Doctor Who 2008: Sontarans cometh, RTD Ood 'ave 'im etc.

Kingfish,

AFAIK this is as real as it gets, or else represents a WHOLE new level of disinformation out of Upper Boat and would make the Wiggy disinformation scandal look like a tiny little fib.

For those of us who remember Neverwhere being on in the Gap Years, the discussion at the time was that he would be a great Doctor. Well, that and how NG had ripped The Doctor off for the character.

Hang on, a quick dig reveals a photoshoot last week. Yeah, this is real.

Can't find that shoot. Link?

No pics out there, just confirmation it took place. Not a costumed thing, think the picture of David and Freema on the sofa where he was wearing that hideous shirt.

Wait they're already shooting for 2010? Sounds unlikely.

He was already in Who, mind? He was on the Weakest Link with Rose. I think I approve though.

Looking at the preview clip upthread, surely a future doctor who recognise a previous regeneration? Seems like an imposter to me.

No no, that's David Morrissey. Paterson Joseph is someone else entirely.

Matt, not shooting for 2010, photoshoot for the publicity for the announcement.

Anyway, I think he'll be good. Paterson does a top line in jitteriness and manic facial experessions. They need to get the voice right though - somewhere between Johnson and Tom Baker would do nicely.

http://www.dvdtalk.com/images/neverwhere04.jpg

Did anybody read the comic adaption?

I read the book, is that the same as the comic? Not one of Gaiman's best but pretty entertaining anyway.

and yeah Paterson Joseph is way Doctor-y in the BBC versh - it didn't really occur to me that the Marquis de Carabas was supposed to be a Doctor rip until I saw his performance.

http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/9703/jekyllkilledanyonenj8.gif

ha James Nesbitt is not still in the running is he?

heh. This is from a Gaiman introduction to a Telos novella written in August of 2003:

...It’s probably a good thing that I’ve never actually got my hands on the Doctor. I would have unhappened so much.

A final Dr Who connection – again, from the baggy-trousered Troughton era, when some things were more than true for me – showed itself, in retrospect, in my BBC TV series, Neverwhere.

Not in the obvious places – the BBC decision that Neverwhere had to be shot on video, in episodes half an hour long, for example. Not even in the character of the Marquis de Carabas, who I wrote – and Paterson Joseph performed – as if I were creating a Doctor from scratch, and wanted to make him someone as mysterious, as unreliable, and as quirky as the William Hartnell incarnation. But in the idea that there are worlds under this one, and that London itself is magical, and dangerous, and that the underground tunnels are every bit as remote and mysterious and likely to contain Yeti as the distant Himalayas was something, author and critic Kim Newman pointed out to me, while Neverwhere was screening, that I probably took from a Troughton-era story called “The Web of Death”.

And as he said it, I knew he was spot on, remembering people with torches exploring the underground, beams breaking the darkness. The knowledge that there were worlds underneath... yes, that was where I got it, all right...

If this is true, I think the thing I'm most pleased about is that they haven't lazily gone for a pretty boy Tennant-alike.

PJ is super-pretty...and super talented. It's a win win! I'm enjoying this new trend of fiendishly handsome Doctors...

And here we are:

So, a dashing Pertwee type?

I hope he plays the Doctor closer to his performance in Survivors than Neverwhere. That's a bit too Rent-a-Ghost for me.
I they going to hurry up and announce that he's been cast, or what?

So the Children in Need thing was just the trailer we've already seen before, right?

I did find this:

haaaaa. watch the 2nd half of this one

http://sarahsilverman.comedycentral.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=211432

A behind-the-scenes thing where Christopher Eccleston stars as "Dr. Lazer Rage", and the show's director is seriously dorking out over having him on the show.

aaand a bit from that episode

Fuck me, the Christmas special doesn't actually air UNTIL Christmas?! But but but torrent speeds at my parents' house are horrible!

Anyway, now watching the last two eps of Sarah Jane. Having the Brigadier and his baritone around is always great, even in his older, checkered- and cabby cap-bedecked form. His appearances on the audios are well worth tracking down. The Sontaran actor in these ones isn't as much fun as Mike TheCoolGuy's sharper bluster but what are you gunna do. His sidearm looks like something you'd see attached to a Namco shooter in a video arcade.

We're going to have a dry spell of a long time, aren't we. The first of the specials isn't until Easter, right? Is the Sarah Jane show worth watching? Like, worth one's time more than shotgunning Torchwood?

just rewatched last year's christmas one. they always seem better after 2nd viewing.

Sarah Jane is lots of fun, but very much the kids' show (not that that's actually a fault): has something of the vibe of 1970s Pertwee stuff, with less political commentary and better effects.

or else represents a WHOLE new level of disinformation out of Upper Boat

Chiwetel Ejiofor? Really?

Oh I love him, that would be great.

I haven't been paying attention, have they announced a companion yet?

okay wait lololololol CATHERINE ZETA-JONES

I don't know what to believe any more.

Dan, the specials are going to have a different companion in each. I guess after that it's a Moffat clean slate?

Can we start the "bring back Sally Sparrow" campaign now?

You guys.

Have been appalled at the amount of commercials on BBC America during Who.

Since it's not really paced for ad breaks I can imagine how annoying that would be.

Tracer, it's mad: they have about five ad breaks every 30 minutes. No wonder America has an ADD problem.

For those who haven't seen this yet:

David Tennant on "Extras"

"He's hyperpodulating!"

Words fail me. Just... no.

(I had actually been quite enjoying it up till then. There must have been a giant shark in the Thames, because it jumped it on the way out.)

I quite enjoyed it. Certainly better than last years and the cyber king steam punk element was rather good.

The only bits that stuck in my craw were the "doctor saves the little boy" sequence and the "lets hear it for the doctor" crap.

ah that wasn't too bad, just giving him a little respect where it's due. nothing like the vomitous olympic torch sequence in season 2.

Giant steam-powered Cyberman stomping all over Victorian London, that's what I'm fucking talking about.

Other than that, meh.

But but but torrent speeds at my parents' house are horrible!

and I was right. 3 more hours til this finishes, dammit.

Problems for me were the usual RTD sentimentalities

"He needs a comapnion... wait, I SHALL DO IT FOR MY WIFE!"
"flashy flashy children running round... WAIT, AHA! I HAVE A SON AND HE'S TRAPPED ON THAT LEDGE HE COULDN'T HAVE POSSIBLY GOT TO!"
"The Doctor never gets any thanks, so let's all cheer for him!"

his ridiculous deus exes

Ah, wait, despite having established earlier that they came through the void when it broke down, let's give them enough time to steal piles of dalek techology, including a big stick that when I press it makes the giant robot that has already destroyed 10% of London (despite it never being on record) destroy another 40% by collapsing!

and his "twist finale that will have the fans wondering WHAT IS GOING ON??!!11!!ELEVEN" appears to have been the Doctor having dinner.

SWteampunk cyberman totally undone by "Oh yes, it's a CyberKing Mk XXII, I remember them using them on Brontosaurus Bogosian XVI". Also, Wickidewild-wild-Wickedewild-wild, what's that, Captain Frog?

I thought the first 20 minutes or so, culminating in the Doctor's unravelling of his doppelganger's mystery, were fantastic. The rest seemed tacked on and practically inseparable from nonsense.

Why did the cybermen's giant engine require children? Turning wheels and ropes? Anyone?

When the doctor "severed" Ms Hartigan's mental fusion with the cybermen, thus opening her mind and granting her full self-awareness of the horrible thing she had become, why did that lead to her - and the cybermen's - immediate self-destruction? Is there a logic there? I felt certain that once the Doctor had broken her link with the cybermen that they'd take up where they'd left off and kill her. It would have been just as quick and just as easy (with the added benefit of making some kind of sense).

She was horrified with it all but still had power over them all so killed them? (and herself due to guilt)?

Some actual lines to that effect might have helped. i.e. "What have I done? All this... is finished. (EXPLODE)" Instead of just like "aiiiiaaaghhhghghghahh!!!!!!! (EXPLODE)"

I thought the first 20 minutes or so, culminating in the Doctor's unravelling of his doppelganger's mystery, were fantastic. The rest seemed tacked on and practically inseparable from nonsense.

See? You are me. This possibly means you have beeen watching too much Jon.

I don't know what that means but yeah, it was like they had this cool idea but it was only a 20 minute idea and then they were like, the hell with it, after that let's just make it another story about Daleks oops I mean Cybermen creating a them-human hybrid and attempting to enslave humanity.

WHY DO THEY NEED CHILDREN TO MAKE THE MACHINE WORK? THEY HAVE AN ARMY OF UNSTOPPABLE TIRELESS ROBOTS.

http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/ComicBookGuy1.jpg

Last night's "Doctor Who Xmas Special" was, without a doubt, the worst episode ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes, registering my disgust throughout the world.