When a midwife told us this, I completely freaked out. Worrying even more about the baby in my belly. *sigh*
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 04:20 (twenty years ago)
Er, not to be confused with taking an *active role* since as discussed this is about expecting MEN to perform...just that if you're worried about being taken advantage of in some sense, it's easy to wind up being over-demanding/critical. Because equality/math/life is hard.
― Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)
i suffer from a bit of performance anxiety. simply cos i havent um performed in almost a year lol. someone give me a tip to combat these nerves.
― mr x, Monday, 7 April 2008 10:49 (eighteen years ago)
Practice! Find a nice girl who'll have a bit a bit of patience with and explain the situation to her. Worked for me recently, and I was in a similar position. I know, easier said than done etc. Also if down there isn't behaving quite as it should, make sure you use every other means at your disposal to give her satisfaction - this'll help you get your confidence back.
― chap, Monday, 7 April 2008 10:56 (eighteen years ago)
ta. got a facebook buddy who has intimated that she would be up for it but im a bit worried she has quite high expectations cos of the nature of our phone/msn conversations. i dont think im bad in bed or anything, its just that after so long you become less sure.
― mr x, Monday, 7 April 2008 10:59 (eighteen years ago)
Dear Mr x do you read? never mind, I suggest gay awful no good, horrible,very bad house music for all the confidence in the world. trust me it works! best wishes!
― Kiwi, Monday, 7 April 2008 11:06 (eighteen years ago)
the nature of our phone/msn conversations
http://www.df.lth.se/~ola/Starwars/Empire/thumbs/thumb0.jpg
― J0rdan S., Monday, 7 April 2008 11:07 (eighteen years ago)
Just go for it, I say. If she's a halfway decent person it won't really matter if you don't live up to her expectations, which you may have blown out of proportion anyway.
― chap, Monday, 7 April 2008 11:08 (eighteen years ago)
"I suggest gay awful no good, horrible,very bad house music"
er.... thanks?
jordan s, im more of a return of the jedi guy myself.
― mr x, Monday, 7 April 2008 11:10 (eighteen years ago)
Chap OTM. I think most people would understand that you're not necessarily up for you're best performance when you're doing it for the first time with a new person. With most couples it takes a while to get used to each other's needs and likes. It'd be different if she was just looking for a good one-night lay, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
― Tuomas, Monday, 7 April 2008 11:47 (eighteen years ago)
ok, thing is, im just a bit worried if i tell her ive not been in action for a while, she might not be as enthusiastic. i have met her once, and part of the thing there was i was a bit nervous about the idea of us going back to mine for the reasons ive mentioned above. im not sure if she wants a relationship or just a shagging buddy, and TBH ive only slept with the girls ive been in relationships with, by and large, or at least dated a bit (not a huge number as ive been in relationships most of the time), so this isnt home turf for me.
― mr x, Monday, 7 April 2008 13:48 (eighteen years ago)
I thought "mr x" was max and was like "oh no max"
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 7 April 2008 14:02 (eighteen years ago)
I still say go for it. A 'good one night lay' is a relatively rare thing, I think, the (very few) one-night stands I've had have been crap, and there hasn't ever been any noticeable hard feelings. Also, you may well surprise yourself. Also, it bears repeating, there's more than one method of pleasing a woman.
― chap, Monday, 7 April 2008 14:13 (eighteen years ago)
i kinda feel like i need to tell her about taking an er, respite from the shagging frontlines, anyway, so prob will. hopefully things will proceed as they have been after that.
― mr x, Monday, 7 April 2008 14:16 (eighteen years ago)
wait this isn't the same as the hpv genital warts girl, is it???
― tehresa, Monday, 7 April 2008 14:19 (eighteen years ago)
who?!
― mr x, Monday, 7 April 2008 14:28 (eighteen years ago)
oh nm i guess that was another troll
― tehresa, Monday, 7 April 2008 14:46 (eighteen years ago)
Performances are for actors or trained animals. If you can't be open, honest and 'vulnerable' with your sexual partner, you've jumped the tracks already.
P.S. This opinion will almost certainly earn me flack. Lalalalalala! I'm not listening!
― Aimless, Monday, 7 April 2008 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
I seem to remember an interesting dialogue about this from 'Chasing Amy'. -- Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, February 14, 2003 12:31 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
― ian, Monday, 7 April 2008 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
I don't mean this in one of those "such a double standard" sort of ways, because even as a double standard it's not one I'd have a terrible problem with. But Lara on the hat thread jokes about getting angry with anyone she dated who underperformed, a sort of sentiment that's actually really common. Conversely I doubt many men could get away with saying "I certainly wouldn't put up with any woman who couldn't" ... well, I dunno, you fill in, because apart from visible physical characteristics it's considered unfunny and impolite and just bad to criticize women's sexual performance. In my experience guys don't even do this in one another's company! I've heard maybe the barest hint of it, and that very rarely. I'm not sure what my question is but I find this interesting.-- nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:29 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
-- nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:29 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
BRAGGIN [nabisco]!
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 7 April 2008 18:03 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah wow I can't believe I started this thread, even by back-in-the-day standards.
― nabisco, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
I can't remember why, either (did I get with someone who was really bad, and then realized I felt guilty thinking so?), but for the purposes of all ILX, past present and future, let's pretend I am a eunuch, or the brain of a eunuch which has been preserved in a jar and connected to the internet, like the thing from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
― nabisco, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
That's sort of how I've always thought of you, actually. And his name KRANG.
― ian, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:09 (eighteen years ago)
I dont want girls to think I suck dick at fuckin' pussy
― Alex in Baltimore, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
NO SEX IN DIMENSION X
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
Ian ZierZING
― nabisco, Monday, 7 April 2008 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
its just something we say when we're mad
a dude i dated not too long ago said that all girls are the same in bed. i wonder if thats true?
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 00:44 (eighteen years ago)
no
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 00:44 (eighteen years ago)
he needs to sleep with more women
doppelbangers
― estela, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 01:10 (eighteen years ago)
-- Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, April 7, 2008 7:02 AM (11 hours ago) Bookmark Link
nooooooo
― max, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 01:18 (eighteen years ago)
krang otm
http://filebox.vt.edu/users/mhemsteg/tmntnet2.mov
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 01:24 (eighteen years ago)
Isn't the female equivalent to be called "frigid"? I don't think it's got quite the currency it used to have, but ... yeah.
― lukas, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 09:30 (eighteen years ago)
I think "frigid" means "don't much care for sex" rather than "wants sex, but nervous about it".
Mandee, that guy you dated was crazy. In my opinion, everyone is different in bed. That's exactly why it's unlikely to have a perfect "performance" the first time you have sex with someone. It takes a while to learn what short of invidual your partner is in bed.
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
doing this new thing where i howl right before cave diving
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Friday, 5 May 2017 01:58 (nine years ago)
thread revive of the century
― frogbs, Friday, 5 May 2017 02:01 (nine years ago)
Hope your cert. agency was NSS-CDS or GUE.
― behavioral sink (Sanpaku), Friday, 5 May 2017 03:18 (nine years ago)
finished std-hiv negative magnum cum louder
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Friday, 5 May 2017 03:59 (nine years ago)
omg! was this the thread where nabisco was not otm? my reality is shattered
― Moodles, Friday, 5 May 2017 04:19 (nine years ago)
holy shit yessssssssssss
― flappy bird, Friday, 5 May 2017 04:50 (nine years ago)
^ that's what she said
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Friday, 5 May 2017 05:31 (nine years ago)
uhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
― flappy bird, Friday, 5 May 2017 05:40 (nine years ago)
why are demands about nabisco's otmness quite so acceptable
― schlump, Friday, 5 May 2017 22:58 (nine years ago)
trust nabisco to turn this into a v.sly boast― mark s (mark s)
i was wondering what we called them before harris wittels popularized "humblebrag"!
― why ruin a good tradition? (Will M.), Saturday, 6 May 2017 05:21 (nine years ago)