100 Stupid Movies About Ridiculously Improbable Serial Killers

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (281 of them)

<i>something that has actually happened is by definition more probable than something that never has</i>

^^^^ OK still wtf with this?

Phil D., Sunday, 9 September 2007 02:06 (eighteen years ago)

Wait: why wouldn't just one hobo do? Was the cross made out of hobos? Or was he just using the bits of the hobos that looked sufficiently Jesus-like?

-- nabisco, Saturday, September 8, 2007 10:50 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

he was using a different hobo for each body part

and what, Sunday, 9 September 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)

Why is American Psycho disqualifiable? It's not based on a true story and he's completely ridiculous.

"twist" ending indicating he hasn't actually killed anybody

Shakey Mo Collier, Sunday, 9 September 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

just being a sadistic serial killer IN YOUR MIND does not count as being an actual serial killer

Shakey Mo Collier, Sunday, 9 September 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

dude all these movies are imaginary

da croupier, Sunday, 9 September 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

Untitled Rachel Ray Snuff Film

gershy, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)

is there already a thread listing all the movies where the big twist is "The Psycho was ME all along! WHY, GOD, WHYYYYYYY!???!!! (shakes fist at sky)"? There are a million of em, The Number 23 being the latest and most awful. (There's also the OH MY GOD! I AM ALREADY DEAD! sub-genre eg Sixth Sense, The Others, etc.)

fritz, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:12 (eighteen years ago)

What other OH MY GOD! I AM ALREADY DEAD! are there?

W4LTER, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

The OThers

milo z, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

Sixth Sense

fritz, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

but seriously Jacob's Ladder, for one

fritz, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:19 (eighteen years ago)

angel heart

fritz, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

-15. Zodiac.

John Justen, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

-16. Zodiac.

Deric W. Haircare, Monday, 10 September 2007 00:35 (eighteen years ago)


"twist" ending indicating he hasn't actually killed anybody

just being a sadistic serial killer IN YOUR MIND does not count as being an actual serial killer

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Sunday, 9 September 2007 21:26 (Yesterday) Link

That's what I get for not ever finishing the book or the movie (because it was just too much for me to stomach). Is it the same ending in the book? Anyone know?

Rebekkah, Monday, 10 September 2007 01:57 (eighteen years ago)

from hell otm

roxymuzak, Monday, 10 September 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

You know, it was somewhat spelled out in the movie that it may have been "all in his mind," but I think I chose to deliberately ignore that (consciously or unconsciously) because it's so much more entertaining that way.

Abbott, Monday, 10 September 2007 04:51 (eighteen years ago)

15. Henry: a portarit of a serial killer.
the best serial killer movie ever made,guarentied

Zeno, Monday, 10 September 2007 04:57 (eighteen years ago)

Oh wait, here's one...
PERFUME: THE STORY OF A MURDERER
(tho it's not stupid, but fantastic)

Abbott, Monday, 10 September 2007 04:58 (eighteen years ago)

-19. Heathers

MsLaura, Monday, 10 September 2007 05:51 (eighteen years ago)

I definitely don't think Henry counts. It's so very unnerving because it's so very probable.

Deric W. Haircare, Monday, 10 September 2007 12:03 (eighteen years ago)

Henry is a great movie (albeit one I've only managed to stomach watching once) but hues pretty closely to a tone of flat, mundane realism. Henry doesn't do anything particularly unbelievable or genius or impossible, its all just garden-variety assault/violence.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 September 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)

Something that actually happened: Special needs kid gets drunk on tequila.

Probable movie: Pee-Wee's Big Adventure.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:35 (eighteen years ago)

What's the point of this thread?

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:41 (eighteen years ago)

btw american psycho was so obv ambiguous aka whole point fyi duh

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:43 (eighteen years ago)

American Psycho is improbable! The movie was a gas and the novel was a bloated corpse. Why are we debating the probability? Patrick Bateman is not probable.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:49 (eighteen years ago)

-20. Zodiac

John Justen, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:50 (eighteen years ago)

HI FB!

John Justen, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:50 (eighteen years ago)

I agree that Henry is an awesome movie.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:51 (eighteen years ago)

HI JJ!

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:52 (eighteen years ago)

HI -21. Zodiac!

John Justen, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 06:53 (eighteen years ago)

Listen, I got bored with the Illusionist when I realized the whole movie turned on the ability of the inscrutable Asians inventing holographic projection in the nineteenth century, but I realized it kinda blew before that.

I mean, how probable is it that a Danish graveyard attendant from the sixteenth century was actually that witty? (moving on here to a diferent reference)

Amirite?

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:08 (eighteen years ago)

P.S. I'm not wearing pants.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:09 (eighteen years ago)

U R IMPROBABLE

John Justen, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:10 (eighteen years ago)

the illusionist suked but the prestige was bobm

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:11 (eighteen years ago)

While we're on the subject, does anyone remember an Australian(?) indie flick from the nineties, which mostly consisted of a female psychiatrist interviewing a serial killer in jail? I'm not sure if it was that improbable, but I can't remember the name of the movie.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:12 (eighteen years ago)

I is a not wearing pants actually happened. LOGIK 101

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 07:12 (eighteen years ago)

-22. Zodiac
-23. Zodiac

Deric W. Haircare, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

Wait...The Illusionist? The Prestige? I didn't see those movies, but weren't they about magicians? Do all magicians kill people?

OH GOD...DOES DAVID COPPERFIELD KILL PEOPLE?!?

Deric W. Haircare, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 03:09 (eighteen years ago)

No they're improbable, which means NO MAGICIAN HAS EVER KILLED ANYONE EVER.

John Justen, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)

-24. The Number 23

HI DERE, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 05:03 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

No Country For Old Men haw

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 February 2008 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

HOUSE OF WAX

Jarlrmai, Friday, 8 February 2008 23:34 (eighteen years ago)

Don't anyone be dismissing

http://www.horror-movies.ca/albums/userpics/Feed1.jpg

Eric H., Friday, 8 February 2008 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/untraceable/

Martin Van Burne, Friday, 8 February 2008 23:59 (eighteen years ago)

no mention of the "scream" or any of the slasher film sub-genre yet

murderdogger, Saturday, 9 February 2008 00:18 (eighteen years ago)

slasher subgenre is discussed upthread as being something of a different animal

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 9 February 2008 00:24 (eighteen years ago)

All serial killers are ridiculously improbable, including the real ones

I don't know what this means... I'm referring to movies wherein serial killers are presented as superhumanly intelligent and attentive to details, while also being violently psychopathic and remarkably skillful at psychological manipulation. They are also usually very "cool" and calm and collected.

does this include straight-up slasher movies?

taking the above into account, no. It also rules out most serial killer movies about actual real-life serial killers, who usually are more pathetic and dysfunctional than superhuman.

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, September 7, 2007 8:51 PM (5 months ago) Bookmark Link

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 9 February 2008 00:25 (eighteen years ago)

93. Identity

ya and it sucked too!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 9 February 2008 20:14 (eighteen years ago)

-25. the devils rejects
-26. whats eating gilbert grape
-27. zodiac

sadie8707, Saturday, 9 February 2008 20:20 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.