2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

It's a vast left-wing conspiracy.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

And he can't get it up far enou - wait, that's his arms, innit? Nevermind.

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:19 (eighteen years ago)

If the affair is true, and verifiably so, then kudos to the NYT for sitting on it until McCain had pretty much wrapped up the nomination.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:24 (eighteen years ago)

apparently they were gonna run it in december but mccain lawyered up and started giving them shit

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:30 (eighteen years ago)

Romney must be kicking himself

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:34 (eighteen years ago)

l o l

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

But unless there's a Linda Tripp in the mix somewhere, McCain should weather this fairly easily. I mean, if he denies it and she denies it, how can anyone prove it?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:39 (eighteen years ago)

John McCain is holding a press conference at 9 a.m. ET.

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:58 (eighteen years ago)

aka right now

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:58 (eighteen years ago)

hes v disappointed in the nytimes piece its not true

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:00 (eighteen years ago)

theyre just friends did not fuk

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:00 (eighteen years ago)

not particularly close saw her at events etc

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:01 (eighteen years ago)

"Like my illustrious predecessor Bob Dole, I could not have had sexual relations with that woman."

http://bp0.blogger.com/_Se19XAPwVi8/RbPNYwHY2hI/AAAAAAAAALA/bzZW5ZBu_2I/s400/dole69viagra.jpg

Euler, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:02 (eighteen years ago)

he should resign why cause it look excitin

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:05 (eighteen years ago)

his demeanor is pretty impressive this morning im enjoying it

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.hillaryclintonisyournewbicycle.com

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

so assuming this has salience in the campaign because of the wang, which democratic candidate draws the better contrast?

gabbneb, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

That's a rhetorical question, right?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

as if it wasn't known already, Clinton's campaign having serious financial troubles:

January yields debt for HRC, cash for Obama

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

Hillary Clinton ended January with $7.6 million in debt – not including the $5 million personal loan she gave to her campaign in the run-up to the critical Super Tuesday elections, according to financial reports released Wednesday.

She reported a cash balance of $29 million. But more than $20 million of that is money dedicated to the general election. Her personal loan accounts for more than half of the remaining approximately $9 million, leaving just about $4 million in cash raised from donors.

But even that money is illusionary when measured against the reported $7.6 million in debts.

More than $2 million of the red ink is owed to chief consultant and adviser, Mark Penn.

it mentions that these numbers obviously don't include all the money that's come in since feb. 5, but you get the picture.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

"illusionary"?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

not "accounted for", because that would be an accurate statement

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

seriously, it's kind of astonishing how poorly managed clinton's campaign has been (and by contrast how smoothly obama's has been going).

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

i don't think "illusionary" is a word

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:10 (eighteen years ago)

woops:

Main Entry:
il·lu·sion·ary
Pronunciation:
\i-ˈlü-zhə-ˌner-ē\
Function:
adjective
Date:
1866

: illusory

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

for all the talk about the "clinton political machine" etc, she should've had this wrapped up by now

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

hahaha Tracer, that passed through my mind but then I went "so not gonna go there" because I figured I'd be wrong

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:13 (eighteen years ago)

i think "illusionary" is a less efficient attempt to remember the actually good and correct word, "illusory" -- just cause somebody whom everyone was scared of in 1866 got it wrong doesn't mean we have to listen

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

illusionary sounds more awesomely cosmic

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

i mean why is the dictionary so hellbent on force-feeding us these storylines????

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

"ladies and gentlemen... never before on stage has such an extravaganza of sensory delight been presented before a paying audience... behold! the illusionary grandeur of madame majestique!!!"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/02/21/us/21sat.337.jpg

ta-da!

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

clinton could totally plagiarise the dictionary and be all "They say Obama is a visionary? MORE LIKE ILLUSIONARY, AM I RIGHT, EL PASO?"

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

http://jezebel.com/assets/resources/2008/02/mccainmashup0222108.jpg
wife, girlfriend

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

that my friends is evidence enough

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

trade that ho in for a newer model right?

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40967000/jpg/_40967138_breaking_news_203.jpg

am0n, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

he like em blonde and flinty don't he

uh xp

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

well he already did it once before when his old model broke down

xposts

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:32 (eighteen years ago)

Then again, even eight years ago McCain was pretty old. At that age, he probably just likes the female company rather than actually doing anything about it (if he still can).

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

4xpost: "Wipe your nose for us like you did in Texas!"

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

you don't need an erection to eat a lobbyist out

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:34 (eighteen years ago)

^^^sound advice

roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:34 (eighteen years ago)

*blork*

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

bathtubs in the middle of a field people

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

you don't need an erection to eat a lobbyist out

T-shirt slogan of the year.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

the nyt is tiptoeing around the sex stuff which is lolzy but kind of beside the point. here's the AP on what's really the problem here

The published reports said McCain and Iseman each denied having a romantic relationship. Neither story asserted that there was a romantic relationship and offered no evidence that there was, reporting only that aides worried about the appearance of McCain having close ties to a lobbyist with business before the Senate Commerce Committee on which McCain served.

The stories also allege that McCain wrote letters and pushed legislation involving television station ownership that would have benefited Iseman's clients.

In late 1999, McCain twice wrote letters to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Florida-based Paxson Communications _ which had paid Iseman as its lobbyist _ urging quick consideration of a proposal to buy a television station license in Pittsburgh. At the time, Paxson's chief executive, Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson, also was a major contributor to McCain's 2000 presidential campaign.

McCain did not urge the FCC commissioners to approve the proposal, but he asked for speedy consideration of the deal, which was pending from two years earlier. In an unusual response, then-FCC Chairman William Kennard complained that McCain's request "comes at a sensitive time in the deliberative process" and "could have procedural and substantive impacts on the commission's deliberations and, thus, on the due process rights of the parties."

McCain wrote the letters after he received more than $20,000 in contributions from Paxson executives and lobbyists. Paxson also lent McCain his company's jet at least four times during 1999 for campaign travel.

"Riding on the airplane was an accepted practice," McCain said Thursday, adding that he supported a change in rules since then. As for the letters, he said: "I said I'm not telling you how to make a decision; I'm just telling you that you should move forward and make a decision on this issue. I believe that was appropriate."

xp o jesus christ elmo

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

"you don't need an erection to eat a lobbyist out, but it helps!"

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

Cui boner

kingfish, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:41 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.