Who will have the last word on this thread ?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (268 of them)
IT LIVES

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 15:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

This may be the most uninteresting thread ever.
And yet it intrigues me!!! I can't stop posting to it.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 15:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Apologies for locking this.. I was bored. Continue.

Graham (graham), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

YAY IT'S BACK

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

B-b-but - I would have won, Graham!

I am sick, but I'm still a winner! God damn it!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

this thread was locked?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

I can't believe you're all trying to compete for the last word on this thread.

Mandee, Monday, 20 January 2003 18:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

I know! Silly innit?

jel -- (jel), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

I guess it is sort of silly.

rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

You're all being very childish, and someone with my kind of wisdom and dignity wouldn't even join in. (haha I'm winning!)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

You were winning...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think Dan should win coz it was his birthday the other day.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

three weeks pass...
I intend to win.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 11:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is terrible. Please do not revive it. For everyone knows that the last word was only supposed to be MINE

Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

It wont be me, but then, I'm not sure if I care....

smee (smee), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't care. Definitely not.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

I do.

Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's a shame, cos you ain't gonna win, Vic.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

I wouldn't be so sure 'bout that, Nick

Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh, I would.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

so futile nick, give up now while you still have your sanity

minna (minna), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

jel gets an underscore and thus wins.

Graham (graham), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

um, congrats jel

Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

But who gets the LAST underscore?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

This thread need to be revived.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 10 February 2003 12:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes. I am a public servant.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

don't mess with the best

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 16:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

This thread is silly.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 17:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

yes,isn't it?

alix (alix), Monday, 10 February 2003 17:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

No.

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 17:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes?
NO

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

here

Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hi!!!!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

http://www.novareinna.com/scribbles/lastword.jpg

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

You have to say something to have the last word. Duh.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

No you don't

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Shut up. Yer stupid.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Okay

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

Stop being a dumbass.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry, will do.

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jel, Sarah told me to tell you to tell yourself that you are being a dumbass.

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

view source

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Touche

Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

but really, I'm gonna retire from this thread

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Senator BRUCE. Begot by, the abuses of the old saloon, and hastened to maturity by the economic necessities and uncalculating enthusiasm of the World War, and by the lavish use of money and political threats by the Anti-Saloon League, national prohibition went into
legal effect upward of six years ago, but it can be truly said that, except to a highly qualified extent, it has never gone into practical effect at all. The appetite for drink, which has been one of the primal impulses of the great mass of human beings ever since Jesus at Cana manifested forth His glory, to use the words of St. John, by converting the water in six water pots into wine, has, In its struggle with the vast repressive agencies set in motion by the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead Act, furnished another illustration of the truth, which neither moralist nor statesman should ever forget, even in his most fervid moments of disinterested or generous feeling, that man is a creature who can be regulated and bettered, but can not be made over. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of human slavery, Henry Brougham decried what he termed "the wild and guilty fantasy that man can hold property in man." As wild and guilty is the fantasy that even the power of the Federal Government can totally divest man of his warm garment of animal sensations, desires, and appetites. Ever since the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead Act became parts of the legislation of our land the human instinct of personal liberty, guided by a correct sense of the limits within which natural law can be controlled by municipal ordinances, has maintained an unbroken resistance to them; and nothing can be more unwarranted than the statement often heard that this resistance is limited to a single self-indulgent social class.

It is not kept up more stoutly by what the prohibitionists, vainly seek to excite social disaffection and jealousy, call the smart social set, than it is by the members of the American Federation of Labor. It is not limited to any social class or sect. It has brought about close working relations between the bootlegger and thousands of the most intelligent and virtuous members of American society who feel no more compunction about violating the Volstead Act than the Free Soiler did about violating the fugitive slave law, or the southern white did about nullifying ignorant negro, suffrage, the Federal Constitution in each instance to the contrary notwithstanding And the ever mounting record of arrests for drunkenness in all of our American cities since the enactment of the Volstead Act indicates only too significantly that the humbler and less fortunate members of society have their illicit purveyors of drink too. The recent utterances of Jewish rabbis, Protestant bishops and ministers, and of Catholic prelates like Cardinals O'Connell and Hayes, demonstrate the existence of a growing feeling, even among the American clergy, that absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of human morality.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 10 February 2003 19:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

oy.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 20:32 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.