Just when you thought it was safe - OK CUPID PART 3: The Return of the WOO!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11167 of them)

Snipping or adding a year, especially with the aim of putting yourself definitely in the category you would like to be searched on (such as saying you are 40 when you are 39 or 29 when you are 30) I really don't see as a big deal at all.

Removing 5 years from your age is really kind of questionable, but it would really depend if other things are lied about. For example, I think lying about whether you have children or not (or indeed want children or not) is far more despicable than lying about your age.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

I got taken to task in chat recently for "looking for" women 25-45. (I'm 40.) To think that I could have just called myself 35! But how do you walk something like that back? Just "heh heh nope I lied"?

Hadrian VIII, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

OK, let me rephrase that. If you're deducting a large age gap (large meaning more than 2 years) from your age with the specific point of dating people much younger than you, that's just kind of creepy.

But even thinking about this kind of thing kind of makes me hate humanity.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

ljubljana, what's the actual age gap between you, and what's his stated age gap? This has actually put kind of a skeevy slant on it. Because I was thinking it was more along the lines of saying you're younger than you are in order to appeal to people actually the same age as you.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

Kate, you change your age to a younger one, right? You are the first woman under 60 I've met that does that.

I had a patient once that had added FIFTEEN YEARS to her age to minimize the age gap between her and her husband. She'd actually managed to get the false age onto her driver's license and into her medical records--I called my agency soon afterward so that they could get the right age into her file. (She was born after 1933, so she would have had a birth certificate. However, her false birthdate was earlier than that, so she could have lied and said that she didn't have one when she got her driver's license.)

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

I am just going to rewrite my profile to say I'm only looking for pointy nosed ginger dudes who have their own oscillators.

(However, I have found only one guy who met those criteria - he was friendly, but then I read the small print and saw he was poly. Um, no thanks.)

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

When I have lied in the past about my age, I have always lied for biographical purposes, not relationship purposes. I've always come clean on the second date, if the bloke seems decent enough to see a second time.

And I dunno. It seems to have been hugely common in my social scene, but that might just be because the music industry is so insane about ages. I've known a lot of women, usually in their 30s, who have lied to make themselves a year or two younger. (Or lied to make themselves a decade younger for bio purposes - this is totally standard practice)

It was actually quite funny, I knew a family of 3 sisters, and the oldest started lying about her age, saying she was the same age as the middle sister, so the middle sister had to start to lie - and would usually ask people "how old did my sister tell you she was?" before revealing her own age because otherwise they would have had to pretend to be twins. It was kind of hilarious.

But then again, I was 22 for 11 years which is also hilarious.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

OK, let me rephrase that. If you're deducting a large age gap (large meaning more than 2 years) from your age with the specific point of dating people much younger than you, that's just kind of creepy.

Kate, to you, how much of an age gap between a couple can there be before it starts being "creepy"?

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

And I dunno. It seems to have been hugely common in my social scene,

It's always seemed to me to be one of those old-fashioned Woman Things, like faking orgasms and wearing false eyelashes to bed. But we do run around in different social circles.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 29 August 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

It's not the age gap that's creepy. It's *lying* about it that's creepy.

But, you know, after you've been in close relationships with some people that have lied about pretty important aspects which would have changed your decisions about them had you had full knowledge, your creep detector gets set more sensitively. I rarely trust what anyone says they are any more, on the internet.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

Kate, I'm 38. He said he was 43 and is actually 48. I think he's been out with much younger women than me in the past. I don't have a problem with that, I have a problem with the lying.

ljubljana, Sunday, 29 August 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

At least one of the relationships with a much younger woman (I now think it must have been nearly a 20 year age gap) was a committed one lasting 3 or 4 years, and I believe she ended it.

ljubljana, Sunday, 29 August 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

Hadrian, I will report back on how you walk back knocking off 5 years after this evening. If it's anything other than an earnest entreaty for forgiveness, I dunno.

ljubljana, Sunday, 29 August 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

That's just a bit weird, to me. Like, what difference would it make to someone in their late 30s if their partner were in the mid 40s or late 40s? Lying with no reason to lie is, well... I was gonna say weird, but it's not so much weird as a caution flag. I have had some real problems with habitual liars, and one of the signs of habitual liars is that they lie over stuff which they have no reason to lie over - *and* the big stuff.

I thought it was pretty obvious why I have a problem with people lying about large age gaps. When I was 27, a boy lied and told me he was 24 in order to get in a relationship with me when he was 17. He also turned out to have lied, in that he was still sleeping with (and impregnated) his 15 year old ex.

So, you know, there is *no* problem whatsoever with a 5, 10, 20, whatever year age difference if both parties are aware of it and consent to it. Whatever makes you happy. But I *do* think it is suspicious and kinda creepy if someone is significantly altering their age in order to deceive people of that age group into dating them. It is both the deceit and the intent.

Just as some examples:

25 y.o. and 45 y.o. dating with full knowledge of each other's ages - FINE
45 y.o. saying is 35 to date 25 y.o. - NOT FINE
39 y.o. saying is 37 to date other 39 y.o. - questionable but fine if they come clean if it goes anywhere
17 y.o. saying is 24 to date 27 y.o. - REALLY NOT FINE AND POSSIBLY ILLEGAL

Draw your own conclusions on what the pattern is. And where "30 y.o. saying is 22 in order to get record contact and laughing self sick at record company not noticing that they were 22 in 1999 and still 22 in 2001" falls on that scale.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

baggy neck :(

conrad, Sunday, 29 August 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

Kate, I don't know why you think I'm trying to argue with you when I'm not. I've said nothing to contradict what you've said.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 29 August 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't think that I'd made my somewhat ambiguous reasoning clear. I apologise if you think that was argumentative.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Sunday, 29 August 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

OK, I understand.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 29 August 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, conrad, baggy neck. I'm sure I'll have one myself before too long. The rest is fine though ;-)

ljubljana, Sunday, 29 August 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

Lying with no reason to lie is, well... I was gonna say weird, but it's not so much weird as a caution flag. I have had some real problems with habitual liars, and one of the signs of habitual liars is that they lie over stuff which they have no reason to lie over - *and* the big stuff.

absolutely! i'll sometimes lie about completely trivial things to random strangers, probably because i have a knee-jerk instinct to be completely honest, and the lying is just a way to test my ability to counteract my instincts, but that's a completely different thing than lying to someone you care about.

sarahel, Sunday, 29 August 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Apology was very half-hearted. Age is just a number, blah blah. Feels guilty I think about the trust issue, but not guilty enough. Going away 10 days, will see what happens after.

ljubljana, Monday, 30 August 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

Now you need 10 days of not thinking about him at all. Bar the doors.

Someone asked me out via match.com (which I never, ever visit) and we're going out tonight.

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 30 August 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

ha, i had completely written off okc but someone v promising messaged me today out of the proverbial

acoleuthic, Monday, 30 August 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

the most promising bit is that they are potentially interested in being in my band though - that is more impt than 'dating' atm

acoleuthic, Monday, 30 August 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

how is your band coming along?

sarahel, Monday, 30 August 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

FAO London ppl, JOIN MY BAND!

acoleuthic, Monday, 30 August 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

One of those weird cases where the gender neutral singular "they" makes no sense at all. Unless L-Jagz is advertising for couples now.

Karen D. Tregaskin, Monday, 30 August 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

Not wanting to derail at all, but I can't honestly see how in context that 'they' is confusing. It makes perfect sense to me.

emil.y, Monday, 30 August 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

ha...so for the last few days i've been chatting to a girl on here and we're going for a drink next week. she's really fun and good to talk to and she is also incredibly beautiful, like kind of jaw dropping, i mean mega stunning.

without wanting to sound utterly devoid of self esteem (i have...some!) I keep wishing I wasn't away all weekend so we could meet sooner and hence there'd be less time for me to fuck this up! my main prob is we're exchanging messages a lot and i don't want to have it all burnt out by 7 days time...should I just hold off now we've agreed to meet..slowly tone down the messages a bit? or is that bad?

ah neuroses...

I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

Ronan you're an incredibly witty guy - it's hard to imagine sending messages would be anything other than a very strong suit for you! I'd keep at it - if you drop it off you're risking being judged by a fresh first impression rather than a v.favourable one?

Gravel Puzzleworth, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

thanks a lot! yep prob better to keep talking, I guess just surprised to meet someone I really like on this site.

I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

I am in a remarkably similar position - the someone v promising is morelike vvvv promising - also I cannot think about them (lol) until 1pm so ban me or w/e

godspeed ronan - imho keep the flame burning, just talk about amusing inane stuff if need be

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

me and this girl sent each other gifs until the flame burnt out

oh how it burned

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

giforrhea?

sarahel, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

a+

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 05:36 (fifteen years ago)

high warning: i could become unbearably squee over the next coupla weeks depending on her very next email/our planned cityscape poetry ramble

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

her? i mean THEIR. dammit.

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

it would be funny if it was the same girl

I see what this is (Local Garda), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

don't terrify me

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

i know...lets not discuss this any further!

I see what this is (Local Garda), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

although if i'm anything to go by, if there's someone i click with online, anybody else i'm talking to is kinda...deprioritised, shall we say - i'd imagine most people are the same, so if yr having rly upbeat regular chatz with someone it's reasonable to assume you are the one they are concentrating on too

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

DEFINITELY.

I see what this is (Local Garda), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

i don't get the "their" comment

sarahel, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

emil.y and kate mithering upthread

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

you don't know if it's a girl or not?

sarahel, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

but yeah exciting times for ilx's london bachelor brigade - autumn is truly the classy season for romancing imho

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

gf has moved down to college for a year, considering this tbh

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

KIDDING, sheesh

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

you dog

acoleuthic, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

he just wants an excuse to objectify women imo

sarahel, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.