I want to get invited to one of Nucky's parties.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 01:34 (fifteen years ago)
eh. this is fairly entertaining thus far, but it's not exactly great.
i like Buscemi, but he feels miscast here. not believably charismatic enough to be a successful politician, not tough or intimidating enough to be a gangster. the scene in the last episode when he notices a spot on a glass and flips the table in a rage sent home the latter point. Michael Pitt is very pretty, but he's a damn boring actor. each episode seems to have a certain T&A (thanks Paz) and violence quota. often feels gratuitous. the show's too conservative, no real interesting plotlines, just standard gangster shit we've seen 100x before in a fancy new setting. it all feels a bit shallow.
also thought that Chalky scene in last episode was a little hammy, tbh. *ducks*
i'll stick it out, it's rarely boring and it COULD be something great, i'm just not exactly all that impressed with it at this point.
― circa1916, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 02:02 (fifteen years ago)
each episode seems to have a certain T&A (thanks Paz)
Was feeling the T&A on Jimmy's ill-fated Chicago squeeze, she reminded me of a younger sexier Jennifer Jason Leigh.
I pretty much agree entirely with circa. Moreover, I don't feel like I'm on anyone's side yet. Yer Don Drapers, Walter Whites, Dexter Morgans and Tony Sopranos are all pretty repulsive in their own ways, but their respective shows had you rooting for them pretty much from the off. I'm guessing Margaret is supposed to be filling that role, and she's growing into it but hasn't reached that point for me yet. Her exchange with the anti-Suffrage guys was her best moment yet, showing her as more than a sobbing victim.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 02:13 (fifteen years ago)
margarets got some nice gams
― johnny crunch, Monday, 18 October 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
I thought that was the best episode yet, everything had a bit more breathing space. And I'm glad Nucky and Margaret cut to the chase at the end, things should start heating up plotwise now.
Michael Pitt is still the weak link, but the actress who played Pearl was pretty good. Her trajectory was predictable, but she sold it very well I thought.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Tuesday, 19 October 2010 00:05 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, been done a lot before but what was still good (mantra for the show, perhaps?). Nothing as good as the Nucky/Margaret stuff at his birthday from last week but still very solid and moving along nicely. If we get more Chicago shenanigans next week I'll be happy.
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Tuesday, 19 October 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)
Eli's speech was a very funny sequence.
Michael Stuhlbarg has been consistently killing it in all his scenes.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Tuesday, 19 October 2010 00:12 (fifteen years ago)
Don't mind the opening credits that much... Brian Jonestown Massacre gets some $$$$
― Stockhausen's Helicopter Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Thursday, 21 October 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
this is great, really enjoying it now. god those anti booze people are annoying tho
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Sunday, 24 October 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
Anybody not on board with this show yet needs to get real. The Jimmy/Capone stuff is really great.
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Monday, 25 October 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with this show, totally love it.
I loved Pearl though, miss her already.
― "I am a fairly respected poster." (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 25 October 2010 03:13 (fifteen years ago)
Margaret/Nucky stuff has been moving fast but handled so well.
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Monday, 25 October 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)
Completely loved Pearl yeah, :(
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Monday, 25 October 2010 09:11 (fifteen years ago)
everything is moving fast; plus it def feels like theres a quota of nudity & violence, which is fine imo, im sure these were naked, violent times & ppl
― johnny crunch, Monday, 25 October 2010 11:09 (fifteen years ago)
This show is finally getting my attention
― A Reclaimer Hewn With (Michael White), Monday, 25 October 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
two weeks behind. should catch up tonight.
― Str8 Drapin It (chrisv2010), Monday, 25 October 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
every time i see this thread title this image pops into my head:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/cinema/images/kenneth_williams1_gal.jpg
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Monday, 25 October 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
It's really hitting its stride now. Good stuff.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, 25 October 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
I'm digging how the storytelling is very straightforward and unpretentious.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, 25 October 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
is a great show...really liking it now. the capone/jimmy storyline is played out so well. all the tensions between characters are, in fact.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Monday, 25 October 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, this show's really coming together for me. I was starting to lose interest, but the last two eps hooked me again. Michael Stuhlbarg's Rothstein is mesmerizing in every scene he's in. Van Alden's an awesome character, and Michael Shannon has the most amazing face. I loved the glimpse at Capone's home life, and Margaret's becoming an interesting, complicated character. The portrait of the bickering 'Professional Irishmen' at the St. Patty's day dinner was great.
― Princess TamTam, Monday, 25 October 2010 23:56 (fifteen years ago)
ttly agree re: rothstein - hope he gets more screentime
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 26 October 2010 00:29 (fifteen years ago)
We know remarkably little about Nucky's past and inner life for a lead character. Maybe that will change, or maybe it's deliberate and we never will.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Tuesday, 26 October 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)
Between this show and seeing A Serious Man recently, Stuhlbarg is rocketing towards the top of my "must watch everything he does" list.
― "I am a fairly respected poster." (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 26 October 2010 01:44 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, same. I actually caught A Serious Man recently too, due to loving him in this, and he was possibly the highlight of it for me.
― Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 26 October 2010 01:59 (fifteen years ago)
He's Houdini's brother... but he's just as good!!
― Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 26 October 2010 02:07 (fifteen years ago)
haha! I couldn't stop thinking about Buscemi in Fargo at the night club with the hooker when he said that.
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Tuesday, 26 October 2010 02:16 (fifteen years ago)
Brian Jonestown Massacre gets some $$$$
― Stockhausen's Helicopter Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Thursday, October 21, 2010 6:17 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark
is that who that is
hate the credits but <3 the tune
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 October 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)
have been kinda shocked by some of the violence. capone with the shotgun & g-man guttin the blown open guy both stuck around in my head longer than i would have liked.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 October 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)
I'm digging how the storytelling is very straightforward and unpretentious.― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, October 25, 2010 4:04 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark
― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, October 25, 2010 4:04 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark
yeah im really digging that the shots are in focus and the actors remembered their lines
― it's always random in wackydelphia (history mayne), Thursday, 28 October 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)
The sex scenes in this are ridiculous.
I love it when they show people boning in the middle of a scene-establishing pan.
― macaroni rascal (polyphonic), Thursday, 28 October 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)
it is v violent yeah, pearl getting her face cut was a bit "oh jaysus" as well
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 29 October 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
that and a certain pool cue scene in sons of anarchy s2 filled my wincing quota for the week
― everything you do is a meatloaf (another al3x), Friday, 29 October 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
thinking of omar's lynching story and the cunny story this week: in both cases, two of three lines in i am bored, i can see the punchline but i feel like i've got to sit through another minute of "aria" writing to get to it, i don't believe the other character's reaction, and i'm thinking about the writer not the show. it's shitty writing that ruins suspension of disbelief. i don't have a problem with speeches in drama per se. maybe these two just sucked.
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
did michael pitt have one to the his prostitute gf last week too? i don't remember that one bothering me. maybe it was just those two.
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)
i liked the omar story...i agree it was obvious where it was going but it still felt real to me.
― I see what this is (Local Garda), Friday, 29 October 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
otm. i feel like the people singing halleluias over Chalky's monologue were watching a different show than me (probably The Wire).
― sean gramophone, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)
Every episode I've seen I always get thrown by the close-up of Buscemi in the title sequence:
http://imgur.com/0HpE6.jpg
Sure I can't be the only one. It's like he's CGI or something.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
i don't believe the other character's reaction,
agree w/ this re: the omar story, but still liked it
michael pitt's 1 was bad cuz the acting was shitty imo
― johnny crunch, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
thinking of omar's lynching story and the cunny story this week: in both cases, two of three lines in i am bored
that should have read "two or three lines"
remind me what the michael pitt one was about? maybe that one sucked too.
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
maybe i'm misremembering, but i don't remember the wire having many big set piece anecdotes? or do you just mean people saw omar and got confused into thinking it was good?
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
The Chalky monologue was great.
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Friday, 29 October 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)
Chalky's speech did bore me, I was hoping they would do something interesting with that setup but it went exactly where I expected. I don't have a problem with speeches or storytelling, and it's possible that people used the exemplum in everyday speech more often back then, but it just has to be a little more interesting... for instance I liked Rothstein's story about the guy who swallowed billiard balls (I wondered if it was a reference to Frank Norris's McTeague, later adopted by Erich von Stroheim as Greed, which is the kind of movie that seems like a possible stylistic influence or antecedent to this show - anyway, there's a weird scene in it where a couple of guys have a contest to see who can fit more billiard balls in their mouth)
― Princess TamTam, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
the michael pitt 1 was his memory of going out on a boat owned by some dude his mom was dating on the 4th of july when he was a kid
― johnny crunch, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zweq4ZabNd8
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwn
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)
i think part of the point with chalky was that the klansman knew the punchline too. which isn't to say you couldn't suffer too, just because the dialogue was weak.
i completely lost track of pitt's story to the prostitute about being on a boat or whatever halfway through, and it didn't seem worth a rewind
― everything you do is a meatloaf (another al3x), Friday, 29 October 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
totally didn't believe the klansman's reaction.
paz's reaction was even less plausible though.
feel like they told those two actors that the speech they were about to hear was impressive and they should act accordingly.
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
not quite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhwsks02qRw
but getting there
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
le clip oscar
― caek, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
Honestly, the entire subplot with Chalky and the Klan felt like something designed to flatter modern sensibilities.
Paz's reaction in re: Schroeder's speech worked for me though, because she reacted with impatience to a speech that was designed to wrest away control of the conversation and also provide a sick burn - it's not like her jaw dropped and eyes bugged out, she was just like 'whatever' IIRC
― Princess TamTam, Friday, 29 October 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)