DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived Cleggeron era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7011 of them)

Seriously though - fuck all this crappy banter the pair of you...

12.14pm: Miliband says Cameron claims to be making a hard choice about tuition fees. But who has Cameron put on the civil service payroll this week? His own personal photographer. (See 10.47am.) Mililband imagines what the photographer would say: "We're all in this together - just a little bit to the right, Nick."
Cameron asks if this is what Miliband's opposition has been reduced to. The last Labour government spent £500m on communications. The coalition will cut that by two thirds. Cameron suggests Miliband should engage with the serious issues.
Miliband says this is a government of broken promises. "That is what they meant by broken Britain." Cameron is destroying trust in politics.
Cameron says Miliband can have a succession of "lame soundbites", or he can decide to engage in a debate about the government of the country. People know what Miliband is against. But they don't know what he stands for.

on the cusp of eligibility (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)

Communications Budget slashed to "lots of nice pictures of me"

Mark G, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 12:48 (fifteen years ago)

That was shit on Miliband's part. Beyond shit actually.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)

As many as three people could go to university for the cost of that photographer.

James Mitchell, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

Or one for a whole degree.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

ed miliband is so rubbish

Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

£9k a year tuition fees! Clearly when the coalition talks about not wanting to make the next generation pay for this generation's mistakes, they're full of shit.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

yeah. fucking incredible. i felt hard-done-by when they were a grand a year. im still like eight thou down, but £27k and rising on graduation? fuk dat.

it's always random in wackydelphia (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

It's outrageous that Cameron's photographer can still claim child benefits.

Eto'o ))) (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

Whatever happened to Punch and Judy politics?

Tom A. (Tom B.) (Tom C.) (Tom D.), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

hey folks! just checkin in to say i'm thinking of you...

no really -- funny to see ppl wondering about what the US midterms mean for the UK (no idea btw) because i've been thinking about the UK example in terms of what the new crop of hard-right legislators have said they want to do: cut everything now. and the cameron plan, in general, looks like a good test case. gee, what happens when you dump another few hundred thousand public employees into the labor market in the middle of a recession? i don't think any american pundit has made this connection, but i'll be curious to see how the two economies and political systems handle the next two years.

thanks for your time!

Mannsplain Steamroller (goole), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

what happens when you dump another few hundred thousand public employees into the labor market in the middle of a recession?

see: ireland, republic

caek, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

we're not really like ireland (labour try to make this comparison). or like greece (the tories try to make this comparison). but yes it is going to be shit.

it's always random in wackydelphia (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno about consequences of US politics for the UK, but looking at any US pol thread is sure to make me terrified of a(n even more) 2-party system

thanks Lib Dems for so eagerly making yourselves Tory fall guys; thanks everyone who never voted for them being so gleeful at being able to say "I told you so"

fred aboombong (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

my pleasure

Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

things can only get better guys

Eto'o ))) (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

This pundit suggests the UK horrorshow will dissuade the US from austerity measures, but I doubt it:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/oct/25/economics-economy

Stevie T, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

Republicans get elected by promising "smaller government"; in office they tend to spend more than Democrats. They cut benefits and gut regulatory regimes so it FEELS smaller but it's more than made up for by corporate giveaways.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

For the past 20 weeks I have been engaged in a very strange dialogue with the two noble Lords, in the course of which I have been trying to bring to their attention the willing availability of a strange organisation which wishes to make a great deal of money available to assist the recovery of the economy in this country. For want of a better name, I shall call it foundation X. That is not its real name, but it will do for the moment. Foundation X was introduced to me 20 weeks ago last week by an eminent City firm, which is FSA controlled. Its chairman came to me and said, "We have this extraordinary request to assist in a major financial reconstruction. It is megabucks, but we need your help to assist us in understanding whether this business is legitimate".

...

I found myself between a rock and a hard place that were totally paranoid about each other, because the foundation X people have an amazing obsession with their own security. They expect to be contacted only by someone equal to head of state status or someone with an international security rating equal to the top six people in the world. This is a strange situation.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2010-11-01a.1463.8#g1536.0

wtf? he's just got one of those nigerian emails, right?

joe, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

Fell asleep reading a Dan Brown book, more like.

James Mitchell, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

haha what the fuck

NI, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

is he just an old nutter? biggest lol comes after this guy has bumbled on for 30 minutes, ranting about "finding out the truth!" and some lib dem lord interrupts with "My Lords, back to the spending review..."

if someone is losing their marbles in a big way, why are they still ok to sit in the house of lords and waste everyone's time like this?

NI, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

hundreds of years of tradition.

Owner of a Homely Face (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

Something very lolworthy about this:

"Our ambition is to bring together the creativity and energy of Shoreditch and the incredible possibilities of the Olympic Park to help make east London one of the world's great technology centres."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11689437

James Mitchell, Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:53 (fifteen years ago)

East London is already full of Nathan Barley-looking cunts and I'm sure the Olympic Park has already got plenty of companies signed up for the tax breaks, so in my many ways this plan can't fail.

James Mitchell, Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)

*in many ways*, even.

James Mitchell, Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:56 (fifteen years ago)

It's not an inherently terrible idea, but the notion that they all have to be in East London is presumably just bandwagon jumping after Cameron read that Silicon Roundabout story in the Standard the other week. Seems to overlook the fact that the UK tech industry isn't really clustered around Shoreditch.

Matt DC, Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:28 (fifteen years ago)

for a sharp advertising mind such as Cameron Technology = Media = Facebook. Clever jonnies up in Cambridge curing cancer doesn't come into it.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 4 November 2010 12:14 (fifteen years ago)

gonna put plaistow on the map, then confuse everyone over how it's pronounced

Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Thursday, 4 November 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)

Looking forward to buying a Ginsters at the "Facebook Garage".

James Mitchell, Thursday, 4 November 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

better than the relentless garage

Eto'o ))) (ken c), Thursday, 4 November 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11695416

a good thing, no?

NI, Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

depends how much poison comes with the sugar

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 4 November 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

Cameron's obviously got a few hooky tracks on his ipod.

State Attorney Foxhart Cubycheck (Billy Dods), Thursday, 4 November 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

So we'll get our version of the DMCA? With extending the recording copyright lifetime thrown in as well, I imagine…

carson dial, Thursday, 4 November 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

Blimey, this doesn't happen very often. Woolas is such a cunt... I had no idea that Miliband had appointed him as a Shadow Minister with this hanging over his head, doesn't look like great judgement there.

Matt DC, Friday, 5 November 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)

Two High Court judges have ordered a re-run of this year's General Election

Only read that far and got excited for a sec.

"joeks bruv" defence (Noodle Vague), Friday, 5 November 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)

Just me or has Ed Miliband so far failed to make any impression whatsoever?

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 5 November 2010 12:20 (fifteen years ago)

Biding his time until the leadership election's over.

"joeks bruv" defence (Noodle Vague), Friday, 5 November 2010 12:20 (fifteen years ago)

i know it shouldn't matter but watching ed in PMQs the other day all i could think about was his lisp and how childlike and callow it made him seem.

NI, Friday, 5 November 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)

Unlike the elder statesmanlike gravitas that Cameron brings to leaning on a podium.
PMQs just makes me angry. Both of them need to get down to business.

on the cusp of eligibility (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 5 November 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

They're both so so bad, I imagine them going over their lines beforehand and deludely going "lolol, this will kill him".

Matt DC, Friday, 5 November 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

Seems to me EdM needs to definitely step up a gear or three and stop playing silly buggers. And, yes, fuck knows what making Woollas anything (let alone the fucking Home Office) was about. But, also, lols at LD's taking the high ground when it comes to campaigning.

on the cusp of eligibility (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 5 November 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

i haven't been following the uk papers/radio since the leadership election, but my impression is that emills has been a bit of a damp squib. is that fair?

caek, Friday, 5 November 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

(not just at pmqs, more generally)

caek, Friday, 5 November 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

Problem is we only ever see him at PMQs!

Woolas should step down now but I don't suppose he will. I really don't understand his appointment. EdM knew this was coming, surely, he owes Woolas nothing - big supporter of his bro during the election iirc (except for haha - nominating Abbott at the last moment to make sure she got on the ballot) - and the man was hopeless at immigration (although tbf that's a no-win position for just about anyone anyway).

on the cusp of eligibility (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 5 November 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

It's all very depressing anyway.

on the cusp of eligibility (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 5 November 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

no, some media people think he's done better than expected

but they aren't, you know, against the cuts, not wholeheartedly

they're sitting it out and (i would imagine) slightly hoping it all blows up in osborne's face

meantime alan johnson is reading his economics primer (ha bloody ha)

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Friday, 5 November 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

speaker's office has confirmed woolas is no longer an mp.

joe, Friday, 5 November 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

Hoorah!

Tom A. (Tom B.) (Tom C.) (Tom D.), Friday, 5 November 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.