A New Thread fot the Current Israel/Palestine/Lebanon mess

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1021 of them)
My settings cut off the first few postings--I see the nuclear issue acknowledged there.

Neither the US nor Israel have the resources to invade Iran. It's gotta be airstrikes or back to the bargaining table.

Hunter (Hunter), Saturday, 15 July 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

Can't wait for the Georgie/Vlady telegrams.

-- Ned Raggett (ne...), July 14th, 2006.

Well, their meeting has provided one of the stupidest quips Bush has ever uttered. Another one for the record books:

"I talked about my desire to promote institutional change in parts of the world, like Iraq where there's a free press and free religion, and I told him that a lot of people in our country would hope that Russia would do the same," Bush said.

Putin's droll response: "We certainly would not want to have the same kind of democracy that they have in Iraq, quite honestly."

Mitya OTM re: WWIII similarity is meant broadly as a larger conflict escalatingly out of a (seemingly) localized incident.

anyone who directly instigates a conflict involving both the US and the Israeli military is gonna get there asses handed to them on a silver (probably highly irradiated) platter...

Like Saddam got his ass handed to him? There's a lot of comparison between Israeli/US vs. Iranian/Syrian military power in this thread, and, sure, we can handily crush nearly any country we like in the region, but can we manage the fallout? I don't feel comforted anymore by the "If all else fails we can bomb/invade them" shibboleth. And do we really want to drop a fucking atom bomb on Iran? That will really dissuade N Korea from pursuing nuclear arms (axis of evil, two down, one to go!).

New question: What are the chances that insurgents in Iraq are headed West to join Hezzbolah in fighting? Cause those guys get wet at night dreaming about engaging Israel in armed conflict.

Edward III (edward iii), Sunday, 16 July 2006 10:10 (nineteen years ago)

In other news, 8 dead from Hezzbollah missles in Haifa (and they were aiming for an oil refinery, which they missed).

Edward III (edward iii), Sunday, 16 July 2006 10:11 (nineteen years ago)

More Bush wisdom, from today's NY Times:


"In my judgment, the best way to stop the violence is to understand why the violence occurred in the first place,” Mr. Bush said. “And that’s because Hezbollah has been launching rocket attacks out of Lebanon into Israel, and because Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers. That’s why we have violence."


Now I get it!

nicenick (nicenick), Sunday, 16 July 2006 13:04 (nineteen years ago)

The Haifa strike is really bad news. Obv. the deaths of civilians are always bad news. But also, Israelis are terrified of Hezbollah's (or whoever's) ability to strike targets such as Haifa and possibly further south. It plays on their "we're a small country surrounded by enemies" nightmare. This fear is one of the things that will drive continued retaliation and make the whole thing harder to stop.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 13:07 (nineteen years ago)

Not to mention the 100+ civilian deaths in Lebanon already. Cover photo of today's NY Times is the bodies of the Lebanese killed in Israel's minivan strike. More wind to stoke the flames.

Israel has issued its demands for ceasefire, but it doesn't sound like Hezzbolah's biting.

Cover story on this week's Time: The End of Cowboy Diplomacy.

We should be so lucky. We're still going to have cowboy diplomacy, except instead of John Wayne it's more like Joe Buck.

Edward III (edward iii), Sunday, 16 July 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

US evacuation plan seems to be to airlift people to the Isle of Cyprus. From there US evacuees have to pay their own way off of Cyprus - the US government has generously offered people loans for those who can't afford airfare. Nice that we'll give Israel billions to buy bombs and create a refugee situation, but we won't pay to get those poor stranded bastards back home.

Edward III (edward iii), Sunday, 16 July 2006 13:59 (nineteen years ago)

http://lebanonheartblogs.blogspot.com/2006/07/warning-strong-pictures.html

gbx (skowly), Sunday, 16 July 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

Another Israeli plea for sanity:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/738739.html

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

Apparently the voices of restraint and deliberation have had the same effect in Israel as they have had in the US. All this talk of the war's effect on Lebanon's economy - their tourist economy is already done for. The words of Colin Powell come to mind; "You break it, you own it." Perhaps the Lebanese govt and Israel/US will be able to work together to force Hezzbollah out of the country - but will they subsidize Lebanon when their economy is dialed back 30 years due to the cost of their military action?

Edward III (edward iii), Sunday, 16 July 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)

I don't agree that voices of restraint are futile, even if they lose in the end. Editorials like that force people to break their march-to-war mindset for a moment, even if the extremists ultimately shout down the dissent.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

The most frustrating thing to me about the whole situation is that supporters of the Israeli strikes on Lebanon argue only that the actions are "justified by the attacks on Israel," making no distinction of degree and asking themselves no questions about whether it's actually a good idea. Of course it's "justified" to respond when a guerilla group crosses your border and attacks your military, but that doesn't mean it requires an all-out war, not even to speak of the consequences.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

Agreed - my extreme frustration is probably now registering as a depressing futility, but those voices are more important now than ever before. I think Sarid's piece above should be read every night during the evening news.

Edward III (edward iii), Sunday, 16 July 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)

I am wrong for wanting this mess, having been started, to work through to some kind of "conclusion" (to whatever extent that's possible)?

Part of me sees this cross-border fighting continuing on for a few days. Lebanon is thrown back 30 years, Israel decides it's taught someone a lesson and stops the attacks, whatever, and we're just back in a stalemate with more bad blood on both sides. At least let someone come out of this with a different perspective.

pleased to mitya (mitya), Sunday, 16 July 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

CNN is now reporting that US Marines will be going into Beirut to evacuate US civilians, not aiming for a fight but "ready for one if necessary." Will they be targeted by Hezbollah?

pleased to mitya (mitya), Sunday, 16 July 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

Depends on how stupid Hezbollah is, I guess, but it doesn't seem impossible.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)

Also it wouldn't take much - one Hezbollah rocket kills a few Marines, one Hezbollah fighter shoots a couple, and suddenly there's a larger war if the U.S. wants one.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)

I've been wondering for a long time if the U.S might seek a pretext for a draft and a full-scale middle east war.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

I can't see a draft being politically feasible without an attack on US soil.

pleased to mitya (mitya), Sunday, 16 July 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

Neither the US nor Israel have the resources to invade Iran

... I agree, but this is ruling out some massive war mobilisation on the part of the US. Which I don't see happening without a direct attack on the US, but then stranger things have happened.

stet (stet), Sunday, 16 July 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)

BEIRUT, Lebanon (CNN) -- Israeli airstrikes pounded the southern suburbs of Beirut on Sunday, hours after a rocket attack on Haifa killed eight Israelis.

The militant group Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the attack on Haifa, saying it was responding to overnight Israeli airstrikes inside Lebanon.

Shortly after Haifa was hit, the head of Israel's northern command, Maj. Gen. Udi Adam, warned civilians in southern Lebanon to head north because "in two or three hours we are going to attack south Lebanon heavily."

CNN's Alessio Vinci described the scene in the southern part of Beirut as "utter destruction," with buildings collapsed and large areas devastated. (Watch devastation in southern Beirut -- 4:30)

The Israeli military said the airstrikes hit buildings where Hezbollah members lived and worked.

The Associated Press reported that the airstrikes reduced entire apartment buildings to rubble and knocked out electricity in parts of Beirut.

Earlier, journalist Anthony Mills said he heard at least six bombings near the Lebanese capital between 11 a.m. and noon (4 a.m. and 5 a.m. ET).

Lebanese officials said Sunday that 104 people have been killed and 286 wounded in the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah militants that began Wednesday.

A total of 12 Israeli civilians and 12 Israeli military personnel have been killed since Wednesday. More than 100 others have been wounded.

The AP reported Sunday that an Israeli airstrike in the southern port city of Tyre killed nine civilians and wounded 42, according to security officials, and that five of those killed in Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon on Sunday held Canadian citizenship.

In the attack on Haifa, one of the Hezbollah rockets hit a railway depot in the city's industrial zone, killing at least eight and wounding 17 others -- six of them seriously -- Israeli medical services said. (Watch train depot shattered by rocket -- 2:29)

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said Sunday that his fighters still have plenty of weapons and the will to keep fighting.

"Our fighters are ready, and they love the confrontation and have the determination to defeat," he said in a televised address in Arabic to the Lebanese people.

"And as we surprised [Israel] in the sea, and as we surprised them in Haifa, we will surprise them with what's beyond Haifa," Nasrallah said.

He accused Israel of attacking civilian targets, while insisting that Hezbollah was patient and has aimed its rocket attacks only at the Israeli military.

"The enemy does not know our capabilities," he said. "The Zionist enemy is ignorant of what we have on all levels. We are still in the beginning, and the Zionists will see."

Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz said the attacks on Lebanon will not end until Israel is sure "the reality will change" so there are no threats on Israel by Hezbollah.

Peretz spoke in Haifa hours after the Hezbollah rocket attack.

"Everyone who has attacked and harmed the city of Haifa and the Israeli home front will pay a very expensive and costly price for this," Peretz said.

Israeli Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz said the missile contained Syrian ammunition.

"The Iranians supply Hezbollah with weapons and technology," said Mofaz, Israel's former defense minister. "Syria is taking part."

The weapon was a Katyusha rocket with a range of 35 to 40 kilometers (22-25 miles), Israel Defense Forces spokeswoman Miri Regev said.

Iran rejected a similar Israeli assertion that it supplied Hezbollah the missile that struck an Israeli warship off the coast of Lebanon on Friday, killing four Israeli sailors.

The Israeli military found the bodies of three of the sailors Sunday. The body of the fourth sailor had been found the day before.

Rockets also hit the northern towns of Akko and Nahariya on Sunday, and residents of northern Israel were told to take cover in bomb shelters. (Watch fear gripping Israeli towns -- 1:45)

Meanwhile, a U.S. military team has arrived in Beirut to assist in the evacuation of Americans trapped in Lebanon by the fighting, the U.S. Embassy confirmed. (Full story)

Israel on alert as far south as Tel Aviv
The Israeli military warned residents as far south as Tel Aviv to raise their level of awareness, as the country is on alert against conventional weapons, according to the Israel Defense Forces.

The Israeli military said Hezbollah has fired more than 450 rockets into northern Israel since Wednesday.

Speaking before his weekly Cabinet meeting, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the attack "will have far-reaching implications" on Israel's relationship with its "northern neighbors."

A spokesman for the Italian government said Lebanon has been given a list of Israeli conditions for a cease-fire that includes the release of two Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah, the withdrawal of the group from south Lebanon and an end to rocket attacks on Israel.

The conditions were relayed to Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora in a phone call by Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi, according to Italian spokesman Silvio Sircana.

Hezbollah, which is backed by Syria and Iran, is considered a terrorist organization by the United States and Israel. The group holds 23 of the 128 seats in Lebanon's parliament. (What is Hezbollah?)

Other developments:

Israeli forces bombed the Jiyeh power plant south of the Lebanese capital early Sunday, sending plumes of smoke billowing across the sky, Lebanese army sources said. The sources said they had no report on casualties in the strike. Israel also struck northern Lebanon near its border with Syria.


Israeli forces redeployed to Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza early Sunday to halt Qassam rocket launches, the IDF said. The Israeli military moved in after launching three airstrikes overnight Saturday to quell "terror infrastructures" in northern Gaza. (Full story)


Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa called the Middle East peace process "dead." Speaking at a news conference after a meeting of Arab League foreign ministers in Cairo, Egypt, he said the peace process failed "because certain powers have given Israel every capacity to do whatever it wishes."

gear (gear), Sunday, 16 July 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)

Clemons hypothesizes the Israel's real target is the US. He claims that recent behind the scenes diplomatic pursuits by the US to make nice with the Arab world and even Iran (in order to stabilize Iraq and reduce the Iranian nuke threat) have spooked Israel, and they wish to limit US outreach to those states and groups.

The flamboyant, over the top reactions to attacks on Israel's military check points and the abduction of soldiers -- which I agree Israel must respond to -- seems to be part establishing "bona fides" by Olmert, but far more important, REMOVING from the table important policy options that the U.S. might have pursued.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 16 July 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)

I have to say, I tend to be a defender of Al Jazeera (as a sort of mixed blessing but ultimately more good than bad), but their coverage has been hopelessly one-sided. The subtext of almost every article they run seems to be that Israel is a bloodthirsty nation that actually wants to kill as many civilians as it can.

This article speaks of the "chilling" message sent to Palestinians and Lebanese:

http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?service_ID=11741

Israelis were already sent that "chilling message" many years ago. Palestinians have long considered Israeli civilians legitimage targets and have openly expressed desires to kill as many as possible, women and children included.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

I have to say, I tend to be a defender of Al Jazeera (as a sort of mixed blessing but ultimately more good than bad), but their coverage has been hopelessly one-sided. The subtext of almost every article they run seems to be that Israel is a bloodthirsty nation that actually wants to kill as many civilians as it can.

This article speaks of the "chilling" message sent to Palestinians and Lebanese:

http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?service_ID=11741

Israelis were already sent that "chilling message" many years ago. Palestinian militants have long considered Israeli civilians legitimage targets and have openly expressed desires to kill as many as possible, women and children included.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry for double post - note "Palestinians" in last sentence changed to "Palestinian militants." I didn't mean to suggest that all Palestinians share this view.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

@text:cai intjw 222 jer glbh eur brt URGENT Israel attacks Israeli airport with four missiles
BEIRUT, Lebanon (AP) — An Israeli warship blasted the vicinity of Beirut's airport with four missiles Sunday, setting a fuel storage tank ablaze, security officials said.
Sunday's bombardment was the fourth time Israel hit the Rafik Hariri International Airport located on the southern edge of the capital since Wednesday when it began its strikes on Lebanon.

stet (stet), Sunday, 16 July 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

and yes, that should be "attacks Beirut airport"

stet (stet), Sunday, 16 July 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

THIS JUST IN: SAME SHIT DIFFERENT DAY

[URL]Internet casino gambling online[/URL] (eman), Sunday, 16 July 2006 19:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060716/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_canadians_killed

What will come of this, if anything?

starke (starke), Sunday, 16 July 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)

i'm so so so angry right now.

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 16 July 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

a response to what occurred with the soldiers is understandable but i'm sorry but this response is so far over the top i can't see how anyone can argue in its favor.

gear (gear), Sunday, 16 July 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

jesus fucking christ.

gbx (skowly), Sunday, 16 July 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

Meanwhile, Lebanese missiles have reached Afula, which is further South than Haifa.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

Hezbollah is claiming now that it can reach almost anywhere in Israel. Could be a bluff. Hard to say.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

Attacks continue, all over the shop. Tripoli in the north, Gaza city. It smells as if this has been prepared for some time, and they were waiting for a pretext to kick off

stet (stet), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

My friend's dad, who is Israeli, is convinced that that's the case (that Israel was just waiting to do this).

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

sure seems like it, huh.

also, does anyone think that the captured soldiers will possibly make it out of this alive? it seems to me that the nature of the response has basically signed their death warrants (ie - why on earth would Hezbollah bother to keep them alive at this point?).

gbx (skowly), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

NRO world continues to perversely amuse. Basically they're saying we're finally in the grips of World War IV (III was the Cold War, you see) and wondering why more people aren't up in arms about it all. Personally I wouldn't mind seeing all of them on the front lines about now.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

We aren't up in arms because we're sure that the NRO gang is going to enlist and take care of it for us.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

Which is, duh, like what Ned just said if I'd just pay attention. Yes, my attention span is THAT SHORT.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

I expect more people in the general populace aren't up in arms because everyone is sick and fucking tired of all the shit in the Middle East in general.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

I'm very shaken. Meanwhile Cliff May. I could almost agree with the first paragraph -- until the yuk-yuks he offers in the last:

More and more, it appears that Israel has determined that its goal is to cripple Hezbollah. If that trick can be managed, it will deliver a blow not only to Hezbollah but also to Syria and Iran and the entire Militant Islamist movement.

It also would produce a huge benefit for the vast majority of Lebanese who do not want their country run by Hezbollah/Syria/Iran and who do know that the Israelis have no wish to remain.

Since disarming Hezbollah is what is called for by the “international community” in UN Security Council Resolution 1559, it is hard to see how even the French could call such an action disproportionate.”

It makes one wonder what the French would regard as a proportionate response. Forming a collaborationist government in Vichy, perhaps?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 16 July 2006 22:56 (nineteen years ago)

yes this is clearly going to be great for lebanon.

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 16 July 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)

meanwhile, not everybody is upset by the news

with handclaps, even!

kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 16 July 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

holy shit that page gets the award for "most disturbing use of emoticons ever"

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 17 July 2006 00:06 (nineteen years ago)

It also would produce a huge benefit for the vast majority of Lebanese who do not want their country run by Hezbollah/Syria/Iran and who do know that the Israelis have no wish to remain.

Oh, yes, this logic has proven so true for Afghanistan and Iran!

pleased to mitya (mitya), Monday, 17 July 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

Ahahah, thanks, Kingfish. That page is fantastic for a laugh.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 17 July 2006 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

holy shit that page is unbelievable.

omg the lady that's as giddy as a bride waiting for her bride!!! LIKE, ATTACHING THE VEIL AND SHIT.

gbx (skowly), Monday, 17 July 2006 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

husband, whatever.

gbx (skowly), Monday, 17 July 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)

meanwhile, more people died due to car accidents in the past hour in america than die of terrorist attacks in a single year in israel. why is this war happening again?

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 17 July 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.