I have never had sex.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (647 of them)
noodle vague otfm. every time I've found myself falling for someone who is from a different background (usually more 'a bit rough' than a bit toff) or someone attached (to a wanker) or someone outclassing me in life achievements (££, good career, educated) or someone who's just been/done/seen more than me & is probably cleverer (self-insecurity beside them) I'm like... UGH! Why the fuck do we NEED all this shit?

The answer of course is you don't. So be prepared (together) for giving people the incentive to stfu about you & the person you care for.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

I snogged (and more) my girlfriend of the last five years on the night we met.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

xpost - wherever you might find her...

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

Okay I have never made out with someone who was so bad that I had flashbacks to missed opportunities. My condolences, nabisco.

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

(XP to JJJ) Oh dear god, yes. After my first (increeedibly brief AND OVERDUE) kiss I promptly FREAKED OUT about it for a few weeks, in the vein of "What have I done? You can never get that innocence back, you know. NOW you've done it, you've given in, if he doesn't call back you'll be SHAMED." DO NOT DO THIS, I BEG OF YOU. You are not your hospitality roster or rapsheet, nor are you a delicate blossom who will be dirtied and crumpled and lose value by having a mind and a life and a past.

In conclusion: religion fucks you up.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, like jaymc with me (however infrequently) the intimacy thing has nearly always happened quite quickly, as a result I'm pretty much... uncertain about a lot of shit when it comes to the whole (tradition of) extended dating period :/

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:59 (nineteen years ago)

I'll just say one thing and leave this thread to its long, long unravelling: if you find someone to love, the whole sex thing pretty much takes care of itself. Things get much more awkward when you try to put the cart before the horse.

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

I never fucked a cart or a horse.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

Having been something of a late bloomer myself I can sympathise. I dunno I suppose it was a combination of shyness and bad luck. But, as glib as it may sound, it will happen. I suppose I was looking for romance as much as sex and I'm glad that when it did happen it was with someone I really liked and it felt really natural and great.

Afterwards I didn't feel as if I'd gone through some life-changing experience, but I did feel a weight lifted from my shoulders and was much more chipper over all. Not just cos of the sex but cos of the romance too. I had, ahem, frolicked, as it were, with a couple of girls before. If they'd been up for it I probably would have gone the whole hog, but can genuinely say I'm glad I didn't cos there was no real connection there other than booze and desperation. I suppose it gave me some, er, work experience, but you learn on the job pretty quickly anyway, and if she's any kind of decent person she'll be understanding.
I'm not saying you should expect fireworks or you have to be madly in love, but it's so much nicer if you at least like each other and feel comfortable.

Stew (stew s), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

In conclusion: religion fucks you up.

There's still a part of me that thinks sex is bad and dirty. I think people who think sex is perfectly natural and open and beautiful are the weird ones.

Charlie Brown (kenan), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

Learn one shame!

Charlie Brown (kenan), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

But yeah, being in love helps. There is, however, a; nothing to say you need to be in love with the person you lose your virginity to, and also equally b; nothing to say you don't have to be in love with the person you lose your virginity to.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

is LJ like a hybrid of ian riese-moraine and graham?

i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:03 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, "first kiss" is nothing. I was 12. She was 14. Her mate was copping off my my friend and told hedr to cop off with me, in the stairwell at the school Junior Night (youth club, basically, but not a club). Oh those were the days. Pounds wasted on Gauntlet Arcade and the pool table, upstairs after 8pm for Warhammer. Joy.
-- Sick Mouthy (sickmouth...), January 17th, 2007 6:50 PM.

why does the british description of a first kiss sound like Popeye Doyle raids the poolhall

deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:03 (nineteen years ago)

I didn't phrase that right;

a; you can be in love with the person

b; you can also not be!

Neither is key.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:05 (nineteen years ago)

Key = having sex.

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

Louis, I'm just guessing from the responses you gave to my questions, but I can see one problem you might be having, and you can tell me if this rings true to you:

You're starting relationships the wrong way. I mean, all the things you describe as some kind of pre-kissing courtship are activities that are known to most people as "making friends." You're trying to become close to people before you sort out your romantic interest, which is also known as "making friends." And this will work against you, because once you've made a friend, you're looking at a much bigger challenge -- instead of just starting a romantic relationship, you're trying to convert an existing, comfortable friendship into one. And that can work, sometimes, but it's like building a covered bridge and then trying to make it into a house: it's way easier to just build a house in the first place.

The alternative isn't just to go to some "meat market" and pick someone up. The normal alternative would be this: next time you go out with friends and meet new people, if you meet some girl you think is attractive, and who you enjoy talking to in a friendly way for an hour or two ... ask her out. Not as a "friend," and not to build some platonic relationship while you find out more about her: ask her out on a date, as a potential romantic interest. You will have way more success with this than trying to turn your established friends into lovers. And then you can work from there in largely the same way, except that any intimacy you build from there will be understood as romantic intimacy, not as friendship.

I want to speculate a little on why you don't do this already, so please remember that I'm just guessing here. But: the risks are higher for this sort of thing. Asking someone to do something in a friendly way doesn't carry that much risk of rejection; asking someone on a date does. And if there's no rejection, it means getting to know someone via a process that's far messier and more fraught than being casual-friendly and figuring everything about them out that way. But ... it's just kinda what you have to do. You're not going to know everything about the person. You might not even turn out to like the person that much. She might not like you. Chances are, you'll break up. You kinda have to bite the bullet and do it anyway. And the good news is that you apparently have friends, and your friend relationships will go on as normal even as you try different things and maybe get into messes and rejection on the romantic side.

Just try to keep those things more separate than you currently are. Within a day or two of meeting people, try to think about whether you want to initiate a friend-relationship or a romantic relationship. I totally understand that this is inconvenient, because you don't know them enough to decide, but those are kind of the breaks. You might be wrong, and have a failed relationship with someone who might have been a great friend. But it sounds like right now you're doing the reverse, and having friendships with people who might have been great girlfriends. You just have to make a blind bet on which way you want to try things, and see what happens. (And if it makes you feel any better, it's probably easier to convert someone you dated for a couple weeks to a friend than it is to convert a close friend to a lover.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

nabisco OTM.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:08 (nineteen years ago)

I'm proud to say I don't relate to this thread at all. Man, guys are so girly.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

I would like to point out, though, that MANY guys I know were virgins when they first came to college (a couple were virgins the first few years of college).

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:11 (nineteen years ago)

LOL "convert"? Is this "Extreme Makeover: Fucking Edition"?

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

everyone knows you need a retaining wall before you can fuck a girl.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

True.

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

oh whatever guys, the metaphor's a little shaky but nabisco's post is one of the least inane things said on this thread and is pretty good advice on the whole.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/happygirls.jpg

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

how come there are some okay threads on this board that got spammed with furry tigerman cocks and tubgirls and shit, and this one didn't?

TOMB07 (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Nabisco totally OTM. I'm saying this as someone who learned it the hard way and probably not even until recently.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

Louis, one important thing: whenever you do the deed don't come running here to tell us about it, okay? just please don't.

geoff (gcannon), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:18 (nineteen years ago)

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a393/jrdeanel/nbc_the_more_you_know.jpg

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

Geoff OTM. If Louis posts "GUYS I TOTALLY DID IT...I THINK...TELL ME IF THIS COUNTS AS SEX -- (1000-word blow-by-blow follows)" I will gouge out my internet with a fork.

do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:23 (nineteen years ago)

Look out for the live wires!

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

wear a jimmy hat, LJ

‘•’u (gear), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

Stop me if you've heard this one before... nabisco otm!

Aimless (Aimless), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

That's not fair.

TOMB07 (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:31 (nineteen years ago)

"GUYS I TOTALLY DID IT...I THINK...TELL ME IF THIS COUNTS AS SEX"

no way, the potential for a lousis jagger "Huzzah! Huzzah! I have achieved poppage!" thread in a few months is his one redeeming quality. that thread will be a monster instant classic.

tony conrad schnitzler (sanskrit), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

OMG, Nabisco appears to have nailed it! Again!

All it takes is confidence. Making myself seem wonderfully friendly and interesting will only make friends; taking the plunge is something else entirely. I've asked girls out for dinner before, but never raised the stakes to describing (or treating) it as a date.

Oh, and Aimless, I've spent the last 5 years looking for someone to love. I normally get hung up on certain girls, often think I love them, and am mortified when it doesn't happen. Something needs to click into place.

Some of my behavioural traits betray my unsoiled state, I'll admit. I mean, I've publicly tooth-drummed ffs, nobody with a girlfriend would show off his tooth-drumming skills!

Oh, and the thread (I worked this out earlier today, in fact) is going to be called, simply, 'POPPAGE'.

the killfire konspiracy (Haberdager), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:35 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.retrojunk.com/img/art-images/Popples.jpg

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

Nabisco completely OTM - 'partial' data is fine.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

You can't "look for someone to love", dude. It doesn't work that way.

xxpost

John Justen says Toonces was one of the most talented cats on televison (johnjus, Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

It is not fun or easy to have sex with girls on pedastals.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:38 (nineteen years ago)

"nabisco otm"

Yup. If you spend long getting friendly before you bring "I want to be on you" into it, then you're kind of betraying whatever friendship you've established beforehand. She's gonna think you were sweaty-palming it all along (which you were), and it might make things difficult for a while.

And you know this, that's why you (probably) never reveal the sexual tension you've built into yr. "friendships", thus sparing yrself the ugliness. And possible blowjobs.

Moral: you have to be creepy. You have to make your fuck-want clear from the beginning, even if you choose to go smooth and disguise it as "romantic interest". I understand that the romantic interest route is very popular.

I didn't get fucked, didn't get kissed until I was in my 20s. Drove me fucking crazy. I obsessed about it and about my own sexual loserdom to the point of incapacitating mental illness and listening to Swans records. Then I got drunk, hooked up with a lovely and similarly enabled girl, and ... well, let's discreetly draw the blinds on the indiscretions of the past.

Disagree that getting laid is not a curative, though. It is a curative. I never worried about it after that, and never had trouble making my intentions clear to girls I liked.

Adam Beales (Pye Poudre), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:38 (nineteen years ago)

(partial data not fine on LJ's first time - no data is fine on that. We'll have to guess based on his newfound confidence.)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

wtf, don't listen to adam beales

say it with blood diamonds (a_p), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

You have to make your fuck-want clear from the beginning

*shudder*

‘•’u (gear), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

rule one: don't be creepy

say it with blood diamonds (a_p), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

Moral: you have to be creepy.

How would you go about doing this?

You have to make your fuck-want, clear from the beginning,

aiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

how did this fucking thread immediately get 75% more wtf

say it with blood diamonds (a_p), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

Adam Beales, to the rescue!

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

Okay, fine, the language sucked. I wanted to edit it to "hideous fuck want" but it was too late.

Thought it'd be clear that "fuck-want" was the way those ashamed of their sexual interest tend to demonize it.

Guess not.

The point I'm trying to make is that it's a bad idea to make hide sexual interest in "friendships" and then to crucify yourself about it over time.

Adam Beales (Pye Poudre), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:42 (nineteen years ago)

The only part of your post that should be heeded is "Listening to Swans records." Not to help you get laid, but just because it's good to listen to Swans records.

John Justen says Toonces was one of the most talented cats on televison (johnjus, Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:43 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.