post one reason dating the poster above you would rule and one reason it would suck

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (473 of them)

Can revise that? Prettier than me, in fact.

Laurel, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)

Laurel:

c: witty, smar, and cool
d: takes no bullshit - I'd be afraid to piss her off

ENBB, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

smart - oops

ENBB, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

accentmonkey, you exagerate!!

remy, like I'd ever waste a good martini, thusly!

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

(x-post because I already did M.)
c: really pretty, good sense of humor, starts great threads
d: again with the married thing.

luna, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

c: pretty
d: we'd end up as junkies

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)

c: the 蕃 part
d: the 茄 part euuuugh

Will M., Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

c: Probably has awesome drugs.
c: Probably would make fun of my peeing dog macro.

xp

Abbott, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

c: would look enough like me that people would think it was cute
d: would look enough like me that people would think we were related and that would be creepy

Alba, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

c: Funny, vibrant, smart
d: Cannot spell umbrella

xpost

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)

d: we'd end up as junkies I want to dispute this, but I cannot.

luna, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

c: luna
d: southern california

nabisco, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

c: is OTM
d: is a dude

DG, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

c: would be able to yell "nabisco otm!" during sexytimes
d: too twee

xpost

bell_labs, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

c: would be able to yell "nabisco otm!" during sexytimes

actual lols

horseshoe, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

You know, you can already do that, whether you're dating me or not.

Just so everyone knows.

nabisco, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

c: v v pretty
d: stalker

xposts to bell labs

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

You know, you can already do that, whether you're dating me or not.

Can you imagine the look on her partner's face?

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

i dont think luna is real guys

chaki, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

oh chaki, give it a fuckin' rest already.

luna, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

c: might be real
d: is no chaki

Will M., Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)

We do lots of suspension of disbelief around here.

We all figured out Ned was a teenager around 2002, but we run with it anyway.

Forget it, Jake, it's the internet.

nabisco, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

give it a rest?? thats the first time ive posted that!

chaki, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

wait ned isnt a teenager?

chaki, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

r: is a bro, we could start a band
s: likes teenagers

Jordan, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)

r: is drummer
s: is from WI

dan m, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)

It might be the first for you, but it's about the 900th time I've seen it, and it was funny maybe the first time and now, not so much. I apologize, I should have said something more like "please, for the love of christ, no one ever say that again as it stopped being funny about 12 years ago."

luna, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

^ not real

DG, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

i didnt know it was a thing. i was not trying to be funny. i am just stating my opinion.

chaki, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

xp to Dan

r: tall, handsome, and jolly
s: a much kinder person than I am, would prob dislike me inside of 6 mos

Laurel, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:07 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.aurigintech.com/robot-typing-hand.jpg

omar little, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:07 (eighteen years ago)

xp to laurel

r: fancy dancing, general impression of awesomeness
s: appears to do things other than drink all day

John Justen, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)

I'm having a beer at work right now, so...not much!

Laurel, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

Plaudits, Laurel

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

c: i can borrow his awesome clothes!!!
d: reeks of booze early in the morning!

chaki, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

Persiflage! (Usually)

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

c: keeps posting here so he can learn his weaknesses and improve upon them by reading the "d" column when someone inevitably posts after him
d: OR IS HE?

Will M., Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)

Nah, I'm just channeling my inner polygamist.

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

Ho.

Laurel, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

it's a date, not marriage. sheesh, getting ahead of yourself. buy us a drink first! xp

Will M., Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

Nah, I'm just channeling my inner polygamist slut.

Fixed.

Barkeep! A drink for the whole thread and keep'em coming.

Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

c: seems like he'd be a generous love
d: too much cock, not enough vag

chicago kevin, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

r: parties
s: too bony

Jordan, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

r: drummer
s: too Jewish

Laurel, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

i've got no more bones than the next person!

chicago kevin, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

Oh bullshit.

luna, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

Um, not to ck - I do believe you have exactly the required number of bones, no more or less.

luna, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

lol @ Laurel

Jordan, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

:) cute/hot in a manic sorta way; is in band
:( would have to fight off pantie-throwing groupies for his attention

Rubyredd, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.