are the same arguments really being rehashed out again on this thread, or is this part of the 'inception'
― dayo, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
It's sort of funny that the people hated this movie for its lack of imagination are repeating the exact same things.
― Tina Tina Cheneuse (DJP), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like I've dreamt this whole thread before.
― shaking my hamster (KMS), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
I thought for some reason that ILX would twig to the fact that Inception isn't so much about dreams as it is about the experience of watching a movie.
― penis with a man hanging from it (Leee), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
experience of watching a mediocre movie
― baubles to the wall (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
I will admit, that as far as movies about tempermental dreamweavers haunted by muses and played by guys from Gangs Of New York go, it sure beats Nine.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
I think if you put Fergie's musical number from "Nine" into the middle of "Inception" with no preamble or explanation and then continued on from there as if it hadn't happened, you would have a movie that would have satisfied the haters.
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)
the haters != josh duhamel
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)
"Perhaps ‘Inception’ is a movie for people who just like movies that make up their own arcane rules, that have nothing to do with anything outside the movie itself, but give the fleeting illusion of creating an (incoherent) self-contained world. It’s for people who think the reductive Director’s Cut of ‘Donnie Darko’—the one that removes all the mystery and resonance and wit—to the original.”- Jim Emerson
heh heh, motherfuckers :)
― ok (Tape Store), Monday, December 20, 2010 6:49 PM
weird argument.
― omar little, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)
xp: yeah but apparently what ppl wanted was "more random dancing walruses" so
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
walruses
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
maybe Tom Hardy could have done Kate Hudson's "Guido" number
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
it's no vanilla sky
― all i gotta do is akh nachivly (darraghmac), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
If you're going to do a cool movie about going into other people's dreams and stuff, why are all the dreams set in hotel lobbys, car parks and leafy city boulevards?
I'm sure this has been asked and answered at least 10 times already but I would like to point out that I have never had a dream where I am flying around in a purple/pink space with suspended stripes of water, flying eyeballs and the 600 foot woman; but I have had a lot of dreams where I am at a school and other boring ass places (even though my dreams are rarely boring)
― 486.52 (CaptainLorax), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
you know, I was kind of young at the time so parts of it appealed to me, but in retrospect I can say that I really am pissed off by vanilla sky
― mh, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
it really helps going in to vanilla sky expecting it to be kind of crappy before realizing it is kind of crappy
maybe I'll finally be able to watch all of Eternal Sunshine of Long Names are Shitty because I know I hate every part of the movie up to when I stopped watching it
― 486.52 (CaptainLorax), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
serious question for serious people, has anyone seen Abre los Ojos and is it >>>>>> Vanilla Sky?
― e.g. delete via naivete (ledge), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)
although, y'know, a movie with tom cruise in a phantom of the opera mask running round a giant deserted office lobby yelling "TECH SUPPORT!!!", it can't be all bad.
― e.g. delete via naivete (ledge), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)
From what I've heard and the bits I've seen Abre los Ojos is pretty close story-wise to Vanilla Sky (and Penelope Cruz is in both!)
― thermite art (latebloomer), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, one is basically a slightly-more fleshed-out take on the other, only with Cameron Crowe's musical sensibilities blaring over the plot and Tom Cruise being Tom Cruise.
― mh, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)
i was otm in this thread
― caek, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 01:01 (fifteen years ago)
I remember liking Abre los Ojos a lot but I saw it pre-Vanilla Sky.
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 01:05 (fifteen years ago)
Tape Store offtm in this thread
― Bitch, it cold outside!!! BURR (San Te), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 01:40 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 01:01 (1 hour ago)
he really was, you know
― smexy fishy hawt joey martin (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 02:25 (fifteen years ago)
FWOMMMMMMMMMMMM
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Friday, 24 December 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ OTM
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 24 December 2010 03:54 (fifteen years ago)
Karina Longworth OTM:However, I do sort of wonder if the massive success of Inception is a sign that we're getting stupider. Sold — and bought — as the year's most "intelligent" blockbuster while actually baldly insulting its audience's intelligence (to quote Andrew O'Hehir's Salon.com review, "Every time the story gets puzzling the characters call a time-out and explain it"), Inception both conquered the 2010 zeitgeist and helped define it.
― ok (Tape Store), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:02 (fifteen years ago)
That's actually not very otm, what an interesting thing... have i just been inceptioned
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:06 (fifteen years ago)
ITM
― benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)
it can be easy to ignore handyholdy stuff though. i've ignored instructions countless times for example
― 486.52 (CaptainLorax), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:25 (fifteen years ago)
can you tell me how to do that?
― ok (Tape Store), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)
what
― 486.52 (CaptainLorax), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:42 (fifteen years ago)
lol
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Friday, 24 December 2010 04:42 (fifteen years ago)
Dude, it's a Nolan film, his general way of doing things is to have plots that *could* be puzzling but are easily unraveled. Meanwhile, there are neat visuals or novel plot devices. See Memento, Insomnia, The Prestige. No one is saying "whoa, I didn't get the plot!" unless they're napping and can't understand any movie.
― mh, Friday, 24 December 2010 04:45 (fifteen years ago)
I honestly avoided reading about this for half a year. And the lady I just rented the DVD from told me the ending. WTF
― kenny noggins (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 26 December 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)
― ok (Tape Store), Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:02 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark
so otm, this film blew my mind in that i couldn't believe how 90% of what i was told was a clever movie actually turned out to be characters who might as well have been looking right at the camera explaining 'dream rules'
― sleepingbag, Sunday, 26 December 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)
it was just setting that shit up for inception 2: mnemonic boogaloo
― all i gotta do is akh nachivly (darraghmac), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
lol at "requires multiple viewings"
― plax (ico), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)
if some movie is going to play by like 100,000 made up rules, you have to tell the audience about them somehow. Would rather sit through a DiCaprio lesson to Ellen Page than make it something I'd have to "infer" in a four-hour movie
― kenny noggins (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
It's like watching a Fellini movie and complaining we're such stupid idiot americans because we need to see subtitles in English
― kenny noggins (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)
if the dialog was all about things to consider while reading the upcoming subtitles and then there was 15 minutes of movie and it was over i probably would complain. about something.
― sleepingbag, Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno, i always seem to feel the need to vent about this movie because i thought it was a very cool premise that was 100% wasted. but that's just me. i think it would have worked better as a tv series.
― sleepingbag, Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:52 (fifteen years ago)
I'm with Whiney. Having a few exposition-heavy scenes took nothing away from the excitement of the film for me. In fact, in a way, they contributed to it -- I felt like, "Oooh, now we get to find out the rules!"
― Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
think it would have worked better as a tv series.
"Hoping each time that his next inception ... will be the inception home!"
― Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)
― Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, December 26, 2010 5:55 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
yeah, exactly... those scenes laying down the ground rules were fun!
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
Glad to know that the fact that I like this movie means I'm a dumb retard, and complicit in the downfall of western civilization. ILX is always so classy.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
So you were our representative who —- bought -- it as the year's intellectual blockbuster? b/c I was wondering who signed us up for that.
― i have been otm (bnw), Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)
vast majority of ilx opinion itt is favourable iirc, i wouldn't sweat it either way
― all i gotta do is akh nachivly (darraghmac), Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)
So you were our representative who —- bought -- it as the year's intellectual blockbuster?
Nah, but it was fun to watch both times I saw it.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)
Karina Longworth OTM:
However, I do sort of wonder if the massive success of Inception is a sign that we're getting stupider. Sold — and bought — as the year's most "intelligent" blockbuster while actually baldly insulting its audience's intelligence (to quote Andrew O'Hehir's Salon.com review, "Every time the story gets puzzling the characters call a time-out and explain it"), Inception both conquered the 2010 zeitgeist and helped define it.
congratulations
― omar little, Monday, 27 December 2010 01:46 (fifteen years ago)