2008 Primaries Thread 3: The Rejecting and Denouncening

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6022 of them)

This "loving your country" stuff is coming from a guy who got his d*ck sucked in the Oval Office, the ultimate symbol of American democracy, while he was the president - srsly, how can anyone swallow any of this, especially from him?

StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:15 (eighteen years ago)

do people still srsly hold that agin him?? i've only recently 'wrapped my head' around how skeevy the whole thing was. i found it really boring back then for some reason.

tremendoid, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:22 (eighteen years ago)

i was well attuned to how full of shit the repub leadership by the time impeachment came around. now that was fascinating. Henry Hyde, the rest of those eberts, my own local congressman Jim Rogan who I'd theretofore thought of as generally earnest for a republican, as he'd come to my college to speak where I asked him some lefty question and he batted me down with logic. Jim was religious about taking Clinton down, weird stuff.

tremendoid, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:29 (eighteen years ago)

I just thought he'd be one of the last to be allowed to talk about loving his country or respecting the voters, considering what he did. But people forgive and forget (or, probably: don't give a shit)

StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:29 (eighteen years ago)

(xpost)

and now the Clintons are (ok, indirectly) campaigning for the republican candidate, ain't that something?

StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:30 (eighteen years ago)

re: Rogan so ironic he got taken out by Adam Schiff, Bill Clinton's brunette doppelgänger.

tremendoid, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:38 (eighteen years ago)

if i have my districts right

tremendoid, Sunday, 23 March 2008 10:39 (eighteen years ago)

This "loving your country" stuff is coming from a guy who got his d*ck sucked in the Oval Office, the ultimate symbol of American democracy, while he was the president - srsly, how can anyone swallow any of this

Find the joke here.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 23 March 2008 12:40 (eighteen years ago)

and now the Clintons are (ok, indirectly) campaigning for the republican candidate, ain't that something?

you're the one playing Ken Starr here

dmr, Sunday, 23 March 2008 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

I like Suzy's pussy-cat picture.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 March 2008 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

guys, Hillary took the initiative in inventing the internet. Barry is too nice to tell you that, but you can bet that your friend Mr. Straight Talk Express will let everyone know that she's a legend in her own mind, and that all you need for verification of her experience and judgment is to ask her extremely trustworthy husband

What I don't understand is how the Dem. party leadership even allows this kind of crap anymore.

no such thing

gabbneb, Sunday, 23 March 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

"So, what's the difference between you and Clinton then?" - Obama's reply: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qUoN-fjvLY

StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

I guess it's just a funny coincidence that the Clinton hatchet men are the "white boys"

gabbneb, Sunday, 23 March 2008 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

Obama's big fairy tale, the press myth re Bill's racial attacks, read about all this and more in Fables of Clinton

gabbneb, Sunday, 23 March 2008 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

Oooh, this sounds like it's going to end with everyone living happily ever after - nice!

StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

In the presidential primary campaign, HRC benefits not just from the demographics of Pennsylvania, but its unique amber-preserved culture.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9165.html

gabbneb, Sunday, 23 March 2008 17:01 (eighteen years ago)

"The Congealed State"

gabbneb, Sunday, 23 March 2008 17:02 (eighteen years ago)

"So, what's the difference between you and Clinton then?" - Obama's reply: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qUoN-fjvLY

-- StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 15:54

takes him a while to get on a roll there

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 23 March 2008 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

But it's like he's dying to say the difference is character, or something blindingly obvious. Also Gabbneb OTM about Straight Talk Express, why else would McCain get chumsy w/HRC?

suzy, Sunday, 23 March 2008 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

I think that clip of Obama is terribly impressive.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 March 2008 17:25 (eighteen years ago)

hey you wanna fucking puke? look at this picture!

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/15918/thumbs/r-MCCAIN-WANTED-IRAQ-WAR-large.jpg

jhøshea, Sunday, 23 March 2008 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

OMG you mean McCain supports the war?!?

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 23 March 2008 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

wait waht?

jhøshea, Sunday, 23 March 2008 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

He's the only one not wearing camouflage gear - are those soldiers trying to get him killed?

StanM, Sunday, 23 March 2008 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

I could never forgive Sean Hannity for the way he and Foxnews treated Ron Paul. I dont have cable TV anymore because of it.
Steve | 03.22.08 - 9:24 pm | #

J0rdan S., Sunday, 23 March 2008 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

Okay THAT made me LOL.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 23 March 2008 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

that obama clip is great...it does take him a while to get going but that's what's kind of good about it; he's able to slip in lots of passive aggressive stuff while complimenting her

akm, Monday, 24 March 2008 03:47 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-rodriguez24mar24,0,5884639.column

In some ways, Barack Obama's speech on race last week was as brilliant as it was nuanced. But for all its rhetorical beauty, it was also an enormous step backward and, in the end, a rather self-serving call for more discussion about racial grievance in a country that has already done way too much talking.

ughhhhh

deej, Monday, 24 March 2008 04:02 (eighteen years ago)

http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2008/03/those-darn-black-people.html

Pat Buchanan: We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?

kingfish, Monday, 24 March 2008 04:12 (eighteen years ago)

goddammit guys this shit is trying my zen

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 06:24 (eighteen years ago)

and it's only just beginning

kingfish, Monday, 24 March 2008 06:29 (eighteen years ago)

Anyone catch part of Richardson on the Today show?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 24 March 2008 11:35 (eighteen years ago)

plz explain the fucking relevance of daily Gallup poll to anything

Dr Morbius, Monday, 24 March 2008 13:16 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.watchingsitcoms.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/welcomebackkotter.jpg

HI DERE, Monday, 24 March 2008 13:21 (eighteen years ago)

daily gallup is essential to the 'sport' aspect for those heathens who didn't fill out their brackets.

Cosmo Vitelli, Monday, 24 March 2008 13:47 (eighteen years ago)

<3 Chuck Todd

gabbneb, Monday, 24 March 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

Hitch:

To have accepted Obama's smooth apologetics is to have lowered one's own pre-existing standards for what might constitute a post-racial or a post-racist future. It is to have put that quite sober and realistic hope, meanwhile, into untrustworthy and unscrupulous hands. And it is to have done this, furthermore, in the service of blind faith. Mark my words: This disappointment is only the first of many that are still to come.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

is that written in english?

dmr, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

wow

That same supposed message of his is also contradicted in a different way by trying to put Geraldine Ferraro on all fours with a thug like Obama's family "pastor." Ferraro may have sounded sour when she asserted that there can be political advantages to being black in the United States—and she said the selfsame thing about Jesse Jackson in 1984—but it's perfectly arguable that what she said is, in fact, true, and even if it isn't true, it's absurd to try and classify it as a racist remark.

dmr, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

trying to put Geraldine Ferraro on all fours

UH

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

Uh, welcome to the part of Obama's speech where he says that calling Ferraro a racist misses the point of her remarks, Hitchens.

HI DERE, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

why does Hitchens still have a job

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:52 (eighteen years ago)

yeah the all fours w/ a thug part was what I was wowing at

dmr, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:52 (eighteen years ago)

He hates religion so much that he sees red instead of black.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

That Hitchens article is full of pernicious nonsense.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 March 2008 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

nothing like completely misinterpreting/misrepresenting a black man's remarks while simultaneously summoning the image of a thuggish black guy raping an old white lady, eh Hitchens

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 24 March 2008 18:54 (eighteen years ago)

Onward and upward: The Obama Doctrine. (analysis of Obama's broader foreign-policy vision)

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 March 2008 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

has hitchens always been weird about The Blacks?

gff, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:03 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.