What's the best way to discourage people from going to see Danny Boyle's Sunshine?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (195 of them)
(I mean, I'm sure there are many reasons to object to it on scientific grounds, but that's not why it's so bad)

Alba, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:50 (nineteen years ago)

But yes, you have convinced me too. I knew little about the film but may have gone to see it on a whim. I trust you enough to erase that possibility from my future. Hopefully I can do the same for you one day.

admrl, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

Okay to clarify.

Event Horizon sucks because it sucks.
I can't read the Doctor Who threads because it's like 20 Comic Book Guys locked in a Portaloo.
I quite like Danny Boyle so what's up with Sunshine cos I haven#t seen it yet?

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:52 (nineteen years ago)

I have brought some light to the world today. I will now go to bed.

Alba, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

Akshully I'm being unfair, the first half of Event Horizon is fine. But that only makes the film's subsequent descent into tosserosity more annoying.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

i cannot be worse than millions. Unless it involves the great white race traveling across the galaxy to bring water to a planet of dry africans.

akm, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

I enjoyed it. Go and see it.

chap, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

I never understand the hate for Event Horizon.

blueski, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:01 (nineteen years ago)

I thought Millions was alright, even allowing for James Nicebitt.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:01 (nineteen years ago)

Nor it seems do the people who hate it!

blueski, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

And surely Danny Boyle (or Chris Eccleston for that matter) cannot do anything worse than Strumpet.

blueski, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:03 (nineteen years ago)

xxxpost

Cos it deploys the worst kind of "OH IT WAS ALL A DREAM" bollockness and dissipates any kind of tension/excitement/caring aboutness it might've built up? Cos it's Solaris done by my infant school but not as cool as that idea sounds? Cos it makes Jeepers Creepers look like a horror film?

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

event horizon is great til sam neil shows up with no eyes.

oh, 'spoiler' and all but who gives a fuck.

pisces, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:08 (nineteen years ago)

I was moderately excited about this, but last weekend I was dissuaded from ever going near it by friends.

Alba has said exactly the same things about that my friends did, so I'm going to assume it is true.

I will probably see it someday, but I'll probably not enjoy it.

However, Rose Byrne was in Troy. Troy was awesome.

Sunshine has also reminded me, from the trailers, of Event Horizon. Event Horizon was horrible.

In conclusion: this film is probably shit, but there is a possibility I will see it because I'm really bored with nothing at all to do seven days a week.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

I'm going to make a correction, pisces:

event horizon is "passable" until "well before" sam neil shows up with no eyes.

I would do that whole crossing-out thing, but I'm not that clever.

Event Horizon still makes my stomach churn. It was also the best Paul W.S. Anderson film. No contradiction there.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:11 (nineteen years ago)

Nah, Mortal Kombat is far better. More sophisticated plot.

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

These are not convincing arguments re Event Horizon. The 'it was a dream (within a dream)' retains a giant question mark around it at the end of the film, which is great!

blueski, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:14 (nineteen years ago)

http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r113/denycesteffi/AgreetoDisagree2.jpg

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

I loved Millions.

nickalicious, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:40 (nineteen years ago)

"millions" was good. "event horizon" is good until sam neil shows up with no eyes, the dude propels himself back to the ship with a jetpack, and sam neill starts getting philosophical with no eyes. i liked jack noseworthy ending up in the other dimension briefly or whatever the fuck happened. it was sort of dumb, though.

i am looking forward to the non-boyle directed 28 weeks later!

rps, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:48 (nineteen years ago)

Which also has lovely Rose Byrne in it.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 07:40 (nineteen years ago)

You know, this film ain't all that bad. In fact, it's fairly pretty and the music is noodly-techno great.

Mikey Bidness, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 07:50 (nineteen years ago)

Rose Byrne.

You need another reason?

SeekAltRoute, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 07:51 (nineteen years ago)

I forgot to say that the score, like the rest of the film, was imitatively portentous and empty.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 07:57 (nineteen years ago)

I thought it was I N C R E D I B L E

I left the theatre with tear streaks down my face, my heart pounding, and my legs shaking.

The photography and sound effects, capturing the inconceivable, blazing, screaming power of the sun, were a tour de force.

ledge, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:11 (nineteen years ago)

I don't quite believe you.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:13 (nineteen years ago)

Oh. Me and the wife were going to see this at the weekend, after a barbecue. We shall now stay longer at the barbecue.

xxpost - Hm, I think I still have to go with Alba's advice. We might have disagreed on You and Me and Everyone We Tra la la or whatever it was called but I was maybe being a bit harsh on that and anyway he was Right about Pan's Labyrinth.

Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:14 (nineteen years ago)

I kid you not. Perhaps it didn't tell me anything profound about life. Perhaps the by last act it had turned into a slightly lame thriller. Perhaps, ultimately, it was just a movie. But it was the most fucking intense movie I can remember seeing.

ledge, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:17 (nineteen years ago)

I'll get it out on DVD...

Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:18 (nineteen years ago)

Millions wasn't too bad until they landed somewhere in Africa right at the end. Sunshine is actually quite good for the first half of the film. Until they hook up with Icarus 1. You kind of wonder why he had to go add that crappy Pinbacker dude. Especially since that meant doing shitty things with the camera. But i found the space shots and the sun things really good looking. When was the last time that happened? Also, i found the fascination these guys have with the sun interesting. And it made for beautiful scenes.

Jibe, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:21 (nineteen years ago)

alba is wrong, it is a good film. alba liked 'blades of glory', which i saw a week ago and can hardly remember. 'cirque du so lame' aside.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:22 (nineteen years ago)

We might have disagreed on You and Me and Everyone We Tra la la

I don't even remember liking You and Me and Everyone We Tra la la! I think you just liked it less than I did. We agreed the kids were funny, I think.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:23 (nineteen years ago)

i reviewed it for a journal of record. i tried to a slip a 'the *luminous* rose byrne'-type line in. btw cillian murphy is also v pretty.

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:25 (nineteen years ago)

Everyone: go and see The Namesake instead.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:26 (nineteen years ago)

I can't read the Doctor Who threads because it's like 20 Comic Book Guys locked in a Portaloo.

This is exactly why I read them.

Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:29 (nineteen years ago)

i am going to see 'the shooter'

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:31 (nineteen years ago)

Sunshine would just about pass muster as a nu-Who episode.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:33 (nineteen years ago)

(if it actually had the Doctor and Martha in, otherwise it would stil be rubbish)

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:33 (nineteen years ago)

but it has non-shonky special effects, things like 'lighting' and 'sound design', hotter actors, absence of bbc cross-promotion, lack of daleks...

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:35 (nineteen years ago)

the point is it isn't *danny boyle's* sunshine, it could be brett ratner for all it matters on-screen. is there anything boyle-y about it?

That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:36 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, it's rubbish.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:37 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, sorry for misrepresenting you a little re: the cloyingly whimsical You and Me and Tralala in which the kids were funny.

Has Boyle not admitted somewhere himself that Sunshine is a slightly indulgent mish-mash of films he likes himself? Or is that someone else's review I've put in his mouth? (He did an int on the bbc Culcha Show about it.)

Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 08:48 (nineteen years ago)

I had a great time at this movie. A very solid entertainment.

Ben Boyerrr, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 09:04 (nineteen years ago)

norbit was great

RJG, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

lack of daleks

big con

blueski, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 09:26 (nineteen years ago)

Ah this reminds me of the the great 28 Days Later wars.

Sunshine was nowhere near as offensive to me as 28 Days Later, but its devolvement in the last third is truly rubbish. And yes, nicking ideas from PT Anderson seems perverse.

Go see Lights In The Dusk instead.

Pete, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 09:54 (nineteen years ago)

I quite liked 28 Days Later. I was thinking of seeing this. But I think of seeing many films and rarely do.

It couldn't possibly be as bad as Signs, could it? That's 100 minutes of my life I'll never get back.

Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 09:55 (nineteen years ago)

Pam & I rented Me, You and a Dog Named Boo - along with The Hours and, er, something else - last week. I'd love to tell what I thought but, despite having them for seven nights, we didn't get time to watch any of them. This, sadly, is my life.

I saw Signs on a cheap bus from DC to NY so it was 100min I could've spent looking out of the window, I suppose.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 10:05 (nineteen years ago)

alba, what is your opinion of 2001: a space odyssey?

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 10:05 (nineteen years ago)

Signs was good fun.

blueski, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 10:08 (nineteen years ago)

I have just figured out what was one of my favourite things about it - and it's only something that popped up during the directors commentary.

There's no tacked-on romance! I really liked that! I was really terrified that there was going to be something between Capa and Rose Byrne's character, and was really relieved when there wasn't.

It was really really refreshing to have the female characters there to be scientists and pilots and suchlike and just DO THEIR JOBS rather than just function as cheap love interest/sex objects.

Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 14:35 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

i liked this! sort of a missed opportunity with regard to the premise...but maybe every movie doesn't have to be a masterpiece.

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)

this is prob in my top films of the decade list. fuck tha haterz.

ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)

I liked the extremes of heat and cold....the sense of how small and fragile the little sliver of possibility is that allows us to exist, the infinite forces beyond our understanding on either side...making it tangible to us in fire and ice.

the zombie killer bit was just sort of a let down....im not sure how it works in to those themes, or why they would interrupt those meditations for that reason. it felt a little like pandering. why not just jump off into the abstract and mystical like 2001?

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:05 (seventeen years ago)

often im willing to give such major plot points the benefit of the doubt...they obviously planned this and it's not as slapdash as it seems...but im having a hard time with this one...maybe because i wanted it to be a slightly different movie.

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)

I dunno, I might have felt as fobbed off with a pseudo-mystical 2001 type ending. That shit's hard to pull off.

ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)

definitely...

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

The real problem with Sunshine is that its flawed genius, which is worse than no genius at all.

Still best science fiction of the decade

Hamildan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:36 (seventeen years ago)

Loved the dread of the first 2/3, abhorred the zombie killer part - but I don't know where they should have gone after the first 2/3. Not slasher, but not 2001 either.

sad man in him room (milo z), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:43 (seventeen years ago)

the premise is stupid

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:19 (seventeen years ago)

All I have to say is-PINBACKER MOTHERFUCKERS.

NewBeefLover, Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)

The real problem with Sunshine is that its flawed genius, which is worse than no genius at all.

Still best science fiction of the decade

― Hamildan, Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:36 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol what the hell

s1ocki, Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:54 (seventeen years ago)

five months pass...

Just watched this. Thought it was pretty good and Danny Boyle managed to (just about) avoid his usual temptation of having a half-naked white man running around like a lunatic for the last third. The serial killer bit was a bit stoopid, but whatya gonna do? And this...:

The real problem with Sunshine is that its flawed genius, which is worse than no genius at all.

― Hamildan, Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:36 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink"

...is completely wrong. Flawed masterpieces are the only ones worth discussing when it comes down to it.

ears are wounds, Tuesday, 26 May 2009 16:04 (seventeen years ago)

this loses a lot when they bring on the slasher aspect but before that this is AWESOME

gangsta hug (omar little), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 01:24 (seventeen years ago)

doesn't this movie literally end with a "half-naked white man running around like a lunatic"?

s1ocki, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:52 (seventeen years ago)

Think he might be completely naked. Actually isn't half his skin burnt off, which is ultra douple-plus naked?

Just remembered I bought the dvd but haven't watched it yet, i'll give it a go tonight.

man saves ducklings from (ledge), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:58 (seventeen years ago)

Well a half-burnt blur running about like a lunatic. Hence the qualifier "just about".

ears are wounds, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

Watched it again. Still fucking intense. Still blown away by Kaneda's death scene. Choked up at quite a few other scenes too, or maybe I was just thinkin' 'bout the wondrous ilx pledge drive.

It's a movie of extremes. Light and dark, noise and silence, madness and sanity, logic and emotion. Totally should've been nominated for a technical oscar.

man saves ducklings from (ledge), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 22:51 (seventeen years ago)

Burned flesh aside, it was visually very beautiful. And Kaneda's death scene was really well done.

James Morrison, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 00:17 (seventeen years ago)

three weeks pass...

£4 in whsmith this morning (there was a bunch of stuff around that price, serenity for £2 say but i picked this). am hoping i'm more of a ledge than an alba.

koogs, Thursday, 25 June 2009 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

have you reached a conclusion?

ledge, Monday, 29 June 2009 10:24 (seventeen years ago)

i watched it at the weekend. bit disappointed that it was in 2.35:1 ie a tiny strip in the middle of my 25" 4x3 tv but i cranked up the surround sound to compensate.

reminded me a lot of 42 episode of dr who. crossed with event horizon.

the glitchy monster effects were nice but are usually there to distract from the bad monster make-up. and served to make the end confusing. (oh, and the single-frame images of the original crew just served to break the 4th wall)

music good. end title music not so good.

my big problem, though, was them calling the ship 'Icarus'.

oh, and alternate ending on the dvd = v disappointing. was exactly the same ending without the snow.

koogs, Monday, 29 June 2009 11:06 (seventeen years ago)

ha, i didn't even know that was there. i'm from the 'life is too short for dvd extras' school.

ledge, Monday, 29 June 2009 11:11 (seventeen years ago)

oh, and Benedict Wong will always be Errol from 15 Storeys High to me.

koogs, Monday, 29 June 2009 11:11 (seventeen years ago)

> i'm from the 'life is too short for dvd extras' school.

is a minute and a half, tops. but don't bother.

koogs, Monday, 29 June 2009 11:12 (seventeen years ago)

bit off topic, but Serenity for two quid is a vastly better deal then Sunshine for four, what with Serenity being fucking ace an' all.

Bill A, Monday, 29 June 2009 21:12 (seventeen years ago)

just 6 months till i can start a 'skiffy films of the 2000s' poll.

ledge, Monday, 29 June 2009 21:14 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

I watched this again last night (must be my 4th or 5th time) and I still love it.

For the first time I found myself not only unperturbed by the turn it takes at the end, but actually seeing it as a worthwhile and important part of the movie - the veering from being totally realistic (within its sci-fi construct) into a subtle mysticism and fantasy gives it an ambiguity amd scope at the finish that it wouldn't have otherwise.

krakow, Sunday, 10 October 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)

*ambiguity AND scope...

krakow, Sunday, 10 October 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)

two years pass...

http://cat.www.bfi.org.uk.meowbify.com/news-opinion/news-bfi/features/danny-boyle-career-10-songs

Ward Fowler, Monday, 1 April 2013 16:07 (thirteen years ago)

three months pass...

http://i.imgur.com/PL4i87l.png

Gukbe, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 01:03 (thirteen years ago)

This movie has problems, but it has stuck with me more than most movies.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 02:49 (thirteen years ago)

twelve years pass...

Rewatched this for the first time since seeing it in a theater (which I see I documented in this very thread 18 years ago). It was more intense than I remembered, effectively so. The psycho turn still felt a bit forced, they could have done any number of more interesting things to rev up the tension at the end. But the things I remembered most about it — the enveloping sense of isolation and the overwhelming and terrifying presence of the sun — still held up.

Also reminded me that Oppenheimer wasn’t Cillian Murphy’s first movie as a mega-bomb scientist.

paper plans (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 24 August 2025 17:56 (ten months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.