― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 March 2005 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 18 March 2005 00:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 18 March 2005 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 March 2005 00:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 March 2005 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)
I bet David Horowitz watches a tape of this episode and jerks off to it.
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Friday, 18 March 2005 05:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― ()ops (()()ps), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 March 2005 07:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 18 March 2005 07:51 (twenty-one years ago)
"We need a scientist, an engineer, and a black person to sacrifce when things go wrong." (According to my wife, most of this episode was an extended harshing on "The Core". She also agreed that the episode was weak.)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 18 March 2005 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― ()ops (()()ps), Friday, 18 March 2005 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Friday, 6 May 2005 01:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 6 May 2005 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)
I started off thinking South Park sucked, thinking that the shtick was just shock humor. But, now I realize it's a great show and always watch it when I discover it's on.
― Unfortunate Prankster (Unfortunate Prankster), Friday, 6 May 2005 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― 100% WJE (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)
― Jonothong Williamsmang (ex machina), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)
the only bad thing is that for the second straight week, trey parker and company have written themselves into a hole that they can't really resolve. Do they really expect to be sued over this episode?
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 03:41 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2005 04:05 (twenty years ago)
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)
Fuck these guys; they're the Dennis Miller of tv toons.
― M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 17 November 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)
thats exactly what it is, and its no reason to overlook this show, which is often very funny and insightful. ive always hated the idea that its just a step or two below O'Reilly or Limbaugh, that just seems like a ridiculous talking point in and of itself.
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 04:18 (twenty years ago)
Still, the ending(and watch the credits) is cute.
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2005 07:21 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 17 November 2005 08:42 (twenty years ago)
Tonight's was probably the only one this season worth watching, and yeah, it was more or less a rehash of the much better Mormon episode. Still, not bad at all.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 17 November 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)
Talking point? Whose talking point? Hippies Anti-Defamation League?
― M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 17 November 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)
― KSTFUNS (Ex Leon), Thursday, 17 November 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 November 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)
" Anderson argues that Comedy Central's cartoon series, South Park, embodies the "fiercely anti-liberal comedic spirit" of the "new media" from Kaus to Coulter. The cartoon, he writes, reflects a "post-liberal counterculture" that is "particularly appealing to the young, however much it might offend older conservatives." "
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
And you think this is bullshit? I don't. I think it's basically accurate (though grouping them with Ann Coulter is bullshit). They're fundamentally big-hearted, I guess, but they're also part of the Transgressive Cryptoreactionary Fratboy meme. (The asshole who ran fuckedcompany.com was another example, btw.)
― M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 17 November 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 November 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)
but yeah, these guys are libertarian types.
On the other hand, I think the Suck.com folks in particular weren't nec. so much libertarians as just straight hipster contrarian asshole/nihilist-types. Remember that they were active during the Clinton years, so they had to go against that. Snarky for no particular reason, other than just being so. Wonkette never changed her tone, even after Suck went down. The Pose is all that matters, etc.
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
which is precisely what south park isn't. you can't create a character like butters and be this.
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)
this is gonna be the team america thread all over again isn't it?
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)
We can avoid that. What if we were to discuss the political implications of Butters, instead?
Say, have they used Pip since Butters appeared? (aside from their Charles Dickens/Monty Python ep?) I'm trying to think of another character they both torture and celebrate so much as Butters. Pip they just tortured.
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)
It's such an extrodinary show which will be seen in the future as a key satirical work, more so than the Simpsons, I believe.
― chap who would dare to tell uninteresting celeb spotting stories (chap), Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
you're also really getting at something. To me, Butters has always been a statement that reads something like: "Even if the world is post-modern, not all of it's inhabitants are"
― JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)
― chap who would dare to tell uninteresting celeb spotting stories (chap), Thursday, 17 November 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 17 November 2005 19:25 (twenty years ago)
1) wanted the whales nuked, or2) were completely oblivious to how subsequent events had changed the way other people would view that bumper sticker.
Look, Sean Penn may be kind of an asshat, but no way is Stone & Parker's obvious, disproportionate focus on the asshattery of the Sean Penns of the world "apolitical" in 2005.
― M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 17 November 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 November 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)
The internet is rotting my brain.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 November 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)