haha hover-hand
― David Warner (Princess TamTam), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
http://i51.tinypic.com/71r9kl.jpg
Hey! That guy's browsing Facebook at work oh wai--
― Cunga, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
Is that Katy Perry?
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/altreport/2011/01/katy-perry-visits-facebook-hq-mark-zuckerbro-has-hornie-grin.html
― Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
Is that Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.)?
http://cdn.hipsterrunoff.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/800/20110121-8inshnwc3pwsh26ss37imcnud3.jpg
And for a billion dollar company, Facebook has a shitty workplace.
― Pleasant Plains, Friday, 21 January 2011 23:01 (fifteen years ago)
looks just like the movie
― dayo, Saturday, 22 January 2011 02:11 (fifteen years ago)
http://runt-of-the-web.com/post/2472562549/why-i-need-quit-facebook
― markers, Monday, 24 January 2011 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
This fucking horrible black-bordered pop-up has just started appearing when you view photos. Really hope it's not permanent. Stop fiddling, Zuckerberg.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:41 (fifteen years ago)
An eminently more sensible addition would be to have a hi-res viewing option on photos.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:56 (fifteen years ago)
ive noticed on some of my friends photos there is a button for "download hi-res version" now
― gr8080, Friday, 4 February 2011 01:16 (fifteen years ago)
wonder if FB did the smart thing and stored everybody's photos in their original res when they were uploaded
― dayo, Friday, 4 February 2011 01:28 (fifteen years ago)
yeah prob not otherwise shit that was uploaded before they went from 600px wide to 720px wide wouldnt still look tiny and crappy
― gr8080, Friday, 4 February 2011 01:59 (fifteen years ago)
Nah you can opt to upload in hi res so I'd say its when ppl have chosen that option.
― Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Friday, 4 February 2011 02:35 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, pretty sure though that anyone over 50 is still going to just upload 200 x 150s of themselves.
I don't know how you even do that on purpose, let alone on accident.
― Pleasant Plains, Friday, 4 February 2011 04:10 (fifteen years ago)
i always comment "y'all are small" on those
― gr8080, Friday, 4 February 2011 05:11 (fifteen years ago)
http://grab.by/grabs/28baad5bef139414f4cf03264ec1b117.png
― gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 03:33 (fifteen years ago)
A guy I know recently got hired as a writer for the TV show Lights Out, and now this guy is commenting on his Facebook updates:http://remote.lohudblogs.com/files/2008/01/regecathey.jpg
― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
awesome
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 04:35 (fifteen years ago)
ugh new photo viewer sucks unless you're on a big screen
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:41 (fifteen years ago)
^^^
― ENBB, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:43 (fifteen years ago)
its weird! wtf w/the black background
― ice cr?m, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:53 (fifteen years ago)
ruh roh, i don't think i have seen this
― markers, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:55 (fifteen years ago)
lotta photo nerds say photos always look better on a black background, but yeah still weird
just noticed that if you get a new notification while in that viewer, you have to close the viewer just to see that you have a new notification. not a big deal, but still poorly designed
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:55 (fifteen years ago)
also, you cant right click and get the image url, but there is a "download" button
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:56 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i can understand their motivation for the change but it just seems a lil rough even for facebook
― ice cr?m, Friday, 11 February 2011 03:58 (fifteen years ago)
is this where they start to die like myspace?
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 04:10 (fifteen years ago)
i just defaced and so did everyone i know o well
― ice cr?m, Friday, 11 February 2011 04:12 (fifteen years ago)
More Beautiful Photosby Sam Odio on Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 1:21pm
UPDATE on Thursday, February 10, 2011: We are rolling out the new Photo Viewer to everyone over the course of the next few weeks. Now, you can browse more photos faster without having to lose your place in Facebook. Visit the Help Center to learn more about using the Photo Viewer. Check out our Engineering blog for more technical details about how we designed and engineered the new feature.
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 05:40 (fifteen years ago)
pr0 tip: hit F5 to return to old-skool photo mode
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
* Request to Join Against facebook new photo viewer 22 members * Like The new photo viewer on face.book sucks Page 407 people like this. * Request to Join new facebook photo viewer sucks 10 members * Request to Join New Facebook Photo Viewer?..C'Mon son. 2 members * Request to Join Please change the new Facebook photo viewer 8 members * Request to Join FACEBOOK: Change the photo viewer back to how it was 262 members * Request to Join The new Facebook photo viewer is a big pile of poo 37 members
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
facebook users in 'hate change' shocker
― Most women do not like atheism.(8)(9)(10) (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 11 February 2011 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
i finally got invited to google questions because grady wanted to know where he could buy ugly shoes
― max, Friday, 11 February 2011 06:04 (fifteen years ago)
you're making me feel like forks here but come on how are these uglyhttp://classicrockmusicblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/joe-jackson-look-sharp.jpg
― gr8080, Friday, 11 February 2011 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
dog
― max, Friday, 11 February 2011 06:18 (fifteen years ago)
i mean maybe that shit would fly in hawaii
yeah that question about the shoes went to my school email and i was really confused
― dark link (roxymuzak), Friday, 11 February 2011 14:41 (fifteen years ago)
how are they not ugly
― am0n, Friday, 11 February 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
theyre "sharp"
― dark link (roxymuzak), Friday, 11 February 2011 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
and thus begins ridiculous trend of brand pages trying to break the world record for most fb status update 'likes'http://www.facebook.com/LilWayne/posts/135207573211169http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150104058844653&set=a.124804629652.101377.114998944652&comments
― salsa shark, Wednesday, 16 February 2011 17:24 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ the 12 guys who accepted this friend requesthttp://i.imgur.com/Uql9u.png
― gr8080, Thursday, 17 February 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
college of the sequoias made me lol
― dayo, Friday, 18 February 2011 00:42 (fifteen years ago)
what its just some hot naked chick making friend requests to strangers, shes prob v nice
― ice cr?m, Friday, 18 February 2011 00:54 (fifteen years ago)
I miss myspace where it was the same dozen dudes making comment like "u so hot call me add me."
― http://tinyurl.com/lil-shits (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 18 February 2011 01:19 (fifteen years ago)
yo can i get wit u
― ☠ (roxymuzak), Friday, 18 February 2011 02:08 (fifteen years ago)
a/s/l
― Trayce, Friday, 18 February 2011 02:18 (fifteen years ago)
hey i dont use facebook much but check out my dating profile and videos here
― gr8080, Friday, 18 February 2011 02:24 (fifteen years ago)
you know in 5 years when we look back and ask why did facebook fail, it's not going to be some marketing misstep or privacy violation or new competitor. it's because it still can't handle a fucking ANIMATED GIF. wtf
― dayo, Friday, 18 February 2011 02:32 (fifteen years ago)
otm
― gr8080, Friday, 18 February 2011 03:10 (fifteen years ago)
ive always said thats why fb cant really be considered 'internet'
― ice cr?m, Friday, 18 February 2011 03:12 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah its not the same without penguin.gif HRs and BLINK TAGS ;_;
― Trayce, Friday, 18 February 2011 03:23 (fifteen years ago)