Jean-Luc Godard: S and D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1453 of them)

yeah I liked Musique far better of those two

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 30 September 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

in the panel discussion after FS, I discovered that Richard Brody has an unruly Catskills-socialist beard

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 30 September 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

As Vanessa Redgrave might say, here come da Jews!

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/02/movies/02godard.html

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/movies/2010/11/the-oscar-question.html

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 02:05 (fifteen years ago)

Researchers at the academy’s Margaret Herrick Library turned up no sign that any aspect of a Godard film had ever been so much as nominated for an Oscar, despite awards and festival recognition abroad.

Haha, an Oscar nod for a Godard film? Get real, researchers!

gay nerd fuel (Eric H.), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 02:11 (fifteen years ago)

As Vanessa Redgrave might say, here come da Jews!

ugh

but also lol: anti-semitism not exactly unknown among upper-class brits, let alone upper-class british trotskyists

it's always random in wackydelphia (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)

Do you know the whole Redgrave story of the '77/78 Oscars, nrq?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 02:44 (fifteen years ago)

not in detail. -- s.thing about "zionists" getting on her nerves? because zionists are really the enemy of the jews or whatever, presumably? because zionism, unlike palestinian nationalism, is a terrible thing. her opponents of the time sound pretty crazy, but we shouldn't have to choose between crazies. she was part of a weird, sinister, sexual-abuse-oriented trotskyist cell at the time.

it's always random in wackydelphia (history mayne), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)

Look, whatever it takes to make for an interesting Oscarcast.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)

Oscarcaust.

it's sort of useless to present someone with an honorary award, if he hates the entire thing it represents right. I wouldn't have bothered if I "was" the Academy, or whoever decides who gets these things.

Ludo, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)

http://grab.by/grabs/52562e75af330aaf7093e94a603a16af.png

candid gamera (s1ocki), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)

Mr. Godard has blamed Moses for having corrupted society by bringing mere text, in the form of written law, down from the mountain, after having encountered an actual image, the burning bush.

WAHT

I BLOATED (Edward III), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:19 (fifteen years ago)

he was expecting a graphic novel.

candid gamera (s1ocki), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

The Godard award is not on the Oscarcast, Eric, and I'm pretty sure we'll see 6 seconds of tape of JLG's chosen flunky picking it up.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

For Mr. Robinson, the art and the artist are separate. “D. W. Griffith got an honorary Oscar in 1936,” he said, “and the man was horribly racist. Also, Kevin Costner? What a dick.”

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

btw to me that Times piece confirms that Tarantino will present Godard's Oscar

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

you must be psyched

candid gamera (s1ocki), Wednesday, 3 November 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

Watched Une Femme Mariee the other week. A cracker! The accompanying booklet -- which looks lush, btw -- has a transcript of an internet convo between a few film theorists, and I'm willing to bet its crackers.

Mr. Godard has blamed Moses for having corrupted society by bringing mere text, in the form of written law, down from the mountain, after having encountered an actual image, the burning bush.

Big fan of Celine, isn't he?

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 3 November 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

Jungen: Once again, there is a debate in Jewish newspapers about whether or not you are an anti-Semite. Does this hurt you?

Godard: That's nonsense! What does 'anti-Semite' mean? All peoples of the Mediterranean were Semites. So anti-Semite means anti-Mediterranean. The expression was only applied to Jews after the Holocaust and WWII. It is inexact and means nothing.

this smirky evasive shit really makes me sick and upset

google street jew (s1ocki), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

only anti-semites come out with that shit, fuck this guy

cue morbs for the defence

Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

boooooooooooooooring

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

what's boring?

google street jew (s1ocki), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

it actually gets way fucking worse tbh

http://landscapesuicide.blogspot.com/2010/11/everything-or-nothing-2.html

The Jews have inhabited your intellectual universe since the late sixties. Is there a certain reason for this?

When the Holocaust happened, I was 15 years old. My parents kept it a secret from me, despite belonging to the Red Cross. I only found out about it much later. Even today I still feel guilty, because I was an ignoramus between the age of 15 and 25. I am sorry I couldn’t stand up for them. Today, in my own thoughts, I would like to have a critical look at them. I am generally interested in the ‘other’. It’s the same thing with blacks. First, they were colonised, and later everyone acted as if they were just as we are. Of course, a black person can wear glasses and a watch, but this doesn’t make us the same.

google street jew (s1ocki), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

In Film socialisme it is said that although Hollywood was founded by Jews, everyone is looking in the same direction. Do Jews stand for diversity?

For commerce. The big studios were founded by Jews from central Europe, especially from Germany. Why did they go to Hollywood? Because they could get access to the American financial sector. The Jews were neither authorized to be bankers or doctors, nor lawyers or professors. That’s why they concentrated on something new: cinema. The Jews also came to an arrangement with the mafia quite quickly. But if you say this, immediately you are accused of being an anti-Semite, even though this is not true. People don’t see the images — one should have a closer look at the people who founded Las Vegas.

google street jew (s1ocki), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

is Jews starting Hollywood a controversial thing to say?

Gukbe, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

can't we all just get along

conrad, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

i founded las vegas

buzza, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

give me a break that's all he 's saying

google street jew (s1ocki), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:20 (fifteen years ago)

The Jews also came to an arrangement with the mafia quite quickly. THE JEWS.

google street jew (s1ocki), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:20 (fifteen years ago)

these quotes are appalling, im actually furious, i guess because i know so many people who'll let it slide

Why did they go to Hollywood? Because they could get access to the American financial sector.

apart from the anti-semitism and racism, he doesn't even know anything about the history of the movies

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

The Jews have inhabited your intellectual universe since the late sixties. Is there a certain reason for this?

haha

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

don't know how anti-semitic the Jews in Hollywood stuff is

Gukbe, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:50 (fifteen years ago)

are you Mediterranean?

buzza, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

i like feta cheese

Gukbe, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

mmm tzatziki sauce

otherwise, and twat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

heyo

acoleuthic, Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)

"Of course, a black person can wear glasses and a watch, but this doesn’t make us the same."

Salient.

portrait of the artist as a yung joc (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 16 November 2010 23:59 (fifteen years ago)

so I guess he's a racist/anti-semite? I'll run with whatever guys.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

don't know how anti-semitic the Jews in Hollywood stuff is

― Gukbe, Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:50 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark

it's kind of weird and inaccurate: think very few of the moguls were german. thomas ince, d w griffith -- pretty sure they were not jewish. and the segue to vegas and the mafia... is that not a bit anti-semitic? why do we need to look closely at the people who founded vegas? what's the big idea? i have no idea what he is talking about, with hollywood coming to an agreement with the mafia 'quite quickly'. so far as im aware the 'mafia' weren't much in california till hollywood was up and running. lansky and meyer weren't in vegas till the 1930s iirc.

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

Well I wasn't really referring to the Vegas thing, as I don't know much at all about it.

but

The founders and inventors of this "quintessential America" were almost without exception, immigrant and first-generation Jews. Within a few years of each other, Carl Laemmele built Universal; Adolf Zukor and Jesse Lasky, Paramount; Louis B. Mayer and the Schenks, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer; and Harry Cohn, Columbia. Together with the Warner Brothers, William Fox, and Samuel Goldwyn, these Moguls, whose lives and times are richly documented in the archives of the American Jewish Historical Society, created a constellation as brilliant as any the firmament could offer.

Who were they? A remarkably similar group --Yiddish-speaking immigrants or their sons, born in grinding poverty in shtetlekh or ghettoes, to pedigree-poor families, headed more often than not by ne'er do-well fathers. The Moguls, the men who invented the majesty and mystery of Hollywood, were a rough-hewn bunch of ambitious men determined to thrust themselves into the epicenter of American life.

Also I thought it was fairly well known that the Hays code was engineered not just to allow autonomy from the government but also to head off possible anti-semitism.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

By the way, I'm not at all advocating some "Jews control the media" nonsense.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

The Jews were neither authorized to be bankers or doctors, nor lawyers or professors.
The Jews were neither authorized to be bankers or doctors, nor lawyers or professors.
The Jews were neither authorized to be bankers or doctors, nor lawyers or professors.

how can someone so erudite believe this? and even if his interviewer didn't know that 60% of the doctors in vienna in 1900 were jewish, they must surely recognise the above as fanciful

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:20 (fifteen years ago)

i can only conclude i) he just makes it up as he goes along to give his trolling a bit of spontaneity or ii) he is so deranged from empirical thought that he unknowingly invents history when he is trolling

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:25 (fifteen years ago)

I seem to recall the imposition of the Hays code was also to try to take autonomy away from Jewish producers, to Christianize the industry? Though I might not be remembering my film classes correctly.

EDB, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

Xpost: yes, the evasive "what does Semitic even mean" comment would imply trolling.

EDB, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

It was brought in by the Jewish moguls to make the industry seem less Jewish/more Christian.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

The Jews were neither authorized to be bankers or doctors, nor lawyers or professors.

how can someone so erudite believe this? and even if his interviewer didn't know that 60% of the doctors in vienna in 1900 were jewish, they must surely recognise the above as fanciful

― nakhchivan, Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:20 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark

This seems like a broad generalization, but weren't Jewish immigrants locked out of certain professions like law and medicine? I might be totally misremembering something unrelated btw.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:31 (fifteen years ago)

gukbe -- yeah im aware of the provenance of the hollywood moguls. just pretty sure few if any were german. the other details ring false. sure, they were mostly jewish immigrants. and?

Why did they go to Hollywood? Because they could get access to the American financial sector.

which was, of course, centred in southern california...

guy is just a bit of an idiot

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:33 (fifteen years ago)

no, i mean you've probably heard of felix frankfurter, but there were quotas for 'the wrong sorts' at ivy league schools etc

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:34 (fifteen years ago)

Hmmmn, I'll try to look up my notes to check, since I can't verify things one way or another. I do seem to remember hearing that it was more anti-semitic in nature.

And yeah, I also seem to recall that the early Hollywood producers were less fat cats looking to break into lucrative financial positions so much as working class dudes (at least Zukor) who were taking chances with new businesses that arose with cinema and hit the jackpot when it turned out to be Cinema. But again, don't take my word on this.

EDB, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

which was, of course, centred in southern california...

guy is just a bit of an idiot

― rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:33 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

Pretty soon after the cinema studios starting paying dividends Wall Street became an absolutely huge part of the industry.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 00:38 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.