Inception (with implanted spoilers)

yeah, what I figured too - ppl be mad overthinking this

wait you just said you weren't buying that?

What if they were actually all Greek Gods bored and creating new WORLDS OF PEOPLE who they then tricked into thinking they were dreaming but really they were just going between different levels of the maze and...

ahh fuck it

oh I thought 'but it doesn't work in the end' referred to the theory, not the failed inception

please, defend that view of the movie!

ok, my opening defence is that it's the movie. now go.

ppl be mad overthinking this

― let it sb (acoleuthic), Thursday, August 5, 2010 4:53 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

rrrrriiiiiiigggghhhhhtttt

this is from a guy who spent hours of his life on some that fuckin' craigslist whinge?

game see game

i don't think that could be accurately decribed as overthinking though, be fair to the dude.

ok I will read upthread and have a think about the movie as an inception of cobb

I don't get these wild interpretations, I mean I thought the ones I came up with wayyyyyyyyyy upthread were reaching but they never left the realm of that the first 75% of the movie happened as appeared on screen.

to mei t's like suggesting someone besides Kevin Spacey was Keyser Soze!

i'm not even sure is my reading that it was all an inception of cobb or is it that cobb was just left dreaming a level below real life when his wife jumped off the hotel balcony, and he's just doing the rest to himself.

key will be JGL's characters interaction with Cobb when I see it again- whether he's imagined or whether he's a friend sent in to help.

this film is streets ahead of any other film with its budget that i can think of.

lol qualifications

exactly its budget, mind

i think with movies such as this, which play with a certain amount of trickery, people like to play guessing games as to what vast secrets are being hidden just out of view by the filmmaker, and i think without fail the theories that are conceived are totally offtm. maybe we can blame the glowing suitcase in pulp fiction or something, i dunno. i think the number of films that have these weird secret stories about what actually happened that are hidden completely from the audience is pretty much zero.

the amount of movies that hint at it to fairly good effect is small enough, and imo this is one of them

lol qualifications

― ☼ (Lamp), Thursday, August 5, 2010 5:10 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

i also think it's better than any film by haneke, von trier, the dardenne bros, etc

well those dudes are hacks

i think with movies such as this, which play with a certain amount of trickery, people like to play guessing games as to what vast secrets are being hidden just out of view by the filmmaker, and i think without fail the theories that are conceived are totally offtm.

arent those guessing games half the point & most of the fun? the movie invites u to qn its reality/purpose & its not like theres much else to engage the viewer other than how handsome jgl is.

ne way w/e got roped into seeing this again last wknd thought even more that it was stupid but good-looking. cobra snow fort was the best part, probably.

its not like theres much else to engage the viewer other than how handsome jgl is.

tom hardy is pretty handsome imo. his suit in the mombassa scene is badass. and ellen page is pretty.

cotillard is amazing

also i know of women that have obv been hypnotised by leo's squint because he is also rated better than average in attractiveness ime

yeah im not usually mad about cotillard, but she was bringing it when not all teary and suicidal

there's a 'women amirite' joke for the taking there i guess

xp well actually yeah rather than blanket 'amazing' i'd go with this. and in that one movie with russel crowe as leslie phillips

xp not this fukn week there's not

this movie has the highest shots-aimed to shots-hit ratio of any gun movie I've ever seen btw

not on the enemy side, mind you

i think with movies such as this, which play with a certain amount of trickery, people like to play guessing games as to what vast secrets are being hidden just out of view by the filmmaker, and i think without fail the theories that are conceived are totally offtm. maybe we can blame the glowing suitcase in pulp fiction or something, i dunno. i think the number of films that have these weird secret stories about what actually happened that are hidden completely from the audience is pretty much zero.

http://www.thedailycontributor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/southland-tales.jpg

*shudder*

but dude have u herd the commentry on DD:TDC bcz that explaing fkn EVERYTHING

southland tales fucking rules fuiud

I still have never seen Southland Tales, I don't if it would be lolariously bad or just bad bad.

It was brutally boring and terrible.

i think with movies such as this, which play with a certain amount of trickery, people like to play guessing games as to what vast secrets are being hidden just out of view by the filmmaker, and i think without fail the theories that are conceived are totally offtm. maybe we can blame the glowing suitcase in pulp fiction or something, i dunno. i think the number of films that have these weird secret stories about what actually happened that are hidden completely from the audience is pretty much zero.

http://www.newwavefilms.co.uk/assets/directory/45/4227_headless_woman_slv_SHR.jpg

this otoh sucked

yeah like darraghmac I am NOT buying the 'omg the inception was on COBB' angle - perhaps there's meant to be some by-product effect on his subconscious but I don't think that's the main point of the 'heist'

my best friend has spoken lucidly about this film and I am about to present his thoughts 4u

any film with a mega-zeppelin not alluded to it in the first 2/3 of the running time but them whoomp there it is can never be totally worthless

xposts

wtf history mayne

his post was "ASTOUNDING"

(me: dream/film metaphor!)

yes yes, there's also the bit where they sit around planning how to manipulate Fischer with their scripts like actors at a rehearsal AND the bit where Cobb starts going on about how you don't remember the beginnings of dreams - 'how did we get here?' which is (as Observer critic Philip French has pointed out) just like the cinematic process of the cut. However, I would say fine, yes, there are references to the mechanics of movies but these don't go much beyond mere gestures

(me: compromises his concept with making it a high-budget action movie!)

I think the compromise comes through the endless exposition. I read somewhere that Nolan was too intelligent to make it easy for his audience. I think he spends his entire time addressing his audience in the manner of a lecturing religious studies teacher, pointing out that this is the way certain inexplicable things are, without noticing the burgeoning inconsistencies swelling up beneath him

Nolan doesn't seem to get that the association between film and a dream is almost a given and doesn't require such explicit treatment

Watch it again (if you want) and as you watch it, think to yourself how many times the subtext of a line is 'what is going on?/this is what is going on'

I think there's a lot to be said about the emergence of CGI and films like Avatar and Inception which preach the essential (or inessential) unreality of the world - their aesthetic supports the corporate machine that makes money of it, however much they'd like to claim to be opposed to it

He then told me there's a film called 'The Woman In The Window' as an excellent comparison, and I suggested 'Vertigo', which he concurred with.

Apart from his regrettable intolerance of religious studies, I think he makes some good points. What say you?

jesus its like that guy doesn't read lazenby's tumblr

the person in this thread I most agree with is caek fwiw

Nolan doesn't seem to get that the association between film and a dream is almost a given and doesn't require such explicit treatment

yeah it's sorta well known that watching films actually puts your brain into something very close to a dream state

i think Mulholland Drive was about lesbians

mulholland dr is from a different planet of goodness to inception

also says more about movies in any one of its scenes than all the inception criticism ever

pandora's box right there

jesus its like that guy doesn't read lazenby's tumblr
this

so wait is lazenby now the ineffable authority on inception