Inception (with implanted spoilers)

FWOMMMMMMMMMMMM

FWOMMMMMMMMMMMM

^^^ OTM

Karina Longworth OTM:
However, I do sort of wonder if the massive success of Inception is a sign that we're getting stupider. Sold — and bought — as the year's most "intelligent" blockbuster while actually baldly insulting its audience's intelligence (to quote Andrew O'Hehir's Salon.com review, "Every time the story gets puzzling the characters call a time-out and explain it"), Inception both conquered the 2010 zeitgeist and helped define it.

That's actually not very otm, what an interesting thing... have i just been inceptioned

ITM

it can be easy to ignore handyholdy stuff though. i've ignored instructions countless times for example

can you tell me how to do that?

what

lol

Dude, it's a Nolan film, his general way of doing things is to have plots that *could* be puzzling but are easily unraveled. Meanwhile, there are neat visuals or novel plot devices. See Memento, Insomnia, The Prestige. No one is saying "whoa, I didn't get the plot!" unless they're napping and can't understand any movie.

I honestly avoided reading about this for half a year. And the lady I just rented the DVD from told me the ending. WTF

Karina Longworth OTM:
However, I do sort of wonder if the massive success of Inception is a sign that we're getting stupider. Sold — and bought — as the year's most "intelligent" blockbuster while actually baldly insulting its audience's intelligence (to quote Andrew O'Hehir's Salon.com review, "Every time the story gets puzzling the characters call a time-out and explain it"), Inception both conquered the 2010 zeitgeist and helped define it.

― ok (Tape Store), Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:02 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark

so otm, this film blew my mind in that i couldn't believe how 90% of what i was told was a clever movie actually turned out to be characters who might as well have been looking right at the camera explaining 'dream rules'

it was just setting that shit up for inception 2: mnemonic boogaloo

lol at "requires multiple viewings"

if some movie is going to play by like 100,000 made up rules, you have to tell the audience about them somehow. Would rather sit through a DiCaprio lesson to Ellen Page than make it something I'd have to "infer" in a four-hour movie

It's like watching a Fellini movie and complaining we're such stupid idiot americans because we need to see subtitles in English

if the dialog was all about things to consider while reading the upcoming subtitles and then there was 15 minutes of movie and it was over i probably would complain. about something.

i dunno, i always seem to feel the need to vent about this movie because i thought it was a very cool premise that was 100% wasted. but that's just me. i think it would have worked better as a tv series.

I'm with Whiney. Having a few exposition-heavy scenes took nothing away from the excitement of the film for me. In fact, in a way, they contributed to it -- I felt like, "Oooh, now we get to find out the rules!"

think it would have worked better as a tv series.

"Hoping each time that his next inception ... will be the inception home!"

I'm with Whiney. Having a few exposition-heavy scenes took nothing away from the excitement of the film for me. In fact, in a way, they contributed to it -- I felt like, "Oooh, now we get to find out the rules!"

― Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, December 26, 2010 5:55 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

yeah, exactly... those scenes laying down the ground rules were fun!

Glad to know that the fact that I like this movie means I'm a dumb retard, and complicit in the downfall of western civilization. ILX is always so classy.

So you were our representative who —- bought -- it as the year's intellectual blockbuster? b/c I was wondering who signed us up for that.

vast majority of ilx opinion itt is favourable iirc, i wouldn't sweat it either way

So you were our representative who —- bought -- it as the year's intellectual blockbuster?

Nah, but it was fun to watch both times I saw it.

Karina Longworth OTM:

However, I do sort of wonder if the massive success of Inception is a sign that we're getting stupider. Sold — and bought — as the year's most "intelligent" blockbuster while actually baldly insulting its audience's intelligence (to quote Andrew O'Hehir's Salon.com review, "Every time the story gets puzzling the characters call a time-out and explain it"), Inception both conquered the 2010 zeitgeist and helped define it.

― ok (Tape Store), Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:02 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark

congratulations

Tape Store, do you enjoy being completely po-faced and precious about movies?

Tape Store gets a commission for every person at Borders who puts down a copy of Inception and picks up Battle of Algiers instead....

also, food for thought, a movie can be smart without being intellectual.

also- hates fun, for free xp

speculation as to which movie Tape Store will endorse to hate in 2011?

I hear it's a strong ticket

need to see which harmless yet snappy yet dumb movie is beloved by enough people first imo

TS bitching about Inception >>>> TS endorsing Paper Heart

Glad to know that the fact that I like this movie means I'm a dumb retard, and complicit in the downfall of western civilization. ILX is always so classy.

Don't worry I actually, and quite literally, bought this movie on Blu-Ray. So I'm a dumb fucking retard that is too stupid to watch movies right with you.

Solidarity, dumb-bro!

lol

I got this on blu-ray for Christmas and watched it a couple days ago at high volume. I still liked it quite a bit.

I also was eating pizza at the bar last night with a friend and chatted with a young guy who seemed fairly on top of things who was waiting to pick up a to-go order. He thought it had merited some thought and could use a second watching. So, average guy in the bar finds it comprehensible but worthy of rewatch.

think it would have worked better as a tv series.

"Hoping each time that his next inception ... will be the inception home!"

― Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:56 (2 days ago) Permalink

I lol'd at this one

I saw this twice in the cinema and once on the DVD I bought the day it came out. Colour me retarded.

Watched this again last night, "again" being the second time. I thought it might suffer from having seen it previously, but it was better. Love how, near the end, when Cobb tells Mal that they did grow old together, Nolan avoids showing any faces and just shows the elderly couple from behind walking hand in hand, and the clasped hands as they lay together on the train tracks.

Kids are def. older and wearing different -- but VERY similar -- clothes at the end.

This was everything asinine about contemporary, grandiose popcorn movies distilled into eight crisp hours.

ahh yay, morbs finally sees a movie that came out six months ago and is ready to contribute to the discussion

there's no shelf life, esp for shit like this.

lol how can you say that a month after tron: legacy came out

My friend weighed in with a funny insight: "Inception is like a Hideo Kojima game without the gameplay. I'm totally right and that's why that movie was stupid."

He also joked/truth bombed that the movies' scenes had the aura of videogame levels, with the hotel scenes where people were floating in the air being the "well there goes any internal logic" equivalent of a video game's difficult "water level."

"Every time the story gets puzzling the characters call a time-out and explain it"

hasn't this been happening since, you know, the bible and the start of story telling?

yeah, that's not actually a bad thing as long as it's an interesting explanation - and it is!

no, it hasn't and no, the 4 dozen labored adolescent-nerd bullshit "explanations" weren't.

more like a Goichi Suda game imo