Strictly Come Dancing--am I on my own here?

Marcello is turning into the Geir of BBC threads.

They should have been taught in no uncertain terms to know their place on this show and to keep it.

I thought that Cherie's partner's outburst on Sunday night was sincerely expressed and, from a contestant's perspective at the very least, entirely justified. One Saturday night TV talent contest whose participants are brow-beaten into knowing their place and never going off-message is quite enough, thank you!

I think James Jordan (Cherie's partner) is just paranoid and pissed off because last year he was dancing with Gabby Logan and she got voted off very early (in a dance-off with also-not-shit Penny Lancaster), before similarly untalented Kate Garraway and Kenny Logan. As I recall, Kenny asked if he could quit and let his wife stay on in his place, and wasn't allowed.

There's been a massive groundswell of "John Sergeant shouldn't still be in this", but if people feel that strongly that someone else should be in instead of him, they should pick up their phones and vote for them and not him. The level of vitriol thrown at Sergeant's abilities are quite incredible - he wasn't even the worst dancer in the series, and his ballroom is passable. Do none of these whingers remember the utterly cringeworthy performances that somehow got Chris Parker to the final?

Dissapointed not to see Thatcher crashing in during Sergeant's press conference.

Bryan Adams on the One Show wondering WTF is going on

Whom my mother has just incorrectly identified as Bryan Ferry...

I've gone right off James Jordan now.

I watched It Takes Two last night.

JS completely dignified and noble.

The rest of them from Goodman on down to Jordan, petty, sneering and evasive.

JS goes - now the "real" contest can start "in earnest."

JS stays - gets the sent to Coventry treatment, is bullied.

JS goes because he quite correctly believes that he came on the show to have a bit of fun rather than be howled down by jealous "purists" - gets bullied for not having the "guts" to stay.

So it's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

Public school bullying at its worst - and once again, the bullies, the mediocre losers like James Jordan who'd be lucky to pull three pensioners to the opening of a new British Heart Foundation charity shop in Garstang - have been seen to triumph.

Once again, if people didn't like JS being on the show then they should have been allowed to exercise their democratic, licence paying right to vote him off.

But that's the New BBC Order for you - get rid of anyone who's in the slightest bit different.

That's what happens when you run an organisation on the basis of fear.

So, let's see...

Increased ratings for next saturdays prog.

Then decreased ratings for the rest of the run.

Oh, and JS to 'return', albeit not as a competitor, but by popular acclaim, to do more dancin'

One thing did strike me last night: A heck of a lot of 'old folk' who do the tea dances and are actually less good than JS, voting for one of their own not in a spirit of irony, but in a spirit of 'he's enjoying it like we are, and is not young and 'attractive' but old and happy.

i.e. a spirit of occupying the same spirit as they do.

Are their votes less valid and less 'important'?

Guess so.

Clearly the BBC are now more interested in not upsetting the tabloids than they are in getting ratings. I understand that R2's Saturday audience has done a convincing impression of the Titanic since Richard "We're Calming Things Down Here" Allinson and Alex "Abandoned Phone Boxes" Lester took over from Ross and Brand.

Like I say, the BBC are rubbing this particular baloon for all it's worth.

JPaxman much involved, and fair enough, he's a mate.

"So, Bryan Adams, What do you make of all this" The One Show, etc....

You'd think that JPax would do the decent thing and step into Sergeant's shoes on Saturday...

(either that or get Tom Paulin or Paul Morley Out Of Newsnight Review...)

A heck of a lot of 'old folk' who do the tea dances and are actually less good than JS, voting for one of their own not in a spirit of irony, but in a spirit of 'he's enjoying it like we are, and is not young and 'attractive' but old and happy. i.e. a spirit of occupying the same spirit as they do.

I was at an 80th birthday party the weekend before Strictly started and the chatter was all about Sergeant, very much along the "he's one of us" lines.

Just to keep things shipshape:

Correction 20 November 2008: An earlier version of this story wrongly stated that the money raised from calls to Strictly Come Dancing goes to Children in Need.

Since January 2008, the BBC no longer gives money raised by phone votes to charity. The money raised by Strictly Come Dancing phone votes pays for running the phone vote system itself. No money goes to Children in Need. Rules were changed after last year's phone votes scandals.

"have every intention of reimbursing people" does not necessarily equal "going to refund every caller's charges."

Anyway, let's stop Children In Need now. Fuck all use to the children in need in Haringey, wasn't it?

The star also gave his opinion on John Sergeant's exit from Strictly Come Dancing.

"He's fallen on his sword for the good of the nation," he said.

"He knows why he's done that and hopefully it's positive."

The star in question then mentioned that he's going to film a movie version of his cancelled US series, and went on to say " yerrr, we're going to get actual gorillas to film it, yeahrrrr."

It's Ant 'n' Dec and the Blue Peter cat all over again:

A cabinet minister has called for the judges of Strictly Come Dancing to be sacked following John Sergeant's decision to quit the BBC One show.

Scottish Secretary Jim Murphy said the the ex-journalist's dance performances had been "entertainment and good fun"

...

"The fact is the judges don't know what this programme is all about."

I thought it was all about judging which celebrity was the best dancer?

I thought politics was about running the country, not watching fucking television programmes.

I want a blanket ban on politicians making any comments on popular culture.

I don't want politicians to be my friend. I want politicians to govern this fucking country properly, to be remote, elitist, in charge.

but they would give itall up to go on Strictly! Or be the guitarist in The Wedding Present! or,or, ...

Then they should be sacked. There's a fucking recession on and my taxes should be paying for them to sort it out, not piss about with a guitar.

Big tearjerkin' speeches. Nicely timed to play just after TV Burp finished on ITV.

I don't think Jim Murphy was being entirely serious. I think politicians have a right to get involved if there is a question of licence-fee-payers getting fucked over in some way by a public service broadcaster, but no-one's saying or talking about it like that, they are all "lol he is a bad dancer". So fucking what, he's popular. Was everyone whinging when utterly shite Chris Parker got to the final a few years ago? Let go already.

Anyway, the dancing. Rachel is really REALLY boring. Fear for Jodie and Christine this week, but would laugh very hard indeed if Austin ends up in the dance-off. It'll be one of those three v Lisa anyway, because it appears no-one likes her very much except me.

Poor Jodie.

And so now, La Bleakley becomes the one to worry about for the rest. I'm gonna stick my neck out and say Lisa vs. Tom next week.

Bleakley should have gone this week and would have gone if it hadn't been for that stupid staged judges' tiff. Next week, and probably up against Lisa again (or maybe Austin since people are realising just how boring he is).

OK, now Lisa's up the right end of the scoreboard, Christine must be going this week. The interesting thing will be to see whether it's Tom or Rachel joining her in the dance-off.

It was, probably rightly, Christine and Rachel in the dance off and, absolutely rightly, Christine has gone.

Estelle didn't seem to know where she was either.

^ proper OMGWTF telly, that.

Bye bye Austin then? I'm thinking an Austin v Rachel dance-off this week.

Providing Chambers isn't bottom of the leaderboard next week, I think he's won this.

It was Austin vs Lisanbrendan and the former lost.

Lisanbrendan to go next since they are essentially unlovable.

Tom just earned maximum "stupid cock" points from me for that ultra-"I fancy myself I do" jump and slide.

Chambers came bottom. Chambers has, officially, blown it.

Good. I hope Lisa wins, simply because Rachel's partner is a cock as well. It's a twisted set of circumstances where Brendan seems like a normal, likeable person.

Odd thing - just saw the ad for the SCD Live!!! Tour - Tom and Rachel are on it. Lisa isn't.

Doesn't matter, Tom's still out. Even if he comes top of the voting, he's still in the dance-off against someone who got 39 or someone who got 40. Hmmm.

I'm guessing Lisa's not doing the tour because she has a real job.

Even if he comes top of the voting

In that eventuality, I will be popping down to Hell to get some ice for my drink...

he's been top of the voting every week so far, I think. He must have been top last week at any rate.

So... I don't exactly understand what's happened just there?

Assuming what's happened: they realised a little too late this situation meant that Our Tom mathematically couldn't escape dance-off, so all votes for him were basically pointless, so... phone vote scandal! Again! YAY!

Yes, that's it. Presumably working it out for themselves was beyond the general public.

These showdance people are freaky.

They're WORLD CHAMPIONS at... I am not sure. But they're good enough that they don't have to perform with Dave Arch's Fantastic Orchestra And His Wonderful Singers.

Ah - SHOWDANCE! Freestyle!

World champion at being quite light and getting thrown around a lot!

Johnny Vegas is SAT RIGHT THERE and YOU ARE TALKING TO MATT DAWSON INSTEAD FFS

"18 stone of idiot... and Johnny Vegas sitting behind..."

JUNE WHITFIELD?

JUNE WHITFIELD??

JUNE WHITFIELD???