Todd Haynes

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (422 of them)
was everyone too sidetracked by the endless sirk references and the admittedly fantastic cinematography to notice that far from heaven was actually k-boring plotwise?

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:22 (twenty-three years ago)

the most surprising thing about far from heaven was that there were absolutely NO surprises. to me, it just sort of set itself up to plod, presumably coasting on the assumption that all the self-congratulatory film-school sirk de soiling bizness would be enough

for me it kinda wasn't

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think the Sirk stuff was necessarily a "sidetrack"--it was, at least from a certain perspective, a big part of the meat of the film. Although my mother and her friend, who are not familiar with Sirk at all, managed to enjoy Haynes's film very much.

Haynes's is v. talented at making "impossible" films--films that can't really be assimilated to any one set of critical expectations, and that are necessarily frustrating for that and other reasons. They're difficult to love, in my experience. I'm still wondering if that sort of thing has a value in itself, but given how much thought I've given to Far from Heaven I suppose the answer is yes.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:33 (twenty-three years ago)

v. talented at making "impossible" films--films that can't really be assimilated to any one set of critical expectations, and that are necessarily frustrating for that and other reasons

can you expand on this pls?

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Ack yes yes yes I can but can I say: "later"? I'm at work and it's not that I'm incapable of expanding, I'm just afraid of starting a little research project with so much else I should be doing.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:37 (twenty-three years ago)

i still say all frame no picture

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Sometimes I suspect that as well--that the anxiety produced by the films comes more from the nature of their place in the culture (i.e. a 50s melodrama made in 2002), the debates they stir up, (ie. the FRAME) than by the content. But Far from Heaven was a beautifully-made picture; perhaps he didn't have every aspect of Sirk's style down pat, but the reconstruction was more complete than any other filmmaker could probably hope to achieve. The question is whether the "beautifully-made picture" and the anxious object have a meaningful relationship with each other.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Why my suspicions are usually quieted: Hayne's genuine talent as a filmmaker, and not just a "technical" sort of talent. In Safe, when Peter is talking to Carol and suddenly points to a coyote off at the foot of the mountains--the hard cut to the coyote is completely charged. I wish there were more moments like this one in his films, but they're there.

Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Last I heard (as of a few months ago), he doesn't have a lover -- not the sort you'd bring to the Oscars, anyways. So now's your chance, Anthony.

Chris P (Chris P), Monday, 24 March 2003 16:52 (twenty-three years ago)


my anxiety stemmed from the fact that it was a 50s throwback sirk-style done seemingly for its own sake

hollow meta levels

i think i'd rather see a douglas sirk film in 2002.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 March 2003 17:03 (twenty-three years ago)

seven months pass...
Spotted: A guy wearing purple eyeshadow, mint green iridescent leather trenchcoat, jeans, and light blue sequined gaiters over black cowboy boots bicycling across the intersection of Park Anenue and 57th Street. He brought a little Velvet Goldmine into our lives today.

felicity (felicity), Friday, 7 November 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

in the names of continuity and hypertextuality:

Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story: classic or what?

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 7 November 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
apparently beyonce is 'to play bob dylan' in haynes' newie. play fuckin loud.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

All of a sudden I'm interested in Bob Dylan.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

i heart todd h.

far from heaven wz a bit of a slog tho

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

part of me wants a zim biopic, but only if it stuck to the good bits (64-6). that would be incredible, or could be. the problem with the ali film was it kind of replicated the docs that already existed, and i guess that might be why they are taking a roundabout route to biopicking bob. who knows. maybe beyonce will shine.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I would think Blood on the Tracks era would make a better film ... oh wait: Renaldo & Clara

Silky Sensor (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it Beyonce for sure? Here's a report that a friend of mine e-mailed me the other day:

Bob Dylan has given permission to a Hollywood studio to make a film about his life and will be portrayed by seven actors - one of them a black woman reports The Times Online.

Todd Haynes confirmed last week that he is searching for a woman who can do justice to the short white Jewish singer's "inner blackness". The seven will play Dylan during different eras in his 43-year career, starting in the 1960s when his song "The Times They Are A-Changin'" turned into an anti-war anthem. Costing £30m, the film is due for release next year under the title "I'm Not There: Suppositions on a Film Concerning Dylan".

It is traditional in films spanning a lifetime for characters to be played by more than one actor, but rarer for them to change sex or race. Haynes is considering actresses ranging from pop singer Beyoncé Knowles to tennis champion Venus Williams and the one and only Oprah Winfrey.

I'm really curious about this. Like Ned, I could care less about Dylan's music, but I do think he's a pretty compelling personality and icon.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

if they film any of this in MN i will definitely go to rubberneck.

f--gg (gcannon), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)


He does a bang-up job interviewing Van Sant on the new Pvt Idaho DVD.

Far From Heaven seems to work best on people who recognize top-flight pastiches can unleash emotions, like Magnetic Fields' 69 Love Songs.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

please let it be Beyonce.

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

im v. v. v. excited about the new one, even more if it is oprah

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i could definitely go for of those buttercrackers with some cream cheese right now.

ie am hungry., Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

oh wait.

yes, beyonce. what a terrible idea. it is a pointless, and obscene, gimmick.

i am still hungery., Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

he is the only one who can convert well-learned "film theory" into an actual real unexpected film, i think: i guess i felt w.far from heaven that he confused his fondness for sirk with studious reverence for "sirk theory" and never shimmied out of that overcareful trap --- less mise-en-scene than mise-en-prison

(but if you swap sirk for glam, and VG for FFH, i wd probably be defendin it, so maybe it's just that i'm not really THAT big on sirk myself)

the person i wz with - unrepentent sexual pirate and general tomboy activist - knew nothing abt sirk or sirk theory and wz emotionally overwhelmed, except in a bad way: we had to go straight to a gay bar after and have several drinks

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I think liking Far From Heaven hinges heavily on liking Sirk (which I do luckily.)

I'd rather he get Venus Williams (or Lisa Leslie) than Beyonce though!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

oprah would be more interesting. beyonce is too robotic.

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

one of the answers in today's nytimes crossword is "okra winfrey"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

you can't BE "too robotic"!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

TOM CRUISE

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)

*unable to think of response*

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, beyonce. what a terrible idea. it is a pointless, and obscene, gimmick.

If it were Todd Solondz behind the camera, I'd agree with you. (Actually, wait, doesn't his new film Palindromes do the whole multiple-actors-playing-the-same-character thing, too? That's weird.) But Haynes truly does have the ability to transcend his conceits. That combination of intellectual cleverness and genuine, overwhelming emotion is why Far From Heaven and Eternal Sunshine are two of my favorite films of this decade.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

That makes it sound like Haynes directed Eternal Sunshine -- no, I'm just saying that I respond to that combination, and there's another film that has it.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like Velvet Goldmine goddammit!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Way to spoiler, Tracer.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i love the beyonce casting but i hope the "inner blackness" line was just something he came up with on the fly

jones (actual), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the sound of this film far more than haynes' others. 'far from heaven' was as good as 'psycho 98', make of that what you will (ie, would have made a good gallery piece); 'safe' i liked but i think that mark s possibly points to a problem in haynes: imo haynes' knowledge of film theory outstrips his knowledge of the lives of suburban women 1950-1990.

N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I spoke with Todd about this around five years ago, and as I dimly recall, one of the seven characters was always going to be black.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 24 March 2005 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I think FFH getting Oscar nominations -- ie, went over with many ppl whose Sirk knowledge / sense of film history is nil -- shows it's not dependent on knowing DS's stuff. I know civilians who liked it who've never seen Sirk either.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

was i the only one who actually really liked van sants pyscho--i mean liked it almost as much as the janet leigh---does that make me perverse?

anthony, Friday, 25 March 2005 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

& wasnt todd haynes new movie similar in its conceits

anthony, Friday, 25 March 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

todd soldnz

anthony, Friday, 25 March 2005 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it doesn't make you perverse, it just means you liked the movie!

i think the conceit is sort of similar, but haynes's film was much more imaginative in its reworking of the source materials and much more rigorous in its evocation/replication of the style of said materials.

i don't know, i think van sant is gifted but not very smart, honestly. haynes could not be accused of not being smart, i suspect.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe that's snotty (about van sant), i don't know. and to be honest i haven't seen all his films. maybe the early ones have more spark. but "elephant" and "gerry" struck me as films that didn't have a thought in their heads, despite having a stylistic flair.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

the french loved "elephant," probably because it showcased americans shooting each other and had a patina of artistic seriousness.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm a fan of van sant's psycho and have said so a fair bit around here. i've probably mentioned this before too, but it seems like some of the most interesting things (to me) about van sant's stuff often don't seem to have occured to him – i don't think this diminishes it tho. at any rate i don't really think he and haynes are mining very similar territory.

jones (actual), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Elephant was terribly stupid.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)

(i thought its shallowness made it a lot more genuinely troubling as a film than it could have been otherwise – to me that's not the same as being stupid, but i know what you mean)

jones (actual), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought it was an irresponsible film that hid behind its "daring". i don't think van sant ever owned up to the real motivations behind the film, which i think were largely opportunistic. i'm not even sure he's smart (or whatever) enough to recognize the nature of his own motivations and ambitions. although obviously he's articulate in a certain sense (not a profound one).

i guess the most interesting part about "elephant" was the degree of human sympathy it elicited for characters not often seen in films (NOT the killers, but some of the students introduced in the first half ), but that was ultimately sort of incidental to the film and its main reason for being. i've written about this on an "elephant"-specific thread.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like elephant a whole lot.

cozen (Cozen), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Throw those dreary vows away, they bore me!

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Monday, 18 December 2023 20:49 (two years ago)

I like the idea that Haynes is focusing on us (the audience) as avid consumers of lurid tabloid stories, and turning the narrative and whatever truth there might be about it back on us, to what our reactions to this movie might reflect about us

Dan S, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 01:07 (two years ago)

Throw those dreary vows away, they bore me!

― stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Monday, December 18, 2023 8:49 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

lol

ꙮ (map), Tuesday, 19 December 2023 16:45 (two years ago)

The general atmosphere here is very Macbeth-ish.

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 December 2023 16:49 (two years ago)

We've seen you like this before. Is it over or is it just beginning?

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Tuesday, 19 December 2023 17:16 (two years ago)

thought joe actor/character was really good. the put down of 'this is what grown ups do' was one of the most off handedly condescendingly mean thing I've seen in a movie in a while. the graduation dress shopping scene with the daughter's reaction to the 'your brave to wear that dress and show off your upper arms' volley from the mum was great/chilling. never got a handle on who gracie was throughout the whole thing. hopefully that was the point.

oscar bravo, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 19:51 (two years ago)

the music cues kept making me think of 'invitation to love'

oscar bravo, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 19:52 (two years ago)

the put down of 'this is what grown ups do' was one of the most off handedly condescendingly mean thing I've seen in a movie in a while

Yeah, this one got a gasp from me

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Tuesday, 19 December 2023 19:55 (two years ago)

Portman nailed the delivery.

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 December 2023 20:10 (two years ago)

two weeks pass...

This latest “controversy” is really killing any remaining goodwill I have toward … well discourse in general tbh

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2024 03:13 (two years ago)

this. a24 not contacting the last remaining brother of the von erichs until after the iron claw was made…the aaliyah story a younger zendaya turned down…it should be an ethical requirement to request an individual’s permission for a biopic or “inspired story,” based on THEM. https://t.co/56QqnSQ7kI

— kristen (not crystal) yellowjackets shish-kabob 🍡 (@lordesbbqribs) January 4, 2024



give me a fucking break here lol pic.twitter.com/rhW0HmvyQk

— alice (@modlssss) January 4, 2024

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2024 03:29 (two years ago)

I think artists should be able to write about whomever they want…but I also think if they’re based on a real person, there should be a sincere effort to understand that person and give them a fair shake…kind of a theme of this movie iirc

joe was clearly the character the story was most sympathetic to imo, fwiw

truly humbled underdog (k3vin k.), Friday, 5 January 2024 03:40 (two years ago)

Right. I'm not myself feeling sympathetic.

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 5 January 2024 03:42 (two years ago)

He may be the inspiration but it's not a biography. It would be extremely misguided to even mistake it as one, just as it would be to think Charles Foster Kane is supposed to be a biographical depiction of William Randolph Hearst. Public figures inspire countless fictional characters. The plot may involve adapting a controversial event into a TV show, but it's still doing so within the realm of fiction.

birdistheword, Friday, 5 January 2024 03:46 (two years ago)

I don't know why so much of the audience nowadays has trouble grappling with the concept of fiction - it's like when they mistake any film, book or song as being some kind of coded memoir. Is it reality TV warping their understanding of such things?

birdistheword, Friday, 5 January 2024 03:48 (two years ago)

And thanks to its mixture of tones it winds up fair to all the principals? We understand without sympathizing.

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 5 January 2024 03:55 (two years ago)

I can understand the guy's feelings, sure, but that's just how stories work. Stagger Lee would like a word.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Friday, 5 January 2024 04:03 (two years ago)

sensible and justified for this dude to see it the way he sees it

sensible and justified for haynes et al to proceed with their creative project without involving him

"If they had reached out to me, we could have worked together on a masterpiece"

i do like his delusions of grandeur though

Lavator Shemmelpennick, Friday, 5 January 2024 04:49 (two years ago)

Indeed, this movie could've been up there with The Amy Fischer Story. Instead, it's merely Haynes' best movie since Safe (the Village Voice poll's best movie of the '90s).

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2024 14:30 (two years ago)

It's funny how in the movie the people the story is based on are involved but not in the actual production of the movie where that happens

plax (ico), Friday, 5 January 2024 18:29 (two years ago)

This movie is so exquisitely awkward

Marten Broadcloak, mild-mannered GOP congressman (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 9 January 2024 22:55 (two years ago)

Yeah, between this and Showing Up it was a good year for awkward.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 9 January 2024 23:04 (two years ago)

Showing Up is awkward, and is a remarkable film about a small local community of people (an arts community in Portland OR) trying to navigate the world, with all of the frustrations and divided feelings that come with it. It is my favorite movie so far from this year.

May December is also a favorite film this year, but it seems very slippery and knowing and almost conniving, and is almost the opposite of awkward to me, although there are some moments in it that are cringy

Dan S, Wednesday, 10 January 2024 01:34 (two years ago)

six months pass...

In a surprising move to just about everyone involved in the project, Joaquin Phoenix abruptly walked away from starring in the untitled Todd Haynes film that he's been developing with the director for years just five days before filming commenced in Mexico, sources tell Entertainment Weekly.

Reps for Haynes and indie production company Killer Films declined to comment, while Phoenix's reps did not immediately respond to EW's requests for comment. IndieWire was the first to report the news.

Phoenix, who will be seen on screen this year in Joker: Folie à Deux, was set to star in the lead role of the movie, described as an explicit gay romance set in 1930s Los Angeles and Mexico. Danny Ramirez of Top Gun: Maverick and Captain America: Brave New World had been cast in a supporting role. Based on Haynes' previous comments to the press, the story revolved around a corrupt L.A. cop and a Native American who are forced to flee Los Angeles for Mexico......

.....This film would have marked Phoenix's first gay role on screen. Haynes was open about making the sex scenes as explicit as possible. "Joaquin was pushing me further and going, 'No, let’s go further,'” the filmmaker told IndieWire in May 2023. “This will be an NC-17 film." He then told the same outlet later last year, "The whole experience was prompted by Joaquin. It was prompted by his daring, his desire to push through barriers and to really get into the uncomfortable places about this relationship. And yet it felt like a very organic process."

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 August 2024 20:12 (one year ago)

Could Colin Farrell be subbed in for the now-uninsurable Joaquin Phoenix? He’s fearless. He’s a total pro. They’re almost the same age. And Farrell’s already done publicity for “The Penguin,” which starts streaming in a month, so he might be able to do it.

— Janet Maslin (@JanetMaslin) August 9, 2024

bratwurst autumn (Eazy), Friday, 9 August 2024 20:14 (one year ago)

Stunned. Really sucks, I hope it isn't too damaging to the project.

birdistheword, Saturday, 10 August 2024 00:29 (one year ago)

seven months pass...

Have a trial Apple subscription, so I rewatched the VU documentary. The other time was from a digital file my friend got hold of somehow when it came out--one thing I remember was that the speaker's names got cut off. I carped about a couple of minor things at the time; can't find the post and can't remember what they were (one was Mary Woronov's East Coast snobbishness).

Anyway, really loved it this time. The ending, when all those deaths are noted within a few seconds, and then moving into the '70s clip of Reed/Cale/Nico performing "Heroin," is so moving. One thing I noticed this time was how perfect the assemblage of interviewees is; there's not a single person of the 20+ where you wonder why that person is there (i.e., no Bono, no Johnny Depp, etc.). And with the exception of maybe Gerard Malanga, still alive at 82, if Haynes missed somebody important who he could have conceivably spoken to, I don't know who that would have been.

clemenza, Monday, 24 March 2025 03:07 (one year ago)

five months pass...

Some good news it seems..

EXCLUSIVE: Todd Haynes’ gay romance ‘De Noche,’ which shut down about a year ago, is being revived, with Pedro Pascal circling.

This is a great ray of sunshine for a production which was long considered kaput after Oscar winner Joaquin Phoenix left the production.

Pascal would… pic.twitter.com/PvCPrkZD5s

— Deadline (@DEADLINE) August 27, 2025

piscesx, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 18:44 (nine months ago)

Joaquin and Pedro seems pretty much interchangeable, right? Pop out the old one, plug in the spare, and you're good to go!

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 19:03 (nine months ago)

"Pascal would show more"

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 23:56 (nine months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.