The Shining

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1313 of them)

http://www.jayweidner.com/images/IMG_0066.jpg
http://www.jayweidner.com/images/IMG_0069.jpg

Danny is literally carrying a symbolic Apollo 11, on his body, via the sweater, to the Moon as he walks over to room 237. Why do I think this?

Because the average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 237,000 miles.

LOL

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

i have never seen this movie, nor will i ever. im scared shitless by it.

Str8 Drapin It (chrisv2010), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

overlook hallway carpeting is so badass

naked human hands and a foam rubber head (contenderizer), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

The funniest thing is, I've read some "serious" analyses of The Shining that make equally broad conclusions based on minuscule details as the moon landing guy.

Tuomas, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

In high school, I was once at the house of Tim Daly (of Wings fame; his son went to my school & we were in an a cappella group together). On a shelf, surrounded by dozens of other VHS cassettes, was a hand-labeled tape titled "THE SHINNING."

I always think of that when someone mentions this movie; I wonder what THE SHINNING, as a different movie, could be like, and whether it would star Tim Daly.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvkgKRMlp90

omar little, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

Gonna use this opportunity to repost the Physical Cosmologies analysis, which is pretty convincing and a damn wonderful read!

http://www.mstrmnd.com/log/802

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGMoBo9f40I

Tub Girl Time Machine (Phil D.), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

xp goddamit omar

Tub Girl Time Machine (Phil D.), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

The funniest thing is, I've read some "serious" analyses of The Shining that make equally broad conclusions based on minuscule details as the moon landing guy.
yeah there's one (which i think was linked to on ILX somewhere) that was fairly convincing in some respects ... but totally batshit in others.

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

oh xpost - that's the one i'm talking about, adam. kinda fascinating.

tylerw, Friday, 29 October 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

The funny thing about that Tim Daly story is that his Wings co-star Steven Weber went on to star in the Stephen King-approved TV miniseries version of "The Shining."

Tub Girl Time Machine (Phil D.), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

omg i never knew that -- that might explain what was on the tape, and why it was home-recorded! lol thx phil

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 29 October 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

Eyes Wide Shut was released on July 16 th 1999.

Stanley Kubrick insisted in his contract that this be the date of the release.

July 16 th 1999 is exactly 30 years to the day that Apollo 11 was launched.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 29 October 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

I present this tidbit of an interpretation to show not only that Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings but also to ask NASA to release all of Kubrick's Apollo moon landing footage in their original, glorious 70 mm film.

would he settle for a blu ray release

mr. mandelbrot flythrough vertigo, esq. (Edward III), Friday, 29 October 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

i have never seen this movie, nor will i ever. im scared shitless by it.

That fits, as it scares no one shitless while they are watching it.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 30 October 2010 02:27 (fifteen years ago)

I have seen the shining scare plenty of ppl oh wait it's dr morbius

mr. mandelbrot flythrough vertigo, esq. (Edward III), Saturday, 30 October 2010 03:02 (fifteen years ago)

thank you for this link, tuomas!

the waning trend (latebloomer), Saturday, 30 October 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

This explains why the previous "caretaker" was so pressured and stressed that he had to kill his TWIN daughters.

Why?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
Because the previous NASA missions before Apollo were named Gemini!

Hugo Stiglitz, a rich young man in search of romance & adventure (Pillbox), Saturday, 30 October 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

Here's another site with an incredibly complex analysis based on tiny details in the movie. For example, according to the site a commentary on the genocide of Native Americans is hidden in the food cans you can see on the background in the storage room scenes.

I'm not saying these analyses are invalid, it's perfectly possible Kubrick meant to hide those messages in the movie. If that's true though, it begs the question: if you want to make a statement on American history, why the hell hide it in cryptic background items most viewers are not even gonna notice?

Tuomas, Monday, 1 November 2010 10:47 (fifteen years ago)

Because Kubrick had OCD resulting in an extreme attention to detail in his movies?

Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Monday, 1 November 2010 10:51 (fifteen years ago)

nine months pass...

Kubrick's daughter's documentary :

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4745727919325920852

calstars, Friday, 12 August 2011 01:12 (fourteen years ago)

five months pass...

Here's another page with some more links to interpretation essays:

http://theshining.20m.com/

calstars, Sunday, 5 February 2012 16:57 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/01/documentary-room-237-sundance/

‘Neuroscience’ and ‘near death’ pepper (Eazy), Sunday, 5 February 2012 17:03 (fourteen years ago)

My favorite detail is how the carpeting changes after the ball is rolled toward Danny while he plays with his toys down the hall from Room 237:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2567539/shining_danny1.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2567539/shining_danny2.jpg

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2567539/shining_danny3.jpg

calstars, Sunday, 5 February 2012 17:06 (fourteen years ago)

a MOMENTARY LOSS of MUSSSSSSSCULAR COORDINATION! a few extra foot-pounds of energy per second per SECOND!

the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Sunday, 5 February 2012 19:02 (fourteen years ago)

Something must be in the air!

http://io9.com/5882985/watch-this-insane-breakdown-of-stanley-kubricks-hidden-narrative-in-the-shining

Using unpublished info from the Stanley Kubrick Archives as a key source, Kubrick's Gold Story is a film analysis that uncovers economic themes encoded in The Shining with regard to gold vs fiat monetary systems.

You got to ro-o-oll me and call me the tumblr whites (Phil D.), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 17:26 (fourteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

Strange, I remember 1980 audience laughing at most of the stuff the guy is surprised about here.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/i-saw-the-last-showing-of-the-warner-bros-35mm-print-of-the-shining/

And though I've never come around to liking this film, it's a shame there are going to be even more "last 35mm screenings."

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 March 2012 19:11 (fourteen years ago)

guess many of the Shining lovers here have never seen it in 35mm

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 03:54 (fourteen years ago)

O HAI

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/4530/shinning.jpg

<3 this movie so much

Jurgis Rudkus // Dick Butkus (Pillbox), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:23 (fourteen years ago)

Every time I see that screencap I mistake the guy on the right for George Bush Sr.

cashmere tears-soaker (Abbbottt), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:24 (fourteen years ago)

guess many of the Shining lovers here have never seen it in 35mm

35mm or no, I would love a chance just to see this on the big screen at all - same goes for pretty much all Kubrick, I suppose, but esp. this & 2001. The only one I was around to catch in its original theatrical run was Eyes Wide Shut (which I actually rather like, but still..)

Jurgis Rudkus // Dick Butkus (Pillbox), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:27 (fourteen years ago)

Every time I see that screencap I mistake the guy on the right for George Bush Sr.

that would go a long ways in understanding why Dubya turned out the way he did ...

morbz will sneer but the only Kubrick i've seen on the big screen is barry lyndon (it was worth it of course).

kurwa mać (Polish for "long life") (Eisbaer), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:31 (fourteen years ago)

just remembered that I caught a screening of Dr. Strangelove back in lolcollege. My first time seeing it!

Jurgis Rudkus // Dick Butkus (Pillbox), Friday, 2 March 2012 04:34 (fourteen years ago)

I saw it in 35mm but was 12 years old and don't really remember much about the screening itself due to having been terrified. Have seen it a dozen times on DVD and Blu-Ray since. I've seen 2001 in 70mm at the AFI, Lolita in 35mm at the Cleveland Cinematheque, and Eyes Wide Shut in its theatrical run.

Flagpost Sitta (Phil D.), Friday, 2 March 2012 11:22 (fourteen years ago)

The DVD/Blu-Ray of the shining still only contains the theatrical print, rather than the longer television version, which i don't think has ever been made available to purchase - just as the original, longer theatrical cut of 2001 remains MIA.

Ward Fowler, Friday, 2 March 2012 11:25 (fourteen years ago)

The DVD/Blu-Ray of the shining still only contains the theatrical print, rather than the longer television version

No, this "longer television version" was the original theatrical release! Save for the penultimate scene of Barry Nelson visiting Shelley Duvall in the hospital, which I saw on opening night but was cut by Kubrick after a few days and has never been seen again. THEN he further cut it AGAIN from 144 minutes to 113 after MONTHS. I saw this version once and it's total hash from my POV.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/alternateversions

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 12:30 (fourteen years ago)

OK, rereading Ward's post I don't know what the difference is, if any between "the longer television version" and "the original, longer theatrical cut" is. I don't think it was SK's practice to re-edit for TV (aside from the violence/nudity in The Shining for broadcast censorship).

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 12:37 (fourteen years ago)

ahh, looking at the IMDB entry, it seems that the "longer television version" i know (from watching it on britishes tv) is, in fact, the original long theatrical cut (minus that final scene.) i'm p sure, tho, that it's the shorter 'European version' that's on the DVD and Blu-Ray in the UK, thoguh again, it appears the american dvd/blu ray is the longer version.

Ward Fowler, Friday, 2 March 2012 12:48 (fourteen years ago)

so i guess i have to buy the region 1 dvd to get the longer cut

btw, did anything ever come of atom egoyan's plan to make an opera based on the film of the shining?

Ward Fowler, Friday, 2 March 2012 12:49 (fourteen years ago)

Strange, I remember 1980 audience laughing at most of the stuff the guy is surprised about here.

http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/i-saw-the-last-showing-of-the-warner-bros-35mm-print-of-the-shining/

And though I've never come around to liking this film, it's a shame there are going to be even more "last 35mm screenings."

― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, March 1, 2012 2:11 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

ah shit, i had no idea that was the last ever showing of the 35mm print. i was planning on going too!

RudolfHitlerFtw (Hungry4Ass), Friday, 2 March 2012 14:00 (fourteen years ago)

barry lyndon in 35mm is some kind of wonderful. gorgeous!

flagp∞st (dayo), Friday, 2 March 2012 14:03 (fourteen years ago)

I can only imagine!

Seeing 2001 in 70mm was like one of the greatest things that's ever happened to me. Awe-inspiring in the most literal sense of the phrase.

Flagpost Sitta (Phil D.), Friday, 2 March 2012 14:25 (fourteen years ago)

So is WB going to pull ALL celluloid prints of Kubrick's films from theaters now? The Film Forum here in NY is showing Digital Cinema Package editions of 2001, Strangelove and The Shining this week as a way to ease Film Catholics into the New Era.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 March 2012 15:05 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/IhOqq.jpg

Chris S, Friday, 2 March 2012 17:53 (fourteen years ago)

haha

pplains, Friday, 2 March 2012 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

i saw the shining in 35mm i guess a dozen years ago. it was a fantastic experience.

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 2 March 2012 18:15 (fourteen years ago)

still keep meaning to make it to toronto to see 2001 in 70mm whenever the lightbox shows it next.

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 2 March 2012 18:15 (fourteen years ago)

monkeys and the typewriter got me.

pplains, Wednesday, 7 March 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.