I thought exactly the reverse - that it appeared Haggard was barely restraining himself from violence. Dawkins was upset that his position was being misrepresented, but Ted had a look in his eye and tremble in his face that I associate with "get ready to rumble."
― It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 5 November 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 5 November 2006 04:13 (nineteen years ago)
i would love if haggard took his NEA connections and worked for soul force, but i doubt its going to happen
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 5 November 2006 04:17 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 5 November 2006 04:20 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 5 November 2006 05:11 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 5 November 2006 05:48 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 5 November 2006 05:49 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 5 November 2006 08:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 5 November 2006 08:28 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 5 November 2006 08:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 5 November 2006 08:37 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 5 November 2006 09:04 (nineteen years ago)
― J (Jay), Sunday, 5 November 2006 13:37 (nineteen years ago)
― David Kennedy (funny ringtones), Sunday, 5 November 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 5 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
Sooo OTM.
After reading that Harper's piece last year (incidentally, Jeff Sharlet is the best investigative journalist working today; seek everything he's done), I was so frustrated thinking I'd never really hear anything once any of these obvious maniacs fell hard... so this is hugely satisfying. You feel bad for his wife and family, of course, but fucking hell.
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Sunday, 5 November 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)
― i am not a nugget (stevie), Sunday, 5 November 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Sunday, 5 November 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)
Now Satan has Wal-Mart in his line of fire!
This legacy of faith and love for Jesus Christ by Mr. Walton is being trashed before our very eyes!
After being lambasted for years by the anti-family, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, radical environmental left, Wal-Mart has finally succumbed to this constant harassment and blackmail. She has now chosen a policy of appeasement to assuage all of the false accusations leveled against her in hopes that the devil will somehow stop being so mean. It is sad to say that Wal-Mart has joined the The National Gay & Lesbian, Chamber of Commerce.
The NGCC called Wal-Mart's action "part of the company's ongoing commitment to advancing diversity (homosexuality) among all of its associate, supplier and customer bases."
The NGCC desires that the world's largest retailer would also become the world's largest promoter of homosexual sodomy!
Wal-Mart desperately needs our help! There is something that we can do. It requires that we get out of the closet and run toward the roar!
WE MUST SAVE WAL-MART!
― Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)
Hi,
I am one of those people who is no longer shopping at Wal-Mart, but as I talk with other Christians I often get the response that they're going to continue shopping at Wal-Mart because probably all of the other stores we would shop at in place of Wal-Mart are also doing sinful things and/or supporting gay and lesbian groups etc. What is your response to this? Do you know if Kmart supports gays and lesbians? Do you have a list of businesses which Christians can support in good conscience?
I believe if I can address this issue I could be more effective in encouraging people not to support Wal-Mart.
Thank you,
Eileen K.
Hi Eileen,
Why Wal-Mart? It's very true that many other stores have also been bullied into supporting gay issues and have engaged in other evils, but Wal-Mart is special. It is the single largest private employer in America with 1.3 million employees. It is the largest retailer and the largest privately-owned retailer in America , with 127 million weekly customers. It boasts a $300 BILLION a year business . Wal-Mart is the biggest in everything! And it started out under Sam Walton as a godly, family-friendly operation. If we can fight and win at Wal-Mart, we'll be sending a strong message to other companies that they too need the support of American families to succeed and they won't get it by stomping on our values and encouraging and promoting those things that God abhors.
I hope this helps!
God bless your efforts for His kingdom.
Brenda/OSA
― Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)
But in a news conference after the service, the head of the oversight board, Pastor Larry Stockstill of Baton Rouge, La., told reporters that Haggard denied engaging in homosexual acts or being gay. Stockstill said Haggard's admission that he received a massage from a gay man was enough grounds for the board to remove him.
At the same time, Stockstill said the board found discrepancies in Haggard's account. He did not go into detail.
"(Haggard) is not in touch with truth and reality, and he readily admitted that," Stockstill said.
A separate pastoral board, still being formed, will work further with Haggard to explore his sexual issues in more depth, Stockstill said.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 5 November 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)
― researching ur life (grady), Sunday, 5 November 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)
well, off to rehab w/ mark foley for him, then
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 5 November 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
After being lambasted for years by the anti-family, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, radical environmental left, Wal-Mart has finally succumbed to this constant harassment and blackmail. She has now chosen a policy of appeasement to assuage all of the false accusations leveled against her in hopes that the devil will somehow stop being so mean.
― Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Monday, 6 November 2006 00:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Monday, 6 November 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)
"is it backwards day?"
"yes. no. i mean, yes. i mean--"
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 6 November 2006 04:17 (nineteen years ago)
― BrianB (BrianB), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)
Phrase it like that, and you'd have to remove half of anyone who's ever been to a day spa.
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:40 (nineteen years ago)
Additional weirdness: surely acknowledging the sin, evil, and temptation in the heart of man is appropriately religious already? INXS are good Calvinists, no reason to edit their work.
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
yeah, but remember how these guys work; acknowledging something they don't approve of without condemning it is identical to zealously advocating it, which is why talking about gay people or having a gay character on your tv show is akin to promoting the radical homosexual agenda.
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
Oh yeah, and that you should hire "heterosexual male assistants" to defend your priestly body from temptations of the world.
and all this is best described by Jon Swift, in an essay entitled "Ted Haggard Shows the Virtue of Hypocrisy"
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
He sat in on a conference call w/ Bush and other Evangelical leaders every Monday. He was in no way Bush's "top spiritual advisor," and despite the calls and meeting him in person, hardly influential at all in the Whilte House's policy making. He was more or less used in turning out the Evangelical vote. Its not like he was hooking Cheney up with meth and giving Bush BJ's.
I saw Jesus Camp this weekend and CAN NOT BELIEVE it isn't getting name-checked in every story about Haggard seing as though he's seen preaching a sermon on homosexuality in it.
― researching ur life (grady), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
not on a weekly basis, at least
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
That Driscoll entry gets pretty nuts in places, but for a man of the cloth to impose ragulations on himself such as "dont be alone with women" isn't any different from rules about High School teachers not giving rides home to students.
Not hysteria so much as being smart about the position you're in, and the potential for something fucked up to go down.
― researching ur life (grady), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
oh i know & understand that bit. It's the same doctrine that Billy Graham follows. There's just something about the guy specifying "male heterosexual assistants" that makes him sound like he need to be tailed by two strong, young bucks at all times.
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. High school teachers aren't supposed to give rides home to students mostly because they have no good reason to fraternize with students outside of their work. (Also because the students are minors over whom teachers have extensive power.) For a man of the cloth to impose regulations on himself such as "don't be alone with women" would be more like ... a male teacher who tutors boys after school, but refuses to meet with a girl during study hall to discuss her grade.
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)
agreed.
fwiw, my father has been a (much more moderate) Evangelical minister for 25 years and has never been alone with a woman who wasn't his secretary or someone in his family. I've never asked him, but I think he imposed that after the Swaggert thing.
(Please spare me the jokes about if my mom puts out.)
Nabisco, i suppose "alone" would be defined as "no one else is present, on the premesis, or witnessing our engaging with eachother." My father meets in private with female members of his congregation to discuss things, but someone always knows about it and sees the visitor come and go. Its not OMG MUST CONTROLL PENIS so much as realizing that you're somewhat vulnerable in a position like that.
― researching ur life (grady), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)