http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2011/01/06/12513/little_britain_could_return
And Walliams admitted that Little Britain had fallen out of fashion, but would one day become a ‘classic’ that people would want resurrected.
‘We’re waiting for it to become classic,’ he told ITV’s This Morning. ‘There’s a bit where the recent past is naff. Look at Take That. Just after they finished, the thought of seeing them back together wasn't that exciting. Ten years later and suddenly we all want to see it.’
Once you get past the sheer arrogance of that quote, clearly the lads are openly engineering their own revival. I mean.
― goldenarsehat.jpg (Schlafsack), Thursday, 6 January 2011 22:48 (fifteen years ago)
Add to that Walliams's dismal performance in that shit-awful clip show he's doing and he's well on track to be the next crusty old has-been of British television.
― goldenarsehat.jpg (Schlafsack), Thursday, 6 January 2011 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
Not really British TV (it's on Showtime in the US but downloadable), but anyone seen the first two episodes of, er, Episodes? Steven Mangan & Tamsin Grieg are successful sitcom writers, lured over to LA and their show ends up changing beyond all recognition and stars Matt LeBlanc, everything goes wrong etc. Was surprisingly un-sitcommy.
― Not the real Village People, Friday, 7 January 2011 02:17 (fifteen years ago)
Mangan and Greig as a married couple is megalolz after their Green Wing relationship. Can't wait.
― goldenarsehat.jpg (Schlafsack), Friday, 7 January 2011 02:21 (fifteen years ago)
It wasn't laugh-out-loud by all means but promising. I'm aware it's probably because I am a Britisher in CA (no hueg mansion in LA tho)
― Not the real Village People, Friday, 7 January 2011 02:27 (fifteen years ago)
btw this is absolutely British TV, it's produced by Hat trick and goes out on BBC2 next week.
― goldenarsehat.jpg (Schlafsack), Friday, 7 January 2011 02:34 (fifteen years ago)
Ah cool. It has Daisy Haggard in too who I can't really believe as an LA media type but that's because I've been re-watching Psychoville where she's a total ditz.
― Not the real Village People, Friday, 7 January 2011 02:41 (fifteen years ago)
Produced by Hat Trick; paid for by Showtime - it's pretty genuinely co-pro'd.
― She Got the Shakes, Friday, 7 January 2011 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah but it counts in this thread is what I mean.
― "Smurfette's Smurfy Adventsmurf" (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 7 January 2011 11:03 (fifteen years ago)
Come Fly With Me officially racist
Jim Davidson has come out in support of Matt Lucas and David Walliams' new comedy Come Fly With Me.
― "Smurfette's Smurfy Adventsmurf" (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
Right, no one watch Episodes. Abysmal.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, 10 January 2011 22:37 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, fairly poor really.
― progspeed you! black metallers (aldo), Monday, 10 January 2011 22:42 (fifteen years ago)
Every scene was so laboured.
Richard Griffiths looks very fucking strange these days doesn't he?
― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, 10 January 2011 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
Aye, seemed like it was the first 5 minutes of a normal comedy show stretched to 30.
― progspeed you! black metallers (aldo), Monday, 10 January 2011 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
I think I might stick with it for another week to see if it gets better, but I basically appreciated the idea of it rather than actually liked it. The running gags were awful.
Also, Tamsin Greig playing it as Emma Thompson was really annoying.
― ailsa, Monday, 10 January 2011 23:55 (fifteen years ago)
I am rapidly becoming the Geir of this thread.
Episode 1 is slow but ep 2 picks up the pace. Really enjoying it so far.
― Suppositori Spelling (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:32 (fifteen years ago)
it did spin up towards the end, but a bit laboured and cliched. Worth another week at least.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 11 January 2011 02:59 (fifteen years ago)
ping as lindy-hopper on ed reardon = perfect
― moholy-nagl (history mayne), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:18 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know what enter of those thing are
not 'in the loop' of uk lol industry
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)
enter=any
God, Episodes really was abysmal. In the absence of any laffs seemed to rely on the same weird failed UStv production values as the terrible BBBC4 adaptation of Money. Not even Daisy Haggard could save it.
― Stevie T, Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
Yep, I agree, I thought Episodes 1 was a bit slow-but-kinda-interesting and then it really picks up the pace. It's not thigh-slappingly hilarious, but succeeds in being a good mix between Extras, 30 Rock and Curb.
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Friday, 28 January 2011 09:46 (fifteen years ago)
actually, I don't agree at all.
hey, how is Richard Griffiths younger than my dad??!
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Friday, 28 January 2011 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not seeing the pace ramp up at all with Episodes. Studio boss is still an ignorant dick, uptight bickering English people are still uptight and bickering.
New development! Joey has a big cock! Let's have some of that social awkwardness that really seems to amuse people ten years ago.
― onimo, Friday, 28 January 2011 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
I like all that, really. British couple fall for nearly every trick in the book, and you're kept guessing as to whether Matt LeBlanc is a complete moron or an evil genius. Studio boss is a mahoosive two-faced arsehole. And I really like the red-head director lady - she's like an LA cyborg or something.
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Friday, 28 January 2011 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
onimo's got a point, there's nothing about this show that screams 21st century. It's not bad or anything, just not doing anything new or pushing any boundaries.
― Balls is significantly to the left of Brown (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah and also it's quite bad.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Saturday, 29 January 2011 03:21 (fifteen years ago)
disgree on both points. i can't remember many other fourth-wall satires on the many facets and entanglements of the UK/US television divide. this is a subtle commentary on the nature of audience demographics, personal values vs marketability, selling out, and the underhanded nature of the entertainment machine.
For instance I like the way LeBlanc convinces the male lead that changing his much-beloved lesbian character to a straight romantic interest, not because of American family values, but because of the sheer length of a US comedy series compared to a British one.
Okay, we've had Extras which touched on a few points but had too many wacky moments and didn't quite delve deep enough with the subject. Curb was mostly farce about an old guy struggling with day-to-day life and 30 Rock, brilliant as it is, was comfortable dealing with US TV on its own rules. This show deals almsot entirely with the question - Do you or do you not sell your little private homegrown creation to a much larger market, and how much do you let them remold it until you put your foot down?
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Monday, 31 January 2011 11:21 (fifteen years ago)
i can't remember many other fourth-wall satires on the many facets and entanglements of the UK/US television divide. this is a subtle commentary on the nature of audience demographics, personal values vs marketability, selling out, and the underhanded nature of the entertainment machine.
ooh, ooh, where can i get a dvd?
― history mayne, Monday, 31 January 2011 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
For instance I like the way LeBlanc convinces the male lead that changing his much-beloved lesbian character to a straight romantic interest, not because of American family values, but because of the sheer length of a US comedy series compared to a British one.Yeah, I was pretty impressed with that too. There's serious potential for the use of intelligent concepts in this show. It's not taking the viewer for a mug, basically.
― dirty man haw (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 31 January 2011 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
Bollocks.
Do you or do you not sell your little private homegrown creation to a much larger market, and how much do you let them remold it until you put your foot down?
Yeah, maybe this makes sense if you're in the 0.02% of the audience that has a little private homegrown creation (or even the 0.5% that *thinks* it has one) and you therefore give a a flying fuck whether that's a good idea or not. I guess I'm in the other part of the audience though, the part that just wants lols and doesn't get them.
― JimD, Monday, 31 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
Liverpool's transfer deadline day to thread.
― progspeed you! black metallers (aldo), Monday, 31 January 2011 17:52 (fifteen years ago)
Lol just came to make that joke
― sammy bagels (a hoy hoy), Monday, 31 January 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
― JimD, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 04:11 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I don't give a shit about local councils but I watch Parks & Recreation. Not sure what your point is.
― dirty man haw (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 31 January 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
dl was basically saying "this is a good show because it's about X", which only works as an argument for people who care about X. P&R isn't good because it's about parks, it's good because it's funny.
― JimD, Monday, 31 January 2011 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
See you're just doing opinion now.
― dirty man haw (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 31 January 2011 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
Oh wait, I see what you're saying now.
― dirty man haw (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 31 January 2011 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
I offered to put on 10 O'Clock Live. Wife said 'what's that?' I told her it's the UK comedy/news thing with Carr and Brooker and Mitchell and Laverne, and she said she didn't remember it. Within one second of it starting she said 'oh, you should have said it's that thing with too much colour.'
― sexy Santa cosplay (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 6 February 2011 09:56 (fifteen years ago)
Limmy's Show is back, and the first episode is possibly the overall strongest one he's done.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 18 February 2011 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
I mostly don't get Limmy.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Friday, 18 February 2011 10:29 (fifteen years ago)
Episodes finally got funny with the fight scene that briefly seemed like it could be a gay makeout session. It did take its time to get into its stride.
10 o'clock live on the other hand bugs me enormously that they think they could compete against Question Time. I foolishly watch both.
― danzig, Monday, 21 February 2011 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
funniest bits on Limmy
his intro
"kill jester"
the" man-ia twain" thing esp. the third one
still not seen the first series tho :o
― u $ steal (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2011 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
limmy needs a thread of his own and when i get the time im gonna do it. new series is fucking amazing
what's the verdict on this friday night dinner series on ch4? haven't heard anything of it until just now checking robert popper's twitter - apparently he co-wrote it. worth a watch?
― NI, Thursday, 17 March 2011 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
I kind of feel the 30-min sketch show isn't the right format for Limmy - stretches him a bit thin, though there is usually one clearly genius moment per episode. So much of his comedy is in his expressions: actually wouldn't mind seeing him in a conventional sit-com.
― Stevie T, Thursday, 17 March 2011 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
Limmy walking into a messy room with happy hardcore blasting out of the stereo and just staring at the camera in total contempt made me laugh more than anything else in ep4
― MPx4A, Thursday, 17 March 2011 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
limmy quite patchy but find the bad patches easy to ignore as they are usually unresolved wee ideas that come to nothing or are otherwise slightly disappointing rather than offensively unfunny like most sketch shows and the good patches are fantastic unlike most sketch shows. happy to sit down for 30 mins and through the less good bits for the few really good bits without having to imagine him a revolutionary format. he was in an ep of the I.T. crowd.
friday night dinner not bad - repetitive but deliberately and amusingly, good acting despite the guy from the inbetweeners being the guy from the inbetweeners. fairly gentle humour with some good moments. feels limited and brief in good ways and as though that's what it's aiming for.
― conrad, Thursday, 17 March 2011 12:24 (fifteen years ago)
I'm willing to forgive Limmy a lot just cos he's likable unlike the majority of tv comedians these days. I think this series is a definite step up i quality too.
― Number None, Thursday, 17 March 2011 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
Episode 4 was pretty great imo.clowning and the beast bit especially. Polises' 1st day pretty pish tho.
― tending tropics (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 17 March 2011 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
Gonna give him another go, just hope I don't get bummed out with another "party on the Finnieston Crane" sketch.
― ledge, Thursday, 17 March 2011 13:52 (fifteen years ago)