Matrix Revolutions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (490 of them)
there is a quotient of fake philosophy and sense of style in this film - ARE YOU BLIND? the Indian guy's diatribe about love etc. - no less interesting than any of the other concepts bandied around regarding programs in the Matrix and their nature. the film has style in abundance but it was necessary for it to take place mostly in the real world dystopia/Zion so form follows function somewhat there.

What's fun about watching a zillion stupid-looking flying robots blow up for like seven hours while people (straight-faced) recite insipid cliches and do that war-movie yell?

what's NOT fun about that? "i've had sex before but not in THAT position/with THAT person/wearing THOSE things..."

Neo's 'magical' persistence in the Matrix is surely just the next progression of his capabilities - I don't think there's any real need for a specific explanation there.

You make the idea of 'robot magic' sound like a BAD thing? jeez. let's see more cyborg warlocks I say. Science IS magic.

Machine Godhead/Robot King/whatever was fine - what the hell do you want?

Post apocalyptic dystopia is a mainstay of the genre so complaining about it in this film is pretty stupid as well.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(xpost)

Whine, whine, whine, whine, whine!

Jesus Christ, you people are pissed off because you didn't get what you wanted there to be! Accept that you didn't write the fucking thing and just let them tell you the story as they want to! Most of the things that I've heard people complaining about "not being resolved from Reloaded" were either
a) totally irrelevant, or
b) answered in the story, but not to your satisfaction - which is to say to a completely quibbling and/or literal-and-physically-possible-in-the-real-world level, or
c) answered in the story, but you didn't get it.

Sorry, but that's how it is in my eyes. Some people just couldn't sit down and suspend their disbelief. But really, there are a ton of answers and a lot of resolution - just because not all of it was specifically delineated doesn't mean that you can't figure out the parts that matter. So you either believe that, yes, by him going to the Source in Reloaded, it fundamentally changes his interconnection to the Machines (and thus the Matrix), or you don't. So many people just can't cope with this one - let it go. Smith copies himself because he no longer is taking orders from the Machines and is power hungry. And because he's the complete opposite of Neo. To sum up the whole fight scene: 1 + (-1) = 0

Burned out techno-apocalyptic Robot Cityscape. Hmm. Well, what were you expecting, the city at the bottom of the ocean in The Abyss?

Again, sorry if I'm being kinda pissy myself, but I just don't get what you people wanted (or if you really would have wanted that anyway). It seems that you want a bunch of silly stuff answered (or didn't see the answers that were obviously there for the stuff that was answered), you seem to magically believe that there was no cheese factor/hammy dialogue/wooden delivery in the first one, and you were all psyched for a Zion battle that you expected would somehow transcend the entirety of massive sci-fi battle scenes. I believe I wanted to say something else here, but I'm forgetting it at the moment. I'll get back to you.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Girolamo otm. it's all happening again for me. i had a few bugbears with all three films yet i feel compelled to defend them to the hilt against all this absurd negativity that surrounds them. perspective here - these films still piss on 95% of everything else within the respective genres they affiliate themselves with.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)

First of all I'm not down with spending 8 bucks to see a film, major components of which I've seen a million times before and probably done better, that features the very original and interesting idea that Love and Believing Will Make Everything OK. Ugh.

I didn't hear a diatribe about love, just a half-assed gesture toward semiotic bullshit. And Neo's abilities do need an explanation--The Matrix and sequels are positioned as science fiction and I was thrown when they trashed the sf/fantasy background, abandoning self-consistency and internal logic for Robot Magic, as were other people I've talked to. I like SF and I like fantasy and I like chocolate and I like garlic but unless you tip me off right at the start that we're going to be mixing them I'm gonna be pissed off.

King of the Robots spoke with a deep voice with crazy echo. Come on. And postapocalyptic dystopia is less a mainstay than a wretched embarrassing cliche. Why isn't Robot City all clean and happy and well-lit? It's not like they have Robot Bums and Robot Criminals and Robot Cockroaches.

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

You are all Matrix apologists!!!

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

If Keanu put as much into playing Neo as Hugo Weaving did Agent Smith this would've been one of my favorite film serieses of all time. I wonder if the Neo-going-blind-wearing-blindfold thing was a sneaky way of hiding his lack-of-ability-to-express-emotion when Trinity died?

Was there any question in our minds that the ammo kid was gonna get to do something extraordinary? I'm guessing no.

The funniest moment wasn't in the goofy dialog, but when Neo tried to get out of the train station. Okay, and when Niobe calls dude's ship she's piloting back to Zion "a fat bitch" or whatever.

All in all I'd say it was a really good film, quite engaging and just on this side of the border of too-corny, but not quite what it could have been (and assumed itself to be)...revolutionary.

x-post I'm not an apologist, I agree with Stevem that this tops just about everything of it's 'genre', but I personally am still a little disappointed in the execution. I wonder if, had they not rushed to get these films (Reloaded incl), they might have been something much more exemplary.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I ain't apologizing for shit! ;)

The city is clean (I would presume). I don't know if it's happy - neither do you, for that matter. Why should it be well-lit?

BTW, you people all would have hated Return of the Jedi had it been released today, but still remember that despite ROTJ's weaknesses, we still lovably accept it as part of the Holy Trilogy. That was a much weaker film than Revolutions.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

we still lovably accept it as part of the Holy Trilogy

I can name a slew of people off the top of my head who will challenge this assertion until the day they die. And some of them post here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

First of all I'm not down with spending 8 bucks to see a film, major components of which I've seen a million times before and probably done better, that features the very original and interesting idea that Love and Believing Will Make Everything OK. Ugh.

in other words you went to see this film because you KNEW you were going to hate it and you wanted to...


I didn't hear a diatribe about love, just a half-assed gesture toward semiotic bullshit. And Neo's abilities do need an explanation--The Matrix and sequels are positioned as science fiction and I was thrown when they trashed the sf/fantasy background, abandoning self-consistency and internal logic for Robot Magic, as were other people I've talked to. I like SF and I like fantasy and I like chocolate and I like garlic but unless you tip me off right at the start that we're going to be mixing them I'm gonna be pissed off.

well i have no problem with SF and fantasy being mixed together like that and I don't need to be warned beforehand.


King of the Robots spoke with a deep voice with crazy echo. Come on.

deep voices with echo never go out of fashion. it's a black jacket.


Why isn't Robot City all clean and happy and well-lit? It's not like they have Robot Bums and Robot Criminals and Robot Cockroaches.

BECAUSE the machines clearly prefer not to spend time and effort cleaning up the skies (or perhaps this was a process underway but not completed yet) when they can cope fine without the Sun and other niceties. nor do they require much light. also it spooks the humans foolish enough to venture out there enough which works to the machines advantage a little.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

nobody complains this much about the SF/fantasy conflicts in anime do they?

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned so OTM I hardly have words.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:20 (twenty-two years ago)

well it doesn't take that many words to say 'actually some of us always thought Star Wars was pants' but whatever

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

You wanna know what really is lame-looking? The friggin eye of Sauron in the LOTR movies. WTF? That's not even in the book, IIRC, it looks kinda crappy, and it doesn't do anything itself visual exciting except continue to act more flaming than Richard Simmons. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

And, um, then let me have a hit - God knows I'm tense now.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Everyone loves tha flaming vagina!

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you on crack?

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

But everyone does love that flamin' vagina. Love as in likes the look of. It is obviously difficult and dangerous to actually physically love a flamin' vagina, and Sauron - wot looks like a flamin' vagina, being a personification (of vaginfication) or pure evil is probably less than loveable.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing to do with Wayne Coyne? I haven't seen LOTR OR Harry Potter OR Star Wars 5 OR Matrix 2/3.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Will watching The Animatrix make the vampire scene not so WTFish?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

are they actually vampires? i thought they were just manipulating the code of the Matrix in order to walk upside down. no there is nothing in the Animatrix about that.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Please, please, PLEASE. Forget about vampires and werewolves - like the Oracle said, they're just stories covering up the exiles doing things they shouldn't be. Yes, Persephone kills one with a silver bullet - but that does mean he is a werewolf, per se. Just means that characteristically, some of the things he does are most easily assimilatable by the system making that story up. I mean, honestly, what use would Merv have for a werewolf in and of itself?

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

but that does mean he is a werewolf, per se

doesn't mean

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Merv

Who needs Merovingian when you have MERV GRIFFIN!

http://www.brntwdmagazine.com/may-june-2000/merv/Merv.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.veg.com.au/slicks/ACV020.jpg

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, that's what Trinity calls him. :) I thought it was pretty funny myself.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

are there any hippies dancing in this one? I wish I'd had a warning of that before I saw Reloaded.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)

No hippies, but there is a dance club full of vampire goths for like 45 slow mo seconds.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)

no, there are S&M gothies though in Merv's club. I think it's still Fluke, though.

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)

in other words you went to see this film because you KNEW you were going to hate it and you wanted to...

Nah. I did that for Intolerable Cruelty which I kind of liked. I wanted to know what happened to Neo at the end of Reloaded. And I still don't. I have no problem with Vampire Werewolf S&M Robot Programs though.

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Teeny's x-posting scares the shit out of me sometimes.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I wanted to know what happened to Neo at the end of Reloaded. And I still don't.

Just because you don't like what you heard doesn't mean you didn't hear it, nonetheless.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

haha nza! we so need to party together dude whoo!

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Machine Godhead/Robot King/whatever was fine - what the hell do you want?

http://www.utc.fr/~macret/cine/realisateurs/boorman/photos/zardoz3.jpg

No, really.

Herbstmute (Wintermute), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

If there's one thing I've learned about this trilogy is that it acts as a sort of a mirror for the viewer; everybody walks out of the theater with exactly what they walked in with.

I've seen hardcore Christians defending it as a Christ story, Buddhists claiming that it showed Neo the true path to enlightenment. Jews have claimed that no, it's an allegory of the Exodus. Hindus, Gnostics, Satanists and Atheists have all claimed that the movies symbolized their own worldview. They got from the movies a look at their own beliefs through another lens.

Likewise, I've seen people who were only looking for an action movie, or who loved pure philosophical discussion. Big Surprise, they walked out of the movie babbling about how awesome the special effects were or how deeply meaningful they found the dialog.

Finally, there are some people who walk into the theater thinking "this movie is never going to live up to the hype, or be nearly as good as (insert movie 'x' here)." Lo and behold, they spend the entire time searching for flimsy plot holes and whining about how there was too much action, or too little action, or too much CGI, or the CGI wasn't used enough, or there wasn't any cool philosophical discussions, or that they spent too much time talking. Meanwhile, they forget to actually watch the movie.

The people in the final group don't even deserve my contempt; their ability to watch a supremely entertaining set of movies and not derive any pleasure from the experience is punishment enough. Some of you fell into this trap for Reloaded; I hope for your own sake that you don't make the same mistake if you haven't seen it yet.

Thanny, Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

If there's one thing I've learned about this trilogy is that it acts as a sort of a mirror for the viewer; everybody walks out of the theater with exactly what they walked in with.

So long as you're not implying it's only these films in particular that act as a mirror in such cases, you're probably onto something.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think that they are exceptional in that regard, although certainly films that do this are in the minority.

Thanny, Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

so many people wanted to hate this film (even the ones who claim they didn't). i'm so sick of people just deriding these things because they think the CGI is 'lame' (does this make Tron a crap film? wait, don't answer that) or there's 'no story' or other idiotically vague criticisms. it'll happen again with Episode 3 and loads of other films. if the Star Wars films are essentially kids films (and they are really, the adult appeal is just a bonus) then this franchise is more for teenagers. i am much more comfortable with it in that light. it's by no means as 'clever' or sophisticated as Alien or Dune or Blade Runner, not as gung-ho as Aliens, Die Hard, Predator. it opts for the middle ground because that's where it knows it can be the most successful commercially. The Matrix films have grossed more than any of those mentioned above which sort of proves my point. Not that the main motivation here is money, there's still a huge amount of creative invention in the series - new ideas fused with old, but you'll have to look elsewhere for the more cerebral strain of sci-fi. there are films that outstrip the Matrix series in that department for sure, but they don't compete with it for thrills n' spills, that's the compromise the Warchowskis banked on.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I wonder if this movie will spawn a neck-brace craze amongst club world denizens?

Also, nice to see that even the architect of the Matrix couldn't improve on good ol Technics SL-1200s

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 November 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

OMG DID THIS MOVEI SUK1!1!11! BORNG FIGHTS BAD ACTNG NO ROY JONES HORIBLA HORIBL3 DIALOGUE NOT ENOUGH BLUCI - THIS WAS AWFUL!11! WTF

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I spent the last 2 minutes giggling to myself thinking "What Would Not Donald Sutherland Do?".

That was a good browny.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

when they entered the club and you saw people dancing dancing dancing to that crazy techno sound you could feel the audience draw its breath in like 'ohdeargod - not another rave scene'

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

haha I heard a kid a few rows back go "UGH" right then

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

also, that one puppydog eyed 'golly gee willickers neo - you sure are swell! can I shine your shoes?' guy that apparently couldn't pass for 18 even though he looked 21-22 to me was the fucking ewoks of the series.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I could've accepted the ewoks if they'd been covered in blood and shooting rounds from their huge mecha-hands.

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Roy Jones??

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean I wasn't that impressed with the first one, but god it was alot better than the second one - the directors had some sense of how to tell a story, they built up to the over the top actions (lending it some impact), and they understood that vagueness and not filling in the details is the way to go with scifi (ie. showing zion, the council of zion, etc. = showing the old republic, the jedi council, coruscant)(I kept waiting to find out neo had a high midichlorian count). the second was a huge dropoff but had enough of it's own gonzo touches (merv, belluci, all the heebity jeebity mumbo jumbo dormtalk), the third one is just k-meh. fucking awful. talk about ending with a whimper instead of a bang.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

dude roy 'best fighter in the world today pound for pound' jones jr. is in the second one! he's also in the devil's advocate apparently ("uncredited") - him and keanu must be tight!

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah that's true!! The directors went through quasi-extras like they were sticks of Fruity Stripe. When we see all the new Zion dudes right at the beginning of Revolutions I was like "who the hell are these guys??" Who cares though I guess, they are pretty interchangeable. Silly humans.

Blount I think you are nostalgic for that feeling that the movie was just a LEETLE cleverer than you. By the second Matrix it was dubious. You either gave it the benefit of the doubt or you didn't. By Revolutions we're five steps ahead and like "hurry up, movie!!!"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

no - by my usual logic I should love the third more than the others, I usually hate pretentious action flicks (hated fight club also)(BIG exception - the hulk)(it helps to be on the verge of suicide when you watch the hulk cuz then you're all 'god this movie is sooo true - NOONE WILL EVER LOVE ME')(haha - last week I watched the hulk and listened to 'the killing moon' over and over again) which is odd cuz I looooove pretention! I think it's just that I know all the fanboy geeks are gonna think it's 'deep' or 'provocative' (see every mid to high brow hype piece on the matrix this spring) when those 'aspects' are usually the weakest part of the movie. (except with second - my reaction to the first one: "it was good when noone was talking", my reactio to the second: "it was good when people were talking" (well not 'people' - was anyone rooting for zion? what bores!), my reaction to the third: "the mc escher part was alright")

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

take occam's razor to this film, and more comes off than the first two. put together.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I finally saw Revolutions tonight. Better than #2, not as good as #1. Shorter (although long) fight scenes, which helped a lot. Still too much Zion focus--I know it's the whole point, but I don't find it interesting. But
CGI insect robots---please stop doing this. Ugh. So fake, so boring.
Psycho-babble...I don't know, I kind of liked it this time.

But please, someone, please explain what happened at the end? Why did Agent Orange blow up? "Everything that has a beginning has a second and third installment..." If it's above, I didn't see it. I don't understand! //stamping foot and frowning// Have I forgotten something from the first 2 that would explain it? I just didn't get it! Forgive me. But help me!

HATED machine god.

Skottie, Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.