. It wasn't annoying to me at all--it resulted from the actions of the characters, so it wasn't arbitrary.

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

I think half the reason they did the fly episode was budget constraints.

Number None, Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:54 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that was a classic "bottle" episode

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

Loved the fly episode

Jeff, Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

Frankly, I found the whole secret underground lair conceit more than faintly ridiculous for the duration of S3. I thought it veered close to Nip/Tuck levels of ridiculousness. Hope S4 brings things back to reality at least a touch.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

Really? You find it that outlandish?

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

Yes. Like, James Bond villain outlandish.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, on a show with crazy homicidal mexican twins and shit?

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

s3 > s2 > s1 IMO. I'll be surprised if S4 manages to continue this trend. Really hope all concerned have a specific endgame in mind.

Simon H. Shit (Simon H.), Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

I remember reading that Vince Gilligan specifically told the writers to write themselves into corners in S3.

Number None, Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really find the "underground lair" particularly outlandish considering what IRL drug traffickers are willing to do:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narco_submarine

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

He has hummed and hawed a little about whether the fourth season will be the last. I hope it is though and they can go out on a high.

Number None, Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

I remember reading that Vince Gilligan specifically told the writers to write themselves into corners in S3.

― Number None, Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:29 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

lol if season 4 actually takes place in a corner

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

I loved that whole framing device for Season 2. It wasn't annoying to me at all--it resulted from the actions of the characters, so it wasn't arbitrary.

― shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:53 PM (45 minutes ago) Bookmark

the end of s2 resulted in part from the actions of a character who had only been introduced a few episodes earlier, whose relevant profession was revealed like a couple scenes earlier. i get that it was in part ABOUT that reveal but i feel like the less effort goes into 'planting the seeds' of something like that, the more arbitrary it ultimately feels.

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

no, the end resulted from Walt's actions (or inaction)

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

arbitrary? wasn't the wreckage featured at the beginning of many of the episodes in S2? (been a while since i've seen these episodes)

jeff, Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

well sure, through a rube goldberg butterfly effect that the characters themselves have no way of being aware of, not in any way that demonstrates a sense of right and wrong and consequences. xpost

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

the only thing I found "outlandish" about the whole underground lair, and really the whole arrangement with (and value of) Heisenberg, was the idea that they were the first/only crew to pull something like that off. Am I supposed to believe that all meth in this country comes from junkies in RVs?

xxps

rockapads, Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

The only reason the coincidence seemed like a Rube Goldberg machine is because we knew the guy who was the main catalyst. That is how things happen in real life; we just can't see it that way we don't have the god's eye view of the narrative. Was the crank head finally getting fed up and dropping the ATM machine dropped on dude's head any less of a coincidence?

rockapads, Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

x-post to some dude

it's not very rube goldbergian at all! walt's inaction allows jane to die, which affects her dad, then plane goes crashy. not that crazy. dramatic maybe, but THAT'S BECAUSE IT's FUCKING DRAMA.

everything walter does has consequences, which seems to me to be the point.

shamefully blowable (latebloomer), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

that was just a thing that happened, there was no actual or even perceived coincidence to the ATM thing (xpost)

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

ultimately i get that there IS some degree of logic or at least thematic coherence to this stuff, i'm just saying the overall effect strikes me as dumm and faux 'deep'

hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

we don't usually have the god's eye view in this show so when something like that happens it can yank you out of it; it did me. usually the big strength of the show for me is seeing the characters working through the consequences of fucked up shit and it usually feels natural, even inevitable. the final ep of S2 you could see the writers pulling it all together which is funny when it happens on seinfeld but not so much here. that said this is one of the very best shows ever made for television so... i'll allow it

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

ultimately i get that there IS some degree of logic or at least thematic coherence to this stuff, i'm just saying the overall effect strikes me as dumm and faux 'deep'

there are parts of s2 that i dislike, or find heavy-handed, & the plane crash as visual metaphor is probably too much but i think thematically its really good & interesting & works to push the audiences awareness beyond just sorta ~whats going on~ & really helps throw into relief how selfish & self-deluded walt's thinking is in a p powerful way...

idk i think the show gets morally interesting in late s2 & i like that its trying to make the point abt the sheer magnitude of 'unintended consequences'. also i think the moment where walt kills jane is probably one of the most emotional & potent moments of the show so far imo. it was cathartic to have that dramatized into this big 'the sky is falling' thing in the story itself

dearth of the hipster (Lamp), Thursday, 28 April 2011 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

plane crash is worth it for Walt's speech at the school gym in s3

Simon H. Shit (Simon H.), Thursday, 28 April 2011 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

^^ so true, I recant my criticism.

Clay, Thursday, 28 April 2011 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

w/r/t suspension of disbelief, the only thing on the show that I struggled with is the idea that Gus is so completely reliant on Walt that he has to go to these lengths to keep the lab running. Is his overhead so high that he can't go a month without supply?

Also they need to explain why Saul made such a radical decision to put his life on the line for Walt and Jesse.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 28 April 2011 23:52 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.