Did anyone ever see that movie? Seems like a complete memory hole of a release.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 9 August 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
i remember that happening.
but what does it have to do with GL?
― the itsytitchyschneider (s1ocki), Monday, 9 August 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
far and away
― the itsytitchyschneider (s1ocki), Monday, August 9, 2010
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Monday, 9 August 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
oh
right
i was secretly hoping that was another "wrong thread" posting we could all laugh about
― the itsytitchyschneider (s1ocki), Monday, 9 August 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
My wife saw "Far and Away" and felt like Tom and Nicole had the sexual chemistry of a gay man and a random cheerleader.
― people are for loving (HI DERE), Monday, 9 August 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
I was just thinking about this today: I had this old coworker, in his 50s or so, and when this movie came out everyone at work was complaining about Jar-Jar. And this guy says, "I don't get why everyone has such a problem with Jar-Jar and how he talks – I happen to like Jamaican people."
― spanikopitcon (Abbott), Monday, 9 August 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
That's so clueless as to be kind of sweet.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Monday, 9 August 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
that's when I thought Tom Cruise was cute. Sigh.
― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 9 August 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
The Jar Jar Binks character will be legendary and deserves to permanently destroy the Star Wars legacy. To quote the Rifftrax guys (who really do a great job tearing TPM to shreds) It is offensive on a metaphysical level.
― Beach Pomade (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 9 August 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)
just about to watch this, anyone else seen it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfBhi6qqFLA&feature=related
― a hoy hoy, Monday, 9 August 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
It's so bizarre, it's some strange frankenstein's monster gone horribly wrong, the abject repressed nightmare inside the mind of a marketing executive who is having a bad acid trip. That something so grotesque and hideous was actually - and eagerly - created is bizarre beyond comprehension. He looks like if you bred Bug Bunny and a duckbill platypus and then had the resulting spawn skinned.
― Beach Pomade (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 9 August 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I've watched that review - there's some very sharp criticism. The persona the guy puts on can get a bit much, but worth watching.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Monday, 9 August 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.allmystery.de/dateien/mg46044,1259971164,Darth-Maul.jpghttp://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/389264/Insane+Clown+Posse.jpg
― Beach Pomade (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 9 August 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)
fuckin Mynocks, how do they work?
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
george lucas with the lid off
― blap...tremendo (deej), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 03:15 (fifteen years ago)
on part 4 of that attack of the clones review. wow.
― not everything is a campfire (ian), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 03:33 (fifteen years ago)
Lucas's "crimes" pale before Tarantino's
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 03:38 (fifteen years ago)
damn that's challenging
― da croupier, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iSwCsgcQqEM/SfmNdHgnwZI/AAAAAAAAAEc/MqR4U6Jzh10/s320/1:32:25+this+is+how+liberty+dies+++History.png
"Lucas's crimes against liberty pale before Tarantino's"
― buzza, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)
still can't believe you rep for the star wars prequels morbs... i can not even imagine what you are thinking standing up for this kiddie cartoon trash
― snooki stackhouse (s1ocki), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 04:12 (fifteen years ago)
I DONT 'REP'
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)
you kids with your newfangled jibber jabber.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
he doesn't rep but he does resent!
― caek boss (latebloomer), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 06:26 (fifteen years ago)
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, August 10, 2010 2:20 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark
I said, "Mom, what are you doing, you're ruining my rep"She said, "You're only sixteen, you don't have a rep yet"
― snooki stackhouse (s1ocki), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
very illuminating interview w/Lucas' former producer/associate Gary Kurtz:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-gary-kurtz-20100812,0,134728,full.story
― caek boss (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
The discussed ending of the film that Kurtz favored presented the rebel forces in tatters, Leia grappling with her new duties as queen and Luke walking off alone “like Clint Eastwood in the spaghetti westerns,” as Kurtz put it.Kurtz said that ending would have been a more emotionally nuanced finale to an epic adventure than the forest celebration of the Ewoks that essentially ended the trilogy with a teddy bear luau.
Kurtz said that ending would have been a more emotionally nuanced finale to an epic adventure than the forest celebration of the Ewoks that essentially ended the trilogy with a teddy bear luau.
sigh
― grateful dad (LOLK), Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw i love this fuzzy bastards
― caek boss (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
those*
haw
somebody's got a new user name
― caek boss (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i mean i still love the original yub nub ending and all but... what if?
― grateful dad (LOLK), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
it would have been cooler no doubt!
― caek boss (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
I'm telling you, they could have fixed everything by having the Ewoks eat the Stormtroopers
― How could you forget the crazy hooker? (HI DERE), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyophYBP_w4
― ('_') (omar little), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
THE END
― caek boss (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
I was very distracted by the fly on dude's forehead
― How could you forget the crazy hooker? (HI DERE), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I always kind of suspected he made up that whole "It's supposed to be 9 movies" after they realized they could make a killing on these films.
― Beach Pomade (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
Nice read. Kurtz's ending doesn't sound GREAT to be honest - - I mean, what's the point of rescuing Han and then having him die, beyond the general idea that the rogue's arc of redemption must end in self-sacrifice? Totally agreed about the redundant Death Star though....could they just not come up with anything else?
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
I always assumed that they did, since a) they were fully prepared to eat Han, Luke and Chewie, and b) those stormtrooper helmets being used as rototoms came from SOMEplace.
― a mix of music (Lionel Ritchie) and kicks (my tongue) (Phil D.), Friday, 13 August 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)
maybe a Death Cafe or a Death Water Park
― plate of dinosaurs (San Te), Friday, 13 August 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)
That reminded me of another Kurtz interview, post-Phantom Menace. He hasn't changed his tune.
http://www.filmthreat.com/interviews/8/
― Millsner, Friday, 13 August 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aoc3roT81nU
― piscesx, Saturday, 14 August 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
i heard George Lucas raped a koala once
― plate of dinosaurs (San Te), Saturday, 14 August 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
No that was an E-wok
― Evan, Saturday, 14 August 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
Or, whatever.
― Evan, Saturday, 14 August 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
Favorite bit of the Clones review: explaining how casting Samuel L. Jackson was a 100% cynical bait-and-switch to get black people into theaters.
― kenan, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
What about Billy Dee Williams then?
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
Billy Dee Williams isn't a bait-and-switch - - - what exactly was Williams's reputation at the time that he could be cynically cashed-in upon? I get the complaint with Samuel L. Jackson, basically you're expecting this ultimate Jedi badass, with some taut, just-barely-controlled anger fueling the delivery of classic lines. Instead you get a monkish, dowdy cipher. To be fair, most of the characters are ciphers, and I'm not sure I want to start singing the praises of typecasting, but certainly when I heard Samuel L. Jackson was going to be in Star Wars, it got me excited based on things that ultimately were not there in the film.
The little promo clip dude excerpts with Jackson talking about how they're some awesome action and fighting in this movie does seem a little bit calculated, I have to say.
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/REuxl.jpg
― Louis CK BK ANYBODYK (lpz), Wednesday, 22 September 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
i've been thinking more about these prequels, about how it was supposedly impossible to make a movie about war that didn't fetishize it?I think Lucas might have actually achieved the impossible. I can't imagine any kid watching these having any desire to participate in warfare, or at least not with any help from these movies.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 22 September 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)